Junior high school students to participate in live-action CS gun battle broke into concussions, the Court sentenced businessman bear primary responsibility-live-action CS, gunplay, concussion-IT information
High simulation of laser gun, concealed the real obstacles ... ... A simulated shooting game "CS Live-Club" is some of the boys got together during the summer vacation of mental and physical challenges. Students in grade three of Xiao Zhang (not his real name) a CS live with classmates in Shanghai Club "Guild Wars", the falls from a real platform of up to 1 meter, face broke into after a concussion. Afterwards, Zhang and parents regarding the compensation negotiations fail with the Club to court.
A few days ago, Shanghai Minhang District Court of the first instance judgement on the controversy over the right to health, the defendant "CS Live Club" site operator does not fulfill security obligations, should the plaintiff Xiao Zhang's damage mainly civil liability for the consequences.
?? picture is for reference only
CS battle broke into concussions
Minhang District Court revealed on August 16, 2014, at about 1 o'clock in the afternoon, the plaintiff Xiao Zhang and several classmates have agreed to a "CS Live Club" reality CS game play. After entering the playing field, the defence staff equipment, rules of the game were introduced to the game, but the playing field is not described in detail, also warning of the danger area that are not on the playing field to inform.
Game equipment for: canvas Cap 1 (brim around a ring installed with laser-induced beads), canvas vest 1 (equipped with laser-induced beads), laser rifle 1. Rules of the game: when the game starts, first open the laser equipment with the remote control, Pearl laser flashes on the hat, vest, hit count after Pearl laser laser rifle, and voice broadcast "had been hit", hit number after the set number of laser devices automatically shut down, quit the game.
Game field to simulate a terror scene, dimly lit. In the course of the game, plaintiff accidentally Miss fall from more than one meter high platform, directly impact to the head and face injuries on the ground, at that time, the plaintiff to take rest. The groups of students after the end of the game, fellow students, accompanied by the plaintiff to the pharmacy to buy medicine for the plaintiffs face a simple disinfection of the skin damage. Zhihou, peer student speech disorder found the plaintiff, namely, repeatedly asked the students, "what's the date today? "And" what did I just do? "," How can I be hurt? "," My cell phone? "," Haven't finish my homework "and so on, then call the plaintiff parents. Plaintiff parents rushed to the scene, accompanied by the plaintiff to the Shanghai Minhang central hospital emergency treatment and diagnosis for: facial trauma, concussions. Subsequently, the plaintiffs conducted a number of outpatient treatment.
Zhihou, the plaintiff's parents medical documents in consultation with the defendant the plaintiff claims, defendants full compensation for plaintiffs ' medical expenses, but does not agree to compensate the plaintiff damages.
Defendant: best security management responsibilities
During the hearing, plaintiffs claim, defendants provide playing field for security breaches: playing field lights, no warning of the danger area. Accused of mismanagement: beforehand, not safety education of the personnel participating in the game, not detailed to Games venues and dangerous areas; in the course of the game, the defence staff without full inspections, is not hazardous locations safety warning; afterwards, the defence staff did not take any medical treatment to the plaintiff. Above all, reasonable damages of the defendant to the plaintiff 80% civil liability, civil liability of plaintiff's ego 20%.
Defendants argue that simulated shooting game worn equipment comply with the requirements of helmets of helmets, built-in buffer sponge, the plaintiffs injured by not wearing safety helmets. And the defence of due diligence security management responsibilities. Before the incident, the defence arrangements for staff to wear to the game device, game rules are introduced, playground sand table display. In the course of the game, the defence staff site visit in the game. Plaintiff falls landing points are not for stairs, but a one-meter-high platform, woven rope barrier, the plaintiffs themselves did not notice, from the platform from falling to the ground. At that time, the defence staff face damage to the plaintiff for a simple medical treatment and arrange for plaintiffs to take rest. To sum up, the defendant submitted that, the plaintiff is 80% responsible for civil liability in the present case, the civil liability of the defendants-20%.
During the hearing, plaintiffs and students attend statements present in the game after the incident, testimony in the "games for Canvas Hat (not the helmet)", "Zhang (plaintiff) falls from a height of one meter of platform, lying on the ground, saw little equipped, wearing a hat, vest, holding a laser rifle. "Statements.
Defendant does not confirm the authenticity of the above testimony, and said the incident occurred in the present case with live video, also known as on-site computer video information has a certain shelf life, after a period, the computer will automatically overwrite, automatic updates, now the defendant has no video footage of the day of the incident.
During the hearing, according to the defendant's applications, commissioned a forensic institutes of the Court the plaintiff's injuries were serious. Judicial expertise report issued by the certifying agency, expert opinion is: be experts for accident-related injuries, suffering from concussion syndrome, constitute the equivalent of the injured in road traffic accident disability evaluation standard ten level of disability, and recommend the granting of stage 15th and 15th with care.
The Court: the defendant did not fulfill security obligations
Court through the trial, believes that witnesses in the case as a person with limited civil capacity, courts take isolation to investigate measures to witnesses to the incident after incident statement to confirm the case. Trial in the, accused statement its had has video information records has incident Shi accused staff to plaintiffs, students explained game equipment, and game rules, and introduced game scene, and has staff site visits, Hou thought both disputes has solution, and on incident video not to save, so for accused by said plaintiffs injured after, accused and failed to proof be confirmed, so Court adopted above witnesses testimony.
In the present case, first, the defendant "live-action CS Club" site operator, its business services include minors, accused Supreme security obligations to the premises. Because the game is a simulation terror scenarios, so set on the settings many of the obstacles to dimly Sukeyuki, making the game more challenging. Minor people more adults of cognitive capacity also has quite of gap, so for minor game who, accused except needed introduced game equipment, and game rules outside, also should game places for full, and detailed to introduced, especially game obstacles or easy injured of scene for special warning, or in minor people participation game process in the sent staff full track, for in dangerous regional of minor people should to loud reminded, and warning, to reduced game of dangerous coefficient, to prevent minor people in game in the injured. In addition, the accused minors game protective gear such as a helmet, elbow pads, knee pads and other safety equipment. Court held that the defendant did not fulfill security obligations, so the plaintiff mainly civil liability for the consequences of damage.
Second, reality CS game of high strength, Fair Game, scenes need to simulate realistic field settings and terrain, it is also an important embodiment of the difficulty of the game, so the event risk higher . The plaintiffs as a person with limited civil capacity, be aware that the sport has a certain degree of risk, but plaintiff knew Kennedy voluntarily risk risk, and Miss fall injuries, its there fault, responsible for the secondary responsibility.
In conclusion, the Court found that the plaintiff damages in the present case the consequences 30% of civil liability, civil liability for the defendant 70%. Losses incurred by plaintiff withdrew due to injury, including nutrition, family care and delay compensation, disability compensation, Attorney's fees and judicial appraisal fee by the 70% compensation. Court considered that plaintiff minors when the accident occurred, the plaintiff's damage consequences constitute ten disability and according to the percentage of fault liability in the present case, the Court recognized the plaintiff's reasonable spirit solatium for 4000 Yuan, the defendant is compensable.
初中生参加真人CS枪战摔成脑震荡，法院判商家担主要责任 - 真人CS,枪战,脑震荡 - IT资讯
高仿真的激光荷枪、隐蔽性极佳的实景障碍……设有模拟枪战游戏的“CS真人俱乐部”是暑假期间一些男孩们相约一起挑战脑力与体力的地方。初三学生小张（化名）与同班同学在上海某CS真人俱乐部里“激战”时，从高达1米多的实景平台跌落，脸部着地后摔成了脑震荡。事后，小张及父母就赔偿事宜与俱乐部协商不成诉至法院。
日前，上海闵行区法院对该起健康权纠纷案作出一审判决，被告“CS真人俱乐部”场所的经营者未尽到安全保障义务，应对原告小张的损害后果承担主要民事赔偿责任。
▲图片仅供参考
CS激战中摔成脑震荡
闵行区法院透露，2014年8月16日下午1时许，原告小张与几名同班同学相约至某“CS真人俱乐部”进行真人CS游戏的玩耍。进入游戏场所后，被告方工作人员对游戏装备、游戏规则进行了介绍，但未对游戏场所进行详细的介绍，也未对游戏场所的危险区域作警示告知。
游戏装备为：帆布帽1顶（帽檐周边一圈安装有激光感应珠）、帆布背心1件（安装有激光感应珠）、激光步枪1把。游戏规则为：游戏开始时，先用遥控器打开激光装备，使帽子、背心上的激光珠闪光，激光步枪击中激光珠后计数，并声控播报“已被击中”，击中次数达到设定数目后，激光设备自动关闭，退出游戏。
游戏现场为了模拟反恐场景，灯光昏暗。在游戏过程中，原告不慎从一米多高的平台踏空坠地，头面部直接撞击到地面致伤，当时，原告至休息区休息。待该组学生游戏结束后，同行学生陪同原告至药房购买药品为原告脸部的表皮损伤进行了简易消毒处理。之后，同行学生发现原告言语混乱，即反复询问同学“今天是几号？”、“我刚才干了什么？”、“我怎么会受伤的？”、“我手机呢？”、“我作业还没有做完”等，遂电话联系原告父母。待原告父母赶到现场后，陪同原告一起至上海市闵行区中心医院急诊治疗，诊断结论为：头面部外伤、脑震荡。嗣后，原告进行多次门诊治疗。
之后，原告之父母持原告医疗费单据与被告协商赔偿事宜，被告全额赔偿了原告医疗费用，但不同意赔偿原告其他损失费用。
被告：已尽安全管理职责
庭审中，原告诉称，被告提供的游戏场地存在安全隐患：游戏场地灯光昏暗,危险区域没有警示标志。被告存在管理不当：事前，未对参加游戏的人员进行安全教育，未对游戏场地及危险区域作详细介绍；在游戏过程中，被告方工作人员未作全场巡视，未在危险区域进行安全警示；事后，被告方工作人员未对原告采取任何医疗救治措施。综上，被告应对原告的合理损失承担80%的民事赔偿责任，原告自负20%的民事责任。
被告辩称，进行模拟枪战游戏所配戴的装备均符合规定，头盔系钢盔，内置缓冲海绵，原告系未配戴安全头盔致伤。且被告已尽安全管理职责。事发前，被告方安排工作人员对游戏配戴装置、游戏规则进行介绍、游戏场地用沙盘进行展示。在游戏过程中，被告方派有工作人员在游戏现场巡视。原告摔落地点并非为台阶，而是近一米高的平台，有编织网绳阻隔,原告自己未注意到,才从平台摔落在地。当时，被告方工作人员对原告脸部损伤作了简易医疗处理，并安排原告至休息区休息。综上，被告认为，原告就本案事件应自负80%民事责任，被告则负20%的民事赔偿责任。
庭审中，原告及当日在场参与游戏的同学到庭陈述事发经过，证言中有“游戏装备为帆布帽（并非钢盔）”，“小张（原告）从高度为一米的平台跌落，趴在地面，看到小张装备齐全，戴着帽子、穿着背心、手握激光步枪。”的陈述。
被告对上述证人证言的真实性不予确认，并称本案事发时有现场录像资料，但又称现场电脑录像资料有一定的保存期，过了期限，电脑就会自动覆盖、自动更新，现被告处已无事发当天的录像资料。
庭审中，根据被告申请，法院委托司法鉴定机构对原告伤势进行重鉴。该鉴定机构出具司法鉴定意见书，鉴定意见为：被鉴定人因事故受伤，患有脑震荡后综合症，构成相当于《道路交通事故受伤人员伤残评定》标准的十级伤残，建议给予营养期15日、护理期15日。
法院：被告并未尽到安全保障义务
法院经审理认为，本案证人均为限制民事行为能力人，法院采取隔离调查措施，证人对事发经过的陈述能够相互印证本案事发经过。庭审中，被告陈述其曾有录像资料记录了事发时被告工作人员向原告等学生讲解游戏装备、游戏规则，以及介绍游戏场景，并有工作人员现场巡视，后以为双方纠纷业已解决，而对事发录像未予保存，故对于被告所述原告受伤经过，被告并未能举证予以证实，故法院采纳上述证人证言。
本案中，首先，被告系事发“真人CS俱乐部”场所的经营者，其经营服务的对象包含未成年人，故被告对该经营场所应尽最高安全保障义务。由于该游戏场景为模拟反恐场景，所以在场景布置上设置多处障碍，现场以昏暗灯光佐之，使游戏现场更具挑战性。未成年人较成年人的认知能力还有相当的差距，故针对未成年游戏者，被告除需介绍游戏装备、游戏规则外，还应对游戏场所作全方位、详细地介绍，特别是游戏障碍或容易受伤的场景作特别警示，或在未成年人参与游戏过程中派工作人员全程跟踪，对于处于危险区域的未成年人应予大声提醒、警示，以降低游戏的危险系数，以防止未成年人在游戏中受伤。除此之外，被告应完善未成年人的游戏保护装备，如采用钢盔、护肘、护膝等安全防护装备。法院认为被告并未尽到安全保障义务，故应对原告的损害后果承担主要民事赔偿责任。
其次，真人CS游戏系高强度、对抗性游戏，场景需模拟逼真的野战环境及地形，这也是该项游戏难度的重要体现，故该项活动风险性亦较大。原告作为限制民事行为能力人，应当知道该项运动具有一定的危险性，然原告明知道风险而自愿甘风险，并发生踏空坠地受伤事件，其自身亦存在过错，应自负次要责任。
综上，法院认定，原告就本案损害后果自负30%的民事责任，被告承担70%的民事赔偿责任。就原告因伤产生的损失费用，包括营养费、家属护理误工费、残疾赔偿金、律师代理费、司法鉴定费等按70%的比例予以赔偿。法院考虑到，原告事故发生时系未成年人，原告的损伤后果构成十级伤残，且根据本案事件的过错责任比例，法院确认原告合理的精神损害抚慰金为4000元，被告应予赔偿。