Xu Shiping to send an open letter: Tencent junk news more-IT news

IT information news on November 4, East this morning President and editor-in-Chief Xu Shiping sent an open letter to Ma , accusing micro letter monopoly to hurt news industry after micro-has also responded to the letter , said, because the press breakfast, public violation, penalties triggered platform.

Xu Shiping today sent an open letter, said Ma's "hand, through open channels, in circulating a note", avoiding, Xu Shiping said Tencent news and daily Express have a lot more than "19 ducks" dirty message.

Following is the full text:

Dear MA: Hello!

I am extremely reluctant, wrote the second letter.

However, your hand, through an open channel, circulated in a note. They want to explain, we of the press breakfast (xwzc021) is how rumors, and has always been so, persistent, so seven days is light. Well, if that is the case, you will review, public, we stop it.

Open letter about the penguins the ferocious power of the Empire, today millions of people forward. There are busybodies, done a lot of polling, you're busy, but can make your hands look. It certainly would help your mind and body. Enterprises, and high status, some words might not be heard. Since time immemorial, has too many examples like this. I am fond of history, Tencent micro also has a number called "rereading history", free advice. There is no sentiment, look at your good fortune.

Thank you very much your team, in a very short period of time, to write this interesting "notes". I'm thinking, if your team made of the press breakfast (xwzc021) decides it's time for seven days, or we can write a note after the complaint to us, I'm sure will be very moving. Your excellent user awareness. I also believe that if the app team, cattle coax with "button" treated rudely when numerous media and agencies, as well as ordinary users, users can also have awareness, everyone will appreciate, Xie Zhulong grace. However, no. That's why online surveys have many complaints to you.

If I remember correctly, Tencent years come across many similar events. Cognition, and the public is the same. That is Tencent's Bull, defying criticism my way. In a Word, I have always been right, you I? Ma you can remember to ask your men. This note is Tencent nature of exposure, evading death promises, evaded him.

In my first open letter, referring to article 19 ducks. I did, when we integrate sources of articles, are defective, also has problems, not begs the question, is our medium basic professionalism. In this connection, you can see, we give you a formal letter. We also have reviews of places, hoping to strengthen management in the future. So, I wrote an open letter, not protecting their own short, emotional.

In particular, I'd like to reiterate, my letter was a three-point demand. First, it wants to treat media Tencent official certification of the public, when not simplistic, don't be in a rush, after all we are the media, on behalf of a body is not one that is not organizations. Problem is, you ask your men to deal with such a thing, what people deal with it?, Mr Chen is my friend, he has a Word, I was very moved, he said, deal with, at least a little bit of prudence, not a Vice President, has decided to give a body to deal with?! 2nd, also wants national authorities to pay attention to preventing Tencent dominate in multimedia, effects of media ecology and the environment. 3rd, and fundamentally, hope that the national authorities concerned, preventing Tencent no valuation and price, looting of public resources. These three points, I want to say. If your hands, there is a certain level of text, you should understand it. Otherwise, you will have to pay wages, it is bad.

OK, now back to this late instructions. This note, 19 ducks around, pounce, intention is clear. You are the media, should have high demand, not rumor rumor, and we are fair, equal treatment and so on. Your team is too general, but the intentions are bad. You are simply trying to incite ordinary netizens to dissatisfaction with the Government-run media, you Oriental NET what? you? do you have? you don't want to follow the rules? this is not a very good approach. So, you can't blame me, say you're welcome.

Your description, a total of four points. I have a question, don't know if you and your team can reply to me. I have some big claims, please help. First, who reported the press breakfast (xwzc021), can provide reporting data or marks. Second, you gave which tripartite bodies (this I know) finds that? please give their written confirmation. Tencent claims to be a large company, I don't think these two are difficult. You this information, and can publish it? I am looking forward to. Note, has repeatedly used for institutions such as people's daily, people's daily online. Indeed, this trick works very well also give you courage. However, I just want to know that this time, what body? was involved in the review of the press breakfast (xwzc021), and made a decision for seven days. Or are you simply did not like a person, by means of technology, buttons, knife under it? if so, China's media scene is too dangerous. Our media, it was a bunch of rude algorithm determines, and is your company's algorithm. If that's the case, you're out. We have decided not to play with you. In this connection, please reply.

In addition, Tencent said rules and standards, has always been someone else's. I have a claim, can we also commissioned a third party organization devoted to investigating Tencent, owned by your news and letters every day. The two so-called great AP every day than "19 ducks" dirty message. If you want, I can give you 100 every day, if you don't want to, I can also provide to the Department concerned. You want to take your chances? sometimes, I naively thought your company on the market, but also social responsibility, but reality is not so. See BS that comes out the short article, eating people Tencent stinky feet, really a lot. I know you have money, money makes the world go around. In this connection, I'm not worried, after all, they are taking money, not firm. Instead, I'm different. I was a person, a pen, challenging Tencent, and reconciliation, ready to fight to the end.

I never like to make trouble, and professional practice and ethics, made me understand that media with dignity, news personality. No one wants to in an unreasonable, but unilaterally "algorithms" under the rules of life. You're the it person, you probably don't understand. If you think a company, powerful platform can bully, you mistake was wrong. I recommend you read a history of journalism in China, series of my teacher, Mr Fang Hanqi, you must look at. See, back again and see what I wrote two letters, you'll understand.

Wish you all the best.

President, editor of the East East headlines editor-in-Chief Xu Shiping

Tencent micro-text of the official response to the letter in the following figure:

徐世平再发公开信：腾讯垃圾新闻更多 - IT资讯

IT资讯讯 11月4日消息，今天早上东方网总裁、总编辑徐世平发出一封致马化腾的公开信，指责微信垄断伤害新闻行业，之后微信也对此做出了回应，称封号是因为《新闻早餐》公众号多次违规，触发平台处罚机制。

今天下午徐世平再发公开信，称马化腾的“手下，通过公开的渠道，到处在散发一份说明”，避重就轻，另外徐世平还称腾讯新闻和天天快报有很多比“19元鸭子”更脏的信息。

以下为全文：

尊敬的马化腾先生：你好!

我极不情愿，写二封公开信。

但是，你的手下，通过公开的渠道，到处在散发一份说明。他们想说明，我们的《新闻早餐》(xwzc021)是如何的造谣成性，而且一贯如此、屡教不改，所以，封七天都是轻的。好吧，果真如此，你们就报再审一次，把我们的公众号停了吧。

有关企鹅帝国的狰狞威权的公开信，今天被无数人转发。也有好事者，做了不少的民调，你很忙，但是，可以让你的手下去看看。这对你的身心肯定有帮助的。企业做大了，地位高了，有些话就不一定听得到了。古往今来，类似的例子太多了。我是喜欢历史的，在腾讯微信也有一个公号，叫“重读历史”，有空建议去看看。有无感悟，看你的造化了。

非常感谢你手下的团队，在很短的时间里，写出这一份有意思的“说明”。我在想，如果你的团队，在做出《新闻早餐》(xwzc021)封号七天的决定的时候，或者说我们在申诉后就能写这一份说明给我们，我肯定会非常感动。感动你们出色的用户意识。我也相信，如果微信团队，牛哄哄地以“按钮方式”粗暴地对待众多媒体和机构、以及普通网友的时候，也能有这样的用户意识，大家都会感激你们的，谢主隆恩了。但是，没有。这也是网上调查对你们有众多不满的原因了。

如果我没有记错，腾讯这些年，碰到过许多类似的事件。有一点认知，社会公众都是相同的。这就是腾讯很牛，向来不畏人言，我行我素。一句话，老子从来就是对的，你奈我何?马先生你有记性，去问问你的手下。这一份说明，也是腾讯本质的大暴露，避重就轻，死不认帐，顾左右而言他。

我在第一封公开信中，就提到19元鸭子的文章。我说了，我们在整合来源文章的时候，有瑕疵，也有问题，不回避问题，是我们媒体人的基本职业素养。这一点，你们可以看看，我们给你们的正式信件。我们也有检讨的地方，希望今后加强管理。因此，我写公开信，并不是护自己的短，意气用事。

我特别想同你重申一下，我公开信是有三点诉求的。第一，希望腾讯对待有媒体官方认证的公众号的时候，不要简单化，不要轻率，毕竟我们也是媒体，代表一家机构，并不是一个没有组织的个人。问题是，你问问你的手下，处理这样的事，是什么人在处理呢?陈彤先生是我朋友，他有一句话，我很感动的，他说，处理机构的号，至少要慎重一点，不能一个副班长，就决定把一家机构给处理了吧?!第二点，也希望国家主管部门引起重视，防止腾讯凌架于众多媒体之上，影响媒体生态和新闻环境。第三点，也是根本的，希望国家主管部门关心，防止腾讯没有估值和对价，掠夺公共数据资源。这三点，才是我想说的话。如果你的手下，有一定的文字水平，应该看得明白。否则，你付的工资，那就可惜了。

好吧，现在回到这份迟到的说明书。这份说明，围绕19只鸭子，大做文章，意图是清楚的。你们是媒体，应该有高要求，不能传谣造谣，而且我们是公平的，一视同仁等等。你的团队，文字太一般，但意图很恶劣。你们无非是想挑动普通网友对官办媒体的不满，你东方网怎么了?你有关系?你有地位?就可以不守规则了?这不是有很善意的做法。所以，你也别怪我，说活不客气。

你们的说明，一共四点。我有一个疑问，不知道你和你的团队能不能回复我。我有一些重大的诉求，请你帮忙。第一，是谁举报了《新闻早餐》(xwzc021)，可不可以提供举报的数据或者痕迹。第二，你们交给了哪一个每三方机构(这是我特别知道的)做出的认定?请给出他们的书面的认定书。腾讯号称是一家大数据的公司，我想这二条都不难吧。你这些信息，能不能公布呢?我很期待。说明中，一再用人民日报、人民网这样的机构来说事。确实，这一招很管用，也很给你们壮胆。但是，我只想知道，这一次，是什么机构?参与审核了《新闻早餐》(xwzc021)的内容，并做出了封号七天的决定。还是你们根本就没有具象的人，用技术的手段，按钮的方式，就下刀子了了呢?如果这样，中国的媒体生态就太危险了。我们的媒体地位，就被一堆粗鲁的算法决定着，而且是你腾讯的算法。如果真是这样，算你狠。我们决定不跟你们玩了。这一点，也请你回复。

另外，腾讯所说的规则和标准，从来就是针对别人的。我有一个诉求，可不可以我们也委托一个第三方机构，专门调查一下你旗下的腾讯新闻和天天快报。这两个号称很牛的AP，每天有多少比“19元鸭子”更脏的信息。你如果愿意，我每天可以给你提供一百条，如果你不愿意，我可也可以提供给有关部门。你想试试吗?有时候，我很天真，以为你们公司上市了，也有社会责任了，可是真实情形并不如此。看看短时间冒出来的骂娘的文章，啃腾讯臭脚的人，还真不少。我知道你们有钱，有钱可使鬼推磨。这一点，我不担心，毕竟他们都是拿钱的，不会坚定。相反，我不同。我就一个人，一支笔，挑战腾讯，而且不和解，准备战斗到底。

我从来不是喜欢闹事的人，职业习惯和新闻道德，让我明白，媒体有尊严，新闻人有人格。没有人愿意在一种不讲道理、而且是单方面制定的“算法”规则下生活。你是it人士，你或许是弄不明白的。你如果以为，一家企业，有实力有平台就可以横行霸道，那你就大错特别错了。我推荐你看一本中国新闻传播史，我的老师方汉奇先生编的，你一定要看。看明白了，再回过去看看我写的两封信，你就会明白的。

祝好。

东方网总裁总编辑、东方头条总编辑徐世平

下图是腾讯微信官方回应的原文：