Beijing beiyuan road 7 vehicle collision accident in a row do you be deceived | traffic accidents _ news

Not only are we in for a lost life, sorry, but felt sorry for move was challenged to defend the truth.

Dang rumors appeared Shi, official not positive response was understanding for insider heavy, dang official after number day survey clarified zhihou, is and was questioned for clarified of this a initiatives behind still Insider heavy, anyway, this moment believes many people of inside is crash of, because everyone are has not know how to "meet" individual users of needs, to response all so-called of questioned has.

With the development of new media, a growing number of "opinion leader", "net red v", with various types of network platform proliferation of negative emotions, critical mood spreading on the network, blind suspicions and negation, always wears tinted glasses reading and observation of social phenomena, even proud of this, demagogy. But in real life, but do not care about the people and things around, no enthusiasm, indifferent and hang. Violation or a crisis situation cannot stand up, lack of social responsibility, social coldness, depression.

After the incident, the driver, and the suspect has been involved, the media also reported openly on this. Not as some netizens think that, the news was "frozen" and "deep". Of course, there is some doubt on the details, but I believe that as the case enters under the statutory procedure, these details will be gradually clear, restored. Online about this matter many rumours, baseless conjecture should be quiet for the time being, after all, the network environment and illegal land, everyone should be responsible for their words and deeds, that includes reality and the network.

　　Belated notification?

Present development of the incident, was not informed of late. But after a traffic accident, actually today's media reports there had been a preliminary briefing. CCTV later reported on the matter involved suspects also had a mirror made a presentation. Subsequently, believes the official investigation and trial in accordance with legal procedure began. Has today published the bulletin, it is because too many unfounded rumors online woes, starting on the identity of the persons involved rumors, speculation and so on against deleting rumors circulating on the Internet, safe Beijing, precisely in order to clarify these baseless conjecture, issued a statement again. This notification is not late, but at the very time period, an explanation of the matter, netizens in order to obtain an objective, rational and independent judgment, and not let the truth be with many rumors on the Internet. In fact, Beijing peaceful small series, was carried out in most of the comments on this response.

　　Delete shady?

After the accident, newspapers, TV, Twitter, micro-letter on this matter was reported, some also carry a live webcast of the media, I do not know from where the user infers the "controlled media" speech. Secondly, users as reflected in the "delete event", it is because many rumors on the Internet, in order to prevent adverse effects of rumors spread to the whole of society, related site these rumors have to be cleaned up and removed. Clean up Internet rumors. Rumor rumor after all, eventually to be broken to dust. This requires the joint efforts of the whole society. Believe that no one would face a full emotional, walking conspiracy, a miasma of network environments.

　　Extremely light penalty?

First, the crime sentencing, we handed over to the Court, police currently has according to the accident of the most significant features, appropriate measures are taken against suspects involved. According to the current description is based on traffic accident crime suspects detained by the police. Whether the final sentence how, even after the public prosecutor's Office, and upon conviction by the Court. Therefore only publish punishment orthodontic light speech, is too childish. According to article 133th of the Penal Code, violation of traffic regulations and major accident, resulting in serious injury, death, or heavy losses of public or private property, to three years ' imprisonment or criminal detention after causing traffic accident escape or other adverse circumstances, be sentenced to imprisonment between three to seven years; causing death due to escaping, liable to up to seven years in prison. According to China's criminal law, the establishment of any kind of crime must have four elements, namely criminal object, the objective aspects of crime, crime subject and crime subjective. Traffic accident crime and key points of difference between the crime of endangering public security by dangerous methods is, if deliberately driving ways, intentionally killed hurt many people in public places, should decide the crime of endangering public security by dangerous methods. In addition, the intentional use of driving kills, injures or specific people, be convicted and punished on charges of murder, intentional injury. Combined with the circumstances of the case, suspects in crimes of causing traffic to be processed for the time being, in the performance of statutory procedures for scientific rigor.

　　Rational

Another traffic accident, a tragedy of lives gone, rumors of individuals on the Internet hype, tug of war into a rumor with the truth game. This is the case, many users of justice are deplorable. The good news is, in the face of rumors still has many independent-minded users, issued their own rational remarks.

With the development of new media technologies, micro-blogging, micro-circle of friends or even live video popular, virtual, not take legal responsibility, open space is an instant, real life long repressed the most primitive human animal attributes, in the so-called public opinion gathered one by one on the outbreak, gave them the so-called injustices of Yap. This wild and full of contagious blindness and anger, is essentially the citizen in the most cool-headed and the most objective and rational State of law, be naked and torn and trampled on. Malicious interference, sanctions against others, unauthorized disclosure of personal privacy and frequently questioned the ethics of the law enforcement agency or any person, benighted with exaggerated eyeballs, these should be rejected by society.

Responsible editor: Wei chun

Article keywords:
A car accident

I want feedback
Save a Web page
Global times

北京北苑路7车连续碰撞的事故真相 你被欺骗了吗|交通事故_新闻资讯

　　我们不仅是在为一条逝去的生命而惋惜，而且是为捍卫真相的举措被质疑而感到惋惜。

　　当谣言出现时，官方不正面回应被理解为内幕重重，当官方经过数日调查澄清之后，却又被质疑为澄清的这一举措背后仍然内幕重重，总之，这一刻相信不少人的内心是崩溃的，因为大家都已经不知道如何才能“满足”个别网友的需求，去回应种种所谓的质疑了。

　　随着新媒体的发展，越来越多的“意见领袖”、“网红大V”，借助各类网络平台扩散负面情绪，网络上批判情绪的蔓延，盲目的怀疑和否定，总是带着有色眼镜的解读、观察社会现象，甚至以此为荣，哗众取宠。反而在现实生活中，却又对身边的人和事不关心、不热情，事不关己高高挂起。面对违法违纪行为或者紧急危难情境不能挺身而出，缺乏社会责任感，处世冷淡、消沉。

　　事件发生之后，肇事司机、涉案嫌犯便已经被控制，各媒体也曾经对此进行了公开的报道。并不像某些网友想象的那样，这条新闻被“雪藏”“深埋”。诚然，此次事件的细节上尚有一些疑点，但相信随着案件进入根据法定程序的开展，这些细节会得到逐渐的理清、还原。网上关于此事的诸多谣言、毫无根据的主观臆测是否也应该暂时安静一下，毕竟网络环境并非法外之地，每个人都应该为自己的言行负责，这种言行包括现实社会和网络。

　　迟来的通报？

　　事件发展至今，并不是通报迟来。而是一起交通事故之后，实际上当日的媒体报道中便已经有了初步的通报。随后央视也对此事进行了报道，涉案的嫌疑人也已经出镜介绍了情况。随后，相信官方肯定已按照法定程序开始进行调查取证和审理。之所以会在今天发布这则通报，则是因为网上太多毫无根据的谣言接连出现，开始对涉案者身份的谣传、对删帖行为的臆测等等传言在网络上流传，平安北京正是为了澄清这些无中生有的主观臆测，才再次发布声明。这则通报并非迟到，而是在非常及时的时期，对此事进行解释，以期得到网友们客观、理性、独立的判断，而不是让真相被网上的诸多谣言带偏。其实，平安北京的小编，在网友的评论中也对此进行了回应。

　　删帖的黑幕？

　　一起交通事故之后，报纸、电视台、微博、微信都对此事进行了报道，有的媒体还进行了现场网络直播，不知网友从何处推断出了“控制媒体报道”的言论。其次，针对网友所反映的“删帖事件”，也正是因为网上的谣言众多，为了防止谣言扩散带给全社会的不良影响，相关网站的运营方才会对这些谣言进行清理和删除。清理网络谣言。谣言终究是谣言，最终还是要被破除归于尘埃。这需要全社会的共同努力。相信谁也不愿意面对一个充满情绪化、散步阴谋论、乌烟瘴气的网络环境。

　　畸轻的处罚？

　　首先，量罪定刑的事，咱们还是交给法院，警方目前已经根据这起车祸最显著的特点，对涉案嫌疑人采取了相应的措施。根据目前的描述，警方是以交通肇事罪将嫌犯刑事拘留。究竟最终的量刑如何，还要经过检察院公诉、法院审判后定罪。因此仅仅在此就发布处罚畸轻的言论，是太过幼稚的。根据刑法第一百三十三条规定，违反交通运输管理法规，因而发生重大事故，致人重伤、死亡或者使公私财产遭受重大损失的，处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役；交通运输肇事后逃逸或者有其他特别恶劣情节的，处三年以上七年以下有期徒刑；因逃逸致人死亡的，处七年以上有期徒刑。根据中国刑法理论，任何一种犯罪的成立都必须具备四个方面的构成要件，即犯罪客体、犯罪客观方面、犯罪主体和犯罪主观方面。所以交通肇事罪与以危险方法危害公共安全罪的区别要点是，如果故意使用驾车撞人的方法，在公共场所故意撞死撞伤多人的，应定以危险方法危害公共安全罪。另外，故意使用驾车的方式杀害、伤害特定人的，以故意杀人罪、故意伤害罪定罪处罚。结合此案的情况，暂时以交通肇事罪对嫌犯进行处理，是在履行严谨科学的法定程序。

　　应有的理性

　　一场交通肇事、一个生命离去的悲剧，在网上个别人的谣传炒作中，转化成了一场谣言与真相博弈的拉锯战。出现这种情况，让不少心存正义的网友感到可悲可叹。所幸的是，面对谣言仍然有不少独立思考的网友，发出了自己理性的言论。

　　随着新媒体技术的发展，微博、微信朋友圈甚至视频直播风靡起来，虚拟的、不用担负法律责任的言论空间被瞬间撑开，现实生活中长久被压抑的最原始人类动物属性，在一个又一个所谓的民意聚集点上爆发，恶狠狠地向它们所谓的不公之处狂吠。这种狂热而又富有传染性的盲从和愤怒，实质上是对公民在最冷静、最客观、最理性的状态下产出的法律，予以赤裸裸的蹂躏和践踏。恶意干涉、制裁别人，擅自公开个人隐私和动辄质疑执法机关或当事人的道德，夸大其词地管窥蠡测以求眼球效应，这些行为应当被全社会所唾弃。

责任编辑：隗俊

文章关键词：
交通事故

我要反馈
保存网页
环球时报