Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)aaa
published in(发表于) 2013/12/6 12:13:50
Shandong inflatable boy’s case， the Court of Final Appeal upheld accused 1.12 million as compensation for a second puff-Shandong

Lu Jinzeng-block Zheng Zhang Suzhe

Reporter (reporter Zheng Chun Lu Jinzeng correspondents shoots Zhang Suzhe) on December 2, dezhou City Intermediate Court in Shandong province on social concern, "inflatable" boy du a second trial ended the assault case, ruling that rejected the appeal and upheld the.

On June 30, 2012, xiajin County of boys as young as 13 are du Chen Zhao Xin Wei, spring air pump-Jet injuries, emergency hospital, diagnostic, du Pont's gut sizes more than more than 20 broken, perforated, multiple serious injuries to internal organs.

On July 19, xiajin County Court first instance judgment rendered in the case, accused Chen Chun, Zhao Xin Wei guilty of intentional injury crime, were respectively sentenced to imprisonment for six years and five years and nine months; common follow-up treatment such as compensation for medical expenses, more than 1.12 million Yuan, the two defendants jointly and severally liable to each other.

After the delivery of the first instance, Chun and Zhao Xin Chen Wei-refuses, are "the trial court found that the crime of intentional injury errors, sentences, improper compensation" as an appeal.

After the dezhou city intermediate people's Court accepted this, and after marking, questioning Chun Chen and Zhao Xinwei, listening to views and litigation agent acting for the victims of two of the appellant's counsel submissions, feel that the facts of the case clearly, decided not to hold a hearing in accordance with law, written for trial.

Dezhou city intermediate people's Court of second instance trial believed that Chen Chun and Zhao Xin Wei has been engaged in car repairs, knowing the wind Cannon pneumatic high, but still have the wind Cannon sprayed a du, du caused some serious injuries and serious consequences of systemic multiple disabilities. Lower court take into account the specific circumstances of the case, on second conviction and sentencing, and without undue. Then issue a final ruling according to law, dismissed the appeal and upheld the.

(Original title: "inflatable" boy's case, the Court of Final Appeal upheld)

　　卢金增 郑春笋 张苏哲

　　本报讯(记者卢金增 通讯员郑春笋 张苏哲)12月2日，山东省德州市中级法院对备受社会关注的“充气”男孩杜某被故意伤害一案二审审理终结，裁定驳回上诉，维持原判。

　　2012年6月30日，夏津县年仅13岁的男孩杜某被陈更春、赵鑫伟用充气泵喷伤，经紧急送医院诊断，杜某的大小肠出现了20多处破损、穿孔，多个内脏器官严重受伤。

　　今年7月19日，夏津县法院对此案作出一审判决，被告人陈更春、赵鑫伟犯故意伤害罪，被分别判处有期徒刑六年和有期徒刑五年零九个月;共同赔偿医疗费、后续治疗费等112万余元，两名被告人互负连带责任。

　　一审宣判后，陈更春和赵鑫伟不服，均以“原审法院认定其故意伤害罪错误，量刑重，赔偿不当”为由提出上诉。

　　德州市中级法院受理此案后，经过阅卷、讯问陈更春和赵鑫伟、听取被害人的讼代理人的代理意见和两名上诉人辩护人的辩护意见，认为该案事实清楚，依法决定不开庭、书面审理。

　　德州市中级法院二审审理认为，陈更春和赵鑫伟一直从事汽车修理，明知风炮气压很高，但仍持风炮喷杜某，造成杜某重伤和全身多处残疾的严重后果。原审法院综合考虑该案的具体情况，对二人定罪量刑并无不当。遂依法作出终审裁定，驳回上诉，维持原判。

（原标题：“充气”男孩案终审维持原判）

赞