Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)aaapublished in(发表于) 2013/12/17 15:39:00 Former Vice Governor of Hubei Province were women scam， police accused SWIFT case
People Hainan Windows December 16 electric (reporter ningyuan) recently, is concern of Chengdu woman Li Jinglan suspected fraud Hubei Province Qian Deputy Governor Meng a money a case in in Hainan Province Baisha County Court again sitting trial, seized party does not change previously indictment allegations of related content, defence party lawyer is pointed out that, according to new gets of evidence displayed, Li Jinglan fundamental no modus operandi of time and space, so seized party of allegations does not established.
Former Vice Governor reported were scams, rapid sand courts handling cases
A year ago, Li Jinglan Chengdu woman was 25 years old has served successively as Vice Governor of Hainan, Hubei between his allegation of fraud on his money, Li Jinglan surrendered after being released on bail pending trial. May 13, 2013, a year later, she was arrested again by the police on suspicion of fraud penalty in Baisha County, 16th, is the local prosecutors ' Office arrested and Sue to court in the 17th, 18th, the local court to hear the case and render a judgment in order to defraud sentenced Li Jinglan in jail for two years and six months and fined 2000 Yuan. Law said justice organizations work in Baisha County is a "fast".
After receiving the Baisha County Court of first instance, Li Jinglan entrusted a lawyer immediately to the second intermediate people's Court of Hainan Province appeal called Baisha justice organizations illegal investigation, requesting revocation of Baisha breaches of statutory procedures of the Court's decision.
Court of second instance proceedings against
On August 1, the second intermediate people's Court of Hainan Province in Baisha County Court hearing of the case for the second trial. On that day, the prosecution again around the "Li Jinglan whether they constitute fraud" and "police investigation procedures against" fierce debate on the issue.
Hainan two in the homes trial think, a trial trial appeal people Li Jinglan made fraud sin of trial program illegal, by the homes trial Committee discussion decided, in accordance with criminal law of about provides, Yu this year September made ruled, revocation Baisha Court made of (2013) white criminal early word 38th, judgement, and will the crime back Baisha Court again trial (see website Hainan Windows October 16, 2013 reported Baisha public security organs "rapid" case two trial court refers to program illegal under).
On November 28, the Court reopened in Baisha County Li Jinglan alleged fraud case, prosecution and again around the "Li Jinglan whether they constitute fraud", "handling illegal existence program" continues its debate on such issues.
Reporters noted, Baisha County Prosecutor's Office has not made changes to the production of relevant elements of the indictment, also remains in the debate insisted that Li Jinglan constitutes fraud.
Defence said the prosecution allegation cannot stand
However, Lixin Li Jinglan counsel, Hainan law law firm Liao Xiangqi pointed out that, according to the latest police obtain relevant testimony showed that Li Jinglan in the present case there was no crime in time and space, so the prosecution's allegation cannot stand.
Prosecutors allege, August 29, 2010, and accused Li Jinglan respectively in the town of seven square in Baisha County, Hainan Province of Hainan coconut flower wines Ltd and Shandong province zouping daixi Villa two places, and "coconut flower wine" legal representative of our company when you talk about wine co, pretends he is a head of Xie Li and Assistant Director. For cooperation, and asked Lee to join the Agency and to pay 11,000 yuan fee. March 7, 2011, in Haikou to provide remittance address 11,000 Yuan Li.
But Liao Xiangqi said, according to police witnesses on the scene on the day of August 29, 2010 Huang Mouxiong (send Li Jinglan line to the driver of a white sand) and Lu Mouqun (coconut flower liquor production manager) the enquiry confirmed that Li Jinglan Baisha later on that day, there was no Winery, all directly to the town of Baisha seven square one restaurant after dinner, right back to the open sea. According to a statement of the fifth police enquiry, on November 25, 2010, when he and his wife arrived in daixi village in Shandong province, "because of the time it's too late, said Li Jinglan, go back the next day, Yu Zhenping to Shandong and Li Jinglan daixi Villa".
Liao Xiangqi believes that since August 29, 2010, after Li Jinglan in Baisha County, did not enter a winery, on November 25, 2010 did not go into a room, prosecutors allege Li Jinglan respectively in both time and place to commit fraudulent acts could not be established.
He pointed out that prosecutors allege Li Jinglan claimed to be Taiwan Vice-President of a political party and imposed on an identity fraud is also questionable. For many years in politics, with its experience, knowledge, he breaks into a plain paper printing card and two pictures lead you to believe that a young woman was Taiwan political parties, Mr Deputy President, and a don't understand Taiwan political parties or even involved in "Taiwan independence" forces without fear there would be asked to join the Organization, there is no common sense. Submit three reports to the police and the material and accept police record five times, there are numerous contradictions, equally unorthodox.
Liao Xiangqi think, pursuant to Supreme People's Court on established sound against criminal wronged and misjudged cases work mechanism of views under of provides, "finalized evidence insufficient of cases, should insisted suspected Sin from no of principles, law sentenced accused innocence, shall not made ' room ' of judgment", this case accused people was controlled fraud, conviction evidence doubts, and currently of evidence has can excluded accused fraud of facts, should law sentencing accused innocence.
The same day, Li Jinglan also made a final statement to the Court, she insists it is not imposed on a scam, asked the Court to ascertain the facts on the basis of their own innocence.
人民网海南视窗12月16日电(记者 宁远)近日，备受关注的成都女子李靖澜涉嫌诈骗湖北省前副省长孟某钱财一案在海南省白沙黎族自治县法院重新开庭审理，检方并未变更此前起诉书指控的相关内容，辩方律师则指出，根据新获取的证据显示，李靖澜根本没有作案的时间和空间，因此检方的指控并不成立。
前副省长报案称遭诈骗，白沙公检法神速办案
一年前，25岁的成都女子李靖澜被曾经先后担任海南、湖北两地副省长的孟某指称其诈骗了他的钱财，李靖澜在投案后被取保候审。一年后的2013年5月13日，她被白沙县警方再次以涉嫌诈骗刑拘；16日，被当地检察院批捕，并在17日起诉至法院；18日，当地法院审理了这一案件并作出判决，以诈骗罪名成立判处李靖澜有期徒刑二年零六个月，并处罚金2000元。有法律人士说，白沙县公检法机关这样的办案过程堪称“神速”。
在接到白沙县法院作出的一审判决后，李靖澜立即委托律师向海南省第二中级法院提起上诉，称白沙县公检法机关违法办案，请求撤销白沙县法院违反法定程序作出的判决。
二审法院指程序违法
8月1日，海南省第二中级人民法院在白沙县法院开庭对这一案件进行二审。当天，控辩双方再次围绕“李靖澜的行为是否构成诈骗罪”、“公检法办案机关是否存在程序违法”等问题进行了激烈辩论。
海南二中院审理认为，一审审理上诉人李靖澜犯诈骗罪的审判程序违法，经该院审判委员会讨论决定，依照刑事诉讼法的有关规定，于今年9月份作出裁定，撤销白沙县法院作出的(2013)白刑初字第38号判决书，并将该案发回白沙县法院重新审理(详见人民网海南视窗2013年10月16日报道《白沙县公检法"神速"办案 二审法院指程序违法》)。
11月28日，白沙县法院重新开庭审理李靖澜涉嫌诈骗一案，控辩双方再次围绕“李靖澜的行为是否构成诈骗罪”、“办案机关是否存在程序违法”等问题继续展开辩论。
记者注意到，白沙县检察院并未对此前制作起诉书指控的相关内容作出更改，在辩论中也依然坚持认为李靖澜的行为构成诈骗犯。
辩方称检方指控不能成立
不过，李靖澜的辩护律师、海南法立信律师事务所律师廖向琦指出，根据警方最新获取的相关证言显示，李靖澜在本案中根本就没有作案时间和空间，因此检方的指控不能成立。
检方指控，2010年8月29日，2010年11月25日，被告人李靖澜分别在海南省白沙县七坊镇海南椰花香酒业有限公司和山东省邹平黛溪山庄两地，与“椰花香酒”公司法人代表孟某洽谈有关酒业合作事宜时，李谎称自己是某机构负责人谢某某助理兼主任。为促成合作，李要求孟先加入该机构并交纳11000元会费。2011年3月7日，孟在海口市向李提供的地址汇款11000元。
但廖向琦称，据警方对2010年8月29日当天在场证人黄某雄(送李靖澜一行至白沙的司机)和卢某群(椰花香酒业生产厂长)所做的询问笔录证实，李靖澜当日到白沙县后，根本没有进酒厂，大家直接到白沙县七坊镇上的一酒家吃晚饭后，直接回到海口了。根据孟某第五次接受警方询问笔录的陈述，2010年11月25日他和妻子到达山东黛溪山庄时，“由于时间太晚了，李靖澜就说先回去了，第二天，李靖澜和余振平才一起来到山东黛溪山庄”。
廖向琦认为，既然2010年8月29日李靖澜到白沙县后没有进入孟某的酒厂，2010年11月25日亦未进入孟某的房间，那么检方指控李靖澜分别在两个时间和地点实施的诈骗行为就无法成立。
他指出，检方指控李靖澜自称是台湾一个政党的副主席并以此身份对孟某实施诈骗也令人生疑。孟某多年从政，以其人生阅历、知识水平来说，仅凭着一张普通纸打印的名片和两张合影，就相信一个小女子是台湾政党的副主席，而且对一个一点儿都不了解的台湾政党，甚至是否牵涉“台独”势力都毫无顾忌就要求加入该组织，根本不符合常理。而且其向警方提交的三份报案材料及五次接受警方询问的笔录有多处自相矛盾，同样不符合常理。
廖向琦认为，依照最高人民法院《关于建立健全防范刑事冤假错案工作机制的意见》的规定，“定案罪证不足的案件，应当坚持疑罪从无的原则，依法判处被告人无罪，不得作出‘留有余地’的判决”，本案被告人被控诈骗，定罪证据存疑，而且目前的证据已能够排除被告人诈骗的事实，应依法宣判被告人无罪。
当天，李靖澜也向法庭作了最后陈述，她坚称自己并未对孟某实施诈骗，请求法庭在查明事实的基础上还自己一个清白。
赞