Tianjin Boyle put shooting sentenced lawyer: Tianjin, has submitted a petition | | | appeal _ shooting news
> Zhao
Cover article-this huaxi City newspaper reporter Bo Liang
On January 3, lawyer Xu Xin from Beijing to Tianjin. Final destination: Hebei district, Tianjin City detention center. Task: detention center meets with Zhao of convicted criminals to death for illegal possession of firearms. Zhao daughter Wang Yanling says, mother is actually 54, was ID mistake is 51 years old.
Surging news, Beijing, Beijing News and other media reported that Zhao, resigned two months before the jail, Great Mercy Temple in Tianjin Port placed balloons shooting booth. On October 12 last year, Zhao and other similar 13 vendors aheadsun by Hebei police station away. Among them, Zhao booth 9 guns in line, 6 was identified as a firearm. On December 27, 2016, Tianjin Hebei District Court of first instance to the crime of illegal possession of firearms and sentenced Zhao to be sentenced to three years and six months.
Xu Xin told News-cover this huaxi City newspaper reporter, commissioned by Wang Yanling in 2017, new year's day, he accepted the case of Zhao. The morning of January 3, in a detention centre, Zhao formally signed the petition. "I'm going to Tianjin Municipal Intermediate Court this afternoon to submit petition. After Zhao appeal message in error. ”
This is Xu Xin concern "case genuine imitation guns" of the second case. First Department of Sichuan boy imitation guns sentenced Liu Dawei online shopping. On October 18 of last year, Fujian High Court retrial decision and hearing in the near future. Xu Xin Liu Dawei will be pleading not guilty.
Similarly, Xu Xin believe that Zhao did not constitute a crime. At present, Xu Xin has invited the lawyers act against anti-hooliganism together pleading not guilty for Zhao. "These influential cases, we insist on promoting the concept of the rule of law, wishing to promote the standard of firearms increased. "Xu Xin said.
Three reasons to believe that innocent
Though not yet comprehensive marking, however, Xu Xin Zhao case have expressed clear views and gave three reasons.
Xu Xin believe that Zhao in connection with gun-shaped objects, not guns, muzzle than the kinetic energy and the genuine difference of times, to identify toy guns as firearms, with genuine conviction and sentencing of Zhao, and contrary to common sense. 1.8J/cm2 standards is far from causing the possibility of casualties, identified as the gun is wrong and ridiculous. To the standards, and close to the body is just a red dot, will not hurt the skin, without treatment, the power is much smaller than the Slingshot. "Whether the Court should apply the standards are controversial, I think this method of standard and superior of the Penal Code and contravene the gun control laws, the Court adopted the standard error of law. ”
"Zhao had no criminal intent. "Said Xu Xin, Zhao did not know toy guns are firearms, did not know the balloon shooting suspect, only the air gun shooting games as entertainment, lack of criminal intent, does not meet the subjective elements of the crime. Gun crime is an intentional crime, asked the defendant to object is a gun knowing that, if they cannot prove it knowingly, will prevent intentional consequences, cannot be found to be deliberately holding a gun and therefore lack the subjective elements of the crime. Zhao placed balloon shooting for more than two months have not been punished, and monthly payment of booth fees, lack of awareness on the illegality of his actions and the possibilities.
In addition, Zhao placed balloons shooting stall to make a living, did not cause any personal injuries or property damage, there is no harm to society, far less than needed to the extent of criminal law penalties, are liable to a prison term of its June 3, perverse. "Zhao foreign subsidized workers, long arm spur to do heavy work, you can't make an omelet every night, two thousand or three thousand Yuan a month, also to month payment of booth fees, rent, insurance, money from hand to mouth, tough and pitiful. ”
Want to promote the rule of law
Xu Xin told News-cover this huaxi City newspaper reporter, Zhao case is he teenager Liu Dawei shopping replica gun in Sichuan sentenced case, agents in the second, "imitation guns real guns." By the Fujian Provincial High Court retrial decision, Liu Dawei will soon be hearing the case. "By then, I will also strongly pleaded not guilty. Through these cases, we insist on promoting the concept of the rule of law, wishing to promote the standard of firearms increased. ”
Said Xu Xin, I hope people, hope that NPC deputies and CPPCC members concerned about such cases, concerned about low standard firearms; urged the Chinese Ministry of public security to standard firearms, first back to 2001 levels by the muzzle kinetic energy greater than 16 joules/cm; call for judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court, China replica gun conviction and distinguish it from real guns.
2016 "two sessions", Member of the Chinese people's political consultative conference Zhu Zhengfu imitation guns reviewed the proposed amendments to the criminal standard. Cai Xueen of the Chinese national people's Congress representative also submitted the proposal to amend firearms identification.
Xu Xin said, the two looked at the "replica gun gun" problem, because such cases increased substantially in recent years. Cai Xueen said that in recent years, only his Hubei Province, simulated gun-related criminal cases increased by more than 30%. Zhu Zhengfu believes that "breach of scientific understanding and common sense of life" case from standard growth must be stopped.
Tianjin justice wrong?
Zhao shooting balloon gun line, purely for means of livelihood. Court criminal penalties, Tianjin justice wrong?
Xu Xin said, objectively speaking, society of Tianjin public security's criticism is too harsh. Tianjin misjudged on the decision of the Court is not, the judge on the facts and the law have different understanding and judgment, within the scope of the discretionary power, most of the Court continues to apply the standards of China's Ministry of public security 1.8J/cm2, 63rd most judges do not apply criminal law "according to the particular circumstances of the case, approved by the Supreme People's Court or statutory sentence the following sentence" clause. Fault of the judges, only the judicial machinery, and toys/imitation guns is exactly equivalent to genuine conviction and sentencing, resulting in the trial verdict go against common sense reason to common sense. "As a result, Tianjin seriously urge aunt set the balloon shot was convicted of gun possession case, with prudence and wisdom of the judges ' freedom and the life of others, changing the machinery of law enforcement idea, based on conscience, return to common sense considerations favor, make a fair ruling according to law. ”
> Editor: Zhang di
Article keywords:Tianjin fire appeal Zhao
I want feedback
Save a Web page
Sichuan online-huaxi City newspaper
天津大妈摆射击摊被判刑 代理律师：已递交上诉状|
天津|射击摊|上诉_新闻资讯
>赵春华
封面新闻-华西都市报记者梁波
1月3日，律师徐昕从北京赶往天津。最终目的地：天津市河北区看守所。任务：看守所会见因非法持有枪支罪被判刑服刑人员赵春华。赵春华女儿王艳玲说，妈妈今年实际已54岁，是身份证搞错为51岁。
据澎湃新闻、北京时间、新京报等媒体报道，赵春华，获刑前两个月才辞职，在天津大悲院码头摆气球射击摊。去年10月12日，赵春华及其他类似13位商贩，被河北鸿顺里派出所带走。其中，赵春华摊位上9支枪行物中，有6支被鉴定为枪支。2016年12月27日，天津河北区法院一审以非法持有枪支罪，判处赵春华有期徒刑三年六个月。
徐昕告诉封面新闻-华西都市报记者，受王艳玲委托，2017年元旦当天，他接下了赵春华案。1月3日上午，在看守所，赵春华正式签了上诉状。“下午我将去天津市一中院递交上诉状。此前赵春华提起上诉的消息有误。”
这是徐昕关注“仿真枪变真枪案”的第二起案件。第一起系四川小伙刘大蔚网购仿真枪被判无期案。去年10月18日，福建高院作出再审决定，并将于近期开庭。徐昕将为刘大蔚作无罪辩护。
同样，徐昕认为赵春华也不构成犯罪。目前，徐昕已邀请斯伟江律师，共同为赵春华作无罪辩护。“通过这些有影响性案件，我们坚持个案推动法治的理念，希望促进枪支认定标准的提高。”徐昕表示。
三个理由认为无罪
尽管尚未全面阅卷，不过，徐昕对赵春华案已提出鲜明观点，并给出了三点理由。
徐昕认为，赵春华涉案枪形物，根本不是枪支，枪口比动能与真枪相差百倍，将玩具枪认定为枪支，以真枪对赵春华定罪量刑，违背常识。1.8J/cm2的标准远没有致人伤亡的可能性，认定为枪支是错误和荒谬的。以该标准，近距离打到身上只是个红点，不会伤皮肤，根本无需治疗，威力远小于弹弓。“法院是否应适用该标准存在争议，我认为这一标准也与上位法《刑法》和《枪支管理法》相抵触，法院采用该标准系适用法律错误。”
“赵春华根本没有犯罪的主观故意。”徐昕说，赵春华不知道玩具枪是枪支，也不知道摆气球射击摊涉嫌犯罪，仅将气枪射击游戏当成娱乐活动，缺乏犯罪故意，不符合犯罪的主观构成要件。持有枪支罪是故意犯罪，要求被告人对行为对象是枪支具有明知，若无法证明明知，将产生阻却故意的后果，即无法认定有持有枪支的故意，因此缺乏犯罪的主观构成要件。赵春华摆气球射击摊两个多月未曾被处罚，且按月缴纳摊位费，对自己行为的违法性缺乏认识及认识可能性。
另外，赵春华摆气球射击摊谋生的行为，没有造成任何人身、财产方面的损害，没有任何社会危害性，远达不到需以刑法惩罚的程度，一审却判其三年六月有期徒刑，违反常情。“赵春华是外来津务工者，胳膊长了骨刺，干不了重活，每天夜晚出摊，月入两三千元，还要按月缴纳摊位费、房租、社保等，余钱勉强糊口，生活艰难，令人同情。”
希望个案推动法治
徐昕告诉封面新闻-华西都市报记者，赵春华案是他继四川少年刘大蔚网购仿真枪被判无期案之后，代理的第二起“仿真枪变真枪案”。经福建省高院再审决定，刘大蔚案将于近期开庭。“届时，我也将坚决作无罪辩护。透过这些影响性案件，我们坚持个案推动法治的理念，希望促进枪支认定标准的提高。”
徐昕说，希望民众，希望人大代表、政协委员关注此类案件，关注过低的枪支认定标准；呼吁中国公安部提高枪支认定标准，先恢复至2001年的标准枪口比动能大于16焦耳/平方厘米；呼吁中国最高人民法院的司法解释将仿真枪的定罪量刑区别于真枪。
2016年“两会”，中国政协委员朱征夫建议审查修改仿真枪入刑标准。中国人大代表蔡学恩也提交了修正枪支鉴定标准的建议。
徐昕说，前述两位之所以关注“仿真枪变真枪”问题，是因为近年来类似案件大幅增加。蔡学恩说，近年来，仅他所在的湖北地区，仿真枪涉刑案件就增加了30%以上。朱征夫认为，因“违反科学认知和生活常理”的鉴定标准带来的案件增长必须停止。
天津司法是否错了？
赵春华射击气球摊的枪行物，纯属用于谋生手段。法院则给予刑事处罚，天津公检法错了吗？
徐昕说，客观地说，社会对天津公检法的批评过于苛刻。天津法院的这一判决算不上错案，法官对事实和法律有不同理解和判断在自由裁量权的范围内，多数法院仍然适用中国公安部1.8J/cm2的标准，多数法官没有适用刑法第63条“根据案件的特殊情况，经中国最高人民法院核准，也可以在法定刑以下判处刑罚”条款。法官之错，仅在于司法机械主义，将玩具/仿真枪完全等同于真枪定罪量刑，从而导致原审判决违背常识常情常理。“因此，恳请天津慎重对待大妈摆气球射击摊被判非法持枪支案，凭着法官裁判他人自由与生命的审慎和智慧，改变机械执法的理念，基于良知，回到常识，考量人情，依法作出公正的判决。”
>责任编辑：张迪
文章关键词： 天津 射击摊 上诉 赵春华
我要反馈
保存网页
四川在线-华西都市报