Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)aaapublished in(发表于) 2013/12/6 12:16:27 Yunnan was official statutory rape mother protested the relatively light sentences or application-Yunnan-official
Beijing on December 6 the Reuters new media ("Site," good reporters He Chun Li Jinfeng Yang Shaogong) official with statutory rape case, only the first instance convicting the accused in prison for five years, County Prosecutor's Office had "no protest" triggered netizens into question. Superior prosecutors protested, and eventually be ordered a retrial of the case, officials retrial was sentenced to eight years. Daguan County, Yunnan province officials raping 4 year old daughters case "rollercoaster"-style progress, triggering sustained attention to the network at the same time as well as hotly debated how public opinion supervision and judicial justice.
Officials raised rape of jailed "light sentences for serious crimes" challenge
The end of September, "a 4-year-old girl was raped in an open letter," network, describes the Daguan County in zhaotong city of Yunnan province a 4 year old girl, was raped by Daguan County title Office Director Guo Yuchi at, officials were only sentenced to 5 years in prison after the Court, immediately raised concerns of Internet users.
Follow-up investigation of the journalist understands that during a trial in the case, Daguan County Procuratorate accused, defendant Guo Yuchi seeing a girl playing on the side of the night of August 24, it would be him to a bedroom in the implementation of adultery. In accordance with the relevant laws, Guo Yuchi criminal accountability should be based on rape, recommends sentenced to 3-5 years.
Daguan County September 24 hearing of the Court finds that the public prosecution service accused convicted of carnal knowledge should be more severe punishment. But Guo Yuchi own initiative after the arrest of the accused for an offence set forth in fact better attitude in confessing, should be punishment full episodes, sentenced to 5 years.
China University Law Professor Hong Daode describes, in accordance with the penal provisions committing rape shall be liable to three to ten years in prison; a statutory special plots to imprisonment of at least ten years, life imprisonment or the death penalty. Attorney Chen Weibiao said the victim, and other departments jointly issued by the Supreme Law on the legal punishment of the crime of sexual abuse of minors shall be strictly punished according to the law of the views outlined in a situation, including the implementation of national staff identity, rape of children under the age of 12 years.
On the results of the trial, many netizens said imposition of the sentence of the Court is manifestly, clearly falls within the "light sentences for serious crimes." Internet deep sea blue said, the defendant being a government official, and rape, were sentenced to 5-year sentence too lenient, local court proceedings subject to local influence or due to other factors interfere with light sentences.
Guardian considered that the Court of first instance judgment sentencing the victim too light, appeal and protest requests to Daguan County Prosecutor's Office. On October 8, the Daguan County Prosecutor's Office had been reviewed and replies, "a trial determining accurately, and dissuasive", decided not to protest.
Daguan County Prosecutor's Office "no protest" responses, once again raise questions over the network. Many netizens believe that case was clear to officials "leniency", and bending of the light sentence behind Guo Yuchi does have the authority to interfere? Prosecutor's Office not to protest if there is a practice of interest umbrella?
Sentencing retrial "upgrades" for eight years
At the sound of public opinion to question, zhaotong city, the parents of the victims to the public prosecutor's Office request to protest the verdict. On October 14, zhaotong city prosecutor's Office believes that the first-instance ruling "obviously improper sentencing" and proposed "heavier punishment according to law, accused motive despicable criminal acts affecting the poor," protested on three grounds.
On October 17, the intermediate people's Court directive Daguan County in zhaotong city of Yunnan province people's Court shall form a collegial panel to conduct the retrial Guo Yuchi statutory rape case. On December 3, the Daguan County people's court hearing the case again, sentencing judgments focus.
On December 6, Daguan County Court to conduct an open verdict on the case. Court retrial held, the original judgment in the first instance the key facts of the crime are clear, the evidence fully, the conviction is accurate and legitimate trial procedures, but punishment is inappropriate. Consider trial defendant Guo Yuchi facts, nature, circumstances and the harmful consequences of crime, as well as their understanding of compensation to the victims obtain the slain party, trial defendant Guo Yuchi committed rape, a determinate sentence of eight years. After the delivery of the defendant was not in court appeals.
Victim's mother said the relatively light sentence in the retrial verdict than expected, attorney Chen Weibiao introduced the victims, according to the families ' views into account to apply to Daguan County Prosecutor's protest.
A retrial after the publication of the judgement, many netizens said the retrial verdict reflects from the penalty for statutory rape officials and with justice, but the "five-year" changed to "eight years" are still reek of sentencing is too light.
Comments, Mark official statutory rape case in Yunnan province, was not only a sentence of "inappropriate", but also punish "inappropriate". "Talons" is frequently reach out to children, "violation cost" low is the crux is not for people who have demons formed should be deterrent.
Through the "mesh": how public opinion supervision and justice?
From a judgment of imprisonment of five years triggered concerns of Internet users, Daguan County Prosecutor's Office "no protest" brings the parties to question, to the superior prosecution authorities protested, mark court retrial verdict, this case "roller-coaster" type development, many netizens and experts concerned and discuss the case progress, review network of the relationship between public opinion and judicial justice.
Some netizens said, if there is no Internet attention and media coverage, the Yunnan official statutory rape case might end with "official prison". Revision of case retrial, though did not achieve the expected results, but also acted as those attempting to escape by local forces and interests, reducing false alarms of judicial punishment of criminals, "which should be the concern of Internet users between oversight and judiciary self-correction typical cases of positive interaction. ”
Hohai University Law Professor Wang Jianwen believed that under the current legal environment, some local judicial enforcement process, there may be a "practice" phenomenon, Internet users attention and supervision by public opinion in advancing the case concerns information public, breaking the local power has advantages, including obstruction. Supervision by public opinion in terms of judicial processes, the achievement of social justice, in General, has more advantages than disadvantages.
However, in recent years frequently appear excessive views expressed by visitors to intervene in judicial proceedings to form a "public trial" phenomenon, but also aroused public thinking. Shao Shufan, Vice President of Shanghai Lawyers Association believes that, from the perspective of judicial public, Web users can ask questions, but should avoid easy conclusions.
Shao Shufan says supervision should stick to the media specifications, staying neutral, avoid harm caused to the legitimate rights of the parties, "how to grasp public opinion to the administration of Justice, so that it has a positive affect rather than negative, it tests the capacity of judicial practitioners and experienced. "(Participation in the interview and the reporter: Zhu 翃)
新华网北京12月6日新媒体专电(“中国网事”记者何春好 李劲峰 杨绍功) 一起官员强奸幼女案，一审仅判决被告有期徒刑五年，县级检察院却“不予抗诉”，引发网民质疑。上级检察机关抗诉，案件终被指令再审，官员再审被判八年。云南大关县官员强奸4岁幼女案“过山车”式进展，引发网络持续关注同时，也带来舆论如何监督司法公正的热议。
官员强奸幼女获刑 引发“重罪轻判”质疑
9月底，一条“一个被强奸的4岁小女孩一封公开信”网帖，描述云南省昭通市大关县一4岁女孩，被时任大关县编办主任郭玉驰强奸后，官员只被法院判处5年有期徒刑的经过，随即引发网民关注。
记者追踪调查了解到，在此案一审过程中，大关县检察院指控，被告人郭玉驰8月24日晚见到一名幼女在路边玩耍，便将其抱至家中卧室实施奸淫。按照有关法律，应当以强奸罪追究郭玉驰刑事责任，建议判处有期徒刑3至5年。
大关县法院9月24日审理认定公诉机关指控罪名成立，且奸淫幼女应从重处罚。但被告人郭玉驰归案后能主动供述犯罪事实，认罪态度较好，应综合全案情节予以处罚，判处有期徒刑5年。
中国政法大学法学教授洪道德介绍，按照刑法规定，犯强奸罪应处三年以上十年以下有期徒刑；具有法定特别情节的要处十年以上有期徒刑、无期徒刑或者死刑。受害人代理律师陈维镖表示，根据最高法等部门联合发布的《关于依法惩治性侵害未成年人犯罪的意见》中罗列的须依法从严惩处的情形，其中包括实施者属于国家工作人员身份、强奸不满十二周岁的儿童。
对此审理结果，不少网民表示法院判处量刑明显过轻，明显属于“重罪轻判”。 网民深海蓝说，被告身为国家干部，且是强奸幼女，只被判5年量刑太轻了，存在当地法院审理过程中受地方势力或其他因素干扰造成轻判的可能。
受害人监护人认为法院一审判决量刑太轻，表示不服，并向大关县检察院提出抗诉请求。10月8日，大关县检察院经审查后答复，“一审判决定性准确，量刑适当”，决定不予抗诉。
大关县检察院“不予抗诉”的答复，在网络上再度引发质疑。不少网友认为，此案明显有对问题官员“从轻发落”之嫌，轻判郭玉驰背后是否有权力干涉的徇私枉法？检察院不予抗诉是否存在官官相护的利益保护伞？
再审判刑“升级”八年
在舆论质疑声中，受害人家长向昭通市检察院申请对一审判决进行抗诉。10月14日，昭通市检察院认为一审判决“量刑明显不当”，提出“未依法从重处罚，被告人作案动机卑劣，犯罪行为影响恶劣”三条理由进行抗诉。
10月17日，云南省昭通市中级人民法院指令大关县人民法院另行组成合议庭，再审郭玉驰强奸幼女案。12月3日，大关县人民法院再次开庭审理此案，量刑尺度成为判决焦点。
12月6日，大关县法院就此案进行公开宣判。法院再审认为，原一审判决认定的主要犯罪事实清楚，证据确实充分，定罪准确，审判程序合法，但量刑不当。综合考虑原审被告人郭玉驰的犯罪事实、性质、情节和危害后果，以及其对被害人进行赔偿取得被害方谅解的情况，将原审被告人郭玉驰犯强奸罪，改判有期徒刑八年。宣判后被告人未当庭表示上诉。
受害人母亲表示，再审判决比期待中的刑期偏轻，受害人代理律师陈维镖介绍，将根据家属意见考虑是否再向大关县检察院申请抗诉。
再审判决公布后，很多网民表示，再审判决体现了对强奸幼女官员从严从重惩处的司法准则，但“五年”改到“八年”，仍有量刑偏轻之嫌。
有评论认为，云南大关官员强奸幼女案背后，不仅是一次量刑的“不恰当”，更是惩罚态度的“不妥当”。“魔爪”之所以敢频频伸向幼儿，“违法成本”过低便是症结所在，并未对那些心存邪念的人形成应有的震慑作用。
透过“网眼”：舆论如何监督司法公正？
从一审判决有期徒刑五年引发网民关注，大关县检察院“不予抗诉”带来各方质疑，再到上级检察机关抗诉，大关法院再审判决，此案“过山车”式发展，令众多网民和专家在关注和讨论案件进展时，也在重新审视网络舆论与司法公正之间的关系。
有网民表示，倘若没有网络关注与媒体报道，此次云南官员强奸幼女案可能最终以“官员轻判”了事。此案再审改判，虽并未达到预期结果，但也敲响了那些企图靠地方势力和利益关系逃脱、减轻司法惩处的不法分子的警钟，“这应该是网民关注监督和司法自我纠正之间良性互动的典型案例。”
河海大学法学院教授王建文认为，在目前的司法环境下，部分地方司法执法过程中，可能存在“官官相护”现象，网民关注和舆论监督在推动案件疑点信息公开，突破地方权力阻挠等方面具有优势。舆论监督在推动司法进程、实现社会正义方面，总体而言是利大于弊。
然而，近年来屡屡出现的网民意见过度干预司法程序，形成“舆论审判”现象，也引发公众思考。上海市律师协会副会长邵曙范认为，从司法公开角度来看，网民可以提出问题，但应避免轻易下结论。
邵曙范说，舆论监督应该坚持媒体从业规范，保持客观中立，避免对当事人的合法权利造成伤害，“如何把握好舆论对司法的影响，使其产生正面的影响而不是负面的，这考验司法从业者的能力和经验。”(参与采写记者：朱翃)
赞