Dai Yuqing second instance verdict: upheld sentenced to 11 years
Information: Dai Yuqing
The afternoon of July 21, 2016, President of the Guangzhou daily original Dai Yuqing bribery case results in the second instance, the Guangdong provincial higher people's Court sentenced: maintaining the first-instance ruling.
The case in Dongguan on April 13, 2015, made the first-instance judgment, finds Dai Yuqing 2.469 million yuan of bribery and sentenced to 11 years on charges of taking bribes, deprived of political rights for one year, and no personal property of 500,000 yuan.
Subsequently, Dai Yuqing appeal to the Guangdong High Court and strongly denied that the judgment of first instance's findings of fact, he considered himself in Guangzhou daily served as President during the work in principle, was against the Guangzhou Municipal Party Committee propaganda department Minister, Secretary of the Guangzhou City Commission for discipline inspection Wang Xiaoling, affected by persecution.
On November 3, 2015, the post of Secretary of the Guangzhou City Commission for discipline inspection change – Guangzhou, Guangdong Provincial Commission for discipline inspection Standing Committee Liu Liansheng have served as Standing Committee member of CPC, Secretary of the Municipal Commission for discipline inspection, Wang Xiaoling have retired to the age of his predecessor.
The morning of December 4, 2015, second instance hearing the case of Dai Yuqing,
Court, Dai Yuqing and his defenders expressed the view that the judgment of first instance finds that the crime is fabricated, Chang Yongqiang send Dai Yuqing 2 million Yuan and Liang Zhenming sent 450,000 are fictitious.
In addition, Dai Yuqing and Chang Yongqiang confessions and testimony in the investigation stage for illegal evidence, not deciding. People often Roland double during the same confession had been, upon which such testimony cannot be used as a basis. Dai Yuqing's confession was made by investigators not to let sleeping cases, evidence is illegal. Dai Yuqing and his defenders maintained that confronted Chang Yongqiang, and Liang Zhenming should appear.
Finally, the procuratorial organs on Dai Yuqing Wang Xiaoling reported suspected of meddling in the Guangzhou daily office building construction and other issues without evidence, and that reply consists of SFC and other units.
HNA CHAN, one of lawyers for defence counsel, told Sohu news parties "," no one expected that the second instance will be upheld, since he did not get the decision, further analysis for the time being. ”
Another defence lawyer told Sohu and Wang Fu of the press party, detention center to Dai Yuqing, the Court announced its verdict yesterday afternoon received a call from the clerk of the Court, to know has been sentenced, "it violates the principles of publicly. ”
Analysis of Wang Fu, amendments to the criminal code in force November 2015 (I) abolition of the crime of corruption, of the conviction and sentencing of the crime of accepting bribes amount and replace it with "a large amount" "huge" and "a huge amount", scheduled for three years shall be sentenced to the following penalties, three to ten years shall be sentenced to ten years in prison at least three sentences. These two high was released on April 18 this year, the Supreme People's Court, China's Supreme People's Procuratorate on handling criminal cases of embezzlement and bribery laws applied to problems of interpretation.
Judicial interpretation of both the conviction and sentencing of the crime provides for standards, the two crimes "a large amount of" general criteria defined by the criminal law in 1997, adjustment 5,000 yuan to 30,000 yuan, "a huge amount of" general standards for more than 200,000 yuan less than 3 million Yuan, "a huge amount" the General standard for more than 3 million Yuan.
And Wang Fu says, even at first instance finds Dai Yuqing 2.469 million yuan of bribery, also belongs to the "huge" sentencing standards should be "three to ten years ' imprisonment". Guangdong Province High Court and is still supporting the penalty of 11 years in prison, not in compliance with the latest amendments to the Criminal Code (nine) and two high judicial explanation of spirit.
Sohu news parties aware of, at present, the paper has been sent by the Guangdong Provincial High Court judgements.
And Wang Fu says, he will be meeting with Dai Yuqing himself next week to discuss plans for the next. Dai Yuqing's wife Yang Lanling tell Sohu news party, will continue to appeal to the end.
Author: Wang Xiao
Editor: Wang Chen
Category: Sohu news party
Press review:
Dai Yuqing case said a trial in wife to the end of life
(Editor: Wang Xiao UN870)
2016-07-21 19:20:22
Sohu
戴玉庆案二审宣判：维持原判 判处有期徒刑11年
资料图：戴玉庆
2016年7月21日下午，广州日报社原社长戴玉庆受贿罪一案二审结果公布，广东省高级人民法院宣判：维持一审原判。
该案在东莞中院于2015年4月13日作出一审判决，认定戴玉庆受贿246.9万元，以受贿罪判处有期徒刑十一年，剥夺政治权利一年，并处没个人财产五十万元。
随后，戴玉庆向广东高院提起上诉并坚决否认一审判决认定的事实，他认为自己在广州日报社担任社长期间，工作中因坚持原则，得罪了当时的广州市委宣传部原部长、广州市纪委现书记王晓玲，受其迫害。
而在2015年11月3日，广州市纪委书记一职发生变动——广东省纪委常委刘连生已经出任广州市市委常委、市纪委书记，其前任王晓玲已到龄退休。
2015年12月4日上午，戴玉庆一案二审开庭，
庭上，戴玉庆及其辩护人均认为一审判决认定的犯罪事实是捏造的，常勇强送戴玉庆200万元和梁振鸣送戴45万元均属虚构。
此外，戴玉庆和常勇强在侦查阶段的供述和证言为非法证据，不能作为定案依据。行贿人常勇强在双规期间也同样被刑讯逼供，其证词也不能作为定案依据。戴玉庆的供述都是办案人员不让其睡觉情况下所作，是非法证据。戴玉庆及其辩护人均坚持认为常勇强、梁振鸣应当出庭对质。
最后，检察机关关于戴玉庆一审举报王晓玲涉嫌插手广州日报办公大楼工程建设等问题，没有附相关依据，并认为应由证监会等单位回复。
辩护律师之一陈海航律师告诉搜狐《新闻当事人》，“完全没想到二审会维持原判，因为还没拿到判决书，暂时无法进一步分析。”
另一位辩护律师王甫告诉搜狐《新闻当事人》，昨日法院在看守所向戴玉庆公布了宣判结果，今天下午接到法院书记员的电话，才知道已经宣判，“这违反公开宣判的原则。”
王甫分析，2015年11月施行的《刑法修正案(九)》取消了贪污罪、受贿罪的定罪量刑的数额标准，代之以“数额较大”“数额巨大”“数额特别巨大”，定了三年有期徒刑以下刑罚、三年至十年有期徒刑、十年有期徒刑以上刑罚三个量刑档。对此两高在今年4月18日发布了《中国最高人民法院、中国最高人民检察院关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》。
司法解释对两罪的定罪量刑标准作出规定，将两罪“数额较大”的一般标准由1997年刑法确定的五千元调整至三万元，“数额巨大”的一般标准定为二十万元以上不满三百万元，“数额特别巨大”的一般标准定为三百万元以上。
王甫称，即便按照一审认定戴玉庆受贿246.9万元，也只属于“数额巨大”，量刑标准也应为“三年至十年有期徒刑”。而广东省高院依然支持了十一年有期徒刑的判罚，不符合最新的《刑法修正案(九)》和两高司法解释精神。
搜狐《新闻当事人》了解到，目前，纸质判决书已由广东省高院寄出。
王甫称，他将于下周会见戴玉庆本人，商讨下一步的计划。戴玉庆的妻子杨兰凌告诉搜狐《新闻当事人》，将会继续申诉到底。
作者：王晓
主编：王辰
栏目：搜狐《新闻当事人》
新闻回顾：
戴玉庆案一审宣判 妻子称上诉到生命的终结
(责任编辑：王晓 UN870)
2016-07-21 19:20:22
搜狐网