Jiangxi officials claim "collection robot" single bribery 30 million | |-corruption _ corruption news

Xinhua News Agency, "Xinhua viewpoint" journalist Hu Jinwu, Lai Xing

Recently, economic development zone, Jiujiang, Jiangxi, former Party Committee Secretary Li Kuang-case judgment takes effect, the amount of money involved and the bribe were highest in Jiangxi province, Jiangxi province, Jingdezhen city intermediate people's Court of first instance sentenced to 15 years on charges of taking bribes and sentenced to a fine of 2 million Yuan.

As an engine for local economic development, the development zone to State many preferential policies, is the accumulation of funds and projects. "Xinhua viewpoint" press incomplete statistics revealed that since 2013, at least 10 former leaders of China development zone, officers at Lok Ma, exposed zone management system closed, the boundary is not clear, and so on.

　　105 bribery as "collection of robots"

Identified by the trial, Li Kuang-Jiujiang, in the economic and technological development zone during his tenure, total more than 53.65 million yuan of bribery, including retirement amount for accepting a bribe of up to 30 million Yuan. "Power tools, more wantonly accumulate wealth before his retirement. "Investigators say Li Kuang-105 times accepting bribes from 17 people, less five thousand or six thousand Yuan, the largest amount of up to 30 million Yuan.

"At the beginning, when someone gave hundreds of thousands of Yuan, some cower, for fear of being talked about to ridicule. Then your habit, shameless. "Says Li Kuang, in their own way corruption go further, eventually becoming" robots in the assigned receivable. "

Li Kuang said in a confessional book: "in my real job and adhere to principles, not according to the procedures, often in combination of principle and flexibility as an excuse to use their powers are in breach of procedures. ”

The corruption occurred in the zone is not alone. Jiangxi Nanchang high-tech zone management committee the Director of Oklahoma City, a former Director of the Nanchang economic development zone management Committee of the original Nanchang municipal Committee Tang Chengqi, used to be the local "economic expert", end result of powers are not subject to constraints and degenerated into corrupt elements, causing huge losses to the State.

Oklahoma City sentenced December 2014 to make "special relationship with Su Rong's son" of Xingan County of Jiangxi province, former Deputy County head Liu Jianjun to help their promotion, development zone, he instructed subordinates Zhong Xiao assisted Liu Jianjun, Chairman of venture loans business, Liu Jianjun to defraud the enterprise capital of 229 million Yuan.

In June this year, Huangshan city, Anhui Province, former Vice Chairman of tanjinping abuse, bribery case trial. According to allegations, tanjinping in served as Huangshan City economic zone CMC Director during, privately decided for Huangshan outside airlines education investment company advance land transfer gold more than 8.46 million more than Yuan; will by open district acquisition of a land and the ground buildings free transfer to Huangshan are country new energy technology limited, caused national loss 12.95 million Yuan; violation provides and Huangshan joint strong textile limited signed "offers terms", and in joint strong company not reached contract agreed conditions of situation Xia, to award of name returned land transfer gold, Causing economic losses of more than 14.65 million Yuan.

　　Relates to engineering corruption anti-corruption pressure the bottom back edge

In recent years, the development zone projects more and more, growing use of land, large development funds. Interests of corrupt officials and unscrupulous businessmen to form alliances, national resource to their "gourmet meal".

Many cases involve large sums, and related engineering field. Li Kuang-accepting bribes, most of which is sent by the real estate developer, businessman Lai Yongjun of bribing its only 38 million Yuan, is intended to thank Li Kuang in the project bidding process and project help the settlement process. Depends on the army confirmed that the bidding process was Li Kuang-to help their successful bid, and Li Kuang is well aware he is by means of enterprises affiliated to the winning bidder.

39.01 million yuan in bribes received by Tang Chengqi, builders sent property of 23.5 million Yuan (6.5 million Yuan attempted). During while serving as Director of the Nanchang economic development zone management committee, he also instructed subordinates return land transfer to multiple connections in disguise, and embezzlement of State funds as he, killing more than 280 million Yuan losses to the country.

To cover up corruption, corrupt officials "Dodge move" means hidden. Li Kuang received depends on the support of 15 million Yuan after two bank cards, let your sister will lend 30 million yuan in bank transfers to businessman Zhou, Li Kuang guise thanks to name signed a loan contract with Zhou Yongjun, agree to a monthly two-both cover up bribery, but also huge interest.

Tang Chengqi hiding behind the scenes, through the creation of "shell companies" to find someone to act as a puppet, false contracts with other companies, a "joint venture", with powers as "performance shares" to obtain up to 50% of "dividend".

Corruption pressure, some corrupt officials back edge. Reporters found that from 2012 to 2014, Li Kuang-"don't stop" taking bribes at the same time, signs of trouble, has returned money to bribe over more than 10 people. Investigators described, in front of the Disciplinary Committee investigation, Li Kuang returned bribe money a total of 12.41 million Yuan, 290,000 dollars and building a House.

After the incident, says Li Kuang, as the country's anti-corruption efforts to strengthen, especially served as Party Secretary of Jiujiang, Jiangxi province, former Deputy Director of the NPC Standing Committee Chen Zhong et al case, their fear of being investigated and dealt with, so I returned some of the bribes.

　　Run on its own form the closed-end corruption should be reforming the management system

According to China's Commerce Ministry, at present, there are State-level economic and technological development zone, China 219. Zone management agency is generally located above city level people's Government agencies, in addition to which, with the business nature of things, according to authorize the exercise of the people's Government at the administrative examination and approval, economic coordination and management functions.

Reporters comb zone "leaders" rot found in question, many development decision making "yiyantang", as long as the "nod", tens or even hundreds of millions of Yuan in funds would be diverted to any other use, no one, no one dared tube to tube.

Investigators said that because of the particularity of the system, some development zone has almost become "independent kingdoms". For example, while Zhong Xiao knows Thunder indicates that break the rules, but he said: "the Thunder is the ' head ', I can only do so. ”

Experts say, part of the economic and technological development zone was given a large number of people, finance, property rights, the implementation of "closed management, independent operation" mode, the existing administration systems in some extent restricted zone regulatory effectiveness, failing to form a mechanism for mutual restraint, lack of external oversight, can easily cause "closed-end corruption."

"Prevent zone corruption, will radically reform, reform of the management system. "The criminological society of Jiangxi province Yan Sanzhong, Deputy Secretary General recommends that development zone assets operation and management functions stripped out from the CMC, established asset management company, is responsible for the planning, development and construction in the area and daily service and management.

Anti-corruption expert, Professor of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics ren JianMing believes that sound development zone ' Affairs rules, decomposition of powers and establish a perfect all-round supervision system, and this is the key to effective control on power.

Experts suggested that the national level to strengthen the guidance around the development zone, development zone, the power zoom clear responsibility to the people, special task force to ensure power and not random, in particular on the commercial interests of the project, more separation of powers, each other.

Responsible editor: Sun Ailin SN146

Article keywords:
Corruption and anti-corruption

I want feedback
Save a Web page
Xinhua

江西官员自诩“收款机器人” 单笔受贿3000万|贪腐|反腐_新闻资讯

　　新华社“新华视点”记者 胡锦武、赖星

　　近日，江西九江经济技术开发区原党工委书记李光荣案判决生效，其涉案金额及单笔受贿金额均为江西最高，被江西景德镇市中级人民法院一审以受贿罪判处有期徒刑15年，并处罚金200万元。

　　作为促进地方经济发展的引擎，开发区享有国家诸多优惠政策，是资金、项目的聚集地。“新华视点”记者不完全统计发现，2013年以来，中国至少有10名曾经主政地方开发区的官员落马，暴露出开发区管理体制封闭、权力边界不清等问题。

　　105次受贿　成为“收款的机器人”

　　经审理查明，李光荣在九江经济技术开发区任职期间，共受贿5365余万元，其中退休前收受的一笔贿赂金额高达3000万元。“权力成为交易工具，退休前更是大肆敛财。”办案人员说，李光荣先后105次收受17人贿赂，少的五六千元，最大一笔高达3000万元。

　　“刚开始，有人送几百块千把元的时候，还有些畏缩，生怕别人议论讥笑。后来收习惯了，就不知廉耻了。”李光荣说，自己在贪腐的路上越走越远，最终成为“收款的机器人”。

　　李光荣在忏悔书中说：“我在实际工作中，不坚持原则，不按程序办事，常常以原则性和灵活性相结合为借口，利用手中的权力违反程序办事。”

　　发生在开发区的腐败并非个例。江西南昌高新区管委会原主任雷霆、曾任南昌经开区管委会主任的原南昌市委常委汤成奇，都曾是当地的“经济能手”，终因权力不受约束而蜕变为腐败分子，给国家造成巨大损失。

　　2014年12月被判刑的雷霆为了让“与苏荣之子关系特殊”的江西新干县原副县长刘建军帮助自己升迁，他指示开发区下属创投公司董事长钟骁协助刘建军贷款经商，刘建军骗取该企业资金2.29亿元。

　　今年6月，安徽省黄山市原政协副主席覃金平滥用职权、受贿一案开庭审理。据指控，覃金平在担任黄山市经济开发区管委会主任期间，私自决定为黄山 外航教育投资公司垫付土地出让金846万余元；将经开区收购的一块土地及地上建筑物无偿转让给黄山正国新能源科技有限公司，造成国家损失1295万元；违 反规定与黄山联强纺织有限公司签订“优惠条款”，并在联强公司未达到合同约定条件的情况下，以奖励之名返还土地出让金，造成国家经济损失1465万余元。

　　多涉及工程领域腐败　反腐高压下边退边收

　　近年来，开发区工程项目越来越多，土地使用量日渐增大，开发资金数额庞大。贪腐官员和不法商人结成利益同盟，国家资源成为他们的“饕餮大餐”。

　　不少案件涉案金额大，且多涉及工程领域腐败。李光荣收受的贿赂中，大部分为地产开发商所送，仅商人赖拥军便向其行贿3800万元，目的是为感谢 李光荣在工程项目招投标过程和工程款结算过程中给予的帮助。赖拥军证实，在招投标过程中，正是李光荣帮助其顺利中标，并且李光荣清楚地知道他是通过企业挂 靠的方式以买标手段中标。

　　在汤成奇所收受的3901万元贿赂中，建筑商所送财物达2350万元（其中650万元未遂）。在担任南昌经开区管委会主任期间，他还指示下属向多个关系户变相返还土地出让金，以及挪用国有资金作为他用，给国家造成2.8亿余元的损失。

　　为掩盖腐败行为，贪腐官员“闪转腾挪”手法隐蔽。李光荣在收受赖拥军各存有1500万元的两张银行卡后，让自己的妹妹将这3000万元以银行转账的方式借给了商人周某，李光荣假借赖拥军之名与周某签订了借款合同，并约定月息两分，既掩盖受贿行为，还能获取巨额利息。

　　汤成奇藏身幕后，通过成立“皮包公司”找人充当傀儡，与其他公司签订虚假合同，进行“合作经营”，以权力为“干股”，索取高达五成的“分红”。

　　面对反腐高压，有的贪腐官员边退边收。记者调查发现，2012年至2014年间，李光荣在“不收手”持续受贿的同时，一有风吹草动，先后向10余名行贿人退还钱物。办案人员介绍，在纪委立案调查前，李光荣共退回行贿人钱物1241万元人民币、29万美元以及房屋一栋。

　　案发后，李光荣说，随着国家反腐力度加强，尤其是曾任九江市委书记的江西省人大常委会原副主任陈安众等人案发，自己担心被查处，所以就退回了部分贿赂。

　　独立运行形成封闭式腐败　应改革管理体制

　　根据中国商务部数据，目前，中国共有国家级经济技术开发区219个。这些开发区的管理机构一般是所在地市级以上人民政府的派出机构，除其中具有企业性质的外，根据授权行使同级人民政府行政审批、经济协调与管理等职能。

　　记者梳理多起开发区“一把手”涉腐案发现，不少开发区决策大搞“一言堂”，只要“一点头”，上千万元乃至数亿元的资金便被挪作他用，无人来管、无人敢管。

　　办案人员表示，由于管理体制的特殊性，有的开发区几乎成为“独立王国”。比如，虽然钟骁明知雷霆的指示违反规定，但他说：“雷霆是‘一把手’，我只能照办。”

　　专家表示，部分经济技术开发区被赋予大量的人、财、物权，实行“封闭管理、独立运行”的模式，而已有的行政托管体制在一定程度上制约了开发区监督管理成效，没有很好地形成相互制约的机制，外部监督也缺位，极易产生“封闭式腐败”。

　　“防止开发区腐败，就要正本清源，对管理体制进行改革。”江西省犯罪学研究会副秘书长颜三忠建议，将开发区资产运营管理职能从管委会中剥离出来，建立资产运营管理公司，负责区内规划、开发建设及日常服务、管理。

　　反腐研究专家、北京航空航天大学教授任建明认为，应健全开发区区务公开制度，分解权力，并建立完善的全方位监督体系，这是对权力形成有效制约的关键。

　　专家建议，国家层面要加强对各地开发区工作的指导，将开发区各项权力细化明确，责任到人，专人专责，保证权力散而不乱，尤其是对商业利益较重的项目，更需事权分离、相互制约。

责任编辑：孙爱林 SN146

文章关键词：
贪腐 反腐

我要反馈
保存网页
新华网