General Manager of China State-owned enterprises profit of misappropriating 3.9 billion the amount of money involved was sentenced 14 | | State-owned enterprises _ of misappropriating news

Original title: 3.9 billion of State-owned assets were he played in the Palm

"Gave warning of" how he misappropriated 3.9 billion yuan of money?

"Deception", how can he conceal the fact?

"Small horse-drawn carts", big grass-roots procuratorates to do?

Involving more than 3.9 billion yuan, baffling; 12 people involved, not less; involving one over more than 300 true that much complexity involved tens of thousands of the Bank documents, videos, CD. Data is the new district, Zhengzhou city, Henan province, the Procuratorate to handle cases of embezzlement of huge public funds itself.

　　The masses, misappropriation of public funds to profit from the fact that disclosures

In April 2014, reports received in the hospital, said Zhengzhou State-owned asset Corporation (hereinafter referred to as State-owned companies) General Manager Yang Zheng embezzled borrowed without permission and others, for personal gain, suspected of a crime.

"The receipt of the report, we immediately conducted a preliminary investigation on the thread found that whistleblower Yang Zheng masses referred to in question does exist. "The anti-corruption Bureau Director Zhang Wenzhao, told reporters at the hospital, investigators after their first interrogation, Yang Zheng account during his tenure as General Manager of the State-owned company, embezzled company money by Chang Tao, Zhang ZhaoHui, who lend to others, and seek personal benefits from the facts of the crime.

According to Yang Zheng for the 2005 year, Chang began to claim to know boss in production, foreign trade, not to raise money, wanted to borrow from Yang Zheng in the State-owned company, do some Treasury business. At first, Yang Zheng also rather concerned, but under the promise of Chang Tao, Yang Zheng finally dismissed concerns, he asked Chang began to set up a company, then State-owned company money to Chang began to take control of the company, and then lent to other companies. Subsequently, Chang began to give Yang Zheng an interest benefit.

Meanwhile, Zhang ZhaoHui, Yue Jinhuan also Yang Zheng has found money. Zhang, Yue two others for Bank staff. Because of my job, Yang Zheng and was familiar with them, think they know about the situation of State-owned companies, his abilities and look at the project's vision is better. So, when two people introduced to Yang Zheng Zhang, Yue "customers", Yang Zheng assured public funds to them. Similarly, in return, Zhang, Yue duo Yang Zheng paid a benefit of interest, and has repeatedly promised to guarantee financial security.

At this point, Yang Zheng concern is how to hide the fact that lend money. To this end, he won't let financial personnel accounting, consistent with bank statements, he found the Bank's acquaintances Yue Jinhuan, who, according to the normal format of bank statement, eliminating the diversion of part, and interest at bank rates, making a false statement, and then to the accounting officer accounting. Yang Zheng had misappropriated funds of State-owned companies, lent Zhang chaohui, respectively, Chang Tao, Yue Jinhuan, people hundreds of millions of Yuan, and be more than 7 million yuan from the Commission.

　　A Windows key, opening a bunch of false "platform"

However, compared with the masses, Yang Zheng's confession apparently had reservations, which led anti-corruption agency Deputy Director Sun Yayong investigators searched the Law Office of Yang Zheng.

Careful investigators found in an Office "clue"-a crack in the window key. Investigators removed the key, opened a drawer of the desk. A corner of the drawer, seemingly arbitrarily thrown another key. Use this key to continue trying, the result is unexpectedly opened an Office next to the debris. Inside, investigators found Yang Zheng not only a handwritten record of loan repayment and interest records, and ten corporate seal documents and material evidence.

Investigators were surprised to find only from one of the bank accounts they had found 300 million or 400 million in capital flows. Along with it, they have to verify the information on those companies, most are found to be false. But this is Yang Zheng's "making money".

Among them, the "representative" than Yang Zheng and Xu of the overcoming of "cooperation". Statements, according to Yang Zheng, from 2009 to 2010, he beat established companies as a platform for State-owned companies to borrow from outside the company. Company by the beat come forward to register, formalities over, he handed the company seals all Yang Zheng, so Yang Zheng on the control and use of these companies. Whenever the beat when you need money, Yang Zheng will turn the State-owned company's money through online banking to bank accounts of these platform companies, and then go over the specified account.

Because the case involves statements many years ago, when banks were still not connected, all bills issued by the artificial. "Each Bank checking accounts, we have to be moved out of a sack of a sack of bills, and then a a check. The weather is hot, the day, didn't even talk. "Bring the scene, investigators with emotion.

　　Quanfan flight personnel, complete evidence chain

Face of conclusive evidence, Yang Zheng say truthfully all facts of the crime. Subsequently, investigators for another 8 persons involved in legal communications.

However, before investigators "House" is first for Yang Zheng Chang Tao "disappear". "A strong sense of her investigation, ran to the mountains, without opening the phone during the day, open in the evening, just look at the caller. "This headache for Hunt staff, and increasing the difficulty of catching. For more than two months ' time, hunt in the mountains suffered terribly until Chang Tao at large to surrender.

Meanwhile, other people involved the survey became more considerable progress. Among them, the investigation of Zhang ZhaoHui rather convoluted. In order to evade prosecution investigation, Zhang ZhaoHui flight United States. Prosecutors then left to cyber pursuit, and served by the investigators to the criminal suspect Zhang ZhaoHui families urged a fugitive economic criminals to surrender outside the circular, and State criminal policy and interests, family members accepted the prosecution to persuade Zhang ZhaoHui home surrendered, seeking leniency.

In December 2014, the deadline at the end of circular, Zhang ZhaoHui home, investigators tasked to carry out inquiries, and to interview witnesses, collect relevant evidence more than more than 60, by investigating the facts are clearly ascertained and evidence fully, formed a complete chain of evidence.

　　Prosecutors break the excuse, the case finally settled

In November 2014, the Zhengzhou new district attorney to prosecute, the case was transferred to the Court. "The first batch of charges against 7 persons, each employing 2 lawyers, Defender seats full. "Introduced in this case public prosecutor Huang Yao, due to court more controversy, leading to the sat for two days to complete the trial.

"During the hearing, the biggest difficulty lies in the verbal evidence of instability. "Huang Yao told reporters, counsel submitted, in this case, the bank employee no longer punishable crime of misappropriating. Grounds that Yang Zheng registered company, bank capital, Bank staff are working properly. Things though is that they do, but they did not know the whereabouts of money, no offense, at best only violation.

This apparently shirk responsibility. They issued false statements, provide blank statement for Yang Zheng, could this be normal business? So to speak, without the participation of the Bank, Yang Zheng crime cannot be implemented. "The Court, public prosecutor defended the accused gave an eloquent response, pointing out that banks introduced to Yang Zheng" customers ", thereby increasing the volume of business, achieve the purpose of profit, a common criminal. But this is the violation of individual staff members to individual banks, illegal profits, management has nothing to do with the Bank.

On June 17, 2015, the verdict from the Court sentenced Yang Zheng, such as 7 to 14 years of imprisonment to three years and five years ' probation, and the recovery of illegal gains involved. Yang Zheng, who appealed, appeals, respectively. Appeals courts form a collegial panel in accordance with law, and after consulting the interrogation and trial defendant, listen to counsel, considers that a fact is clear, decided not to court, the Court of final appeal ruling, dismissed the appeal and upheld the.

Responsible editor: Kang Yunkai

Article keywords:
Embezzlement of State-owned enterprises

I want feedback
Save a Web page
Justice Network-procuratorial daily

中国国企总经理挪用公款谋利 涉案金额39亿获刑14年|挪用公款|国企_新闻资讯

　　原标题：39亿国有资产被他玩弄于股掌之上

　　“暗度陈仓”，他如何挪用39亿元巨款？

　　“弄虚作假”，他怎样掩盖犯罪事实？

　　“小马拉大车”，基层检察院如何办大案？

　　涉案金额39亿多元，不可谓不大；涉案人员12人，不可谓不多；涉及真真假假公司300多家，不可谓不复杂；涉及银行凭证、录像、光盘上万份。一个个数据，正是河南省郑州市高新区检察院办理一起挪用巨额公款案件的写照。

　　群众举报，挪用公款谋利的事实败露

　　2014年4月，该院接到群众举报，称郑州某国有资产公司（以下简称国资公司）总经理杨政挪用公款，私自借与他人使用，从中谋取个人利益，涉嫌犯罪。

　　“接到举报，我们立即对该线索进行了初查，发现被举报人杨政确实存在群众举报中所称的问题。”该院反贪局局长张文召告诉记者，办案人员对其进行第一次讯问后，杨政交代了自己在担任国资公司总经理期间，挪用公款，将国资公司的钱通过张韬、张朝晖等人借给他人使用，并从中谋取个人利益的犯罪事实。

　　据杨政供述，2005年左右，张韬自称认识一些搞生产、做外贸的老板，不好筹到钱，就想从杨政所在的国资公司借款，做些资金业务。刚开始，杨政还颇有顾虑，但在张韬的承诺下，杨政最终打消了顾虑，他让张韬先成立公司，其后把国资公司的钱打至张韬掌控的公司，再借给其他公司。随后，张韬再给杨政一分利息的好处。

　　与此同时，张朝晖、岳金环也先后找到杨政借钱。张、岳二人皆为银行工作人员。由于工作关系，杨政和她们都很熟悉，认为她们对国资公司的情况比较了解，个人能力及看项目的眼光比较好。所以，当张、岳二人向杨政介绍“客户”，杨政就放心地将公款给了她们。同样，作为回报，张、岳二人各自向杨政支付了一分利息的好处，而且一再承诺可以保证资金安全。

　　此时，杨政关心的是怎样掩盖把钱借出去的事实。为此，他不让财务人员如实记账，为了与银行对账单一致，他便找到银行的熟人岳金环等人，根据银行对账单的正常格式，去掉了挪用部分，并按银行利率计息，制作了假对账单，然后交给账务人员记账。杨政先后挪用国资公司资金，分别借给张朝辉、张韬、岳金环等人数亿元，并从中得到700多万元的好处费。

　　一把窗缝里的钥匙，打开一堆虚假“平台”

　　然而，与群众举报内容相比，杨政的供述显然有所保留，该院反贪局副局长孙亚永带领办案人员依法对杨政的办公室进行了搜查。

　　细心的办案人员在办公室发现了“端倪”——一把放在窗缝里的钥匙。办案人员取出钥匙，居然打开了办公桌上的一个抽屉。抽屉的一角，貌似随意地扔着另一把钥匙。用这把钥匙继续尝试，结果就意外地打开了办公室旁边的杂物库。从里边，办案人员不仅发现了一些杨政亲笔记录的借还款及利息记录，还有近十个公司印章证件、资料等证据。

　　办案人员惊讶地发现，仅从其中一个银行账户就发现了三四个亿资金的流动。随之，他们又对那些公司资料进行核查，发现绝大部分是假的。而这却是杨政的“生财之道”。

　　其中，具有“代表性”的莫过于杨政和许战胜的“合作”了。据杨政供述，2009年至2010年间，他和许战胜成立了几家公司作为国资公司向外借款的平台公司。公司由许战胜出面注册，手续办完后，他就把公司印章资料全部交给杨政，以便于杨政对这些公司的支配和使用。每当许战胜需要用钱时，杨政就会把国资公司的钱通过网银转到这些平台公司的银行账户上，然后再转到许战胜指定的账户上。

　　因为案件涉及到多年前的对账单，那时银行还没有联网，所有票据都由人工开具。“每次到银行查账，我们都要先把一麻袋一麻袋的票据搬出来，然后一张一张核对。天气又热，一天下来，连说话的劲儿都没了。”提起当时的情景，办案人员感慨道。

　　劝返外逃人员，获取完整的证据链条

　　面对确凿的证据，杨政无言以对，如实供述了全部犯罪事实。随之，办案人员对另外8名涉案人员依法进行传讯。

　　然而，还没等办案人员“上门”，被杨政第一个供出的张韬便“不知去向”了。“她的反侦查意识很强，跑到山区，白天不开手机，晚上打开，也只是看看来电显示。”这让追捕人员十分伤脑筋，也让抓捕的难度不断增加。两个多月的时间，追捕人员在山里吃尽了苦头，直至张韬归案自首。

　　与此同时，对其他涉案人员的调查也有了很大进展。其中，对张朝晖的调查颇为曲折。为了逃避检察机关的调查，张朝晖外逃美国。检察机关遂对其实施网上追逃，同时由办案人员向犯罪嫌疑人张朝晖家属送达《关于督促在逃境外经济犯罪人员投案自首的通告》，并讲明相关刑事政策及利害关系，使家属接受了检察机关意见，说服张朝晖回国投案，争取宽大处理。

　　2014年12月，在通告的最后截止日，张朝晖回国，办案人员遂对其进行讯问，并询问证人，调取相关书证60余份，通过侦查认定的事实清楚，证据确实充分，形成了完整的证据链条。

　　公诉人击破辩解，案件终尘埃落定

　　2014年11月，经郑州市高新区检察院提起公诉，该案被移送法院审理。“第一批起诉7人，每人都聘请了2名律师，辩护人席坐得满满的。”该案公诉人黄尧介绍，由于庭审中争议较多，导致该案开庭两天才审理完毕。

　　“庭审中，最大的难点在于言辞证据的不稳定。”黄尧告诉记者，其中有辩护人提出，该案中，银行员工不能按挪用公款共同犯罪论处。理由是杨政注册公司，通过银行验资，银行工作人员做的是正常工作。事情虽然是他们做了，但他们不知钱的去向，就不算犯法，充其量也只是违规。

　　这明显是在推脱责任。他们出具假对账单，为杨政提供空白对账单，难道这是正常业务吗？可以这样说，如果没有银行的参与，杨政的犯罪行为就无法实施。”法庭上，公诉人对被告人的辩解给予了有力回击，指出银行方面为杨政介绍“客户”，从而增加业务量，达到盈利的目的，是共同犯罪。但这是个别银行工作人员个人违规，非法获利，与银行管理无关。

　　2015年6月17日，法院作出一审判决，判处杨政等7人有期徒刑十四年至三年，缓刑五年，并追缴涉案违法所得。杨政等人不服，分别提出上诉。二审法院依法组成合议庭，经过阅卷，讯问原审被告人，听取辩护人意见，认为一审事实清楚，决定不开庭审理，终审裁定，驳回上诉，维持原判。

责任编辑：康云凯

文章关键词：
挪用公款 国企

我要反馈
保存网页
正义网-检察日报