Viet Nam said the Chinese maritime police vessel caused by Viet Nam sinking fishing boat response | Viet Nam fishing _ news
Land generous at a regular press conference, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Q: people are more concerned about China's attack on peacekeepers in southern Sudan, can you update?
A: the UN peacekeeping mission in South Sudan attacks caused Chinese peace-keeping soldiers and 2 expense, 2 people were seriously injured and 3 persons slightly injured. China strongly condemned the acts of attacks against United Nations peacekeepers.
The Chinese Government attaches great importance to this. China's Foreign Ministry on the same day emergency coordination, deployment management matters relating to transport the wounded. Zhang ming, Deputy Ministers had an emergency meeting with southern Sudanese Ambassador, in the South attacked peacekeeping casualties made solemn representations to the South, urged the Government to provide all the necessary security and logistical assistance, fully cooperate with the Chinese side the rehabilitation, assistance for medical treatment and transport the wounded, security is still the safety of Chinese personnel in South Sudan. The Chinese Foreign Ministry had close communication and coordination with the Chinese military, instructed me to relevant embassies, emergency make the United Nations work and both parties to the conflict in South Sudan, requires both parties to the conflict in South Sudan to China for medical treatment and transport the wounded to provide favorable conditions. I believe that everyone has noted that the United Nations Security Council issued a presidential press statement and the United Nations Secretary-General's statement, the United Nations attaches great importance to treatment of wounded soldiers of the Chinese side, provides a positive cooperation and support. At present, Chinese peacekeepers have been injured from the attack on peacekeeping camp smooth transfer to the relatively good condition of the hospital.
Q: Arbitration Tribunal said today will advance to the South China Sea South China Sea claims such as the Philippines and other observer States send text of the arbitration award. China does not participate in the arbitration, will receive the relevant text? Text of form delivery? Was submitted to the Chinese Embassy in Netherlands Embassy or through email?
A: you very accurately describe the position of the Chinese side. From the outset, we do not accept, receive, so it won't happen with this unlawful Tribunal on any judicial proceedings that may have legal significance, we will not accept him no matter what the form of any materials made available.
Q: arbitration result unilaterally proposed by the Philippines in the South China Sea today, how do you think such a result? Such arbitration will have any impact on peace and stability in the South China Sea? Next step will be how to deal with China?
A: I have told Reuters yesterday, including answering reporters ' questions the New York Times said at the time, former Philippine Government out of a so-called Tribunal and China's stance was actually three years ago everyone knew, should not be a new thing.
I would like to say that from the outset, this so-called Tribunal set up in the Philippines violations and illegal demands on the basis of its existence does not have legitimacy, which all the decisions are made in vain, there is no effect.
You've talked about impact, if we want to have any effect, I would like to say, first of all, if it makes the conflict intensified in the region, tension is upgraded, this is clearly not in line with the negative impact of peace and stability in the region.
Second, I can't see a thing like this will have any impact on the established policy of the Chinese Government. There is no such thing, firmly safeguard their sovereignty and security interests of China policy will not change. There is no such thing that China stick to ASEAN countries to a "twin-track" address the issue of South China Sea policy will not change, that is, on the one hand and the direct dialogue by the parties directly concerned resolve relevant disputes, China and ASEAN countries to jointly safeguard peace and stability in the region. Whether there is no such a thing, if there was any provocation challenge Chinese interests, China will firmly deal with determination would not change.
Q: today, the South China Sea following publication of the results of the arbitration case, does China have plans for dialogue with the Philippines? Whether this dialogue is conditions?
A: first, China and the Philippines in fact has long had good relations for a long time, also has maintained a traditional friendship between the two peoples. In recent years, due to well-known reasons, Sino-Philippine relations met with some difficulties. As far as China is concerned, we hope that with our neighboring countries, including the Philippines, renew our friendly relationship, jointly safeguarding regional peace and stability and achieve mutual benefit and win-win. This will not change. We also noted that after the new Government came to power in the Philippines also showed a willingness to cooperate with the Chinese side as soon as possible bilateral dialogue and achieving common development, at the same time effective control issues between the two sides will, of course, that we are opening the doors.
Asked: it was reported that both sides in the conflict in South Sudan yesterday declared a ceasefire. Comment on this?
A: China hopes that both sides of the conflict in South Sudan, the continued ceasefire, and earnestly implement the peace deal, South Sudan's peace and stability as soon as possible.
Q: United Kingdom Home Secretary Teresa Sha·Mei will take office on 13th United Kingdom Prime Minister. What comment do you have?
A: we have taken note of relevant reports. China has always attached importance to China and the United Kingdom relations and is ready to continue the spirit of mutual respect and the principle of mutual benefit and win-win, with the United Kingdom's new Government efforts, increase political mutual trust, deepen pragmatic cooperation in various fields and push bilateral relations "golden age" of further development.
Q: you said the Chinese side will not accept the arbitration text released in advance, then the arbitration after the results are officially announced, will China respond?
A: I have said in response to a Reuters reporter's question, we will not any legal relationship with it, because from the beginning we did not recognize the illegal bodies.
Question: it was reported that EU Trade Commissioner mamusiteluomu said a speech in China, for the Central European investment pact, China needs to establish a more fair competitive environment; EU companies doing business in China remains concerned with the problem. How do you respond to the Chinese side?
A: I also noticed about her position. In fact, 38 years reform and opening up, the Chinese Government gradually established and perfected a good market mechanisms and market system's efforts and achievements are obvious to all. Now the foreign investment environment in China is good, should be determined by the market boss, digital shots. I can give you some figures. 2016 1 April 8,298 national foreign-invested enterprises, an increase of 6.5%, of which, 28 EU investment in China to the new 555 enterprises, an increase of 5.1%. Investors have responded with the practical action of the European Union, China remains the world's hot spot for investors and the European Union.
I still would like to stress that China's foreign policy will not change, for national investment enterprises with a good investment environment in China's policy will not change, protect the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises with foreign investment policies will not change. China's huge economic growth potential and room for manoeuvre, we would like to share with other countries the development dividend and achieve mutual benefit and win-win.
Q: it has come to our attention, United States claim itself as defender of the rule of law of the sea, requires other countries to comply with international law, but to himself and opened the door to illegal so-called allies, turn a blind eye to its ally, the illegal occupation of China for a long time on islands. Do you have any comment?
A: you raised a very good question. We have said many times in this forum, in the United States implementation of the so-called "Asia-Pacific rebalancing" strategy, the South China Sea area, this area is very calm, very peaceful. Then the Americans came, the so-called "balance", this situation has changed. In the United States implemented the so-called "Asia-Pacific rebalancing" strategy, some of the area's existing dispute exists, doesn't mean that there is no contradiction between the relevant countries, but countries in the region as a whole is good to maintain the regional peace, stability, security situation. No matter how American explained, the fact is, in the United States introduced the "Asia-Pacific rebalancing" strategy, situation in the region has changed.
United States some people keeps to marine rule of law of maintenance who itself, but is in United Nations Sea Convention reached 34 years zhihou still refused to approved Convention, keeps requirements other accept third party dispute solution way, himself (everyone can to check a check international judicial of practice) is avoidance and far of, even refused to accept international court this a United Nations most main of judicial institutions made of judgment and command. This kind of international law ", not abandoned" speculative practices can only seriously eroded the authority of international law, the seriousness and effectiveness, that is the real danger of this is the need for the international community on high alert.
Q: reports, Viet Nam accused the Chinese maritime police vessel on Saturday in Viet Nam makes a ship near Viet Nam sank fishing boats and comment on this?
A: on July 9 at 19 o'clock, China maritime search and rescue Center of Viet Nam informed the maritime search and rescue Center, said one Viet Nam national fishing vessels sank in southeastern Nanhai yongxing Island 55 miles, 5 of the Viet Nam national fishermen all fell into the water, requesting aid. After receiving the report, the Chinese side immediately coordinated "save 118 South China Sea" and "sea-men 45102" boats to the scene to conduct search and rescue, and broadcast navigational warnings remind ships to enhance Outlook in the past, aid in a timely manner. It is understood that currently more fishermen in distress have all been rescued.
Question: will China be informed the cause of sinking fishing boat?
A: I have told you my situation in detail.
Q: my understanding is that regardless of whether China is willing to, the Arbitration Tribunal is sent in an e-mail in advance ruling text, does China have a public email address to receive?
A: I have answered this question. Because we do not recognize this illegal Agency, so we're not going to happen with it any legal, judicial relations. Concerned to try every means to create the impression that this is futile, is meaningless.
Q: Chinese media say verdict unfavorable to China, China may consider to withdraw from the United Nations law of the Sea Convention. Do you have any comment?
Answer: I don't know where this news is coming from. I can only say that since 1996 the Chinese Government ratified the United Nations Convention on law of the sea, we are the faithful implementation of the Convention and the defenders. I also would like to say that China has never stressed that all parties to a full and accurate implementation of the Convention, rather than as individual countries based only on their need to selectively apply, and even taking some itself actually acts contrary to the provisions of the Convention.
Responsible editor: Kun Qu SN117
Article keywords:Viet Nam fishing
I want feedback
Save a Web page
China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs website
越南声称中国海警船造成越南渔船沉没 中方回应|越南渔船_新闻资讯
中国外交部发言人陆慷主持例行记者会 问：大家都比较关心中国在南苏丹维和人员遇袭事，你能否介绍最新情况？
答：联合国驻南苏丹维和特派团遇袭事件造成中国维和士兵2人牺牲、2人重伤、3人轻伤。中方对此次袭击联合国维和人员的行径表示强烈谴责。
中国政府对此高度重视。中国外交部在事发当日紧急协调，部署救治转运伤员事宜。张明副部长已经紧急约见了南苏丹驻华大使，就中国在南维和人员遇袭伤亡事向南方提出严正交涉，敦促南政府提供一切必要安全和后勤协助，全力配合中方各项善后工作，协助救治和转运伤员，保障现在仍然在南苏丹的中方人员的安全。中国外交部也同中国军方密切沟通协调，指示我相关驻外使馆、团紧急做了联合国及南苏丹冲突双方工作，要求南苏丹冲突双方为中方救治和转运伤员提供有利条件。相信大家已经注意到联合国安理会发表的主席新闻谈话和联合国秘书长的表态，联合国方面高度重视救治中方伤员，提供了积极配合和支持。目前，中方受伤维和人员已从遇袭维和营地顺利转移至条件相对好一些的的医院接受治疗。
问：南海仲裁案仲裁庭称今天将提前向南海声索方如菲律宾及其他观察员国发送仲裁结果的文本。中方不参与有关仲裁，是否会接收相关文本？文本将会以何种形式送达？是递交给中国驻荷兰使馆还是通过电子邮件？
答：你非常准确地描述了中方的立场。我们确实从一开始就不承认、不接受，所以也不会跟这个非法的仲裁庭发生任何可能产生法律上意义的司法程序上的关系，我们也不会接受他提供的任何不管是什么形式的材料。
问：由菲律宾单方面提出的南海仲裁结果今天出炉，你如何看待这样一个结果？这样的仲裁结果将会给南海和平稳定带来什么影响？中国下一步会如何来应对？
答：我刚才回答路透社记者、包括昨天回答《纽约时报》记者的提问时已经讲过，对于菲律宾前政府单方面搞出来的这么一个所谓的仲裁庭，中方的立场实际上三年以前大家就知道了，应该不是什么新鲜的事情。
我想说，这个所谓的仲裁庭从一开始就建立在菲律宾违法行为和非法诉求基础上，它的存在不具有合法性，它作出的一切裁决都是徒劳的，是没有任何效力的。
你刚才讲到影响，如果说要有什么影响，我想说，第一，如果它使本地区相关方矛盾被激化，紧张被升级，这样的负面影响显然是不符合本地区和平稳定的。
第二，我看不出来这样的一个东西会对中方的既定政策有什么影响。无论有没有这样一个东西，中方坚定维护自身的主权、安全利益的政策不会改变。无论有没有这样一个东西，中方坚持按照东盟国家提出来的“双轨思路”处理南海问题的政策不会变，即一方面与有关直接当事方通过直接对话解决有关争议，另一方面中国同东盟国家共同维护本地区和平稳定。无论有没有这样一个东西，如果有任何方面敢采取挑衅行为挑战中方利益，中方将坚决应对的决心也不会变。
问：今天南海仲裁案的结果发表后，中方是否有同菲律宾对话的计划？这种对话是否有条件？
答：首先，中国和菲律宾实际上在很长时间里一直有着很好的关系，两国人民也一直保持着传统友谊。近几年，由于众所周知的原因，中菲关系遇到了一些困难。就中方而言，我们还是希望跟我们的周边国家，包括菲律宾在内，续存我们的友好关系，共同维护本地区和平稳定，实现互利共赢。这个意愿是没有改变的。我们也注意到，菲律宾新政府上台后也表现出了愿意同中方尽快举行双边对话、实现共同发展、同时有效管控双方之间问题的意愿，当然对这个我们是敞开大门的。
问：据报道，南苏丹冲突双方昨天宣布停火。中方对此有何评论？
答：中方希望南苏丹冲突双方切实、持续停火止暴，认真落实和平协议，尽快恢复南苏丹和平稳定。
问：英国内政大臣特蕾莎·梅将于13日就任英国首相。中方有何评论？
答：我们注意到有关报道。中方一贯重视中国和英国关系，愿继续本着相互尊重和互利共赢原则，同英国新政府共同努力，增进政治互信，深化各领域务实合作，推动两国关系“黄金时代”继续深入向前发展。
问：你说中方不会接受提前发布的仲裁结果文本，那么仲裁结果正式公布后，中方是否会作出回应？
答：我在回答路透社记者提问时已经说过了，我们不会跟它发生任何法律上的这种关系，因为从一开始我们就不承认这个非法成立的机构。
问：据报道，欧盟委员会贸易委员马姆斯特罗姆在华发表演讲称，为达成中欧投资协定，中国需建立更加公平的竞争环境；欧盟企业对在华经商环境问题仍存在关切。中方对此有何回应？
答：我也注意到了她的有关表态。事实上，改革开放38年来，中国政府在逐步建立和完善一个很好的市场机制和市场体系方面所做出的努力和取得的成绩是有目共睹的。现在外国在华投资的环境好不好，应该由市场说了算，由数字说了算。我可以给大家举一些数字。2016年1至4月，全国设立外商投资企业8，298家，同比增长6.5%，其中，欧盟28国对华投资新设立企业555家，同比增长5.1%。欧盟投资者已经用实际行动作出了回答，中国仍是世界和欧盟投资者青睐的一片热土。
我还是想强调，中国利用外资的政策不会变，为各国在华投资企业提供良好投资环境的政策不会变，保护外商投资企业合法权益的政策不会变。中国经济增长潜力和回旋余地巨大，我们愿继续同各国分享发展红利，实现互利共赢。
问：我们注意到，美国口口声声以海洋法治的维护者自居，要求其他国家遵守国际法，但对自己和所谓盟友大开违法之门，长期以来对其盟友非法侵占中国岛礁视而不见。你对此有何评论？
答：你提了个很好的问题。我们在这个讲台上已经多次说过，在美国实施所谓的“亚太再平衡”战略之前，南海地区、本地区是非常平静、非常和平的。后来美国人来了，搞了所谓的“再平衡”，这个情况才发生了变化。在美国推行所谓的“亚太再平衡”战略之前，本地区现有的一些争议是存在的，相关国家之间也不是说没有矛盾，但总体上本地区国家是能够很好地维护这一地区和平、稳定、安全的局面。不管美方怎么解释，事实就是，在美国推行了“亚太再平衡”战略之后，本地区情况发生了变化。
美国某些人口口声声以海洋法治的维护者自居，但却在《联合国海洋法公约》达成34年之后仍然拒不批准《公约》，口口声声要求别国接受第三方争端解决方式，自己（大家可以去查一查国际司法的实践）却避而远之，甚至拒不接受国际法院这一联合国最主要的司法机构作出的判决和命令。这种对国际法“合则用，不合则弃”的投机做法，只能严重侵蚀国际法的权威性、严肃性和有效性，这才是真正危险的，这才是需要国际社会高度警惕的。
问：有报道称，越南指责中方海警船上周六在越南附近海域使一艘越南渔船沉没，中方对此有何评论？
答：7月9日19时许，中国海上搜救中心接越南海上搜救中心通报，表示一艘越南籍渔船在南海永兴岛东南55海里处沉没，船上5名越南籍渔民全部落水，请求救援。接报后，中方立即协调“南海救118”和“海警45102”船前往现场开展搜救，并播发航行警告，提醒过往船舶加强瞭望，及时实施救助。据了解，目前越方遇险渔民已被全部救起。
追问：中方是否被通报渔船沉没的原因？
答：刚才我已经比较详细地把我所掌握的情况告诉你了。
问：我的理解是不管中方是否愿意，仲裁庭都会以电子邮件的方式预先发送裁决结果文本，中方是否有公开的电子邮箱接收？
答：我刚才已经回答这个问题了。因为我们不承认这个非法的机构，所以我们不会跟它发生任何法律上的、司法上的关系。至于有关方面想尽一切办法试图造成这样的印象，这是徒劳的，是没有意义的。
问：有中国媒体称，如裁决结果对中方不利，中方可能考虑退出《联合国海洋法公约》。你对此有何评论？
答：我不知道这个消息是从哪来的。我只能说，自从1996年中方批准了《联合国海洋法公约》后，我们就是这个《公约》忠实的执行者、维护者。同时我也想说，中方从来都强调各方要完整、准确地履行《公约》，而不是像个别国家一样只根据自己的需要有选择地适用、甚至采取一些本身实际上违反《公约》规定的行径。
责任编辑：瞿崑 SN117
文章关键词： 越南渔船
我要反馈
保存网页
中国外交部网站