Network anchorwoman resigned by deleting the video, was sentenced to compensate live platform 7000-anchorwoman, Webcast-IT information

18 year old girl Luo and Chen signed up to become a network anchor, but ROM had a talent to resign in less than 3 months. When Mr Chen during his tenure in the filmed video deleted. On August 19, xingning district, Nanning city, the people's Court informed the special contract dispute, the Court found that Mr a arbitrarily deleted videos to a breach, the amount of compensation "old team" Chen 7000 loss.

He was name after the, grow tall and beautiful. Last November, just 18 years old, she and Chen signed a contract valid for half a year the show farmers sowing, Chen owned a network anchor. Both agreed, Luo a to to Chen a provides effective ID copies and the bank card a Zhang, registered live background and the permanent ID, background account, and password and the all background program return Chen a all, Luo a shall not to any form interference and violations theft; if Luo a default, to compensation Chen a 20,000 yuan; Luo a left can to Chen a application termination, Chen a has informed right, and by Chen a on Luo a of live background for operation; Luo a if in 3 months within suspended contracts, needed to Chen a paid 5000 Yuan training fee.

In fact, he signed a contract after only 1 month, without informing Chen left the post. And Chen registered live background and ID all damaged, causing Chen no longer live exploitation of Chen has registered the background, resulting in a financial loss. Chen believes that ROM from a know nothing about live online students, become a qualified Internet host, is in training under Chen. Luo at the time of separation do not comply with the contract agreement, Chen registered live background and a permanent ID corrupted, violated their property rights shall bear the liability. In May this year, Chen told Luo, xingning District Court, claims 25,000 penalty and training costs.

Luo acknowledged that she had indeed left and delete account video, but because of the contract is unknown and not cause economic loss to Chen, her compensation. And cards belong to the personal property items, she deleted the video, so there is no default. While working in her anchor, Chen is not any form of her training, her compensation for training costs are without foundation.

The Court found that in the show, owners of broadcast contracts, the parties expressly agreed "registered live and permanent ID daemon in the background belong to party a, party b shall not in any way interfere with violations of theft......", indicating that both sides agree on a live background programs. ROM without the consent of Chen's case privately to delete the live video in the program in the background, has violated the contract, Mr a a breach of contract. ROM delete live video in the program in the background, leading to live background cannot play video, live backstage account of the revenue decrease, causing economic loss to Chen.

Judges found that in Romania a 1 month of work, Chen gained 647 Yuan, hence the discretion of Chen bi-monthly revenue for 2000; and Mr Chen has not less than 3 months that left their jobs, the actual violation of contract signed by both parties, Mr Chen should also pay the training fee of 5000 Yuan.

网络女主播辞职删光视频，被判赔直播平台7000元 - 女主播,网络直播 - IT资讯

18岁女孩罗某与陈某签约，成为一名网络主播，可罗某才干了不到3个月就辞职。辞职时，罗某还把在陈某处就职期间拍摄的网络视频全部删除。8月19日，南宁市兴宁区人民法院通报该起特殊的合同纠纷，法院认定罗某擅自删除视频属违约行为，需赔偿“老东家”陈某7000元损失。

罗某是名90后，长得高挑漂亮。去年11月，刚年满18岁的她，与陈某签下一份有效期为半年的《秀场主播合约》，成为陈某旗下的一名网络主播。双方约定，罗某要向陈某提供有效身份证复印件及银行卡一张，注册直播后台及永久ID，后台账号、密码及所有后台程序归陈某所有，罗某不得以任何形式干涉与侵犯盗窃；如果罗某违约，要赔偿陈某2万元；罗某离职可以向陈某申请解约，陈某有知情权，并由陈某对罗某的直播后台进行操作；罗某若在3个月内中止合约，需向陈某支付5000元培训费。

事实上，罗某在合同签订仅1个多月后，未通知陈某就自行离开岗位。并将陈某所注册直播后台及ID全部损坏，造成陈某无法再利用陈某己注册的后台从事直播，产生了经济损失。陈某认为，罗某从一个对网上直播一无所知的在校学生，成为一个合格的网上主播，是在陈某的培训下取得的。罗某在离职时不遵守合同约定，将陈某所注册的直播后台及永久ID损坏，侵害了自己的财产权利，应承担赔偿责任。今年5月，陈某将罗某告上兴宁区法院，索赔2.5万元违约金及培训费。

罗某承认，她确实已经离职并删除了账户内的视频，但因为双方的合同约定不明，未对陈某造成经济损失，她不该赔偿。且银行卡属于个人属性的物品，她删除的也是自己的视频，所以不存在违约。在她开展主播工作期间，陈某未对她进行过任何形式培训，让她赔偿培训费也没有依据。

法院认为，双方在《秀场主播合约》中明确约定“注册直播后台及永久ID等后台程序归甲方所有，乙方不得以任何形式干涉与侵犯盗窃……”，表明双方就直播后台程序达成一致意见。罗某在没有经陈某同意的情况下私自删除该直播后台程序内的视频，已经违反了该约定，罗某属违约。罗某删除直播后台程序内的视频，导致直播后台不能正常播放视频，直播后台账户所具有的收益性减少，确实给陈某造成了经济损失。

法官调查发现，在罗某工作的1个月内，陈某的收益是647元，遂酌定陈某两月的收益损失为2000元；而罗某在陈某处工作尚未满3个月即自行离职，以实际行为违反了双方签订的合同，罗某还应向陈某支付培训费5000元。