Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)aaapublished in(发表于) 2013/12/9 13:40:25 Ting Xu v Bank of first instance convicted of “abuse of right“， refuses to appeal
Nanfang daily dispatch (reporter/Yue Yan/Liu Guannan correspondents) yesterday afternoon, yuexiu Ting Xu sued the banks view the statement by the court case of deposit contract dispute, a ruling is made. First instance with "abuse of right" as an excuse, dismissing Ting Xu charged from your program.
Used by ATM teller machine failures, and steal $ 175,000 worth of Ting Xu, finished serving sentences on May 21, 2012. On July 4 this year, Ting Xu to the Bank in connection with the print trade bills, rejected, on August 16, Ting Xu to yuexiu District Court, banks are required to open an account to provide bank account details so far on the Bill. On October 25, the court hearing the case.
Yuexiu courts believe that Ting Xu with knowledge of account books and records an error case, filed civil proceedings in the present case, asked him to provide it from accounts so far, the only real, legitimate and effective, correct, detailed statements, an abuse of the civil action, contrary to a civil action should be guided by the principle of good faith. Moreover, the account running list as one of the criminal evidence, criminal review identified and already in use, its contents, Ting Xu is known. Therefore, Ting Xu advocated requiring banks to provide bank account details so far from his bank statement claims, not part of the scope of the peoples Court accepts the code of civil procedure. In accordance with the People's Republic of China-related provisions of the code of civil procedure, dismissing plaintiff Ting Xu's prosecution.
Verdict announced, reporter Ting Xu a telephone interview, he said he appealed against the first-instance ruling and will appeal.
(Original title: Court Ting Xu "abuse of right")
南方日报讯 (记者/刘冠南 通讯员/岳岩) 昨日下午，广州市越秀区法院对许霆诉银行查看对账单的存款合同纠纷一案，作出裁定。一审以“滥用诉权”为由，从程序上裁定驳回许霆起诉。
曾经因ATM取款机故障而盗取17.5万元的许霆，于2012年5月21日服刑完毕。今年7月4日，许霆到涉案银行要求打印交易账单，遭到拒绝，8月16日，许霆到广州市越秀区法院起诉，要求银行向其提供开户至今的银行账户明细对账单。10月25日，法院公开开庭审理了此案。
越秀法院审理认为，许霆在明知账户记账记录出错的情况下，仍提起本案民事诉讼，要求被告向其提供从开户至今、唯一、正确、真实、合法、有效的明细对账单，是滥用民事诉权的行为，有悖于民事诉讼应当遵循的诚实信用原则。而且，《账户流水清单》作为刑事证据之一，已经刑事诉讼审查认定和使用，对其内容，许霆也是明知的。因此，许霆主张要求银行提供从其开户至今的银行账户明细对账单的诉讼请求，不属于人民法院受理民事诉讼的范围。依照《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》的相关规定，裁定驳回原告许霆的起诉。
裁定结果公布后，记者电话采访了许霆，他表示自己不服一审裁定，将要上诉。
(原标题：法院裁定许霆“滥用诉权”)
赞