App friends canvassing army flood: two cents a piece-IT information
"Please vote for me and forwarded! "Near the end, annual selection to face, in the face of Twitter friend circle from time's request to vote, some users worry that disclosing privacy, some netizens think they can" paint "and" voting "is not fair. In this regard, the municipal people's Congress Meng fanying, suggested that electoral units organized in networks, micro letter before the vote, should fully assess the necessity and fairness. In addition, stringent voting rules, and network management, avoiding speculative operations.
People experiencing
But for the canvassing becomes advertising
People wearing Lady Xuan Xuan, the son of school first grade this year, summer, she had seen kindergarten classes organized by a training agency courses, public information. As long as forwards the application, in the circle of friends the child and called on family and friends to vote, votes the top 3 children will have free classes. 4th to 10th place varying degrees of tuition are available.
Wear ladies get this information go to the family and friends, started everybody vote. That evening, Xuan Xuan tickets has reached the three-figure, wearing a red hair Lady is pleased to give the Group thank you. The next day, the votes of the other children are also catching up. Wear the woman immediately asked girlfriends sister and transfer the information to your circle of friends, launched friends of friends continued to vote, finally, Xuan Xuan has received a total of more than 400 votes. But Ms rangdai didn't expect is that final votes have all broken the top 10 thousand.
"It takes more than strong relationships! "Wearing women's inferiority complex as well as reaction from their pay packets to training institutions to advertise on a free flow. Soon after, one after the '90 ' new colleague told her that votes defeating is not difficult, Internet has specialized in brush business, the cheapest ticket 0.1 Yuan, 500 tickets for only 50 Yuan.
Worried friends help-fear of disclosure of information
White collar small Cedar circle of friends fresh style, has been dominated by books, film, music, and picture. But recently, her circle of friends is forwarding requests by friends and family to vote and "hijacked". "Last month was a nephew named MoE baby, last week voted for a colleague's beautiful short cat. Yesterday, the highest rated college classmate's father to the most dedicated employees. "Small said, some polling day only cast one vote, can then vote the next day. "Once a friend every day to remind me to vote than clocks. Some polling also showed that will get my photos and other information, I don't know if this will give privacy ". Rather than tired, little is more worrying.
Questioned whether Lottery trick
In addition to voting, citizen King, cast doubt on Twitter sweepstakes micro-letter. He said that in order to increase the amount of reading, at present many public and fans, have sprung up in the lottery. Some government departments send tickets, or tickets to the public, some enterprises and institutions, the public sent trial product, some popular personal public sent out promotional advertising products. These lucky draw prizes small movie tickets, large jewelry, but high and low alike, derived from free will let users move. They are in accordance with the requirements, or to forward the information to your circle of friends, or to fill in personal information, or participate in, public interactions. "Although the public, will announce the list of winners, but they draw do you have a trick? Is the platform behind the random, still has the designation? These sweepstakes, whether notarization? Being monitored? "Some netizens questioned.
Press enquiries
"The Navy" two cents
Beijing morning news reporters in the search for "brush" and realised that the relevant public, they leave the Web site, telephone, app, contacts, claims to have 100,000, some public army manual, one-hour record of 1.3 million votes cast. Reporters in Taobao search "brush" page display "according to relevant laws and regulations and policies cannot be displayed ' brush ' the baby." But for the keyword "vote" after searching, a lot of claims of "champion" team of vote, voting for character selection and other activities, also played "get 10 tickets into the shop," "my first" slogan. Reporters asked the price of several shops, the store said, General activity is 0.2 Yuan, 100 votes cast, concrete activities more difficult.
Meanwhile, Taobao have to sell Twitter account stores, claims that 1 you can buy 12 to vote account, account no forwarding, commenting features, just to vote. Some shops also operate public, fans, artificial reading of the business.
Representative suggested
Internet voting should assess the fairness
At the beginning of this year at the national people's Congress in Beijing, municipal people's Congress Meng fanying, is presented on the strengthening of the network, micro-vote management recommendations. Meng fanying, now through the Internet voting or of votes to judge people and became popular. From the "good character" to "cute baby", then to "cute pet competition for", it seems that only through Internet voting in order to separate the high and low, fair. However, in many cases, Internet voting is not one person, one vote, but by network brush votes, votes not voters, but will operate brush. Browser search for "micro-brush" you can see many links provided brush or operation of the software.
Meng fanying, told the Beijing morning news reporter, she experienced two similar situations. At the end of last year, the city had a "good doctor around" award, need to vote for the winner. Notification message will be sent out shortly after, colleagues and strangers give her a call, and even came to their door, asking whether you want to brush. There is a "named Meng Chong" competition, her vote and many friends to help a friend, friend's pet votes ahead. But at the near end of voting crucial moment, Meng Chong votes by several friends from behind a fierce shot, eventually won.
Meng fanying, said fair vote if only commercial operations, attract popular regardless of right and wrong, but use the Internet to vote to make a decision, it may appear inconsistent with the realities of his own mistakes, to award social good example, good character but also unfair and true. To this end, Meng fanying, suggested that one electoral unit in organizing networks, micro letter before the vote, should fully assess the need, fairness and representativeness. Second, strict voting rules and the network management model, anomalies in the polling process, avoiding speculative operations. Third, establish a hotline or contact and facilitate public supervision report.
Department response
Government Web site:
Will take measures to prevent brush technology
Meng fanying, representatives said the letter in reply, call for public opinion is divided into municipal government levels, the Board and the district autonomous business two types of work. Among them, the various committees and the district collection is mainly composed of independent organization this unit conducts, not city planning. Collection channels, divided into Web site, social networking site collaboration, mobile terminal such as micro-multi-sync publications.
Municipal information Commission is a window on the capital operation and Management Center of higher authorities, window on the capital increase in content publishing and rule management, the establishment of a unified user management system, online voting monitoring system, preventing malicious brush, configure IP voting rights.
Meng fanying, representative of the "brush" problem of capital window focus on network technology opinion collection of quality and efficiency. Including qualified IP, limited cookie, set the validation code and other means of preventing brush, particularly significant voting using identity confirmation vote, mobile phone Gets the CAPTCHA validation options for further strengthening the anti-brushing.
Next, the relevant departments will strengthen the analysis of social conditions and public opinion, data filtering collection topics, organized network, suggested that the Government institutions in the micro letter before the vote, should fully assess the need, fairness and representativeness of purifying the interactive environment, developing progressive collection and judging activities against meaningless awards and voting. Municipality on the Committee told the Beijing morning news reporter, a staff member, reply to vote is related to social conditions and public opinion against Government Web sites, and other commercial websites or network platform as well as voting by territorial management and Department management.
Business networking platforms:
Internet voting is no clear management
Municipal network Office, a staff member told the Beijing morning news reporter, there is currently no legislation aimed specifically at Internet voting terms and conditions. But the content of the Internet voting can be based on other laws that extend the management to, such as in the administration of Internet news information services provisions, does not allow commercial websites original political content, so that voting is not related to the content. Commercial network station or involve vulgar, and so on. In addition, the site should be from a technical perspective and rules to prevent voting behavior brush votes in.
微信朋友圈拉票水军泛滥:投票两毛钱一张 - IT资讯
“请帮我投票并转发!”临近岁末,各种年度评选迎面而来,面对微博朋友圈内隔三差五的投票请求,有的网友担心泄露隐私,有的网友认为可以“刷票”的“投票”并不公平。对此,市人大代表孟凡建议,选举单位在举办网络、微信投票前,应该充分评估必要性及公平性。另外,要制定严格的投票规则和网络管理模式,避免出现投机操作的情况。
市民经历
无奈替儿拉票反成打广告
市民戴女士的儿子煊煊今年开学上一年级,暑假时,她看到某家培训机构开办幼小衔接班课程的公众号信息。只要给孩子报名、在朋友圈转发并号召亲朋好友投票,票数前3名的孩子将可免费上课。第4至10名也可获得不同程度的学费减免。
戴女士赶紧把这条信息转到各个家庭群和朋友群,发动大家帮忙投票。当天晚上,煊煊的票就达到了三位数,戴女士高兴地给群里发红包感谢大家。第二天,另外几个孩子的票数也直追上来。戴女士立马请闺蜜和妹妹将信息转到朋友圈,发动朋友的朋友继续投票,最后煊煊共收到了400多票。但是让戴女士没想到的是,最终前10名的票数竟然全都破千。
“这得需要多强大的人际关系!”戴女士自叹不如的同时也反应过来,自己倒贴红包给培训机构打了免费流动广告。不久后,一位‘90后’的新同事告诉她,票数过千并不难,网上有专门从事刷票业务的,最便宜的一张票0.1元,500张票才50元。
担忧帮友投票恐泄露信息
白领小楠的朋友圈风格清新,一直被书籍、影评、音乐和美图占据。不过近来,她感觉朋友圈快被亲朋好友的投票和转发请求“绑架”了。“上个月是侄子评选萌宝宝、上周为同事的美短猫咪投票。昨天,大学同学的老爸要评选最敬业员工。”小楠说,有的投票当天仅限投一票,第二天可以接着投。“有一次朋友每天定点提醒我投票,比上班打卡还准。一些投票还提示,将获取我的照片等信息,我不知道这样是否会泄露隐私”。比起厌倦,小南更多的是担忧。
质疑抽奖环节是否有猫腻
除了投票,市民王先生对微信微博中的抽奖也表示怀疑。他说,目前很多微信公众号为了增加阅读量和粉丝,纷纷设置了抽奖环节。有的政府部门公众号送景区门票或者演出票,有的企事业单位公众号送试用产品,有的热门私人公众号送出了广告产品做宣传。这些抽奖的奖品小到电影票,大到珠宝首饰,但无论贵贱,免费所得难免会让网友心动。他们按照要求,或是将信息转发到朋友圈、或是填写个人信息,或是参加公众号互动。“虽然公众号也会公布获奖名单,但这些抽奖有猫腻吗?到底是平台后方随机抽出,还是已有指定人选?这些抽奖是否有公证?是否被监管?”有网友质疑。
记者调查
“水军”投票两毛钱一张
北京晨报记者在微信中搜索“刷票”,发现不少相关公众号,它们留下了网站、电话、微信等联系方式,有些公众号声称具有10万水军人工票,有一小时投130万票的记录。记者在淘宝网搜索“刷票”,页面显示“根据相关法律法规和政策,无法显示‘刷票’的相关宝贝”。但换了关键词“投票”后,搜出了不少声称“冠军”的投票团队,表示可以为人物评选等活动投票,还打出“进店送10票”、“稳拿第一”等广告语。记者询问了几家店铺价格,店家称,一般活动是0.2元一票,100票起投,具体看活动链接难度。
同时,淘宝中也有出售微博账号的店铺,声称1元可以买到12个用于投票的账号,账号没有转发、评论功能,只是为了投票。一些店铺还同时经营公众号粉丝、人工阅读量的生意。
代表建议
网络投票应评估公平性
在今年年初的北京人代会上,市人大代表孟凡提出了《关于加强对网络、微信投票管理的建议》。孟凡称,现在通过网络投票或微信投票评价人和事成了热门方式。从“优秀人物”到“可爱宝宝”再到“萌宠争夺”,似乎只有经过网络投票才能分出高低、体现公平。然而在很多情况下,网络投票不是一人一票,而是靠网络刷票,得高票的往往不是投票人多,而是会操作刷票。浏览器中搜索“微信刷票”可以看到很多链接,提供刷票软件或操作。
孟凡告诉北京晨报记者,她就亲身经历过两次类似的情况。去年年底,本市有个“身边好医生”的评选,需要投票选出获奖者。通知消息发出去后没多久,就有陌生人直接给她和同事打电话,甚至来到她们办公室门口,询问是否需要刷票。还有一次是个“评选萌宠”的比赛,她和众多好友帮助一位朋友投票,朋友家的爱宠票数遥遥领先。但就在临近投票末期的关键时刻,几位网友的萌宠票数突然从后位猛蹿上来,最终获得名次。
孟凡说,投票如果只是商业运作、吸引人气尚可不论是非,但用网络投票作决策,就可能出现与现实状况不符的失策,用来评选社会优秀榜样、优秀人物也会有失公平和真实。为此,孟凡建议,一是选举单位在举办网络、微信投票前,应该充分评估必要性、公平性及代表性。二是制定严格的投票规则和网络管理模式,监察投票过程中的异常情况,避免出现投机操作的情况。三是设立举报热线或联络方式,便于公众监督举报。
部门回复
政务网站:
会采取防刷票技术
市经信委在答复孟凡代表意见时表示,政府部门民意征集可分为市级、各委办局与区自主业务两类工作。其中,各委办局与区自主组织的征集工作主要由本单位自发进行,尚未全市统筹。征集渠道方面,分为政府网站发布、社会网站合作、移动端如微信等多端同步发布。
市经信委是首都之窗运行管理中心的上级主管单位,首都之窗在内容发布与规则管理方面加大力度,建立了统一用户管理系统、网上投票的监控系统,防止恶意刷票、配置IP投票权限。
针对孟凡代表提出的“刷票”问题,首都之窗注重通过技术手段保障网络民意征集工作的质量和效率。使用包括限定IP、限定cookie、设置验证码等手段防止刷票,对于特别重大的投票工作采用身份证实名投票、手机获取验证码验证等方式进一步加强防刷票力度。
下一步,有关部门将加大了解分析社情民意,数据筛选征集主题,建议政府事业单位在举办网络、微信投票前,应该充分评估必要性、公平性及代表性,净化互动环境,开展积极向上的征集和评选活动,抵制无意义评选与投票。市经信委一位工作人员告诉北京晨报记者,回复针对的是涉及社情民意的政府网站投票,另外一些商业网站或者网络平台的投票等,则由属地网管和相关部门管理。
商业网络平台:
网络投票无明文管理
市网信办一位工作人员告诉北京晨报记者,目前没有专门针对网络投票的法规和条款。但网络投票的内容可以依据其他法律可以延伸管理到,比如《互联网新闻信息服务管理规定》中,不允许商业网站原创时政内容,那么投票也不能做相关内容。商业网站投票也不能涉及低俗等内容。另外,网站应该从技术层面和规则层面防止投票中的刷票行为。