Hospitals, District Court in Henan province, fined 100,000 hospital issued a response to District Court of Henan | | | provincial hospital _ news

Original title: Court dispute with hospital refers to each other the "mismatch"

Henan provincial people's Hospital received "decision."
Video showed one of the staff members of the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the hospital staff.
Letter issued by the gulou district people's Court of Kaifeng city.

Gulou District Court, Henan Kaifeng, Henan provincial people's Hospital, interfere with investigations, fined 100,000 yuan; hospitals issued late at night back at Court "decisions and reckless"

Because of a medical history form that does not exist, Kaifeng city, Henan provincial people's Hospital and the gulou District Court "battle".

August 19, 11 o'clock, two staff members of the gulou District Court in Kaifeng city, came to the people's Hospital of Henan province, requires verification and a copy of a medical record. Party, you want to see courts run by staff identification cards, were rejected. The two sides immediately disputed. That afternoon, the gulou District Court of Kaifeng of Henan provincial people's Hospital made a fine of 100,000 Yuan decided, at the Hospital of "deliberately". Subsequently, the hospital also issued a response, saying the Court "decided hastily."

In this regard, the legal profession, said, in this case, simple and crude work problem on the Court, leaving hospitals slow process, although cannot determine whether intentionally, but also suspected of "delay". At present, the Kaifeng city intermediate people's Court has accepted the application for reconsideration of the Henan provincial people's Hospital, the two sides will continue to coordinate with.

　　"See ID" argument

Late last year, the gulou District Court accepted a private lending dispute cases in Kaifeng city, the original trial began in August this year. On the eve of trial, the defendant had put themselves under treatment in Henan provincial people's Hospital, demanding a postponement of the hearing, and provided a copy of the medical record medical record number 001463736.

August 19, at 11 o'clock in the morning, two staff members came to the gulou District Court in Henan province people's hospital medical records room, according to medical records, access to medical records, and archived copy. After the retrieval of medical records, medical record Department staff found that their registered patients asked to check with the court staff does not match the information. Discovery records and information not, court officers at the on site, under the medical record number of hospital material copied and taken away.

In the introduction of court staff, indicating the need to obtain medical records, and the person's name, identity card number and other information. In the interview with the Beijing News reporter, Henan provincial people's Hospital, the advocacy section, a staff surnamed Xu said, because the medical record number and identity are not consistent, the hospital subsequently filed, court personnel to show identification, and improve relevant procedures, further copying.

In a video provided by the Henan provincial people's Hospital, two staff members of the Court, wearing civilian clothes emotion, a woman who constantly beat the desktop, said the Court acted "not to produce their identity cards." The hospital insists that in the case of procedures is not perfect and cannot provide medical information.

Conflicts arise.

　　Court hospital telekinesis "at war"

A 11:50 noon, two staff members of the gulou District Court came to the hospital again and produce a new introduction. The introduction letter, retaining only a medical record number, omitted the identity of the accused.

Briefing by the gulou District Court in the hospital medical staff that provides complete procedures of the Court, the medical record should be handled. Because you have to leave work at noon time, the Medical Department promised "coordinated medical record given priority after work this afternoon. "Until 3 o'clock in the afternoon, when staff members of the Court again when he came to the medical record, they still moved to produce their identity cards, the parties dispute arose again, then left court personnel.

5:19 P.M., two staff members of the Court accompanied by two gendarmes, came to the medical records section, given to the people's Hospital of Henan province "in Kaifeng city gulou district people's Court decision", decision of Henan provincial people's Hospital, a fine of 100,000 yuan.

August 21, gulou District Court through its official micro-blog, and pointed to the hospital "unprovoked obstacles, and Dodge for no reason." Late in the day, people's Hospital of Henan Province issued a response, denied that "undue delay of 7 hours," said one, questioning the court enforcement process simple and crude, sloppy the process of decision.

　　Focus 1

　　Hospital is suspected of "deliberately delayed"?

From 11 o'clock in the morning, court staff entering the hospital evidence, until 5 o'clock in the afternoon, issued a decision, gulou District Court to obtain medical records, almost 7 hours. Court puts Hospital Department of "stalling".

In the interview with the Beijing News reporter, Henan provincial people's Hospital outreach section staff surnamed Xu denied this. She said that this statement of the Court, confusing "during the 7-hour" and "delay of 7 hours," two concepts, while two staff members came to the hospital three times, spent less than an hour in the hospital altogether. "If they come once a month, and if we can say we delay a month? ”

In national China health family planning Committee issued of medical institutions records management provides (2013 version) 20th article provides, police, and judicial, and human resources social security, and insurance and is responsible for medical accident technology identification of sector, for handle case, and law implementation professional technology identification, and medical insurance audit or arbitration, and commercial insurance audit, need, proposed audit, and check out or copy records information requirements of, handling personnel needed provides including adjustable take records of statutory proved, and handling people I effective ID ming, and Attn valid proof of material.

Hospital found that in the case of staff members of the Court do not provide an ID, not usable and xeroxing materials and disposal of hospital order.

Yesterday afternoon, the Beijing news reporters learned from the gulou District Court in Kaifeng city, Kaifeng city intermediate people's Court has accepted the hospital's application for reconsideration.

　　Focus 2

　　Courts have no fault law enforcement?

Henan provincial people's Hospital, the hospital is full of "active cooperation", instead, staff members of the Court are not uniform, refused to show identification, and interference with hospital normal working order. In the video provided in hospitals, and court staff dressed in civilian clothes emotion and unable to beat desktop.

Gulou District Court information office a staff member of the Beijing News reporter confirmed that two staff members in the video are from the hospital, which women judge men for the judicial police, earlier presented the working documents, and carrying a letter of introduction and other materials.

Staff investigation of the Court, whether in civilian dress? Lawyer with Beijing zeyong Wang Yongjie told the Beijing News reporter, in actual enforcement, uniforms are not mandatory, prior to show photo ID, dressed in civilian clothes and not inappropriate. In the course of law enforcement, hospitals have the obligation to cooperate with it. In the process, process a little procrastination of the hospital, interfere with the progress of the investigation, although it is not subjective intent, but there are also the "delay" of suspects.

However, Wang Yongjie said, according to the scene, the court staff is simple and crude, have an impact on hospital order, interfere with other patients. "In this respect, the Court at least flawed law enforcement. ”

　　Focus 3

　　Fines due compliance?

More than 3 o'clock in the afternoon on the day of the incident, court staff left the phrase "complete copies within ten minutes, otherwise fine" after leaving the hospital. 5:19 two hours later, two staff members of the Court accompanied by two gendarmes, ordered on the spot to the medical records section "decision". Hospital question, from a verbal notice to the punishment, and it took two hours, such a decision, is premature.

According to the People's Republic of China article 114th civil procedure, have an obligation to assist in the investigation, the unit performed, refuse or impede the court investigation, the main responsible person or persons can be fine. Its 115th article of unit fines, less than RMB 50,000 yuan and 1 million Yuan.

Wang Yongjie lawyer believes that in terms of penalty decisions, the Court has discretion, and no clear rules on time. "As long as the seal in the side, in fact, written decision on the issue on the spot fines are possible. "Therefore, procedurally, the Court issued the penalty notice is not illegal.

This version of interview/Beijing News reporter Wang Yu

Responsible editor: Liu Debin SN222

Article keywords:
Hospitals in District Court in Henan province

I want feedback
Save a Web page
The Beijing News

河南一区法院对省医院处罚金10万 医院发文回击|河南|区法院|省医院_新闻资讯

　　原标题：法院与医院起争执 互指对方“不配合”

河南省人民医院收到的“罚款决定书”。
视频显示，一名法院工作人员对医院工作人员表示不满。
开封市鼓楼区人民法院开具的介绍信。

　　河南开封鼓楼区法院指河南省人民医院干扰调查，处罚金十万元；医院深夜发文回击法院“决定草率”

　　因为一封并不存在的病历单，河南省人民医院和开封市鼓楼区法院“开战”了。

　　8月19日中午11点，开封市鼓楼区法院两名工作人员，来到河南省人民医院，要求核查并复印一份病历资料。而院方提出，需要查看经办的法院工作 人员身份证，遭到对方拒绝。双方随即产生争执。当天下午，开封鼓楼区法院对河南省人民医院作出了罚款十万元的处罚决定，直指医院“故意刁难”。随后，医院 方也发文回击，称法院“决定草率”。

　　对此，法律界人士表示，在该起事件中，法院存在工作方式简单粗暴等问题，而医院方面流程缓慢，虽无法确定是否故意，但也涉嫌“拖延”。目前，开封市中级人民法院已经受理了河南省人民医院的复议申请，双方将继续协调处理。

　　因“查看身份证”起争执

　　去年年底，开封市鼓楼区法院受理了一起民间借贷纠纷案件，原定今年8月份开庭。而就在开庭前夕，被告却提出，自己正在河南省人民医院进行治疗，要求延期开庭，并提供了一份病案号为001463736的病历。

　　8月19日上午11点，鼓楼区法院两名工作人员来到河南省人民医院病案室，要求根据病案号调取病历资料，并复印存档。病案室工作人员在检索了病 案号后发现，其登记的患者信息与法院要求查阅的人员并不相符。发现病案号与人员信息对不上，现场法院人员遂提出，将该病案号下的住院材料复印并带走。

　　在法院工作人员提供的介绍信中，注明了需要调取的病案号和人员姓名、身份证号等信息。在接受新京报记者采访时，河南省人民医院宣传科一名许姓工作人员称，由于病案号和身份信息并不一致，院方随后提出，在法院工作人员出示身份证，完善相关手续后，再行复印。

　　在河南省人民医院提供的视频资料中，两名身穿便装的法院工作人员情绪激动，其中一名女子不断拍打桌面，称法院办事“不需要出示身份证”。而院方则坚持，在手续不完善的情况下，无法提供病历信息。

　　冲突由此产生。

　　法院医院隔空“交战”

　　当天中午11点50分，鼓楼区法院的两名工作人员再次来到了医院，并出示了一份新的介绍信。这份介绍信中，仅保留了病案号，删去了被告人的身份信息。

　　在鼓楼区法院发布的情况通报中，医院医务处工作人员认为法院提供手续齐全，病案室应予以办理。由于此时已到中午下班时间，医务处人员答应“协调 病案室下午上班后优先办理。”到下午3点，当法院工作人员再次来到病案室时，对方依旧提出需要出示身份证，双方再次就此产生争执，法院人员随后离开。

　　下午5点19分，两位法院工作人员带领两名法警，来到病案科，向河南省人民医院下达“开封市鼓楼区人民法院罚款决定书”，决定对河南省人民医院罚款十万元。

　　8月21日凌晨，鼓楼区法院通过其官方微博发声，直指医院“无端刁难、无故推托”。当天深夜，河南省人民医院发文反击，否认“无故拖延7个小时”一说，质疑法院执法过程简单粗暴，处罚决定过程草率。

　　焦点1

　　医院是否涉嫌“故意拖延”？

　　从上午11时，法院工作人员进入医院取证，到下午5点多，下达罚款决定书，鼓楼区法院调取病历的过程，将近7个小时。法院方面据此提出，医院系“故意拖延”。

　　在接受新京报记者采访时，河南省人民医院宣传科的许姓工作人员否认了此事。她表示，法院的这一说法，混同“历时7小时”与“拖延7小时”两个概念，而两名工作人员三次来到医院，在院内一共呆了不到一个小时。“如果他们隔一个月来办理，是不是可以说我们拖延一个月？”

　　在国家中国卫生计划生育委员会颁布的《医疗机构病历管理规定（2013年版）》第二十条规定，公安、司法、人力资源社会保障、保险以及负责医疗事故技术鉴定的部 门，因办理案件、依法实施专业技术鉴定、医疗保险审核或仲裁、商业保险审核等需要，提出审核、查阅或者复制病历资料要求的，经办人员需提供包括调取病历的 法定证明、经办人本人有效身份证明、经办人本人有效工作证明等材料。

　　医院方面据此认定，在法院工作人员不提供身份证的情况下，不能调取并复印病历材料，医院的处置合乎规定。

　　昨天下午，新京报记者从开封市鼓楼区法院了解到，开封市中级人民法院已经受理了医院的复议申请。

　　焦点2

　　法院执法过程有无过错？

　　在河南省人民医院看来，院方全程“主动配合”，反倒是法院工作人员未着制服、拒绝出示身份证，并且干扰医院正常工作秩序。在医院提供的几段视频中，身着便衣的法院工作人员情绪激动，并不住拍打桌面。

　　鼓楼区法院宣传处的一名工作人员向新京报记者证实，视频中的两名工作人员，均来自该院，其中女性为法官，男性为司法警察，此前均出示了相应工作证件，并携带了介绍信等材料。

　　法院工作人员调查取证，是否可以着便装？北京泽永律师事务所律师王永杰告诉新京报记者，在实际执法中，制服并非硬性要求，由于事先出示了工作 证，穿着便装也并无不妥。在执法过程中，医院方面有配合的义务。而在此过程中，医院的流程显得有些拖沓，干扰了调查进展，尽管其并非出于主观故意，但也有 “拖延”的嫌疑。

　　不过，王永杰也表示，根据现场情况看，法院工作人员态度简单粗暴，对医院的正常秩序产生影响，干扰了其他患者就诊。“从这一方面来说，法院执法过程至少是有瑕疵的。”

　　焦点3

　　罚款是否正当合规？

　　事发当日下午3点多，法院工作人员丢下一句“十分钟内复印完毕，否则罚款”后离开医院。两个小时后的5点19分，两位法院工作人员带领两名法 警，向病案科当场下达了“罚款决定书”。医院方面据此质疑，从口头告知到处罚通知书送达，前后历时两个小时，这样的罚款决定，显得草率。

　　根据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第一百一十四条规定，有义务协助调查、执行的单位，拒绝或者妨碍人民法院调查取证的，可以对其主要负责人或者直接责任人员予以罚款。其第一百一十五条规定，对单位的罚款金额，为人民币五万元以上一百万元以下。

　　王永杰律师认为，在罚款决定方面，法院自有裁量权，对时间上并无明确规定。“只要公章在身边，实际上，当场开具罚款决定书都是有可能的。”因此，从程序上来说，法院出具的这份罚款通知书并不违规。

　　本版采写/新京报记者 王煜

责任编辑：刘德宾 SN222

文章关键词：
河南 区法院 省医院

我要反馈
保存网页
新京报