Online loans are being sued for playing online games, college students fell into the bottomless pit of the loan-IT information
The morning of October 27, Nanjing's qixia District Court with students ' online loan disputes. Plaintiff holding ious told a specialist school, the repayment of 30,000 yuan. But the accused student Zhu has a deny write ious, or recognize this loan. Because of the authenticity of the ious needed further confirmation, trial adjourned after an hour.
Said in media interviews after Zhu Mouting of the defendant, he was borrowing through the Internet to play online games, but has long been connected with interest paid in excess, now meets all the arrears. In the trial, the plaintiff children complained, on July 11, introduction to his friends met college student Zhu, he borrowed 30,000 yuan to ink a tourism, both sides agreed to end of July returned, interest according to the calculation of interest on earlier loans. Child a promissory note provided to the Court is a format of the printed promissory note borrower information, amount and date and phone number are blank writing, critical information by the hand. 3% penalty agreed by the parties for the day, that is, if extended repayment, and some 900 Yuan every day need to pay liquidated damages.
The defendant argued, the IOU is not his signature, handprints above I do not know who is. Since the original case, the defendants statement of facts a fundamental difference, the Court reaffirmed the proceedings the parties must faithfully statements, not perjury or making false statements, you will need to bear the corresponding legal consequences. IOU authenticity needs further confirmation, trial adjourned after an hour.
Zhu introduced in appearing before the Tribunal, he is introduced by classmates, loan application through the network, a company has to borrow $ 50,000 for the CF and League of legends game expenses. He said that only 3000 Yuan for the first time, and soon also on, and the other does not say anything about interest rates. The next time he wants to borrow 10,000 yuan, and paid each other when he wrote to borrow $ 16,000 on the ious, and took their fees. Zhu claims to actually get their hands for the second time only 8000 Yuan. He borrowed 50,000 yuan today before and after them, then there is no money, they found in his home. This family has a total of more than 100,000 yuan for them.
Zhu said he was annoyed, because their online money is mainly used for playing online games, let the family pay more than 100,000, also has been the subject of other harassment, home was also poured over the paint. In his view, the online loan may seem simple, but very high interest on the money that he met all of the loan, is a bottomless pit.
为玩网游网上借款被诉，大学生掉进还贷无底洞 - IT资讯
10月27日上午，南京栖霞区法院审理一起大学生网上借款纠纷案。原告手持借条告一名专科在校学生，要求还款3万元。但被告的学生朱某否认写过借条，也不承认此笔借款。由于借条的真实性需进一步确认，庭审一个小时后休庭。
被告的朱某庭后接受媒体采访时表示，他确实通过网上借款玩网络游戏，但早已连本带利超额还清，现在遇上还不完的欠款了。而在庭审上，原告童某诉称，7月11日，他在朋友的介绍下认识了在校大学生朱某，他借款3万元给朱某用于旅游，双方约定7月底归还，利息按同期贷款利息计算。童某提供给法院的借条是一张打印好的格式借条，借款人信息、金额及日期和手机号码等都是填空手写，关键信息按了手印。双方将违约金约定为每天3%，即如果超期还款，朱某每天需要支付违约金900元。
被告辩称，这张借条根本不是他签字的，上面的手印也不知是何人所按。由于原被告就案件事实陈述出现根本性差异，法庭重申了诉讼中当事人必须如实陈述、不得提供伪证或进行虚假陈述，否则需要承担相应法律后果。因借条的真实性需进一步确认，审理一个小时后休庭。
朱某在庭后介绍，他是在同学的介绍下，通过网络申请借款，向一家公司先后借款5万元用于CF和英雄联盟游戏支出。他说，第一次只借了3000元，并且很快还上，对方也没有提利息的事。第二次他想借1万元，拿钱时对方让他在借条上写借款1.6万，他们还扣了手续费。朱某声称第二次实际拿到手只有8000元。他前后累计向他们借了5万元，后来没有钱还，他们就找到他家里来了。因为这事，家人一共还了10余万元给他们。
朱某表示自己很懊恼，因为自己网上借钱主要用于玩网络游戏，让家里人付出了10多万，还一直受到对方骚扰，自家门口也被泼过油漆。他认为，网上借钱看起来简单，但是这些钱利息很高，觉得自己遇到了还不清的借款，是个无底洞。