Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)aaa
published in(发表于) 2013/12/6 12:14:15
Stars vs Dongguan Government cases in this Court, public disability review conclusion-dongguang-the star

Stars vs Dongguan Government cases in this Court makes public disability review concluded Court _ stars in Dongguan | | | news

December 6, Hebei zhongxing sued today in the case of Dongguan city, Dongguan city intermediate people's Court heard. Stars in this case on July 20 this year in Beijing Capital Airport explosion in manufacturing concern. Stars claim to 8 years ago in Dongguan, xintang village security team beaten by comminuted fractures of the spine and lower limbs paralysis, asking authorities in Dongguan to open their own battered disability case review concluded.


  Capital Airport bombing took out 8 years ago "disabled"


On July 20 this year, Hebei zhongxing carried homemade explosive devices, from Shandong to live alone by bus to Beijing, and at 6 o'clock that night on the second floor of the Beijing Capital International Airport Terminal T3 detonated explosive devices, causing himself serious injury, a police slightly injured. Subsequently, Star control and captured red-handed by police in Hebei province.


On August 29, the Chaoyang District Public Prosecutor's Office to prosecute suspected crimes of explosions to Hebei zhongxing. On September 17, the Chaoyang District Court hearing the case, Hebei zhongxing insisted that the capital airport is to reflect demands not to "explode", defense attorneys plead for it. On October 15, the Chaoyang Court of first instance sentenced star sentenced to 6 years in the explosion.


After the delivery of the first instance, stars based on fault in Hebei province exploded, disproportionate sentencing and other grounds of appeal. Beijing Municipal Intermediate People's Court after trial believed that stars in the first instance because of related departments to deal with cases of their dissatisfaction with the implementation of the maimed explosion causes have been identified, the facts are clear and the punishment is appropriate and should be maintained.


After sentencing, the Court allowed JI-brother and other family members met with a star in a star. Hebei zhongxing brother said the judge told them a while Shandong, Hebei zhongxing will be returned home, but Mr aylott denies that.


At this point, second instance handed down over this incident. However, the demands of the stars mentioned in, which is 8 years ago with "maimed" not yet has the answer, society is still in question, is the reason stars selection in such an extreme manner?


  "The assault maimed" or the "traffic accident" controversy


On "disability case", what is crippledom induced by traffic accidents or beatings, is always the star, Gong Mingzhao (then by JI Gong Tao of Star motorcycles) a focus of dispute with the police. Hebei zhongxing wrote in 2006, said in his blog,, June 28, 2005, his gong Tao motorcycle ride passengers going to houjie, Dongguan, xintang town, met police find car, chased by vigilantes steel pipe, resulting in fracture of lumbar vertebral body caused paralysis.


JI in the stars of home Shandong juancheng County related sector July 21 reply media Shi said, JI in the stars has in Guangdong Dongguan worked, to opened "motorcycle of" for industry, Yu on June 28, 2005, driving a car motorcycle tuk-tuk soliciting in after Dongguan houjie town new Tong Village security team door Shi, JI in the stars and its by pulled of guest Gong Tao was new Tong Village security team players beat, led JI in the stars spine comminuted fracture, and lower limb paralyzed.


This statement, Dongguan has not been fully recognised. The afternoon of July 21, Dongguan municipal party Committee propaganda Department release on Star reflected the vigilantes, battery with injury issues circulars, denied the stars were beaten in disability statement. Reported: June 28, 2005 from 2 o'clock in the morning, Star motorcycle passengers drive to houjie houjie new pond village security forces near the door, collided with the vigilantes patrolled on the road, JI Gong Tao XING and passengers on the ground was injured.


Circular also stresses, houjie, according to public Security Bureau explained that because the process of the case there are no other pedestrians and crowds of onlookers, so far no evidence that vigilantes beat Hebei zhongxing, Gong Tao, so the case is still under investigation, if confirmed, will be prosecuted.


After that, the Star then carried passengers in Hebei province Gong Mingzhao (Gong Tao). He said in a letter to the Dongguan Public Security Bureau, Galactic assault by a police officer maimed in Hebei province. In a seven-page letter, he detailed the stars beating had occurred. Dongguan Public Security Bureau also confirmed that Gong Mingzhao's letter had been received.


  Conclusions public disability case try various channels for adults


Star case to prosecute the Dongguan Government for "failure to comply with statutory duties of governmental information disclosure disputes". And before the capital detonated explosive devices, stars have been petitioning for 8 years.


On July 8, 2005, Hebei zhongxing families reflected to houjie Public Security Bureau, Hebei zhongxing June 28, been beaten by vigilantes, xintang village, houjie town maimed and request processing. Houjie town Public Security Bureau received a star in the family and explain to them, are investigating the incident, but there is no evidence that vigilantes beat Hebei zhongxing.


On July 28 of that year, Hebei zhongxing commissioned Guangdong, houjie Town South star law firm lawyers to police station to submit applications for administrative compensation, according to law and hold people accountable and compensate for its 334782.49.


On January 31, 2007, the stars to the people's Court of Dongguan city in Hebei province to initiate civil action requires new pond village, houjie Town Board for their personal injury compensation of 338266.99 Yuan.


But on July 26, 2007, Dongguan city people's courts, arguing that lack of proof of Hebei zhongxing, dismissed the star's claim. Star appeal in appeal, the Dongguan intermediate people's Court on January 31, 2008 dismissed the appeal and upheld the.


After losing in civil litigation, stars to Central politics and Law Committee of the petition in Hebei province, and through the website of the State Bureau for letters and calls of complaints reflect problems. Guan said, on March 30, 2010, the Public Security Bureau had rescue Hebei zhongxing, houjie town of 100,000 yuan, and bond was signed on the spot to ensure future because this matter to the relevant authorities for appealing.


Tweets mentioned this star's brother said, "let the signature, I can't read, sign. After the signing, say, no more appealing, this is a relief, not compensation. We feel cheated. ”


In addition to judicial means, Hebei zhongxing also tries himself through the media, "grievance", also tried to take advantage of network protection, but not a cause for concern.


"Airport 7·20 explosion" occurred, the incident received wide attention. Dongguan Government have held conferences, said it would set up a task force, to Hebei zhongxing in Dongguan, Guangdong Province was beaten to disability case review.


On August 1 this year, Hebei zhongxing has assured the Government of Dongguan city government information publicity applications submitted, asking authorities in Dongguan to open its battered maimed in Dongguan's review of the case concludes. The Dongguan Government informed that it is not within the scope of publicly available information. Thus, stars bring administrative prosecution to Dongguan intermediate people's Court in Hebei province, asking authorities in Dongguan to open their own battered disability case review concluded. On October 25, the Dongguan intermediate people's Court to entertain the case.


At the same time, Hebei zhongxing Sue Guangdong Provincial Public Security Department to publicly review the conclusions of the case, after having been dismissed by the Guangzhou intermediate people's Court, at present, the stars have been appealed to the Guangdong high people's Court in Hebei province.

(Edit: SN098)
December 06, 2013 China News Network
(
冀中星诉东莞政府案今开庭 让公开致残复查结论|东莞|冀中星|开庭_新闻资讯

  中新网12月6日电 冀中星状告东莞市政府一案今天将在东莞市中级人民法院审理。本案因冀中星今年7月20日在北京首都机场制造爆炸案而备受关注。冀中星自称8年前遭东莞新塘村治安队队员殴打致脊椎粉碎性骨折、下肢瘫痪,要求东莞市政府公开自己被殴打致残一案的复查结论。


  首都机场爆炸案牵出8年前“致残案”


  今年7月20日,冀中星携带着自制的爆炸装置,从山东居住地独自乘长途汽车来京,并于当晚6点多在首都国际机场T3航站楼二层引爆了爆炸装置,造成本人重伤、一民警轻微伤。随后,冀中星被警方当场控制并抓获。


  8月29日,朝阳检察院以涉嫌爆炸罪对冀中星提起公诉。9月17日,朝阳法院开庭审理此案,冀中星坚称到首都机场是为反映诉求并非为“爆炸”,辩护律师也为其进行了无罪辩护。10月15日,朝阳法院一审以爆炸罪判处冀中星有期徒刑6 年。


  一审宣判后,冀中星以过失引发爆炸、量刑过重等为由提出上诉。北京市三中院经审理认为,一审判决就冀中星出于对相关部门处理其受伤致残一事不满而实施爆炸的案件起因已予认定,事实清楚,量刑适当,应予维持。


  宣判后,法院允许冀中星哥哥等家属会见了冀中星。冀中星哥哥称,法官告知他们过段时间会将冀中星送回山东老家,监外执行。


  至此,这起事件因二审宣判告一段落。然而,冀中星所提到的诉求,也就是8年前的一起“致残案”尚未有答案,社会仍在质疑,究竟是何种原因让冀中星选择如此极端的方式?


  “殴打致残”还是“交通事故”引争论


  关于“致残案”,究竟是交通事故还是殴打致残,始终是冀中星、龚明照(当年乘坐冀中星摩托车的龚涛)与警方争议的焦点。冀中星在2006年写的博客中称,2005年6月28日2时许,自己在东莞骑摩托车搭乘客龚涛去厚街新塘,途中遇到警察巡逻查车,遭到治安队员持钢管追打,造成腰椎体骨折导致完全性瘫痪。


  冀中星的老家山东鄄城县相关部门7月21日回复媒体时称,冀中星曾在广东东莞市打工,以开“摩的”为业,于2005年6月28日,驾驶一辆摩托三轮拉客在经过东莞市厚街镇新塘村治安队门口时,冀中星和其所拉的客人龚涛遭到新塘村治安队队员殴打,致使冀中星脊椎粉碎性骨折、下肢瘫痪。


  对上述说法,东莞方面并不完全认同。7月21日下午,东莞市委宣传部对外发布了《关于冀中星反映被治安队员殴打致伤问题的情况通报》,否认了冀中星被殴打致残的表述。通报称:2005年6月28日凌晨 2时至3时,冀中星在厚街从事摩托车载客行驶至厚街新塘村治安队门口附近,与在路上巡逻的治安队员发生碰撞,冀中星及乘客龚涛倒地受伤。


  通报还强调,根据厚街公安分局解释,因整个案件过程没有其他路人及群众围观,至今仍没有证据证明治安队员殴打冀中星、龚涛的情况,故该案仍在调查中,如若查实,将依法处置。


  在此之后,冀中星当年搭载的乘客龚明照(龚涛)现身。他在给东莞市公安局信件中称,冀中星系被治安员殴打致残。在长达七页纸的信件中,他详述了冀中星被打的经过。东莞市公安局也确认已收到龚明照的信件。


  要求公开致残案结论 此前尝试各种渠道维权


  冀中星起诉东莞市政府的案由为“不履行政府信息公开法定职责纠纷”。而在首都机场引爆爆炸装置前,冀中星已上访8年。


  2005年7月8日,冀中星家属向厚街公安分局反映,冀中星6月28日被厚街镇新塘村治安队员殴打致残,要求处理。厚街镇公安分局接待了冀中星家属,并向他们解释,正对该事件进行调查,但没有证据证明治安队员殴打冀中星。


  同年7月28日,冀中星委托广东南天星律师事务所的律师向厚街镇公安分局递交行政赔偿申请书,要求依法追究相关人员的责任并赔偿其334782.49元。


  2007年1月31日,冀中星向东莞市人民法院提起民事诉讼,要求厚街镇新塘村委会赔偿其人身损害赔偿金人民币338266.99元。


  但2007年7月26日,经东莞市人民法院审理,认为冀中星的举证不足,判决驳回冀中星的诉讼请求。冀中星不服,提起上诉,东莞市中级人民法院2008年1月31日驳回上诉,维持原判。


  在民事诉讼败诉之后,冀中星又向中央政法委信访,并通过国家信访局投诉网站反映问题。东莞方面称,2010年3月30日,厚街镇公安分局曾救助过冀中星10万元,并当场签订了保证书,保证今后不再因为此事而到有关部门进行上访。


  而冀中星的哥哥在发微博提及此事时称,“让签字,我不识字,就签了。签了以后,说不许再上访了,这是救助不是赔偿。我们觉得被骗了。”


  在司法途径之外,冀中星还试图通过媒体给自己“申冤”,也尝试着利用网络维权,但并没有引起关注。


  “首都机场7·20爆炸案”发生后,这一事件受到广泛关注。东莞市政府曾召开会议,称将成立专案组,对冀中星在广东东莞被殴打致残案进行复查。


  今年8月1日,冀中星曾向东莞市政府递交政府信息公开申请书,要求东莞市政府公开对其在东莞被殴打致残案的复查结论。但东莞市政府告知其不属于公开信息范畴。因此,冀中星向东莞中院提起行政起诉,要求东莞市政府公开自己被殴打致残一案的复查结论。10月25日,东莞中院受理该案。


  同时,冀中星起诉广东省公安厅向其公开复查结论的案件,在被广州中院驳回后,目前,冀中星已上诉至广东高院。


(编辑:SN098)
2013年12月06日00:30
中国新闻网
)


If you have any requirements, please contact webmaster。(如果有什么要求,请联系站长)





QQ:154298438
QQ:417480759