Australia raise trade barriers against China or the South China Sea-related | Australia | sea _ news

Original title: foreign media said Australia related to improving the trade barrier to China and the South China Sea

"Global times reported" Australia was once considered one of the countries with lower trade barriers with China, why start now "go back"? The New York Times said on the 12th that Australia's key economic sectors, such as mining and agriculture, heavily dependent on Chinese demand. But in recent years, with many Australia control one after another fall into Chinese hands, locals fear of China's growing economic clout. United Kingdom according to the financial times, China on the United States, Europe and Australia reached a record level of investment, underscoring Beijing's advantages as a driving force in global development and investment source, but it also caused Australia concern regulators.

Australia analysts, economic policy-making and strategic differences in the South China Sea issue in Australia are not unrelated. Australia people newspaper said on the 12th that China strongly hopes to push Australia further liberalisation of the investment, but in September last year after the Australian Government leadership, relations seem Dim. Australia Defence Ministry had previously approved the Darwin rented to private companies in China, but Australia's foreign investment Review Board and then offered to the State review of the implementation of the new infrastructure. Received Australian Government funded think-tank Australia Institute for strategic policy view, different from the former Prime Minister, Abbott, the Australian Government increased investor anxieties about China. The Institute analyst Jennings believes that Australian divisions in the South China Sea to some extent changed the decision of Australia to Chinese investment, "the starting point should be the analysis of China's Asia-Pacific macro strategies and what impact political activities." Reuters quoted a government source as saying that Australia rejected applications for enterprise mergers and acquisitions in China partly due to concerns "are becoming a geopolitical threat."

If the political conflict deepened, trade and economic development momentum will not be broken? "Politically cold heat" "dual track system" can be maintained forever? Researcher at the China Institute of international studies Shen Shishun 12th interview with reporter for global times said Australia's security dependence on United States military and United States echoes, published in the South China Sea and other issues with China opposing views can also be expected. But the refused on grounds of national security Enterprise mergers and acquisitions in the Australian power grid completely untenable, because China does not have Australia as adversaries or enemies poses no any threat to Australian Security. "If Japan, and perhaps understandable. ”

Shen Shishun, said political relations will affect economic cooperation if China and Australia had accumulated between, of course, have a negative impact on economic and trade exchanges. But Australia has been very focused on economic links with East Asia, China is Australia's largest trading partner, is expected to take the Australian side, continue to develop economic and trade cooperation with China, the "main line" should not change.

Responsible editor: Xiang Changming SN123

Article keywords:
Australia South

I want feedback
Save a Web page
China News Network

澳大利亚提高对华贸易壁垒 或与南海有关|澳大利亚|南海_新闻资讯

　　原标题：外媒称澳大利亚提高对华贸易壁垒 与南海有关

　　【环球时报综合报道】澳大利亚一度被认为是对华贸易壁垒较低的国家之一，现在为什么开始“开倒车”？《纽约时报》12日称，澳大利亚的一些关键经济部门，比如采矿业和农业，严重依赖来自中国需求。但近年来，随着许多澳大利亚企业控制权接二连三地落入中国人手中，当地人越来越忧心于中国日益增长的经济影响力。英国《金融时报》称，中国对美国、欧洲和澳大利亚投资达到创纪录的水平，这凸显北京作为全球发展驱动力量和投资来源地的优势，但这也引发澳大利亚监管方的关切。

　　有澳大利亚分析人士认为，经济决策与澳中在南海问题上的战略分歧不无关系。《澳大利亚人报》12日称，中国强烈希望推动澳进一步开放投资，但去年9月澳政府领导层更替后，两国关系前景似乎变得暗淡。澳大利亚中国国防部此前批准将达尔文港租给中国私企，但澳外国投资审查委员会随后提出要对国有基础设施实施新的审查。得到澳政府资金支持的智库澳大利亚战略政策研究院认为，与前总理阿博特不同，澳现政府对中国投资者疑虑增加。该研究院分析师杰宁斯认为，澳中围绕南海的分歧一定程度上改变了澳对中国投资的决策，“出发点应该是分析中国的亚太宏观战略和政治活动会造成什么影响”。路透社援引一名澳政府人士的话称，澳否决中企并购申请的部分原因在于担忧中国“正成为地缘政治威胁”。

　　如果政治上的矛盾持续加深，经贸发展的势头会不会被打破？“政冷经热”的“双轨制”能够长期维持下去吗？中国国际问题研究院研究员沈世顺12日接受《环球时报》记者采访时表示，澳大利亚在安全上依赖美国，军事上与美国相呼应，在南海等问题上发表一些跟中国对立的观点也可以预料。但此次以国家安全为由拒绝中企并购澳洲电网完全站不住脚，因为中国并没有把澳大利亚当成对手或敌人，不对澳安全构成任何威胁。“如果换作日本，或许还可以理解。”

　　沈世顺表示，政治关系会影响经济合作，如果中国和澳大利亚间的矛盾积累多了，当然会对经贸往来产生负面影响。不过澳大利亚一直很看重与东亚地区的经济联系，中国更是澳最大贸易伙伴，预计澳方会顾全大局，继续发展与中国的经贸合作，这条“主线”应该不会变。

责任编辑：向昌明 SN123

文章关键词：
澳大利亚 南海

我要反馈
保存网页
中国新闻网