Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)
published in(发表于) 2016/11/30 7:26:18
Hebei police respond to police entrapment: not true

English

中文

Hebei police respond to police entrapment: not true (figure) traffic police | | | Hebei _barcode fishing law enforcement news

> Flow velocimeter parked near a police car, police did not conduct covert speed. Zhang Pengxiang photography

CNS, Xingtai, November 30 (reporters Zhang Pengxiang and Li Tiechui)-network platform reflects the "ping Xiang police entrapment", a Pingxiang County of Hebei province traffic Police Brigade Deputy team leader Wang Chien-shien, 30th responded that after this thing spreading through the network, attracted great attention Pingxiang County Public Security Bureau, promptly entrust the Commission for discipline inspection and supervision departments to investigate. The investigation, reflected on the Internet platform "ping Xiang police entrapment" is not true, the flow velocity measuring point in line with relevant provisions of China's Ministry of public security and Hebei provincial public security department.


25th, is a "ping Xiang police entrapment" message stick on the ground, spread on forums and media platforms. Content is displayed, in Pingxiang section of Wei, police photographed by the concealed speed measuring device on the vehicle, said ping Xiang police the conduct to be part of "phishing" law enforcement. Meanwhile, the police in less than 10 kilometers of road in question the legality of the 3 speed is set. Article references on further regulating the use of transportation technology, speed monitoring device related provisions on the notice, police questioned the use of speed measuring equipment. Concern is raised after the article was released, many users did not understand the police practice.


29th Beijing, visited the reporters came to the road, villagers said, the sections belonging to Wei line provincial highways, usually traffic is very big, big bend on the road long road junction, frequent traffic accidents.


Weizhuang village, near the road David Lau said, when flow velocity measuring point is not installed before, there have been deaths due to speeding. Since the installation of the speed measurement points, the attention of the passing vehicles, because the sign at gun point of a North-South direction.


Reporters found when driving on the route, the section "s" shape, turning a lot. Dang driving to set Wei line 169 km 100 meters at Shi found, road right vertical has "limited speed 70" and "into 3 km flow speed sections" identifies brand; driving to set Wei line 168 km 100 meters at, road right vertical has "limited speed 70" of identifies brand, identifies brand above and wrote has "ahead flow speed sections"; driving to set Wei line 167 km 300 meters near Shi found, has a car JI e licence of police in road shoulder Park, speed instrument in police West 5 meters at poles Shang placed. Police concealed gun near by.



> "Speed limit 70" and "entering 3 km mobile speed section" sign. Zhang Pengxiang photography

On thing, Pingxiang Police Brigade Deputy big Captain Wang Chien-shien, said, for network Shang reflect of "Pingxiang police fishing law enforcement" of situation, Pingxiang Public Security Bureau obliges Council discipline and supervision sector for has survey, articles said "in insufficient 10 km of sections set has 3 a speed points", by check set Wei line has two a fixed speed points, South points in 181 km 900 meters at, North points in 165 km 600 meters at, two points apart 16 km, flow speed points is located in middle, this is according to Hebei Province Public Security Bureau traffic monitor records traffic violations of work rules to investigate Nineth, 11th "dangerous road traffic accident-prone road sections and the public security organs traffic management departments are required to set traffic-technical surveillance equipment on the road. Does not have a fixed monitoring equipment on the road, or for fixed monitoring equipment could not be evidence of violations, you can use the mobile monitoring equipment. "Provision established. And, as required, on June 2, 2009 by Niu Cheng set up to speed on the evening news was published. Speed 3 speed limit signs in North-South direction, there is no "hidden entrapment". As far as articles on further standardizing the use of transport technology speed monitoring devices belonging to the Gansu Provincial Department of public security of the notice of the local regulations, Hebei provincial public security Department, did not have a similar law.


"In fact, we set the speed, because the road had two consecutive deaths caused by speeding. Since June this year after the equipment is started, has not occurred in traffic accidents caused by speeding. "Wang Chien-shien said that investigations by the discipline inspection and supervision departments, Public Security Bureau, Pingxiang, about" ping Xiang police entrapment "is not true, and the flow of guns in line with relevant provisions of China's Ministry of public security and Hebei provincial public security department. (End)




> Editors: Dong Zhang





Article keywords:
Traffic police entrapment, Hebei

I want feedback
Save a Web page
China News Network
河北警方回应交警钓鱼执法:情况不属实(图)|交警|钓鱼执法|河北_新闻资讯
>流动测速仪附近停放着一辆警车,交警没有进行隐蔽测速。 张鹏翔 摄

  中新网邢台11月30日电 (张鹏翔 李铁锤)针对网络平台上反映的“平乡交警钓鱼执法”一事,河北省平乡县交警大队副大队长王建30日回应称,此事经网络传播后,引起平乡县公安局高度重视,当即责成局纪委、督查部门介入调查。经查,网络平台上反映的“平乡交警钓鱼执法”情况不属实,该流动测速点符合中国公安部和河北省公安厅相关规定。


  25日,一条“平乡交警钓鱼执法”的消息在当地贴吧、论坛及自媒体平台上传播。内容显示,在定魏线平乡段,有交警采用隐蔽式测速设备对过往车辆进行偷拍,并称平乡交警该行为属于“钓鱼”执法。同时,对交警在不足10公里的路段内设置了3个测速点是否合法提出疑问。文章中还引用《关于进一步规范使用交通技术监控设备测速工作的通知》的相关规定,对警方测速设备的使用提出质疑。该文章发布后引发关注,很多网民对交警的做法表示不理解。


  29日,中新网记者来到该路段进行走访,附近村民表示,该路段属于定魏线省级公路,平时车流量很大,路段上大弯道长,路面岔路口多,经常发生交通事故。


  该路段附近的尉庄村村民刘大伟说,以前没有安装流动测速点的时候,发生过因超速造成的死亡事故。自从安装了测速点后,过往车辆都注意了,因为在测速点的南北方向都有提示牌。


  记者驱车行驶在该路线时发现,路段呈“S”形,转弯距离很大。当行驶到定魏线169公里100米处时发现,路右边竖有“限速70”和“进入3公里流动测速路段”标识牌;行驶至定魏线168公里100米处,路右边竖有“限速70”的标识牌,标识牌上方并写有“前方流动测速路段”;行驶至定魏线167公里300米附近时发现,有一辆冀E牌照的警车在路肩停放,测速仪在警车西侧5米处电杆上安置。附近交警没有进行隐蔽测速。


>“限速70”和“进入3公里流动测速路段”标识牌。 张鹏翔 摄

  就此事,平乡县交警大队副大队长王建表示,针对网络上反映的“平乡交警钓鱼执法”的情况,平乡县公安局责成局纪委和督查部门进行了调查,文章称“在不足10公里的路段设置了3个测速点”,经查定魏线有两个固定测速点,南点在181公里900米处,北点在165公里600米处,两点相距16公里,流动测速点位于中间,这是依据《河北省公安厅利用交通技术监控记录资料查处交通违法行为工作细则》第九条、第十一条中“危险路段和交通事故多发路段公安机关交通管理部门须在道路上设置交通技术监控设备。在没有安装固定监控设备的路段上,或者对固定监控设备无法取证的违法行为,可以使用移动监控设备。”的条文设立。并按照要求,在2009年6月2日的牛城晚报上对测速点的设立进行了公示。测速点的南北方向各有3个限速标识牌,不存在“隐蔽钓鱼执法”。至于文章中的《关于进一步规范使用交通技术监控设备测速工作的通知》属于甘肃省公安厅的地方法规,河北省公安厅没有类似法规。


  “其实我们设置这个测速点,就是因为该路段曾连续发生了两起因超速造成的死亡事故。自从今年6月份启动该设备后,至今未发生一起超速引起的交通事故。”王建说,经平乡县公安局纪委、督查部门调查,有关“平乡交警钓鱼执法”的内容不属实,该流动测速点符合中国公安部和河北省公安厅相关规定。(完)



>责任编辑:张冬





文章关键词:
交警 钓鱼执法 河北

我要反馈
保存网页
中国新闻网



If you have any requirements, please contact webmaster。(如果有什么要求,请联系站长)





QQ:154298438
QQ:417480759