Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)aaapublished in(发表于) 2013/12/6 12:11:15 Dongguan， Guangdong star against the Dongguan Government case in court hearing-star-the Court
Xinhuanet, Guangzhou, December 6 (reporter Mao Yizhu)-Dongguan intermediate people's Court of Guangdong Province the morning of 6th hearing "airport '7 · 20' bombing" perpetrators of the star against the Dongguan Government case. Previously, Star asking the Dongguan Government to open its complaints of beatings in disability case review concluded, because the last 3 months did not receive a reply, then prosecution authorities in Dongguan Government information open fulfil statutory duties.
9:30 A.M., Hebei zhongxing vs Dongguan in Dongguan city, the eighth trial in the Government case. Because audit personnel more, after the Court was full, the Court also opened temporary sites, some residents attend live via video. Families of Hebei zhongxing, a dozen cases of domestic and overseas reporters, dozens of people attended.
On July 20, Beijing Capital International Airport after the bombings, Dongguan Municipal Government held a meeting and set up a task force, to review the stars in case disability complaints of beatings. In August, the Hebei zhongxing agents thereof to the Government of Dongguan city government information publicity applications submitted to force disclosure of review conclusions. But after nearly three months without response from the Dongguan Government.
On October 16, the stars to the Dongguan intermediate people's Court in Hebei province bring an administrative action, asked the Court to order the Dongguan Government reply to submitted its application for openness of Government information. Dongguan intermediate people's Court by the review found that the case meets the condition for filing a case, on October 25 and proceeded to entertain.
The trial, the Dongguan Government agent in reply, the Dongguan Government information public hearing the Hebei zhongxing applications are forwarded to the Dongguan Public Security Bureau after processing, failed to inform the stars and their agents in Hebei province during the period, the program did have flaws. On August 23, the Dongguan Public Security Bureau told the star needed extension of 15 working days to respond, and, on September 15, the official replied that Hebei zhongxing public information does not belong to government information Government information under section II of the Ordinance. On October 22, the Dongguan city government has made the information public notice of Government, saying the applications submitted in its reply were transmitted to the Dongguan Public Security Bureau to handle and fulfill the information obligation.
Hebei zhongxing's lawyer Liu Xiaoyuan, believed that Dongguan were transmitted to the Government information disclosure application behavior is illegal. According to the Government information disclosure Ordinance, does not belong to the public or the executive authorities of the Government according to law the information does not exist, shall inform the applicant and public institutions to be able to determine if the Government information, shall inform the applicant that the Executive's name, contact information.
In addition, the Dongguan city government agents believed that Dongguan Public Security Bureau of Hebei zhongxing complaints disability survey content has nothing to do with this case of assault, did not reply. After the trial ended, Liu Xiaoyuan, said in an interview with reporters, Dongguan city government set up a task force to star in investigating complaints of assault maimed nearly 5 months time, review the findings up to now has not been made public. If there are Public Order Joint Defense Force beat Hebei zhongxing, a Hebei zhongxing vs Dongguan Public Security Bureau can start the retrial of the case, and to seek civil compensation for Hebei zhongxing.
At present, the case is still pending, the Court did not sentence the Court.
新华网广州12月6日电 (记者毛一竹)广东省东莞市中级人民法院6日上午开庭审理“首都机场‘7·20’爆炸案”案犯冀中星诉东莞市政府一案。此前，冀中星要求东莞市政府公开其投诉的殴打致残案的复查结论，由于近3个月没有收到回复，遂起诉东莞市政府不履行政府信息公开法定职责。
上午9时30分，冀中星诉东莞市政府案在东莞市中院第八法庭开庭审理。由于旁听人员较多，法庭人满后，法院又临时开设场所，让部分群众通过视频直播参与旁听。冀中星的家属、十几家境内外媒体记者等数十人旁听了案件。
今年7月20日，北京首都国际机场爆炸案发生后，东莞市政府召开会议并成立专案组，对冀中星投诉的殴打致残案进行复查。8月，冀中星委托代理人向东莞市政府递交政府信息公开申请书，要求公开复查结论。但此后近三个月没有收到东莞市政府的回复。
10月16日，冀中星向东莞市中院提起行政诉讼，要求法院判令东莞市政府对其递交的政府信息公开申请予以回复。东莞市中院经审查认为，该案符合立案条件，并于10月25日决定受理。
庭审中，东莞市政府的委托代理人答辩称，东莞市政府受理冀中星的信息公开申请书后将其转交给东莞市公安局处理，期间没有告知冀中星及其委托代理人，程序上确有瑕疵。8月23日，东莞市公安局告知冀中星需延期15个工作日作出答复，并于9月15日正式答复称，冀中星申请公开的信息不属于政府信息公开条例第二条所指的政府信息。10月22日，东莞市政府又作出《政府信息公开告知书》，称其递交的申请已转交东莞市公安局答复办理，已履行告知义务。
冀中星的律师刘晓原认为，东莞市政府转交信息公开申请的行为是违法的。根据《政府信息公开条例》，依法不属于本行政机关公开或者该政府信息不存在的，应当告知申请人，对能够确定该政府信息的公开机关的，应当告知申请人该行政机关的名称、联系方式。
另外，东莞市政府委托代理人认为，东莞市公安局对冀中星投诉的殴打致残的调查内容与本案无关，没有对此进行回复。庭审结束后，刘晓原接受记者采访时说，东莞市政府成立专案组对冀中星投诉的殴打致残案进行调查已有近5个月的时间，复查结论到现在尚未向社会公布。倘若存在治安联防队员殴打冀中星一事，那么冀中星诉东莞市公安局的案件就可以启动再审，并为冀中星争取民事赔偿。
目前，案件尚在审理中，法庭没有当庭宣判。
赞