Chinese Vice-Foreign Minister: South China Sea Arbitration Tribunal composed of actual political action | | | Philippines _ the South China Sea by the arbitral news
Original title: China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs: non-Tribunal arbitral of South China Sea was the result of political manipulation
Beijing News Alerts (reporter Li Dandan) established the South China Sea on July 12, the Philippines unilaterally request arbitration tribunal ruled, 13th, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin said at a China's State Council information Office, the Tribunal is not a legitimate international tribunals, according to various sources prove that arbitral tribunal arbitrator is Japan operated by a citizenship judge Yanai, Shunji.
A reporter's question, following the outcome of arbitration, it was said "the arbitral award is valid for both parties, if China does not implement the decision was" contrary to international law, would damage the international reputation ". How do Chinese think?
Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin said on the arbitral awards are binding, the Chinese Government has to take a stand, a Chinese Foreign Ministry statement has made clear, this statement was "not binding, the invalid, illegal, China will not admit, does not execute."
Liu Zhenmin said, first, that the arbitral tribunal is not an International Tribunal, nothing to do with the International Court in the Hague, the United Nations system. Have a certain relationship with the International Tribunal in Hamburg, but it is not part of the Tribunal. And the Permanent Court of arbitration in the Hague (PCA) is not a system but a bit. As the Permanent Court of arbitration to the Secretariat of the Tribunal provided the service, only this. The arbitral tribunal in the trial used the lobby of the Permanent Court of arbitration, and only this. The arbitral tribunal is not international tribunals.
Liu Zhenmin, the second, the composition of the Arbitration Tribunal was actually a result of political action. The arbitral tribunal is composed of 5 arbitrators, in addition to the Philippines ' own arbitrator, namely from Germany Professor Wolfrum, 4 other arbitrators are by the then-President of the International Tribunal Japan citizenship, Shunji Yanai judges specified.
He said Yanai, Shunji is the judges of the International Tribunal, but also Japan, President of the Abe Government security talkfest with the legal system. Shunji Yanai in assist lifting of collective self-defense, challenges international order after the second world war played an important role, he was also a Japan resident United States Ambassador. According to various sources show that the composition of the Arbitration Tribunal is completely his, and in the later operation of the arbitral process, he is still influencing.
Liu Zhenmin, the third, the composition of the Arbitration Tribunal has a great deal of problems. Five arbitrators of the arbitral tribunal, four from Europe, one from Germany and one from France, one from the Netherlands and one from Poland, are members of the European Union. Another judge from Ghana, was first set up served as President of the International Tribunal, but he lived in Europe for a long time.
"The arbitral tribunal's five judges no one from Asia, much less from China, do they know? They understand Asian culture? Do they understand the issue? Do they understand the complex geopolitics in Asia? Do they understand the history of the South China Sea? They can make a fair judgement? "Liu Zhenming questioned.
Also, Liu Zhenming said, this arbitration Chamber of operation let international law academic plunged glasses, some judge original of views makes people believes they will maintenance China interests, but in arbitration Chamber operation process among, completely desertion has they original insisted of academic views, "these judge is what views, and what position, wrote academic articles of when is a views, to has Arbitration Chamber Shang is is another a views, they has no a established position? ”
For example, he said, one of the witnesses in the book speak of the arbitral "at least 12 marine topography is an island in the Nansha Islands, to claim 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone." But it's time to testify before the Tribunal said "no one", "what kind of expert? Sad thing is, the arbitral tribunal without doing any investigation, without any discrimination, they accepted his proposal. Who is this Tribunal supported? They are making money, who dominated them? Who pays for them? Is the Philippines or any other country. The system with the international law of the Court is totally different. ”
Responsible editor: Gao Yuying
Article keywords:Arbitral tribunal South Philippines
I want feedback
Save a Web page
The Beijing News
中国外交部副部长:南海仲裁庭组成实际是政治操作|仲裁庭|南海|菲律宾_新闻资讯
原标题：中国外交部：南海仲裁庭非国际法庭 是政治操作的结果
新京报快讯（记者李丹丹） 针对7月12日应菲律宾单方面请求建立的南海仲裁案仲裁庭作出的裁决，13日，中国外交部副部长刘振民在中国国务院新闻办公室发布会上表示，仲裁庭不是一个合法的国际法庭，据各种消息证明，仲裁庭的仲裁员组成是日本籍法官柳井俊二操纵的。
有记者提问，仲裁结果出来之后，有国家表示“这个仲裁裁决对当事双方都是有效的，如果中国不执行裁决是“违反国际法、将会损害国际声誉”。中方对此是怎么看的？
中国外交部副部长刘振民表示，关于这个仲裁裁决是否有约束力，中国政府已经表明立场，中国外交部声明已表明立场，这个声明是“没有约束力、无效、违法，中国不会承认，也不会执行”。
刘振民说，第一，仲裁庭不是国际法庭，与位于海牙联合国系统的国际法院毫无关系。与位于汉堡的国际海洋法法庭有一定关系，但不是海洋法法庭一部分。与位于海牙的常设仲裁法院（PCA）也不是一个系统的，但有点关系。因为常设仲裁法院为仲裁庭提供了秘书服务，仅此而已。这个仲裁庭在庭审的时候使用了常设仲裁法院的大厅，仅此而已。仲裁庭绝不是国际法庭。
刘振民表示，第二，这个仲裁庭的组成实际上是一个政治操作的结果。这个仲裁庭是由5名仲裁员组成，除了菲律宾自己指定的仲裁员，即来自德国的沃尔夫鲁姆教授外，其他4名仲裁员是由国际海洋法法庭时任庭长日本籍法官柳井俊二先生指定的。
他表示，柳井俊二是国际海洋法法庭的法官，同时也是日本安倍政府安保法制恳谈会会长。柳井俊二在协助安倍解除集体自卫权，挑战二战后国际秩序方面起了很大作用，他也曾是日本驻美国大使。据各种消息证明，这个仲裁庭的组成完全是他操纵的，而且在后来仲裁庭的运作过程当中，他还在施加影响。
刘振民说，第三，这个仲裁庭的组成有很大的问题。仲裁庭的五位仲裁员，四位来自欧洲，一位来自德国，一位来自法国，一位来自荷兰，一位来自波兰，都是欧盟成员。另外一位法官来自加纳，国际海洋法法庭最初成立的时候担任过庭长，但他长期居住欧洲。
“仲裁庭的五位法官没有一位来自亚洲，更不用说来自中国，他们了解亚洲吗？他们了解亚洲文化吗？他们了解南海问题吗？他们了解亚洲复杂的地缘政治吗？他们了解南海的历史吗？他们凭什么能做出公正的判决？”刘振明质疑道。
此外，刘振明表示，这个仲裁庭的运作让国际法学界大跌眼镜，有些法官原来的观点使人相信他们会维护中国利益，但在仲裁庭运作过程当中，完全背弃了他们原来坚持的学术观点，“这些法官是什么观点、什么立场，写学术文章的时候是一种观点，到了仲裁庭上却是另一种观点，他们有没有一种既定立场？”
他举例说，仲裁庭的一位证人在著作里讲“南沙群岛至少有12个海洋地形是岛屿，可以主张二百海里专属经济区”。但是到仲裁庭作证的时候却说“一个都没有”，“哪有这样的专家？可悲的是，仲裁庭不做任何调查，不做任何辨别，就采信他的建议。这个仲裁庭是谁支持的？他们是挣钱的，谁支配他们？谁支付他们？是菲律宾或者其他国家。这个体制跟国际海洋法法院完全不同。”
责任编辑：高玉营
文章关键词： 仲裁庭 南海 菲律宾
我要反馈
保存网页
新京报