11-year old boy tour cost nearly million buying equipment, parent Tencent and 4399 corporate litigation-IT information
11-year old boy, no more than 3 days, stealing a little sent the letter envelopes swam nearly million buying equipment. The China business news reported on October 9 after, many had the same "bear a child" parents enter the huashang hotline complained of problems, a discussion for mobile games with it.
On October 17, the huashang A07, A08 edition published the hand problem and take anything to save you hand the children reported, has aroused strong repercussions in the community, with the parents through the reflect the increasing problems of their children playing hand, problems also surfaced in hand.
On October 22, the huashang invited readers of 10 callers experience. Meanwhile, invited experts on children's play and the analysis of the problems exist in the game.
On October 31, from the registration form, to prevent addiction system vulnerabilities, and then to the parents accused the game's treasure is a form of gambling, mobile game exposed many regulatory issues ... ... China business daily reported in detail yesterday.
Yesterday, this new addition to the progress. Parents of 11-year old boy said Ms Wu to sue businesses. Lawyers say such a thing everyone should do a social responsibility, offered to free agents.
Parents to sue the business money
Lintong Madam Wu will be prosecuting game companies, and carte blanche to Shaanxi Province Zhao Liangshan, a partner of a law firm lawyer.
Wu said that the morning of October 5, husband was not fit to go to the hospital for treatment. Payment and found no wallet, guess micro-payments. But a check recently found myself micro-letter envelopes sent to many, is 200 yuan per transaction. Husband wondering: no red these days? He followed by banks, that binds less bank cards in the micro-9200. Bank staff also found the money's whereabouts, Wu's husband found their own micro-payment details, it was discovered that during the 11-year old son in the early hours of October 3 to 5th, secretly seeing her husband's micro-payment password, while family members resting hand micro-consumption equipment.
Ms Wu for this thing to look for in a number of sectors, but none on the tube. She questioned the threshold for audit of game companies, but also help regulators do little and helpless.
Ms Wu to sue businesses, demanded their money back. The idea has been brewing for a long time and finally become a reality. Yesterday, Ms Wu will sue the carte blanche to the lawyer.
Lawyers today submitted a complaint
Yesterday afternoon, the China business news journalists saw two civil complaint, one sued Shenzhen Tencent computer system limited, other prosecutions 4399 network company limited. Zhao Liangshan said, is developing two complaint was because we realize, Madam Wu 11 year old son nearly spent 4 games, where "every day bright" and "Crossfire" ownership two games Shenzhen Tencent computer system limited, "Austria wonderful tales" and "line of elite" attribution 4399 network co., Ltd.
In which of a copies up complaint in the, China business reported reporter see prosecution of reason is: accused business of "every day dazzle bucket", and "through FireWire" two paragraph game, are has virtual currency trading, need user with currency purchase diamond, and not according to crowd developed warning description, and accused not perform any audit program, led to minor people can easy login and for trading, the two paragraph game violation has network game management provisional approach 16th article provides: "network game business units should according to network game of content, Function and application, develop online game users and warning instructions and prominently identified on websites and online games. Online gaming business unit shall, in accordance with the national provisions, take technical measures prohibit minors from access to inappropriate games or game features limit the gaming time of minors, prevention of minors addicted to the Internet. "And the 20th article:" online game virtual currency trading service enterprise shall comply with the following requirements: not providing trading services for minors. ”
Zhao Liangshan lawyer said, boy with its QQ, in phone Shang registered has micro-signal, in October 3 to October 5 during, through phone QQ, login has Tencent its of two paragraph game, and boy in parents not informed of situation Xia, through micro-letter paid way to two paragraph game recharge buy equipment, according to civil General 12th article, and contract method 47th article of provides, plaintiffs "high payment behavior and its age, and intelligence not phase adapted", trading behavior belongs to effectiveness pending, Now the plaintiff the plaintiff's legal representatives are not ratified deal, found between the contract, game companies should refund payment.
Zhao Liangshan said today (November 1) will submit two copies to the Lintong District Court complaint. Meanwhile, China business news reporter was informed that Zhao Liang Shan Wu agent does not charge any fees in the case. Zhao Liangshan said, this is a case of social responsibility, he also has a child, knowing that game without a good guide will bring different levels of harm to minors.
11岁男孩花费近万元买手游装备，家长欲诉
腾讯及4399公司 - IT资讯
11岁男孩，不到3天时间里，偷发微信红包近万元买手游装备。《华商报》10月9日报道此事后，不少有同样“熊孩子”的家长打入华商报热线诉说困扰，一场对于手机游戏的讨论随之展开。
10月17日，华商报A07、A08版刊发了《手游的困扰》和《拿什么拯救你沉迷手游的孩子》的报道，在社会上引起强烈反响，随着家长打热线反映自家孩子玩手游的问题的递增，手游存在的问题也浮出水面。
10月22日，华商报邀请10名打进电话的读者进行体验。同时，邀请专家对孩子们的游戏状态及游戏中是否存在的问题逐一分析。
10月31日，从实名注册的流于形式，到防沉迷系统的漏洞，再到家长指责游戏中的抽宝行为已是一种变相的赌博问题，手机游戏暴露出的诸多监管问题……华商报昨日分别进行了详细报道。
昨日，此事再添新进展。11岁男孩的家长吴女士表示要起诉游戏企业。也有律师表示，这样的事情每个人都应尽一份社会责任，提出愿意免费代理。
家长要起诉游戏企业退钱
临潼的吴女士将起诉游戏企业的事情，全权委托给了陕西某律师事务所合伙人赵良善律师。
吴女士说，10月5日早上，丈夫因身体不适去医院就诊。缴费时发现没带钱包，便想用微信支付。谁知一查竟发现最近自己微信红包发出去不少，每笔都是200元。丈夫很疑惑：这几天没发过红包啊？随后他通过银行查询，得知绑定在微信上的银行卡少了9200元。银行工作人员也查到钱的去向，让吴女士的丈夫查下自己的微信支付明细，这才发现11岁的儿子在10月3日到5日凌晨期间，偷偷看到丈夫的微信支付密码，趁家人休息时微信消费手游装备。
吴女士为此事找了不少部门，却没有一家能管得上的。她质疑游戏企业的门槛审核，也对于求助监管部门的无助而无奈。
吴女士要起诉游戏企业，要求退钱。酝酿已久的想法终于变成了现实。昨日，吴女士将起诉事宜全权委托给了律师。
律师今日将递交诉状
昨日下午，华商报记者看到了两份民事起诉状，一份是起诉深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司的，另一份是起诉四三九九网络股份有限公司的。赵良善律师说，之所以拟定两份起诉状，是因为了解到，吴女士11岁的儿子近万元花费用于4款游戏上，其中“天天炫斗”和“穿越火线”两款游戏归属深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司，“奥奇传说”和“火线精英”归属四三九九网络股份有限公司。
在其中的一份起诉状中，华商报记者看到起诉的理由是：被告经营的“天天炫斗”、“穿越火线”两款游戏，均设有虚拟货币交易，需要用户用货币购买钻石，而且未根据人群制定警示说明，并且被告未履行任何审核程序，导致未成年人可轻而易举登录并进行交易，该两款游戏违反了《网络游戏管理暂行办法》第十六条规定：“网络游戏经营单位应当根据网络游戏的内容，功能和适用人群，制定网络游戏用户指引和警示说明，并在网站和网络游戏的显著位置予以标明。网络游戏经营单位应当按照国家规定，采取技术措施，禁止未成年人接触不适宜的游戏或者游戏功能，限制未成年人的游戏时间，预防未成年人沉迷网络。”及第二十条规定：“网络游戏虚拟货币交易服务企业应当遵守以下规定：不得为未成年人提供交易服务。”
赵良善律师说，男孩用其QQ号在手机上注册了微信号，在10月3日至10月5日期间，通过手机QQ号登录了腾讯旗下的两款游戏，而且男孩在家长不知情的情况下，通过微信支付方式向两款游戏充值买装备，根据《民法通则》第十二条、《合同法》第四十七条之规定，原告“高额付款行为与其年龄、智力不相适应”，交易行为属于效力待定，现在原告的法定代理人不予追认原告的交易行为，所以认定双方消费合同无效，游戏企业应返还已付款。
赵良善表示，今日(11月1日)将向临潼区法院递交两份起诉状。同时，华商报记者获悉，赵良善为吴女士代理此案未收取任何费用。赵良善说，这是一个具有社会责任的案子，他也有孩子，深知游戏若无很好的引导，将会对未成年人带来不同程度的危害。