Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)aaapublished in(发表于) 2013/12/21 23:22:44 Baidu sued 360 hijacking traffic case， the Court of final appeal： 360 to 400，000 in compensation，
Baidu sued 360 hijacking traffic case, the Court of final appeal: 360 to 400,000 as compensation for Baidu, 360-IT information Baidu sued 360 hijacking traffic case, the Court of final appeal: 360 to pay 400,000
December 21, Baidu sued 360 cases of malicious tampering, hijacking the Baidu search page flow in Beijing Municipal higher people's Court made a final judgement, judgment maintained the first-instance verdict, establishment of the 360 acts of unfair competition, Baidu 400,000 yuan for compensation, are not subject to appeal.
In early 2012, Baidu, Baidu accused 360 without allowing malicious tagging, tampering, Baidu search results page of search results, and propaganda and misleading to the user users install their browser for 360 browser Guide. Also 360 uses browser-bundling its Web site navigation station, deliberately confuse counterfeiting, Baidu search results, Baidu hijacking traffic. Baidu 360 v Tribunal forthwith.
? Sentence screenshots
In April of this year, the Beijing Municipal first intermediate people's Court of first instance ruling establishment of the 360 acts of unfair competition, Baidu economic loss of compensation and related expenses cost a total of 450,000 yuan, on its website and Home for 15 consecutive days published apologies. Against the first-instance verdict, appeal to the 360, and argued that "the Court of first instance without getting the errors found with security software works", noted on the Web site "safety mark" is the Mission of security software for "user needs".
On September 4, at the Court of second instance, 360 has offered a settlement, but Baidu has not accepted. It is understood that on December 17, in the final judgment of the second instance, the Court found that "strange Tiger company of interfering with other Internet products or services up and running, not for the purpose of protecting the public interest, nor have the effect of protecting the public interest and maintaining the first-instance verdict, Baidu 400,000 yuan for compensation, are not subject to appeal. ”
Judgment makes it clear that, in addition to Baidu search results malicious tagging, qihoo also tampered with the Baidu search box on the search results. Including: odd Tiger company in user set other search direction of situation Xia insert and user set of search direction associated sexual is small of Xia pulled tips Word; boot user access this is not related key word search results in the by Qian location of, and even and user search purpose completely different of odd Tiger company operating of television, and game, page; click odd Tiger company set of Xia pulled tips Word, not entered Baidu search results page, directly entered odd Tiger company operating of television, and game, page.
Judgment finds that qihoo's actions not only interfere with the normal use of the network users to Baidu search, Baidu search box also reduces the use of network users access to Baidu search results page, constituted unfair competition.
百度诉360劫持流量案终审：360要赔偿40万 - 百度,360 - IT资讯百度诉360劫持流量案终审：360要赔偿40万
12月21日消息，百度诉360恶意篡改百度搜索页面、劫持流量案日前在北京市高级人民法院做出终审判决，判决维持一审原判，360不正当竞争行为成立，赔偿百度40万元，不得上诉。
2012年初，百度指控360未经允许恶意标注百度搜索结果、篡改百度搜索结果页面，并向用户宣传及误导用户安装其浏览器，为360浏览器导流。此外还表示360利用浏览器捆绑其网址导航站，故意仿冒、混淆百度搜索结果，劫持百度流量。随即百度将360诉上法庭。
▲宣判书截图
今年4月，北京市第一中级人民法院一审判决360不正当竞争行为成立，赔偿百度经济损失及相关支出费用共计45万元，并在其网站首页连续15天刊载道歉声明。针对一审判决结果，360提出上诉，并辩称“一审法院在不了解安全软件工作原理的情况下作出错误认定”，在网站上标注“安全标识”是安全软件的使命，出于“用户需求”。
9月4日，在二审庭审现场，360方面曾主动提出和解，但百度方面并未接受。据了解，在12月17日的二审最终判决书中，法院方面认定“奇虎公司干扰他人互联网产品或服务的正常运行，并非出于保护公共利益的目的，也不产生保护公共利益的效果，维持一审原判，赔偿百度40万元，不得上诉。”
判决书中明确指出，除了恶意标注百度搜索结果外，奇虎公司还篡改了百度搜索框的搜索结果。包括：奇虎公司在用户设置其他搜索方向的情况下插入与用户设置的搜索方向关联性很小的下拉提示词；引导用户访问本不在相关关键字搜索结果中靠前位置的、甚至与用户搜索目的完全不同的奇虎公司经营的影视、游戏等页面；点击奇虎公司设置的下拉提示词，不进入百度搜索结果页面，直接进入奇虎公司经营的影视、游戏等页面。
判决书认定，奇虎公司的行为不仅干扰了网络用户对百度搜索的正常使用，还减少了使用百度搜索框的网络用户对百度搜索结果网页的访问，构成了不正当竞争。
赞