Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)aaapublished in(发表于) 2013/12/16 0:39:30 Lowest 11.4 billion Government procurement alone， corporate Defense Ministry
"Government procurement" first case sequels
The lowest tender Enterprise two report dissatisfaction with the decision by the Ministry to sue
Commissioned by the national development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of health in the two procurement agencies to purchase related equipment, a company called Beijing Hyundai, Walt trade limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as "modern, Walt") companies bidding for twice the minimum, but were not successful. To this end, the modern Wohl complained to the Treasury, but has not been returned within specified time. To this end, 7 years ago, modern wall to finance prosecutions to court, after a Beijing court hearing, the Treasury lost in both. Case also was called by the media "the first case of public procurement". After the Court of final appeal ruling, the Ministry of finance decision, but modern wall under the Ministry's decisions, sued the Treasury Department once again. Yesterday, the city intermediate people's court hearing the cases of administrative litigation.
Lowest price big loss got sued
The case stems from "atypical pneumonia" outbreak took place after a game worth $ 11.4 billion worth of government procurement.
In September 2003, approved by the State Council development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of health in the preparation of the medical care system of public health emergency plan. In October 2003, the national development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of health commissioned the two procurement agencies--Guoxin tendering limited liability company and China far East international trading Corporation, respectively on medical aid projects for public bidding, procurement-related equipment.
On October 29, 2004 and November 19, 2004 opening of procurement projects of the total 586 units of blood gas Analyzer, wall in companies in two bidding are minimum, but were not successful.
Wall on December 21, 2004, complaints lodged with the Treasury Department, on March 23, 2005, after the Treasury failed to make treatment decisions within the statutory period of 30 days, has not responded for the institution of administrative proceedings and take the Ministry to court.
On December 8, 2006, the city intermediate people's Court of first instance judgment of finance did not perform their statutory duties, the losing. Treasury Department appeal, June 7, 2007, the High Court hearing the case, on November 21, 2012 and a final judgement, dismissing the appeal, maintaining the first-instance court decisions.
Dissatisfied with the response companies sued the Ministry of finance
On May 13, the Ministry of finance in accordance with the Court judgment, processed to the wall of complaints against the decision. Which States that "the complainants their products do not meet the substantive requirements of the tender documents." For this decision, Mr Volcker company called the decision unjustified and considered the fact that contradiction, so Treasury to court again, and health planning Committee, the national development and Reform Commission and China far East international trading Corporation three units as a third party.
Wall company represented in the administrative complaint, on October 29, 2004 and November 19, 2004 opening of procurement projects total 586 units of blood gas Analyzer, world company in bidding for twice the minimum, 56,800 yuan per unit, but tender. Meanwhile, the two bid is awarded to the same company, its bid price of 80,000 yuan per unit, is the highest among all vendors. Wall believed that the tendering process "black-box operation" and to require the purchaser to give a reasonable explanation.
Finance: decisions and procedures are based on legitimate
Yesterday afternoon, Wei did not appear at Planning Commission and the national development and Reform Commission as a third party.
Prosecution, agents of the Treasury Department, decided to make the basis and procedures are legal. This time, agents vote requirement in the tender documents, noting "maintenance-free, no need to replace the pump tube, pipe and gas bottle". Wall company investment product that uses a Peristaltic Pumps, tubing, pipe, the cylinder need replacing on a regular basis, and in personnel training also included a peristaltic pump installation and replacement, installation and replacement of gas cylinders, do not meet the substantive requirements of the tender documents, and therefore finds that it does not comply with the tender documents required.
In this regard, wall said, more advanced technology is actually the company's products, and fully comply with the tender requirements, replaceable cylinder, more in line with the requirements of portable.
For wall company claims that as an agent of the company in the far east of the third person to appear was also responding, pointed out that the tender result was after the judges talk about that, in terms of procedure and entity is no problem.
Agents in particular, is particularly required Tubing parts such as "replace", because at that time the Government procurement tenders is set in "atypical pneumonia" after the outbreak and epidemic, two serious problems occur is a matter of contaminated and infected, so special attention to put an end to these two issues.
Proceeding not sentence the Court yesterday. Morning news reporter Sean he
(Edit: SN067)December 13, 2013 Beijing morning post(114亿政府采购报价最低却落单 企业诉部委|财政部|政府采购|招标_新闻资讯
“政府采购第一案”出续集
报价最低却落标 企业两告财政部 不满处理决定再次起诉
国家发改委、卫生部委托两家采购代理机构采购相关仪器设备中，一家名为北京现代沃尔经贸有限责任公司(下称“现代沃尔”)的公司两次投标报价中均为最低，却都未中标。为此，现代沃尔向财政部投诉，但在规定时间内未获回复。为此，7年前，现代沃尔将财政部起诉至法院，经过北京两级法院的审理，财政部均告败诉。此案也被媒体称为“政府采购第一案”。终审判决后，财政部做出处理决定，但现代沃尔不满财政部的决定，再次起诉财政部。昨天，市一中院开庭审理了这起行政诉讼案件。
报价最低 丢大单愤然起诉
这起案件源于“非典”疫情之后举行的一场价值高达114亿元的政府招标采购。
2003年9月，国务院批准了发改委、卫生部编制的《突发公共卫生事件医疗救治体系建设规划》。2003年10月，国家发改委、卫生部委托两家采购代理机构——国信招标有限责任公司和中国远东国际贸易总公司，分别对医疗救治体系项目进行公开招标，采购相关仪器设备。
2004年10月29日、2004年11月19日先后开标合计586台的血气分析仪采购项目中，沃尔公司在两次投标报价中均为最低，却都未中标。
沃尔公司于2004年12月21日向财政部投诉，后于2005年3月23日以财政部在法定30天时间内未能做出处理决定，也没有给予答复为由，提起行政诉讼，将财政部告上法庭。
2006年12月8日，市一中院一审判决财政部未履行法定职责，败诉。财政部上诉后， 2007年6月7日，市高院开庭审理此案，并于2012年11月21日终审判决，驳回上诉，维持一审法院判决。
不满答复 企业再诉财政部
今年5月13日，财政部按照法院判决，对沃尔公司的投诉意见做出了处理决定书。其中指出“投诉人所投产品不符合招标文件实质性要求”。对于这一处理决定，沃尔公司认为该决定缺乏依据且认定事实自相矛盾，因此再次将财政部告上法庭，并将卫计委、发改委和中国远东国际贸易总公司三家单位列为第三人。
沃尔公司在行政起诉状中表示，在2004年10月29日、2004年11月19日先后开标合计586台的血气分析仪采购项目中，沃尔公司在两次投标报价中均为最低，每台5.68万元，却都落标。与此同时，两次竞标的中标者是同一家公司，其投标价格为每台8万元，是所有供应商中最高的。沃尔公司认为招标过程存在“暗箱操作”，并要求采购方给予合理解释。
财政部：决定依据和程序均合法
昨天下午，作为第三人的卫计委和发改委没有出庭。
针对起诉，财政部的代理人表示，决定做出的依据和程序均合法。此次，代理人特意指出招标文件中要求所投产品“免保养，无需更换泵管、管路及气瓶”。而沃尔公司所投产品使用了蠕动泵，泵管、管路、气瓶需定期更换，在人员培训内容中也包括蠕动泵的安装与更换，气瓶的安装与更换，不符合招标文件实质性要求，因此认定其不符合招标文件要求。
对此，沃尔公司表示，该公司产品的技术实际上更加先进，而且完全符合招标要求，可更换的气瓶，更符合便携式的要求。
对于沃尔公司的主张，作为第三人出庭的远东公司的代理人也进行了回应，指出投标结果是经过评审委员专家讨论之后得出的，在程序和实体上都没有问题。
代理人特别指出，之所以特别要求泵管等部件“免更换”，是因为当时政府采购招标的背景是在“非典”疫情之后，而在疫情中，出现的两个严重问题是污染和被传染的问题，所以特别注意杜绝这两个问题的发生。
昨天此案没有当庭宣判。晨报记者 何欣
赞