Zhejiang prison instructors to inmates for bribes 240,000: to talk implied | | prison of offenders _ news

Original title: prison political Director as "a prisoner" investigation: secret transactions within the walls

Reporter Chen Xiaobo Fu Chen

As a prison supervisor, dense wall should understand the price of freedom. However, a prison of Zhejiang Province "$literal" political Director Zhao Jian area, time period to career, being greedy, and used his position, adjust the position, commutation and parole for prisoners help, accepting bribes of more than 240,000 yuan.

A few days ago, Qujiang district, Quzhou, Zhejiang, people's courts of the first instance decision in the case, Zhao found guilty of taking bribes was sentenced to three years and fined 200,000 yuan have not yet recovered the illegal income continue to be recovered.

　　Time period to career was greedy beat

Born in 1981, jiangshan city, Zhejiang Province, Zhao is people. See from the resume, Cho's life is smooth.

In 2004, Zhao graduated from the Zhejiang police officer vocational college, was admitted to a prison in Zhejiang province. Since then, more than he won more than 10 awards, and grows from an ordinary prison guards for the prison political Director.

Reporters learned that Zhao General position adjustment of the prisoners have the right to decide, and special post adjustment proposal, commutation and parole have the right to vote. These powers for prisoners is attractive, consumed by greed and power, it is Cho from the prison into "prisoners" of important reasons.

On June 13, 2015, Zhao detained on suspicion of accepting bribes, arrested by law on June 29 of that year.

According to Quzhou city Qujiang district, people's Procuratorate allegations, November 2012 to March 2015 during, Zhao a using its served as Zhejiang province a prison four prison district five points prison district political instructor of positions convenience, illegal received criminals relatives cash amounted to 215,000 Yuan Yuan and the 1000 Yuan dollars, and "to take for name" to a name criminals of relatives asking for Yuan 20,000 yuan, for above 18 name criminals in post adjustment, and review appraisals, and commutation parole, aspects seek interests.

　　By "talk" in the name suggests criminal bribery

Journalists combing found that Cho used his position to help offenders adjust status, parole, and collect benefits, and even "talk" in the name of initiative suggests that criminal bribery. In addition, Cho also to lend her name, to the criminal's family members and asked for money.

--"Talk" in the name suggests criminal bribery. Many prisoners prefer to change to easily post, parole, some with Zhao Mouti ask and said what she wanted after "thank" him. While the prosecution in the case also found that Cho on "talk" in the name, ask if some criminals want to a relaxed position, and lend themselves prisoners, let them make phone calls to relatives and friends. Some criminals took the hint, and where their friends and relatives to Cho in the call "send something".

In addition, some prisoners to entrust persons released from prison and spoke to his family, said he served hard and hope that they can give Zhao a gift, with a view to adjusting the position and Zhao told his family a phone number.

--Take advantage of the occasion of the visits, in the car to get the money. These 18 relatives of the prisoners, the vast majority to the prison to visit Cho contact well in advance when, taking bribery imposed on Cho.

Reporters combed the judgment found that the relatives of the prisoners, most take the form of cash, some existing in the selected bank. In addition, journalists noticed that Cho told them about mostly in the urban areas, high-speed export meet. Cho often drive came after Cho's car on the friends and relatives of offenders, will put the money in a brown paper bag for him.

Qujiang district, the Prosecutor in charge of the public prosecutor's Office told reporters that the prisoners relatives sent out "thank you", a minimum of 6000 Yuan, up to 25000.

--To lend her name and asked for money. In addition to "accept" initiative to send money, Zhao and begin to think about the other make money. The first half of 2013, introduced by other police, Cho made his prison sentence in a criminal's son Xu. 2013 national day Eve, called Xu Zhao, to "traffic accident compensation" to borrow $ 20,000 yuan, 20,000 yuan after Xu Hui Cho to the specified account.

Intention of later Zhao Xu for repayment, but Xu made clear that the money not returned, Zhao to the crime have not returned the money.

　　Court found not borrow, are bribes

During the trial, Zhao's lawyer suggested that Zhao Xu asked for 20,000 yuan to the crime does not hold, the amount is borrowed. In addition, the defence believes that Cho's behavior was not typical of trading power for money, although he received property, but only care to offenders in life, did not make use of bribes for criminals to seek illegitimate interests.

Qujiang district people's Court think, Zhao Xu asked for 20,000 yuan, although said to be returned, but he knows Xu have specific merit matters, and Zhao returned with conditions, circumstances, in a 1.5-year period did not return the money, should be identified as "to lend her name" of bribes.

In addition, the 2nd for the defence submission, the Court found that Cho knew their intentions, still taking their belongings, for their benefit, which meet the essential characteristics of trading power for money, bribery should be qualitative.

Taking into account the surrendered Zhao active, truthfully their crimes after the arrest, confessing, and shall be given a lighter punishment, the Court made the ruling.

Because of greed, Cho from a regulator reduced to regulators. He himself said: "the walled, heavily guarded prison work environment, although just boring, but after all, you're managing other people, now are not the same. ”

Responsible editor: Xiang Changming SN123

Article keywords:
Criminal prison

I want feedback
Save a Web page
Xinhua

浙江监狱指导员向服刑人员索贿24万:以谈心暗示|罪犯|监狱_新闻资讯

　　原标题：监狱政治指导员沦为“阶下囚”调查：高墙内的隐秘交易

　　记者 陈晓波 傅晨

　　作为监狱的监管者，面对森森高墙，理应更懂失去自由的代价。然而，浙江省某监狱“80后”分监区政治指导员赵某，正值职业上升期，却被贪心击溃，利用职务之便，为服刑罪犯调整岗位、减刑假释提供帮助，受贿24万余元。

　　日前，浙江衢州市衢江区人民法院对该案作出一审判决，赵某因犯受贿罪被判处有期徒刑三年，并处罚金20万元，尚未追回的违法所得继续予以追缴。

　　正值职业上升期却被贪心击溃

　　1981年出生的赵某是浙江省江山市人。从履历上看，赵某的人生可谓顺风顺水。

　　2004年，赵某从浙江警官职业学院毕业后，被浙江省某监狱录取。此后，他获得十余次嘉奖，并从一名普通狱警成长为分监区的政治指导员。

　　记者采访了解到，赵某对服刑罪犯一般岗位调整有决定权，特殊岗位调整有建议权，减刑、假释有投票权。这些权力对服刑人员而言可谓极具诱惑，而权力被贪婪吞噬，则是赵某从监狱监管者沦为“阶下囚”的重要原因。

　　2015年6月13日，赵某因涉嫌受贿罪被刑事拘留，同年6月29日被依法逮捕。

　　据衢州市衢江区人民检察院指控，2012年11月至2015年3月期间，赵某利用其担任浙江省某监狱四监区五分监区政治指导员的职务便利，非法收受罪犯亲友现金共计21.5万元人民币及1000元美金，并“以借为名”向一名罪犯的亲属索要人民币2万元，为上述18名罪犯在岗位调整、评审评比、减刑假释等方面谋取利益。

　　以“谈心”为名，暗示罪犯行贿

　　记者梳理发现，赵某利用职务之便，帮助罪犯调整岗位、假释等，从中收取好处，甚至以“谈心”为名，主动暗示罪犯行贿。此外，赵某还以借为名，向罪犯家属索要钱财。

　　——以“谈心”为名，暗示罪犯行贿。不少服刑罪犯希望能换到轻松岗位、假释等，一些人主动跟赵某提请求，并表示事成之后将“感激”他。而检察机关在办案时还发现，赵某也会以“谈心”为名，主动问一些罪犯是否想换个轻松的岗位，并将自己的手机借给服刑罪犯，让他们给亲友打电话。一些罪犯心领神会，在通话时便让亲友给赵某“送点东西”。

　　此外，也有一些服刑罪犯委托刑满释放人员带话给家人，称自己服刑很辛苦，希望他们能给赵某送礼，以期能调整岗位，并将赵某的手机号告诉家人。

　　——趁探监之际，在车上收钱。这18名服刑罪犯的亲友，绝大多数来监狱探望时会提前跟赵某联系好，借机对赵某实施行贿。

　　记者梳理判决书发现，这些服刑罪犯的亲友，大多数采取送现金的方式，也有一些人选择了银行现存的方式。此外，记者留意到，赵某大多跟他们约在市区、高速出口等地见面。赵某常常自己开车前来，罪犯亲友上了赵某的车后，将装在牛皮纸袋里的钱送给他。

　　衢江区检察院的经办检察官告诉记者，这些服刑罪犯的亲友送出的“感谢费”，最低的6000元，最高的25000元。

　　——以借为名，索要钱财。除了“笑纳”主动送上门的钱之外，赵某又琢磨起其他生财之道。2013年上半年，经其他民警介绍，赵某结识了在他分监区服刑的一名罪犯的儿子徐某。2013年国庆节前夕，赵某打电话给徐某，以“交通事故需要赔偿为由”向其借款2万元，徐某听后将2万元汇至赵某指定账户。

　　后赵某虽向徐某提出还款意向，但徐某明确表示该笔款项无需归还，赵某至案发都未归还该笔款项。

　　法院认定不是借款，是索贿

　　在庭审过程中，赵某的辩护律师提出，赵某向徐某索要2万元的犯罪事实不成立，该笔款项只是借款。此外，被告方认为，赵某的行为并不是典型的权钱交易，他虽然收取了财物，但仅在生活中对罪犯予以关照，并未利用职务便利为罪犯谋取不正当的利益。

　　衢江区人民法院审理认为，赵某向徐某索要2万元，虽曾表示要归还，但他明知徐某有具体的请托事项，而且赵某在具备归还条件、能力的情况下，在长达一年半时间内未归还该笔款项，应认定为“以借为名”的索贿。

　　此外，对于被告方提出的第二点辩护意见，法院认为，赵某明知这些人员的意图，仍收受他们的财物，为他们谋取利益，这些行为符合权钱交易的本质特征，应以受贿罪定性。

　　考虑到赵某主动投案，归案后如实供述自己罪行，是自首，依法可从轻处罚，法院遂作出上述判决。

　　因为贪婪，赵某从一名监管者沦落为被监管者。他自己也感叹说：“高墙耸立、戒备森严的监狱工作环境，虽然会让人觉得枯燥，但是毕竟你是在管理别人，如今都不一样了。”

责任编辑：向昌明 SN123

文章关键词：
罪犯 监狱

我要反馈
保存网页
新华网