Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)aaapublished in(发表于) 2013/12/17 15:39:57 Henan man two appeal medical Planning Committee： public health breast GB meeting minutes were dismissed
V Health Planning Commission public information access
Breast men call for a public health exchange of views on new national standards developed within the proceedings of the Court found that information from the public
Home consumers Zhao Zhengjun whether the breast is exposed in Henan new ballroom and meeting minutes, twice the original Ministry of health (Health Planning Commission) charged to court. Yesterday, the municipal court hearing in the administrative cases and the court verdict, "open meeting minutes may cause the Member to candidly express their views" from the rejected Zhao Zhengjun claims.
Man with two against the original Ministry of health
On January 4, 2012, Zhao Zhengjun Zhengzhou public to the Ministry of health has sent a letter to express, claiming to be "buy raw milk, about standard-setting" to apply for other open "of the breast (GB19301-2010) 66 food safety standards discussed in the review process, professional writing the minutes of the meeting of the Committee". January 20, original Ministry of health to he sent sent has a copies non-this organ Government information told book under (following abbreviation "told book"), content roughly for Ministry of health has open health breast under (GB19301-2010), 66 items food security national standards, fulfil has its Government information open range within of duties, and professional Committee Department technology institutions, its Conference summary of not belonging to Ministry of health Government information open range.
Due to dissatisfaction with the response of the Ministry of health, Zhao Zhengjun on February 16 to the Beijing Municipal first intermediate people's court proceedings, requesting revocation of prior information public notice of the Ministry of health, and ordered its openness raw milk new ballroom and meeting minutes, and so on. On October 17 of that year, municipal intermediate people's Court decision to withdraw the original Ministry of health had previously "not part of the public range" reply decision and to respond to requests within the statutory time limit. Zhao Zhengjun and former Ministry of health, this decision has not been appealed.
December 13, 2012, original Ministry of health made disabilities Shen Fu (2012) 1080th, Government information according to application public told book under, again reply Zhao Zhengjun, pointed out that its application of information is food security national standards review in the of process sex information, according to notice of the on do Government information according to application public work of views under (State Office sent (2010) 5th,) provides, not belongs to People's Republic of China Government information public Ordinance under by refers to should public of Government information. Zhao Zhengjun refuses the notice to reassure Beijing intermediate people's Court to administrative proceedings. In the course of proceedings, due to institutional reform and the function change of the State Council, accused the Ministry of health has changed for the National Board of health and family planning.
Sentence the Court dismissed the appeal
Yesterday morning, Zhao Zhengjun appear in person should be sued, and while the dock sat David Planning Commission's two agent ad litem. Zhao Zhengjun, proposed, first of all, according to the Government information disclosure Ordinance, he applied to the defendant no public information is not part of the case, to be made publicly available and, secondly, no evidence of meeting minutes is under consideration by the defendant, during the discussion of information and State Office (2010) document as basis reply, belongs to the error of law.
Health Planning Commission agents may say that, according to the State Office (2010) 5th, under article II, executive producer or for the internal management information in their daily work, as well as in the process of discussion, research or review information, generally do not fall within the Ordinance, means the Government information should be made public. Eventually in this case information, such as the breast health 66 national food safety standards have been open, and meeting minutes to the standard form in the course of discussions, research information, and therefore is not part of the regulations the meaning of Government information should be made public. Original Ministry of health related files according to the State Office told by the Defense information, procedure legal, law applicable to the right.
After trial, municipal intermediate people's Court on the court verdict on the case. Court think, considered to government information public Ordinance under of purposes one of is "promoting in accordance with the Executive", and executive organ in executive decisions made Qian can full collection different views, thereby guarantee executive decisions of right made, for in executive organ internal exchange views of Government information, regardless of in executive decisions process in the public, also is in executive decisions made Hou public, are may led to in executive organ internal to Frank express views, therefore class government information should from public. Accordingly, the Beijing intermediate people's Court of first instance judgment dismissing the claims of Zhao Zhengjun.
Morning news reporter Sean he
诉卫计委公开信息被驳
男子要求公开生乳新国标制定会议纪要 法院认定内部交换意见信息免于公开
河南籍消费者赵正军就是否公开生乳新国标制定会议纪要，两次将原卫生部(现卫计委)起诉至法院。昨天，市一中院开庭审理了这起行政案件，并当庭做出判决，以“公开会议纪要可能导致委员难以坦率地表达意见”为由，判决驳回赵正军的诉讼请求。
男子两诉原卫生部
2012年1月4日，郑州市民赵正军向原卫生部发送了一封快递，声称为“购买生乳，了解标准制定情况”，申请对方公开“《生乳》(GB19301-2010)等66项食品安全国家标准在审查讨论过程中，专业委员会编写的会议纪要”。1月20日，原卫生部向他寄送了一份《非本机关政府信息告知书》(以下简称“告知书”)，内容大致为卫生部已公开《生乳》(GB19301-2010)等66项食品安全国家标准，履行了其政府信息公开范围内的职责，而专业委员会系技术机构，其会议纪要不属于卫生部政府信息公开范围。
因不满原卫生部的答复，赵正军于当年2月16日向北京市第一中级人民法院提起诉讼，请求撤销原卫生部的信息公开告知书，并判令其公开生乳新国标制定会议纪要等。同年10月17日，市一中院判决撤销原卫生部此前“不属于公开范围”的答复决定，并要求其在法定期限内重新做出答复。赵正军及原卫生部对此判决均未提起上诉。
2012年12月13日，原卫生部作出卫政申复〔2012〕1080号《政府信息依申请公开告知书》，再次答复赵正军，指出其申请的信息是食品安全国家标准审查中的过程性信息，按照《国务院办公厅关于做好政府信息依申请公开工作的意见》(国办发〔2010〕5号)规定，不属于《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》所指应公开的政府信息。赵正军不服该告知书，再次向北京一中院提起行政诉讼。在诉讼过程中，因国务院机构改革和职能转变，被告原卫生部变更为国家卫生和计划生育委员会。
当庭宣判驳回上诉
昨天上午，赵正军亲自出庭应诉，而被告席上则坐着卫计委的两名诉讼代理人。赵正军提出，首先，根据《政府信息公开条例》，他向被告申请的信息不属于不得公开的情形，应予公开；其次，被告没有证据证明会议纪要属于处于审议、讨论过程中的信息，且以国办发〔2010〕5号文件作为答复依据，属于适用法律错误。
卫计委的代理人则认为，按照国办发〔2010〕5号文件第二条规定，行政机关在日常工作中制作或者获取的内部管理信息以及处于讨论、研究或者审查中的过程性信息，一般不属于《条例》所指应公开的政府信息。本案中最终信息《生乳》等66项国家食品安全标准已经公开，而会议纪要属于该标准形成过程中讨论、研究的信息，因此不属于《条例》所指应公开的政府信息。原卫生部依据国办相关文件作出被诉信息告知，程序合法，适用法律正确。
经审理，市一中院对此案当庭做出判决。法院认为，考虑到《政府信息公开条例》的宗旨之一是“促进依法行政”，而行政机关在行政决策作出前能够充分汇集不同观点，从而保证行政决策的正确作出，对于在行政机关内部交换意见的政府信息，无论在行政决策过程中公开，还是在行政决策作出后公开，均可能导致在行政机关内部难以坦率表达意见，故此类政府信息应免于公开。据此，北京一中院一审判决驳回原告赵正军的诉讼请求。
晨报记者 何欣
赞