Maize sentenced farmers in Inner Mongolia: the best new bar mitzvah is me not guilty | | |, Inner Mongolia received maize prison _ news
> Originally used to get rich off the corn, lay sleeping in the yard. This is a photo of cover of journalists taken on July 7, 2016. A lapse in recent months, Wang Lijun is still with this corn mill, expecting to be acquitted again.
Cover journalists Bo Liang
"The best new year's gift, is judge me to be guilty! ”
On January 1, 2017, as "prisoners outside the walls" to cover news Wang Lijun (thecover.CN) confirmed on December 29, 2016, in bayannaoer, Inner Mongolia notified in the afternoon, he was in the hospital getting Supreme Court retrial decision. As for the specific date of retrial hearing, the Court has not been finally confirmed.
On April 5, 2016, live, linhe district, bayannur Bai NAO Bao Zhen Yong Sheng Cun Wang Lijun 10 group, for selling corn suspected of illegal business operations, linhe district court verdict: Wang Lijun committed crime of illegal business operations, sentenced to a year on probation for two years and fined 20,000 yuan. Pay back illegal profits 6000 Yuan.
The verdict comes into effect, cause social concern. Cover news on July 7, 2016 to visit convicted of trafficking in the corn farmers: syndrome of thousands more people are not doing this under the title, in-depth reporting. On December 31, 2016, the retrial of China's Supreme People's Court released through the official micro-blog the case instruction, said that Wang Lijun maize, not undermine the main of grain circulation channels. In recent years, China's grain yield in consecutive years, many parts of China, especially the relatively advanced agricultural provinces, there are a lot of undocumented food brokers engaged in grain purchase, although this behavior has certain administrative illegality, but objectively promote national acquisition of food, reducing the farmers selling grain than a liability, to a certain extent, stimulate the market.
On February 15, 2015 by river police summoned by December 2016, China's Supreme Court orders retrial, after 10 months of the year, Wang Lijun can finally stand said: "I'm trafficking in the corn is not a crime! "If the second judgment on his innocence, Wang Lijun, said: I will go back, after all this, can not only bring home the bacon, you can also help the farmers.
Never thought
Maize was sentenced
Trafficking in the corn belong to the crime of illegal business operations! On receipt of the police after the arrest warrant, Wang Lijun has repeatedly stressed: "doing this, there are more than 1000 people, did not permit. I do, except to make some difference and could make trouble, in fact, help farmers, how will become illegal? ”
Time February 15, 2015, Wang Lijun received, linhe district, bayannur police summoned. Case did not permit engaged in grain purchasing practices, alleged violations of the crime of illegal business operations. Although Wang Lijun, surrendered to police, and pay back the so-called ill-gotten gains 6000 Yuan, on April 5, 2016, linhe District Court to Wang Lijun of trafficking in the corn make crime of illegal business operations, sentenced to a year on probation for two years and fined 20,000 yuan.
According to the judgment of first instance, the Court held, Wang Lijun in violation of State laws and administrative rules and regulations, without permission of the food authority and approved by the administrative authority for industry and Commerce registered license, illegally purchased corn, amounts of more than 210,000 yuan of illegal business operations, larger quantities, their behavior constituted the crime of illegal business operations. Prosecutors alleged, the Court supported. Since Wang Lijun voluntarily surrendered to the police after the incident, take the initiative to pay back ill-gotten gains, according to Article No. 225 of the Penal Code, paragraph (d) of paragraph 72nd 73rd, second and third paragraphs, 52nd, 53rd, provision, taken in the preceding sentence.
After the verdict, Wang Lijun does not intend to appeal. Because it is suspended, Wang Lijun to sit without cell. He said, "so I was satisfied. The appeal, I do not know how much it costs. This, I not only paid earn 6000 Yuan, was also fined 20,000 yuan, and activity costs, giving total spent tens of thousands of, I have 10 years of corn to earn back. So, come on, accept it! ”
China's Supreme People's Court
Acquisitions have not broken grain
On December 31, 2016, the Chinese Supreme People's Court released through the official micro-blog information on instruction retry Wang Lijun.
China's Supreme People's Court believes that this case, Wang Lijun maize from the farmers sell grain, agriculture played a role of bridges and bonds linking with the grain, not undermine the main of grain circulation channels, and do not seriously disturb the market order, and does not have and No. 225 of the criminal law stipulates the crime of illegal business operations the first three acts harmful to the society, does not have the necessity of criminal sanctions.
China Supreme People's Court while pointed out that, criminal No. 225 article subsection (four) items is in Qian three items provides clear listed of three class illegal business behavior specific case of based Shang, provides of a reveals sex terms, in judicial practice in the applies the items provides should special carefully, related behavior needed has legal, and judicial explained of clear provides, and to has and Qian three items provides behavior quite of social harm and criminal punishment need, strictly avoid will General of administrative violations as criminal to processing.
In recent years, China food continuous years yield, China many place, especially agricultural relative developed of provinces, exists with large of food brokers no card engaged in food acquisition phenomenon, although this behavior has must administrative illegal sex, but objective Shang promote has national on food of acquisition, reduce has food sold grain burden, in must degree Shang inspired has market vitality, no serious disrupt market order, social harm is unlikely to. Insofar as this case is concerned, Wang Lijun maize from the farmers sell grain, agriculture played a role of bridges and bonds linking with the grain, not undermine the main of grain circulation channels, and do not seriously disturb the market order.
Dialogue Wang Lijun
"Judge me to be guilty, I would go back! ”
On January 1, 2017, when received a call from cover journalists, Wang Lijun, said he has received a written decision on retrial of China's Supreme People's Court. As a "prisoners outside the walls", his own retrial results has a lot of expectations.
But when it comes to retrial, Wang Lijun can't afford a lawyer. Bayan Nur City Intermediate Court said legal aid to help Wang Lijun lawyer.
Cover news: receive a retrial decision, what is mood?
Wang Lijun: Bayan Nur city courtyard informing me the retrial decision, on December 29, 2016. Three o'clock in the afternoon when I went to court. See the retrial of China's Supreme People's Court decision, to say, I'm nothing. My wife Wang Meili, sees the retrial decision, happy tears.
Cover news: the retrial results what expectations do you have?
Wang Lijun: some say the retrial decision is the best new year gift to me. In fact, if you tried my innocence, it is my best new year's gift. In fact, from the beginning up to now, I've always thought that, why because trafficking in the corn I broke the law.
Cover news: retrial lawyers yet?
Wang Lijun: I can't afford a lawyer. Bayan Nur City Intermediate Court judge told me, through legal aid, help me to hire a lawyer.
Cover news: the removal of corn piled up yard sale yet?
Wang Lijun: don't sell.
Cover news: will buy corn?
Wang Lijun:. This line because I am familiar with. Not only can increase family income, but also people who can help a lot of corn. As long as the judge me to be guilty, I will do.
Cover news: humbled you these days?
Wang Lijun: can you not humbled? I am still in prison. Without going to jail. However, I want to cover one to two times a week, writing on legal knowledge. To run away a little more, but also to the absence of judicial. Review results, such as, if I was found not guilty. At that time, I'd stand and say: I buy corn, is not a crime, and I'm not a serving officer.
> Editors: Dong Zhang
Article keywords:Collection of Inner Mongolia maize prison
I want feedback
Save a Web page
Sichuan online-huaxi City newspaper
内蒙古收购玉米被判刑农民：最好新年礼是判我无罪|内蒙古|收玉米|获刑_新闻资讯
>原本用来致富的脱玉米机，只能躺在院子里睡大觉。这是封面新闻记者2016年7月7日拍摄的照片。时隔近半年，王力军仍留着这台玉米机，期待被判无罪，能够重操旧业。
封面新闻记者 梁波
“最好新年礼，是判我无罪！”
2017年1月1日，作为“高墙外服刑犯”，王力军向封面新闻（thecover.cn）记者证实，2016年12月29日，接内蒙古巴彦淖尔市中院通知，当天下午，他在该院拿到中国最高人民法院再审决定书。至于具体再审开庭日期，法院尚未最终确认。
2016年4月5日，家住巴彦淖尔市临河区白脑包镇永胜村十组的王力军，因贩卖玉米涉嫌非法经营案，临河区法院作出一审判决：王力军犯非法经营罪，判处有期徒刑一年缓刑二年，并处罚金二万元。退缴非法获利6000元。
此判决生效后，引发社会关注。封面新闻于2016年7月7日曾以《探访贩卖玉米获罪农民：干这行的上千人都没有证啊》为题，予以深度报道。2016年12月31日，中国最高人民法院院通过官方微博发布再审此案指令时指出，王力军的收购玉米行为，没有破坏粮食流通的主渠道。近年来，中国粮食连续多年增产增收，中国不少地方，尤其是农业相对发达的省份，存在着大量的粮食经纪人无证从事粮食收购现象，虽然这种行为具有一定行政违法性，但客观上促进了国家对粮食的收购，减轻了粮农卖粮负累，在一定程度上激发了市场活力。
从2015年2月15日被临河警方传唤，到2016年12月中国最高人民法院被指令再审，一年零十个月时间之后，王力军终于可以挺起胸膛说：“我贩卖玉米，不是犯罪！”如果再审判决自己无罪，王力军表示：我将重操旧业，毕竟这个行当，不仅可以养家糊口，还可以帮农民。
没想到
收购玉米也被判刑
贩卖玉米属于非法经营罪！在收到警方拘捕令后，王力军反复强调一句话：“干这行的，有一千多人，都没有证啊。我这样做，除了赚点差价，还可以让农民省事，其实帮了农民，怎么就成了非法经营？”
时间回到2015年2月15日，王力军收到了巴彦淖尔市临河区公安局的传唤。案由系没证从事粮食收购行为，涉嫌违反非法经营罪。尽管王力军向警方自首，并退缴了所谓非法所得6000元，2016年4月5日，临河区法院还是以王力军贩卖玉米犯非法经营罪，判处有期徒刑一年缓刑二年，并处罚金二万元。
据一审判决书，法院认为，王力军违反国家法律、行政法规规定，未经粮食主管部门许可及工商行政管理机关核准登记颁发营业执照，非法收购玉米，非法经营数额21万余元，数量较大，其行为构成非法经营罪。检方指控，法院予以支持。鉴于王力军案发后主动到公安机关自首，主动退缴非法所得，根据《刑法》第二百二十五条第一款（四）项，第七十二条第一款，第七十三条第二款、第三款，第五十二条、第五十三条规定，遂作出了前述判决结果。
判决结果下来后，王力军不打算上诉。因为是缓刑，王力军不用去坐牢房。他说，“这样我就满足了。上诉，不知道还要花多少钱。这次这个事，我不仅把挣的6000元上缴了，还被罚了两万元，还有活动费用，前前后后，总共花了好几万，我得种10年的玉米才挣得回来。所以，算了吧，认命吧！”
中国最高人民法院
收购行为没有破坏粮食流通
2016年12月31日，中国最高人民法院通过官方微博发布指令再审王力军案消息。
中国最高人民法院认为，就本案而言，王力军从粮农处收购玉米卖予粮库，在粮农与粮库之间起了桥梁纽带作用，没有破坏粮食流通的主渠道，没有严重扰乱市场秩序，且不具有与刑法第225条规定的非法经营罪前三项行为相当的社会危害性，不具有刑事处罚的必要性。
中国最高人民法院同时指出，刑法第225条第（四）项是在前三项规定明确列举的三类非法经营行为具体情形的基础上，规定的一个兜底性条款，在司法实践中适用该项规定应当特别慎重，相关行为需有法律、司法解释的明确规定，且要具备与前三项规定行为相当的社会危害性和刑事处罚必要性，严格避免将一般的行政违法行为当作刑事犯罪来处理。
近些年，中国粮食连续多年增产增收，中国不少地方，尤其是农业相对发达的省份，存在着大量的粮食经纪人无证从事粮食收购现象，虽然这种行为具有一定行政违法性，但客观上促进了国家对粮食的收购，减轻了粮农卖粮负累，在一定程度上激发了市场活力，没有严重扰乱市场秩序，社会危害性不大。就本案而言，王力军从粮农处收购玉米卖予粮库，在粮农与粮库之间起了桥梁纽带作用，没有破坏粮食流通的主渠道，没有严重扰乱市场秩序。
对话王力军
“判我无罪，我就重操旧业！”
2017年1月1日，当接到封面新闻记者的电话，王力军表示，他已经收到了中国最高人民法院的再审决定书。作为一个“高墙外的服刑犯”，他对自己再审结果有着很大的期待。
不过说到再审，王力军没钱请律师。巴彦淖尔市中院表示，将通过法律援助，帮王力军请代理律师。
封面新闻：收到再审决定书，是个什么心情？
王力军：巴彦淖尔市中院通知我去拿再审决定书，是2016年12月29日。我时去下午三点去的法院。看到中国最高人民法院的再审决定书，要说心情，我倒没啥。倒是我妻子王美丽，看到再审决定书，高兴的流泪了。
封面新闻：对再审结果有怎样的期待？
王力军：有人说，这份再审决定书是给我的最好新年礼物。其实，如果再审判我无罪，那才是我的最好新年礼。其实，从开始到现在，我也一直都没想明白，我怎么就会因为贩卖玉米犯了法。
封面新闻：再审的律师请了吗？
王力军：我没钱请律师。巴彦淖尔市中院法官告诉我，将通过法律援助，帮我请一个律师。
封面新闻：家院子里堆放的脱玉米机卖了吗？
王力军：没有卖。
封面新闻：还会再次收购玉米吗？
王力军：会。因为这行我熟悉。不仅可以增加家里的收入，而且还可以帮到很多种玉米的人。只要判我无罪，我就再干。
封面新闻：这些时间日子过得憋屈吗？
王力军：能不憋屈吗？我至今还处于服刑期间。尽管没有去坐牢。不过，每周我都要去报道一至两次，写写对法律的认识。要走远一点地方，还要给司法所请假。等再审结果出来，如果我被判无罪。那个时候，我会挺起胸膛说：我收购玉米，不是犯罪，我也不是一名服刑人员。
>责任编辑：张冬
文章关键词： 内蒙古 收玉米 获刑
我要反馈
保存网页
四川在线-华西都市报