Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)aaapublished in(发表于) 2013/12/17 15:40:37 Leading cadres pay is not transparent or will cause damage to the credibility of the Government
Leaders get to "mystification"
Department recently to the Standing Committee of the National Committee of the CPPCC, Fudan University Professor Ge Jianxiong's proposal in a letter of reply revealed that currently the Department is in conjunction with the departments concerned amendments to provincial and ministerial level cadres live treatment provisions, the party and State leaders living treatment provisions are also being examined by the relevant departments to amend. Media reported that a revision of the party and State leaders living treatment progress was in the public eye for the first time.
Outwardly, the letter is for Ge Jianxiong members this year the "two sessions" reply submission-related proposals. The Department's attitude is very clear, to establish a complete and rational, standardized system of treatment system of leading cadres. The establishment of such a system is necessary, of course. If the leaders ' pay is not, are not standardized, tends to cause a lot of problems.
Judging from the recently exposed a lot of information, treatment of issues surrounding the leader, reform is becoming more and more transparent and standard. Of course, leaders towards a more open and standard of treatment, requires a process to be overnight. Rome was not built in one day, social progress cannot be achieved in a Flash, but be clear, stable pace.
Frankly, past treatment of leading cadres at all levels, on the whole, transparency is not enough. Especially to the middle and upper levels, more people have a "mysterious" feeling. In June of this year, a member of the clear, request others do you first do it, request not made yourself never do. In this context, leading cadres ' treatment "mystification", was indeed granted thing.
In fact, the houses of leading cadres at all levels, service vehicles, equipment, Office space and equal treatment of the Secretariat, is not standard. For example, ministerial equipped with cars to 450,000 yen; a full Ministry standard is 220 square meters of housing; a full Ministry Office area of 54 square metres per person, and so on. Ministerial officials of relevant standards, natural as the level down low. In other words, the General standard on leading cadres ' treatment is there, just open enough. For most people, this aspect of the right, not being well met.
This degree of transparency, is also reflected in the treatment of living for retired leaders. Retired leaders employed during has made contributions to the country, after retirement should get necessary treatment--and there is no doubt about it. Also in the lack of transparency. Reality does exist, people withdrawal, partly of treatment did not return. For example, after some leaders step down, also has offices in multiple locations, which will undoubtedly cause a certain amount of waste.
Treatment of the leading cadres is not transparent enough, tend to lead to speculation in the community. Some guesses inaccurate information, officials credit and undermining the credibility of the Government. Rumor in transparent, this has consensus. Open to the public, the opaque to transparent, both to the taxpayers should be respected, as well as officials at all levels should be required and avoid lack of transparency and a variety of woes.
While in treatment of emphasizes leaders should gradually transparent, also wishes to underline the treatment of a variety of specifications. In this context, a comprehensive reasonable and uniform norms of treatment system of leading cadres, should take the establishment. Such a system, it should at least pay attention to several problems: one was the prerogative of removing wrong; the second is to carry out certain aspects of the exploration, such as residence; c is the pursuit of a comprehensive and complete.
Privileges in human society, "a dazzling spectacle". Against the privileges, the least thing is a modern civilized society. Beware of is that certain privileges also strongly rooted in reality, social ecology, undermine social justice. This privilege, also reflected in the treatment of leading cadres '. For example, some local officials enjoy privileges in medical expenses, some criticism.
Exploring such as residence, is to avoid "trickery" and other phenomena appear. In essence, it is through the official housing allocation reform to avoid abuse of power. At some point, you said you said no, had to come up with good ways. Specification of possible officials with good treatment. In addition, the leading cadres system needed to complete the treatment system, incomplete there will be loopholes.
At present, Central brake "four winds" problem, rejection of all kinds of extravagant waste. Central to solve the excessive treatment of cadres, expected to be a vigorous, is adamant. In this context, leaders get to "mystification", the pursuit of more open, more standardized, as also is the inherent to the topic.
领导人待遇要去“神秘化”
中组部近日在给全国政协常委、复旦大学教授葛剑雄的提案答复函中透露，目前中组部正会同有关部门对省部级干部生活待遇规定进行修订，党和国家领导人生活待遇规定也正由有关部门研究修订。媒体的报道称，党和国家领导人生活待遇规定的修订进展是首次出现在公众视野中。
中组部的这个函，是对葛剑雄委员今年全国“两会”时提交的相关提案的答复。中组部的态度很明确，要建立完备合理、统一规范的领导干部待遇制度体系。这样一个体系的建立当然是必要的。倘若领导干部待遇不合理、不规范，势必会导致许多问题发生。
从近些时候公开的许多信息来看，围绕领导人的待遇问题，大的改革方向是越来越透明与规范。当然，领导人的待遇走向更为公开与规范，需要一个过程，难以一蹴而就。罗马不是一天建成，社会的进步也不可能在一瞬间实现，但是方向要明确，步子要稳定。
坦率而言，过去各层级领导干部的生活待遇，总体上透明度是不够的。特别是到了中高层级，更让人有一种“神秘”之感。今年6月，中央政治局明确表态，要求别人做到的自己首先做到，要求别人不做的自己绝对不做。在此背景下，领导干部生活待遇去“神秘化”，确实也是理所应当之事。
其实，各级领导干部的住房、配车、秘书配备、办公用房等待遇，也不是没有标准。比如，部长级配备轿车须45万元以下；正部级住房标准是220平方米；正部级每人办公使用面积54平方米，如此等等。部级以下官员的相关标准，自然随着层级的降低而降低。也就是说，关于领导干部生活待遇方面的大体标准是有的，只是公开度不够。对于多数民众来说，这个方面的知情权，没能得到很好的满足。
这种透明度不够，也体现在一些退休领导人的生活待遇方面。退休领导人在岗期间，为国家作出了贡献，退休之后理应得到必要的待遇——这并无疑议。问题同样出在透明度不够。现实中也确实存在着人退而部分待遇却未退的情形。比如，有些领导干部退下来之后，还在多处拥有办公室，这无疑造成了一定的浪费。
领导干部待遇不够透明，往往会引来社会上的各种猜测。有些猜测信息不准确，会对为官者的官誉乃至政府的公信力造成损害。谣言止于透明，这一点已经形成共识。该公开的要公开，该透明的要透明，既是对纳税人的应有尊重，也是对各级官员的应有要求，避免因为不够透明而出现各种乱象。
在强调领导人待遇应该逐渐透明的同时，也要强调各种待遇的规范。就此而言，一个完备合理、统一规范的领导干部待遇制度体系，应当抓紧建立。这样的制度体系，至少应该注意几个方面的问题：一是去除不该拥有的特权；二是进行某些方面的探索，如官邸制；三是追求全面与完备。
特权行为一直是人类社会中“一道刺眼的景象”。反对特权，是一个现代文明社会最起码的事情。要警惕的是，一些特权现象还顽固地根植于现实中，影响社会生态，破坏社会公正。这种特权现象，在领导干部生活待遇方面亦有所体现。比如，一些地方官员在医疗方面享用特权，颇受诟病。
诸如官邸制这样的探索，则是避免“以权谋房”等现象的出现。在本质上，这是通过官员住房配置方式的改革来规避滥用权力问题。有些时候，光嘴上说说不行，还得拿出好的办法。借助好的办法实现官员待遇的规范。另外，领导干部待遇制度体系需要完备，不完备就会有漏洞。
当前，中央狠刹“四风”问题，抵制各种奢靡浪费现象。中央对解决干部超标待遇问题，要求是严厉的，态度是坚决的。在此背景下，领导人待遇要去“神秘化”，追求更公开、更规范，当亦是题中应有之义。
赞