Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)aaapublished in(发表于) 2013/12/18 9:51:04 Former Vice Governor of Hubei were women of fraud， police investigation was found guilty of an offence
For alleged fraud, Chengdu woman Li Jinglan Jailbird, but from the criminal detention, arrest, prosecution decisions, the whole process took less than a week, law said justice organizations work in Baisha County is a "fast". Recently, the second intermediate people's Court of Hainan Province on the closely watched case of second instance judgment, held that in the case of a first instance trial procedures illegal, and withdrawn in Baisha County Court of first instance ruling sends back for retrial. According to people's daily online
Second trial prosecutors had recommended remanded
After Li Jinglan appealed, on August 1, the second intermediate people's Court in Baisha County, Hainan Province, the second instance court on the case. The same day, prosecution and again around the "Li Jinglan whether they constitute fraud", "the procuratorial work and the working organs illegal existence of procedures" such as a heated debate on the issue.
In a file in the present case, there are two conflicting enquiry. Two investigation transcripts are issued by the find seedlings in Baisha county police station, an enquiry on April 5, 2012 9:16 to, is asking people to be a place looking Miao police station; a separate record is April 5, 2012, from 14:18, was asked who is the global one Alliance Yu Zhenping, asks a place State-owned Heilongjiang farm hotel. Both records to record a bar sign with Lee's name. Defense counsel submitted to the Court, two transcripts, records the same per capita, but a different location, ask the Court to investigate the two records.
Defender also believes that as an important witness in this case Yu Zhenping, after subpoena have refused to cooperate with the investigation. In such cases, police have handled the case and transferred to the prosecution, so the serious procedural violation in the course of handling the case. Procuratorial organs for legal supervision, failed to seriously look into the prosecution. Does not ascertain the facts of the case, the Court of first instance making hasty judgment of the first instance, there are serious faults, requesting the Court of second instance corrected.
Questions appear to support an indictment the Prosecutor admits that does exist in the case of defects provided by the police and judicial proceedings in the first instance of misconduct, it is recommended that the Court of second instance referred the case back for retrial.
Hainan intermediate people's Court heard believes that, first-instance trial procedures illegal, and by the decision of the Judicial Committee of the hospital, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the criminal procedure law, ruling that revoked in Baisha County Court (2013) white criminal character, the 38th verdict and sent the case back to the Court in Baisha County reopened.
Public security organs, "dramatic work"
Produced according to Baisha County Attorney "white checked criminal procedure (2013)," the complaint, August 29, 2010, on November 25, 2010, in both Hainan and Shandong respectively accused Li Jinglan, with "coconut flower liquor" legal representative of our company when a chat wine co, he lied that he was a Principal Assistant Director Xie. To facilitate cooperation, Li asks Bangladesh to join the Organization and contributions to pay 11,000 yuan. On March 7, 2011, cash remittances to addresses provided by Lee Meng 11,000 yuan. On March 16 of that year, Lee in Jinan, the extraction, but did not apply for membership. After the incident, on April 27, 2012, accused Li Jinglan surrendered to the municipal Public Security Bureau of Chengdu Jinniu branch camp gate police station. Baisha County Prosecutor's Office believes that accused Li Jinglan fictional facts, concealing the truth, obtaining property, fraud should be criminally.
Baisha County Court May 18 "white criminal 38th" criminal verdict showed that Li Jinglan was Baisha County Public Security Bureau in criminal detention for suspected fraud in May 6, 2012, May 13 has been released on bail pending trial. The May 13 "because in this case" Baisha County Public Security Bureau in criminal detention, May 16 arrest; in Baisha County Procuratorate on May 17 of Baisha court prosecution, the Court decided to be accepted on the same day, May 18 trial and verdict the same day, with Li Jinglan fraud-related charges imposed shall be sentenced to two years and six months and fined 2000 Yuan.
Accessory penalty arrest to trial, no more than a week before and after, the local "public security organs" called the swift case.
Victims more than the "special"
It is worth mentioning that, because of the victim's identity is "special", the case attracted widespread attention.
After the first instance judgment, Li Jinglan immediately hired a lawyer to appeal the second intermediate people's Court of Hainan Province, said justice organizations illegal in Baisha County case, asked to set aside judgment. Their families at the same time also by micro-blogging and Internet posting saying, "former Vice Governor of Hainan Meng Mou with ' 11,000 Yuan by fraud ' for use in Baisha county courts, three days of business partners, former Assistant of arrest, indictment, trial, sentencing, serious lack of evidence, but the Assistant was sentenced to two years and six months. Closing at an alarming rate, sentencing has been in breach of any laws! ”
Related statistics show that in September 1987, members of the Organizing Committee, head of the provincial Government of Hainan Province, in February 1988, Hainan Province Vice Governor, Vice Governor of Hubei Province, in April 1993 was transferred. By virtue of their use of functions on the facilities for the benefit of others and taking bribes, a November 1998 by the Central Commission for discipline inspection investigated and expelled from the party, in December 1999, was sentenced to ten years imprisonment for taking bribes.
According to Li Jinglan family introduction, criminal detention by white police immediately after Li Jinglan, surrendered last year, but due to lack of evidence after police bail and be released. In early May, phone in Baisha County Public Security Bureau informed Li Fu, visited the Bureau lifted her daughter bail formalities. On May 13, Li Jinglan Office where it is criminal detention again. , May 17, in Baisha County Court called Li, will be held on the morning of 18th hearing the case. On the phone, Li repeatedly begged the Court postponed hearings but was rejected.
Li subsequently commissioned two lawyers as defenders of Hainan, overnight out of Baisha. Did not receive a copy of the complaint, could not understand the content and reason prosecution, also did not meet with the accused, advocate before the Court has twice asked applications for extension of the Court, but was rejected by the Court. The trial, they have proposed summary proceedings shall not be applicable in the present case, asking for a common procedure, still not adopted by the Court.
(Original title: the procuratorial work and the swift case was convicted of an offence)
因涉嫌诈骗，成都女子李靖澜身陷囹圄，但从被刑拘、批捕、起诉直至判决，整个过程仅用了不到一周时间，有法律人士说，白沙县公检法机关这样的办案过程堪称“神速”。近日，海南省第二中级人民法院就备受关注的一案作出二审判决，认为该案一审审判程序违法，撤销白沙县法院作出的一审判决并发回重审。据人民网
二审检方曾建议发回重审
李靖澜提起上诉后，8月1日，海南省第二中级人民法院在白沙县法院开庭对这一案件进行二审。当天，控辩双方再次围绕“李靖澜的行为是否构成诈骗罪”、“公检法办案机关是否存在程序违法”等问题进行了激烈辩论。
在本案的一份案卷中，存在两份互相矛盾的询问笔录。两份调查笔录均由白沙县查苗派出所出具，一份询问笔录2012年4月5日9时16分至12时52分，被询问人是孟某，地点在查苗派出所；另一份笔录则是2012年4月5日9时18分至14时18分，被询问人是全球某联盟会的于振平，询问地点是在国营龙江农场某宾馆。两份笔录的记录人一栏都签有李某的名字。辩护人当庭提出，两份笔录时间、记录人均相同，但地点不同，要求法庭对两份笔录进行调查。
辩护人同时认为，作为本案重要证人的于振平，几经传唤均拒绝配合调查。在这样的情况下，警方仍办理该案并移送起诉，因此其在办理该案过程中存在严重程序违法。检察机关作为法律监督机关，未能认真审查即提起公诉。一审法院在未查明事实的情况下就匆忙做出一审判决，均存在严重失误，请求二审法院予以纠正。
针对质疑，出庭支持公诉的检察官坦承，警方提供的案卷中确实存在瑕疵，而且一审审判程序失当，建议二审法院将该案发回重审。
海南二中院审理认为，一审的审判程序违法，经该院审判委员会讨论决定，依照刑事诉讼法的有关规定，裁定撤销白沙县法院作出的(2013)白刑初字第38号判决书，并将该案发回白沙县法院重新审理。
公检法“神速办案”
根据白沙县检察院制作的“白检刑诉(2013)26号”起诉书显示，2010年8月29日，2010年11月25日，被告人李靖澜分别在海南和山东两地，与“椰花香酒”公司法人代表孟某洽谈酒业合作事宜时，李谎称自己是某机构负责人谢某某助理兼主任。为促成合作，李要求孟先加入该机构并交纳11000元会费。2011年3月7日，孟向李提供的地址汇款11000元。同年3月16日，李在济南市将该款提取，但未帮孟办理入会事宜。案发后，2012年4月27日，被告人李靖澜到成都市公安局金牛分局营门口派出所投案。白沙县检察院认为，被告人李靖澜采用虚构事实、隐瞒真相的方法，骗取他人财物，应当以诈骗追究其刑事责任。
白沙县法院5月18日作出的“白刑初字第38号”刑事判决书显示，李靖澜在2012年5月6日因涉嫌诈骗被白沙县公安局刑事拘留，5月13日被取保候审。今年5月13日“又因本案”被白沙县公安局刑事拘留，5月16日被执行逮捕；白沙县检察院于5月17日向白沙县法院提起公诉，法院于同日决定受理，并于5月18日开庭审理，当天即作出判决，以诈骗罪名成立判处李靖澜有期徒刑二年零六个月，并处罚金两千元。
从刑拘到判决，前后没超过一个星期，当地“公检法”办案堪称神速。
受害人身份较“特殊”
值得一提的是，由于受害人孟某的身份比较“特殊”，使得该案受到了广泛关注。
在一审判决后，李靖澜立即委托律师向海南省第二中级法院提起上诉，称白沙县公检法机关违法办案，请求撤销判决。其家属同时还通过微博及网络发帖称，“原海南副省长孟某以‘被诈骗11000元’为由，动用白沙县公检法，三天完成了对商业伙伴已离职助理的批捕、公诉、开庭、宣判，证据严重不足，却使该助理被判两年零六个月。结案速度惊人，量刑已违反相关法律规定！”
相关资料显示，孟某1987年9月任海南省筹备组成员、省政府负责人，1988年2月任海南省副省长，1993年4月调任湖北省副省长。因其利用职务上的便利为他人谋利并收受贿赂，孟某1998年11月被中纪委查处并开除党籍，1999年12月因受贿罪被判处有期徒刑十年。
据李靖澜家属介绍，去年李靖澜投案后随即被白沙警方刑拘，但后因证据不足，警方对其取保候审，予以释放。今年5月上旬，李父接到白沙县公安局电话通知，让其前往该局办理解除女儿取保候审的手续。5月13日，李靖澜前往办理时却被再次刑拘。5月17日下午5时许，白沙县法院电话通知李家，将于18日上午开庭审理此案。在电话中，李父多次求法院延期开庭审理但被拒绝。
李家随后委托海南的两名律师为辩护人，连夜赶至白沙县。因未收到起诉状副本，无法了解起诉的内容和理由，也未会见被告人，辩护人在庭前曾两次要求延期开庭申请，但被法庭拒绝。庭审时，他们又提出本案不适用简易程序，要求用普通程序，依旧未被法庭采纳。
(原标题：公检法神速办案被判违法)
赞