Tianjin second homes in response to Zhai Yan rumors: and in fact risked | of | Zhai Yan Tianjin second homes _ news

Original title: Tianjin second homes in response to Zhai Yan online rumors: inconsistent with the fact that serious!

On August 2, 2016, the second intermediate people's Court of Tianjin Zhai Yan arrested for Subversion case public hearing of first instance and judgment of the Court, found Zhai Yan committed subversion and sentenced to three years probation for four years and deprived of political rights for four years. After a trial, widely condemned the defendant's criminal acts that endanger national security, and praised the Court decision reflects the criminal policy of temper justice with mercy. Accompanied a talk that "the trial notice", "secret trial", "the Court does not allow the accused family" and so on. So what is it? To this end, we spoke to Tianjin in the second hospital official.

The official said these rumours seriously inconsistent with the facts. Zhai Yan is a public trial cases, the judicial activities of the Court is carried out strictly in accordance with the legal procedures of a public trial. On July 29, 2016, the Court in trial of three electronic bulletin board service Hall said in court proceedings on the case to the Court announcement (see photo), and recorded on the volume. Previously, on July 18, 2016, Zhai Yan is produced to the Court did not agree with their wives and other relatives and friends sit in a written statement, the Tribunal respecting the defendant so wishes.

The official said, day of the hearing, NPC deputies and CPPCC members, legal scholars, professional lawyers, IL 28 representatives from 12 domestic and 5 foreign media journalists and 20, a total of 48 people attend the trial. Meanwhile, the Court also set the media reception center in Tianjin Grand View Hotel, Tianjin interview media inside and outside court case text record and official Micro-Blog released a record in the second trial live longer Tweets. Stage of the proceedings as a whole has fully protected the defendant's litigation rights to exercise. In the final statement of the defendant said, "today's trial made me feel the courts are impartial, throughout the trial to ensure my rights."

The official said Tianjin second intermediate welcomes the community to supervise the judicial activities of the Court and public opinion, but on the basis of this monitoring should be based on the fact that according to law. (Tian Ying)

Responsible editor: Zhang Chun SN182

Article keywords:
Zhai Yan secondary school in Tianjin

I want feedback
Save a Web page
Changan, China network

天津二中院回应翟岩民案传言：与事实严重不符|翟岩民|天津二中院_新闻资讯

　　原标题：天津二中院回应翟岩民案网上传言：与事实严重不符！

　　2016年8月2日，天津市第二中级人民法院对翟岩民涉嫌颠覆国家政权案一审公开开庭审理，并当庭作出判决，认定被告人翟岩民犯颠覆国家政权罪，判处有 期徒刑三年，缓刑四年，剥夺政治权利四年。一审宣判后，舆论普遍对被告人危害国家安全的犯罪行为表示谴责，同时赞许法院判决体现了宽严相济刑事政策。同时 网上也有个别传言称“案件开庭未公告”、“搞秘密审判”，“法院不允许被告人家属旁听”等。真相到底如何？为此，我们采访了天津市二中院有关负责人。

　　这位负责人表示，这些传言与事实严重不符。翟岩民案是公开审判案件，法院的审判活动是严格依照公开审判的法定程序进行的。2016年7月29日，法院依 法于开庭审理三日前在法院诉讼服务大厅电子公告屏对该案进行了开庭公告（见照片），并记录在卷。此前，2016年7月18日，翟岩民即向法院出具了不同意 其妻及其他亲朋好友旁听的书面声明，法庭尊重了被告人本人意愿。

　　这位负责人说，开庭审理当天，人大代表、政协委员、法学学者、职业律师、各界群众代表28人及来自12家国内媒体和5家境外媒体的记者20人，共48人 旁听了庭审。同时，法院还在天津新桃园酒店设置了媒体接待中心，为来津采访案件审理的境内外媒体提供庭审文字实录，并在二中院官方微博发布了记录庭审实况 的长微博。整个诉讼阶段均充分保障了被告人各项诉讼权利的行使。被告人在最后陈述时也表示，“今天的审判让我感到法庭是公正的，整个审判过程保证了我的权 利”。

　　这位负责人最后表示，天津市二中院欢迎社会各界和舆论对法院审判活动进行监督，但这种监督应当建立在事实的基础上依法进行。（田莹）

责任编辑：张淳 SN182

文章关键词：
翟岩民 天津二中院

我要反馈
保存网页
中国长安网