Mobile phone users encounter an imposter for card losses of 80,000 yuan, China Unicom operations compliance-China Unicom, Telecom fraud-IT information

Public Orrick (not his real name) phone cards are fake card, twice the loss after he found the exception, but are the other hanging solutions. In the meantime, his brush 88 2 credit cards stolen, total more than 80,000 yuan. It is understood that using the stolen card to save obviously forged material errors through the business card, Office personnel have been approved. At present, bei Qi Jia, Changping District concerned Unicom has yet to respond on the matter, Beijing police has accepted the case, is under further investigation.

SIM card solutions twice the loss was hung

Wang Xiang recalled on July 27 at about 1 o'clock in the afternoon, he was traveling in Shandong province, received several broken calls, and no numbers are displayed. Subsequently, Xiang Wang's cell phone signal. Orrick, feeling abnormal, immediately through a colleague's phone calls to Unicom's customer service hotline, and report this number through service in 1:26 P.M..

Orrick, viewing log log on Unicom on-line business Hall, 12 minutes later, the number being strangers hanging solution. 1:58 P.M., Orrick, again through the customer service report this number. Soon, he will not be able to log on through the number online business, login password the suspect being modified, enabled the number again to be a stranger. Mr Wang with other mobile phone to dial the number, but opposite went unanswered.

5:23 P.M. day, Xiang Wang rushed to Yantai, Shandong Unicom Business Hall, with the original identity card pay phone card. At this point, he receives a credit card notification message, "this should be the last reminder for the consumer, when I knew the card was fraudulent. ”

? Temporary card valid for more than 90 days. Proven handling identity card number is not filled in. Party photo

Two credit cards stolen brush 88

Subsequently, Xiang Wang obtained as binding to this number mobile number two credit card records found, from 1 o'clock in the afternoon to 5:23 P.M., 88 between two credit cards in 4 hours credit. A credit card is fraudulent, 37, total amount 34732.5; another credit card is fraudulent, 51, total amount 49135 Yuan. Orrick found that 4:22 P.M. day, fraudulent banks, through their mobile phone also filed a provisional line, a two-card total of 56000 credit up to 84000, final two credit cards equals 83867.5 Yuan by fraudulent, almost reached the ceiling of credit lines.

In those records, reporters found that 88 consumption through 3 different third-party online payment platform. More detailed transaction in a bank record shows that most of the money being used for mobile phone recharge, buy game card, and so on.

Xiang Wang believes that his credit card was fraudulent, Unicom operator is not the direct perpetrators, but because of its lax staff to conduct a review, as criminals offending for replacement of card business provided an opportunity, operators should bear corresponding responsibilities.

Proved to save significantly wrong are approved

Upon enquiry, this card is completed in Unicom, bei Qi Jia town, Changping District Office, and solutions through China Unicom customer service the phone twice to finish.

On July 28, Orrick, the Office learned that 1:05 P.M. the day of the incident, someone wrote the name of the temporary identity card, resident registration card, one stamped with the seal of the public security organs and a temporary ID card processing certificate, to the business Office for phone card for card business.

Issued by the reporters in the Office of integrated services in the registration form found on the photo, the business of Orrick's name in the customer name column, ID number is also consistent with his own. Working on the information in column, "that you have provided valid identity documents (document name: ID card) to apply for the card business, the original card has been revoked. "In the business stated in the notes column," customer information through the Chinese Ministry of public security, database verification of citizenship "," I promise the card number for my number. I promise is willing to shoulder the impersonation for the number card business all liabilities that may arise. ”

However, Orrick found in the certified copy of business retention, criminals use temporary ID is obviously fake, "photo is not me personally." Temporary ID is effective from July 10, 2016 on October 20, 2016. According to relevant regulations, temporary identity card for a maximum period of 3 months, "(false) above is valid for 3 months and 10 days, so obvious mistakes staff were not found. "In addition, stamped with the seal of the public security organs of the so-called temporary ID on the handle proved, does not indicate the ID number, the" real information at opening time on the operator side has reservations, how come they did not find it, it's irresponsible. ”

Mr King and his family, they reflect to the Unicom operator of the matter, the replies received was all compliance.

Yesterday afternoon, bei Qi Jia, Changping District and reporters about the Unicom business contact, but no reply had been received. At present, the Beijing police has accepted the case, is under further investigation.

用户手机遭遇冒名换卡损失8万元，中国联通：操作合规 - 中国联通,电信诈骗 - IT资讯

市民王翔（化名）的手机卡被人冒名换卡，他发现异常后两次挂失，却均被对方解挂。在此期间，他名下的2张信用卡被盗刷88笔，总额8万多元。据了解，盗卡者使用存明显错误的伪造材料通过营业厅换卡，却被营业厅人员审查通过。目前，涉事的昌平北七家联通尚未就此事做出回应，北京东城警方已受理此案，正在进一步调查中。

手机卡两次挂失均被解挂

王翔回忆称，7月27日下午1点左右，他正在山东出差，突然收到几个一接即断的来电，且均无号码显示。随后，王翔的手机信号中断。王翔感觉到异常，立即通过同事的手机拨打联通客服热线，并通过人工服务于下午1点26分挂失了该号码。

王翔登录联通网上营业厅查看操作记录，12分钟之后，该号码被陌生人解挂。下午1点58分，王翔再次通过客服挂失该号码。不久，他就无法通过该号码登录网上营业厅，登录密码疑遭修改，该号码再次被陌生人启用。王先生随即用其他手机拨打该号码，但对面无人接听。

当天下午5点23分，王翔赶到山东烟台的联通营业厅，用身份证原件补回了手机卡。此时，他收到了一条信用卡消费通知短信，“这应该是最后一次消费的提醒，当时我就知道卡肯定是被盗刷了。”

▲临时身份证有效期超过90天。证明中未填写办理人的身份证号。当事人供图

两张信用卡被盗刷88笔

随后，王翔调取了以该号码作为绑定手机号的两张信用卡消费记录发现，从下午1点到下午5点23分，两张信用卡在4个多小时间产生了88笔消费记录。其中一张信用卡被盗刷37笔，合计金额34732.5元；另一张信用卡被盗刷51笔，合计金额49135元。王翔发现，当天下午4点22分，盗刷者还通过其手机向银行申请了临时额度，将两张卡一共56000元消费额度提升至84000元，最终两张信用卡合计被盗刷83867.5元，几乎达到了信用额度的上限。

在这些记录中，记者发现，88笔消费均通过3个不同的第三方网上支付平台进行。在一份银行出具的更为详细的交易记录中显示，这些钱多数被用于手机充值、购买游戏点卡等。

王翔认为，自己的信用卡被盗刷，联通运营商虽不是直接行为人，但由于其工作人员审核不严，为不法分子违规办理换卡业务提供了可乘之机，运营商应该承担相应的责任。

证明存明显错误却通过审核

经查询，此次换卡操作是在昌平区北七家镇联通营业厅完成的，而两次解挂则通过联通客服电话完成。

7月28日，王翔在该营业厅了解到，事发当天下午1点05分，有人持写有其名字的临时身份证、常驻人口登记卡，及一张印有公安机关公章的临时身份证办理证明，到该营业厅办理手机卡换卡业务。

记者在该营业厅出具的综合业务登记单照片上发现，此次业务办理的客户名称一栏确为王翔的名字，身份证号也与他本人的一致。办理信息一栏中注明，“您已提供个人有效身份证件（证件名称：身份证）办理换卡业务，原卡已作废。”而在业务须知一栏中写明，“客户信息已通过中国公安部公民身份信息库核查”、“本人承诺此次换卡用户号码为我本人号码。本人承诺愿意承担因冒充他人办理本号码换卡业务所可能引起的一切法律责任。”

然而，王翔在营业厅留存的身份证明复印件上却发现，不法分子使用的临时身份证明显是伪造的，“照片根本不是我本人”。临时身份证上的有效期竟然为2016年7月10日至2016年10月20日。根据相关规定，临时身份证有效期最长为3个月，“（假证）上面的有效期是3个月零10天，这么明显的错误工作人员都没有发现。”此外，所谓加盖了公安机关公章的临时身份证办理证明上，也没有注明身份证号，“真实信息在开卡时候在运营商这边都有预留，他们怎么就没有发现呢，简直是太不负责任了。”

王先生及其家人表示，他们向该联通运营商反映此事后，获得的答复居然是所有操作均合规。

昨天下午，记者就此事与昌平北七家联通营业厅取得联系，但尚未获得任何答复。目前，北京东城警方已受理此案，正在进一步调查中。