Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)aaapublished in(发表于) 2013/12/22 18:54:06 Like to talk about GM： even throw straws against the wind to say the words
In early September this year, Fang said in a Twitter "to create conditions for people to eat genetically modified" offensive to Cui yongyuan, and continues to this day, "Cui Fang wars". In the meantime, like 3 times to Japan to the United States at his own expense investigate GM issues and speed up he eventually quit the CCTV.
The night before, like facing reporters immediately after getting off the plane, say genetically modified this "major" problems, even throw straws against the wind, also said that said, otherwise sorry one's own conscience.
Yesterday, said in a interview with Xinhua reporter Cui yongyuan, "if GM proved no problem in the future and the national promotion, I'd like to be the spokesperson, but now it's really rushed. ”
Twice in the United States
At their own expense, investigation to find the truth
People's daily: you looking into Japan's GM market, why also went to the United States to investigate GM, also went two times in a row?
Like: China's support for GM technology experts say, safety of genetically modified foods in the scientific community has settled, uncontroversial, said the Americans had been safely eaten 20 years is all right. Is there a controversy? Americans are safely eaten 20 years? Is that not okay? Because this is where I first went to Japan, after the United States.
First visit to the United States were to go to, learn about sending tweets, feel a little problem on Twitter I cannot tell, said we do not necessarily believe that, so I decided to use for documentary. The documentary, to the United States in Los Angeles, San Diego, Chicago, Seattle, Springfield, Davis and other places, is very rewarding. These are all my own expense.
People's daily: you'd have? Cui yongyuan: experts say Americans began to eat genetically modified foods from around 1996, reassuring for 17 years, but I encounter in an interview with American, such as tour guides, drivers, salesmen, and more than half don't know what GM is technology used for food it's safe. I saw an NGO organization, in 2005 in the United States according to a State survey data, only 25% people know that GM technology. So my conclusion is: Americans sleepwalk took 17 years GM, and it's not safe to eat.
Twice to the United States while the inquiry is only a month, but there are some changes, this time to see the United States supermarket shelves start marked "non-GM" in Chinese supermarkets buy six kinds of tofu only one not marked "non-GM", offered by some restaurants began to emphasize beef, not chicken to eat genetically modified feed.
Beijing times: experts mentioned that Americans eat seven to foods containing GM ingredients, is that right?
Cui yongyuan: the fact is that United States 70% per cent of processed foods are likely to contain GM ingredients, processed foods and whole foods are two different things, and are processed foods such as canned, sauce, soy sauce, you can eat.
Currently a controversial issue is a staple food in China do not genetically modified, in the United States before the biggest two foods are beef and chicken, and wheat, while the United States genetically modified wheat still in the laboratory stage. We talked to experts tell us, United States no sweet corn in the seed list of genetically engineered crops, we stated that the non-genetically modified popcorn, were also found in the Mall is the most outrageous production in China's non-GM corn.
In the United States, if you are careful and do, you can never eat genetically modified, because organic certification is very clear, barcode can find producers can count on it. Prices will be more expensive than genetically modified foods, but most of the people I see or can afford to eat.
People's daily: the United States scientific community, are the safety of genetically modified food is not disputed?
Like: China supports GMO experts often say, United States food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Ministry of agriculture, the "community of scientists" believe that genetically modified food and traditional food, such as substantial equivalence, there is no difference, we are called into question. Mainstream scientists say genetically modified poison it is not? In the United States we find scientists in related fields, we were told that there is no problem, we were told that the problem is very large, so I think the safety of genetically modified foods in the United States disputed in mainstream scientists, there is no facts in dispute.
The Beijing times: some people think that you are in the United States doing transgenic research is not precise enough, no interviews with United States FDA, Agriculture Department and other government departments, what do you think?
Like: first went to United States survey, the United States takes the initiative to find me, asked me to Washington to interview with a Government Department, but that time is short before, so this time before I go, I see a United States embassy official, but when I give them the interview outlines, they changed, such as government departments had no one to Christmas, but was rebuffed. I was angry, also protested. So it's not I don't want to cover the United States Government departments, but they suddenly do not accept interviews. I think it might be due to some problem too sharp, and they refuse to answer.
The Beijing times: in the United States where, who interviewed, such as how to select OK? You think a survey and objective?
Like: I think it's very objective, in the interview sample, support, endorse GM scientists and farmers about one-third, why is this? GM voices supported because I think that has a lot, the one-third people say and at home we hear pretty much the same thing.
We look for ad-hoc interviews throughout the US agriculture head of the University of California, Davis, took a laboratory. In addition to interviews with scientists of different opinions, but we also interviewed civil associations, families, doctors, patients, from a journalists perspective, individuals may not have scientific value, but the audience more receptive, you can hear the United States average consumers of GM voices.
People's daily: Chen I-Wan is the clear-cut "inverted" represented, engage him as you investigate the information obtained will enable the translation of one-sided?
Like: when I ask a question, Mr CHAN will sometimes tell me what to ask next to. Then I told him that I was a reporter, would like to ask what is my freedom, I can give you some time to talk to them, but forget about the questions I ask.
People's daily: Fang questioned your GM documentary is in fact promoting organic agriculture, a documentary, what do you think?
Like: that's a trap, doing transgenic research have to say organic farming, and he knows you're going to compare, so I said you were the advocates of organic farming, take their money, but are quotation marks plus a question mark, you can't sue him. Organic agriculture in which one do you have to say that I endorse, then take out the evidence, nobody has to talk about the evidence. We have done this thing, and GM have made contact with me, willing to pay a premium price to shut me up.
The Beijing times: disclose what is enterprise?
Cui yongyuan: inconvenient.
From CCTV
Break the rules simply resign
People's daily online to you there are many rumors out of CCTV, why on earth are you going to leave the CCTV?
Cui yongyuan: CCTV have rules, we all have to sign an agreement, no tweets, even introducing microblogging content cannot be made, so that's what prompted me to leave a reason.
I use the fastest speed with repeated representations, three years ago, I offered to go, but the negotiations most strongly, used to talk about it again, and people keeping you in good faith, this time I was in clear violation of the provisions in, it simply resigned.
Battle of Cui Fang
For science as cannon fodder
The Beijing times: why you are on Twitter and transgenic Fang controversy?
Like: when I saw the news, Fang said that to create conditions to make people eat genetically modified, listen to these words of disgust. Later with Fang to be increasingly constituted on Twitter, are the bottom line.
GM is so important, specifically, a host should not be visible, but we scientists are less impressive, all people have a low level of questioning reviled him, "stupid", but the GM knowledge is what requires subtle and 1.1 points in the patience to give you clear, research and science are not contradictions, assaults, verbal abuse is not a scientific approach.
People's daily: people say that what you do on the net is to petty grudge?
Cui yongyuan: Fang made offensive remarks on Twitter, and I still said it, Hmm, my integrity in one's later years are not saved, not previously established public image, that no, shit is not for me, I think public safety is more important, at a time when homes face. I can't say that what used to be a famous moderator, members of the CPPCC national side, my bad, that's not me, if you think I've a very good image, then you're wrong, like his bandit side.
People's daily: Fang and party powder that you don't read scientific, do you think lack of expertise affect judgment?
Like: I'm definitely expertise on no, I took a very professional way stories, interviewing supporters with opposing point of view, an interview with opponents with the full support of, collision on both sides rather than actually joined in the attack, did not show each other you're a preset position, and asked him to come up with what we say.
The Beijing times: on Twitter, you can also continue arguing with Fang please?
Cui yongyuan: definitely went on to scold. You put him down, and academia is always full of such hostility. I want to be the cannon fodder, after World War I the scientific community is quiet, all in the context of academic discussion, not personal attacks, don't tell lies.
I think science is to stand up to questioning, is questioning, discussion, practice development step by step, not a scientific categorically tell you never disputed, that is not scientific.
Personal advice
Establishment counter marked
People's daily: you have been worried about the illegal cultivation of genetically modified, unregulated, damage the consumer's right to such issues are you using social issues to fight back with science questions?
Like: I have never been against GM technology research, I said very clearly, genetically modified technology itself is neutral, both can do things and can do bad things, I strongly support the research of transgenic technology and study are too slow, now patents are mostly in the hands of the Americans, the best are in the hands of Chinese.
But China to push genetically modified products, there is a strange assertion is that if you study on the commercialization of genetically modified products do not they have no impetus to this very strange. I in the United States come in contact with in the lab, the scientists doing basic research, unrelated to the commercial planting, this is something that two areas, arranged non-scientists.
People's daily: you're doing may involve the interests of business, Government, ever feel the pressure, under threat?
Cui yongyuan: threats on Twitter every day, let me watch it, numerous swear words, "Cui" "Cui idiot" this, that, fortunately, I don't care, suicide or early, but I think there is something I do, so this does not matter, it can't hurt me.
Pressure must be no, not at all, since dared to do such a thing, all ready, the old men are afraid of this.
People's daily: what do you think the cases in China in order to promote genetically modified staple food, make people safe to eat?
Like: I had no say in this respect, have to ask my opinion, it is important to let people know that it is no problem, we want to eat that.
Transgenic technology the people's livelihood, the State must determine the safety, newly established National Security Council weighed in, other scientists involved in the field of genetically modified chain of issues concerning the environment, flora and fauna and many other things. In the United States was also against GM because of religious reasons, believe that God cannot change, we who believe in religion, but without considering from a sociological perspective. In my opinion, if genetically modified food safety scientists dispute, it is best to not to get people to eat, at least the public should be given a right to choose.
I suggest business is headed by genetically modified food counters, guaranteed Shoppe outside food is not genetically modified, this thing the Government should be responsible.
Future
Broadcast documentaries to temporarily cease the paragraph
People's daily: what you intend to do about this situation?
Like: here come to an end, making this documentary, for the public to see, my mission is accomplished.
From the United States came back, we encounter a Chinese airport terminal in San Francisco, previously the soybeans, now a doctor, she was very worried, seriously, someone should stand up and say that genetically engineered this thing. Our mood is the same, now throw straws against the wind, trend, we, as citizens, to say to say, otherwise sorry one's own conscience, it's that simple.
08, 09, interview Beijing Times reporter Shangxi
Trainee journalist Pan Rui
1963
Born in Tianjin.
1981
Admitted to the Beijing broadcasting Institute studying journalism.
1985
Entering the Central People's broadcasting station serve journalists.
1987
Central People's broadcasting station in half an hour in the afternoon reports by journalists like sound.
1993
Begin participation in the CCTV of the Oriental horizon planning.
1996
Preside over the CCTV of the truth, popularity.
1998
Officially transferred to CCTV.
2000
Preside over the Spring Festival evening show.
2013
On September 8
Fang started on Twitter, "gene wars" Prologue.
On September 19
Submit transfer report, three bow to the audience, and res judicata.
On September 25, 2013
Japan survey found that Japan's market it is difficult to buy genetically modified foods.
On October 21, 2013
Investigation in the us for the first time, found that many Americans don't even know what GM is.
On December 7, 2013
Second to the United States survey, interviewed about 50 people, United States shopping malls, farms, genetically modified laboratory visits, such as shooting.
On December 17
Certification confirmed on Twitter has been officially out of CCTV, recruits teach at communication University of China.
"GM companies have contacted me, willing to pay a premium price to shut me up. ”
--Talks on business competition
"This time I was in clear violation of the provisions in, it just quit. "Talk--from CCTV
"Fang names on Twitter, I said it, Hmm, my integrity in one's later years are in jeopardy, not to establish a public image before, that didn't work, I think public safety is more important, at a time when homes face. ”
World war talk--Cui Fang
"GM knowledge need to be motivated, 1.1 a little patience for everyone to make it clear that research and science does not conflict, attacks, verbal abuse is not a scientific attitude. ”
--Talk about a scientific attitude
"I can't say that used to be a famous moderator, Member of the National Committee or something on the side, that's not me, if you think I've a very good image, then you're wrong, like a bandit side. ”
--Talk about personal image
"Interview supporter when all opposing points of view, interviews with opponents with full support point of view, collision on both sides rather than actually joined in the attack, did not show each other you're a preset position, and asked him to come up with what we say. ”
--Talk about interview tool
"I think the science is to withstand questioning, is questioning, discussion, practice development step by step, not a scientific categorically tell you never disputed, that is not scientific. ”
--Scientific attitude
"GM technology itself is neutral, both can do things and can do bad things, I strongly support the study on gene, but also think speed is too slow, and now patents are mostly in the hands of the Americans, the best are in the hands of Chinese. ”
--Talk about personal view
"Now throw straws against the wind, trend, we, as citizens, to say to say, otherwise sorry one's own conscience, it's that simple. "--To talk about citizens as
"In the United States, if you care about it, you can never eat genetically modified, because organic certification is very clear, barcodes can find producers, rest assured. ”
--Talk to the United States experience
(Original title: after World War I the scientific community to quiet down)
今年9月初，方舟子在微博中称“要创造条件让国人都吃转基因”，此举让崔永元反感，并引发持续至今的“崔方大战”。其间，崔永元3次自费赴日美调查转基因问题，并加速他最终离职央视。
前晚，崔永元下飞机后立即直面记者，直言在转基因这个“大是大非”问题上，哪怕螳臂当车，也要说该说的话，不然对不起自己的良心。
昨天，崔永元接受京华时报记者采访时说，“如果今后转基因被证实没问题并全国推广，我愿做形象代言人，但现在确实操之过急。”
两次赴美
自费调查寻找真相
京华时报：您在调查日本的转基因市场后，为什么又赴美调查转基因，还接连去了两次？
崔永元：中国支持转基因技术的专家都说，转基因食品的安全性在科学界已有定论，没有争议，说美国人已经放心地吃了20年都没事。到底有没有争议？美国人是不是放心地吃了20年？是不是没事？就因为这个我先去了日本，后去了美国。
第一次去美国是自己去的，一边了解一边发微博，感觉有些问题微博上说不清楚，说了大家也未必相信，所以决定用拍纪录片的方式来说。这次拍纪录片，去了美国洛杉矶、圣地亚哥、芝加哥、西雅图、春田、戴维斯等地，很有收获。这些全是我自费的。
京华时报：有哪些收获？崔永元：专家说美国人从1996年左右开始吃转基因食品，放心吃了17年，但我采访中巧遇的美国人，像导游、司机、售货员等，一半以上不知道转基因是什么技术，用于食品安不安全。我看到一个NGO组织，2005年在美国一个州的调查数据显示，只有25%的人知道转基因技术。所以我的结论是：美国人稀里糊涂地吃了17年转基因，根本不是放心地吃。
两次去美国调查虽然只隔一个月，但也有变化，这次去看到美国超市的货架开始标注“非转基因”，在华人超市买到六种豆腐只有一种没标“非转基因”，一些餐馆开始强调提供的牛肉、鸡肉等吃的不是转基因饲料。
京华时报：有专家提到，美国人吃的七成食品中含有转基因成分，是这样吗？
崔永元：事实是，美国加工食品的70%至80%都有可能含有转基因成分，加工食品和全食品是两回事儿，像罐头、调料、酱油等是加工食品，一辈子吃不了多少。
中国当前一个争议很大的问题是主粮要不要转基因，在美国消耗量最大的前两位食品是牛肉和鸡肉，然后是小麦，而美国小麦的转基因还在实验室阶段。我们采访的专家还告诉我们，美国转基因作物的种子目录里没有甜玉米，我们看到爆米花上都注明非转基因，最令人气愤的是还在商场找到了中国生产的非转基因玉米。
在美国，如果你非常在意这件事儿，可以一辈子不吃转基因，因为有机认证非常明确，条形码可以找到生产者，尽管放心。价格会比转基因食品贵一些，但一般人我看还是吃得起的。
京华时报：在美国科学界，转基因食品的安全性究竟有没有争议？
崔永元：中国支持转基因的专家经常说，美国的食品药品管理局（FDA）、农业部、“科学家共同体”等都认为转基因食品和传统食品实质等同，没有差异，这个我们也很质疑。只要说转基因有害的就不是主流科学家？这次在美国我们找了相关领域的科学家，有人告诉我们没有问题，有人告诉我们问题非常大，所以我觉得转基因食品的安全性在美国主流科学家中有争议，这是没有争议的事实。
京华时报：有人认为您在美国做的转基因调查不够严谨，没有采访美国的FDA、农业部等政府部门，您怎么看？
崔永元：第一次去美国调查时，美国方面主动找到我，提出让我到华盛顿采访政府部门，但那次时间短来不及，所以这次走之前我见了美国大使馆的官员，但当我把采访提纲给他们后，他们就变了说法，比如快到圣诞节政府部门找不到人等，反正就是回绝了。我很气愤，还提了抗议。所以不是我不愿去采访美国政府部门，而是他们突然不接受采访。我觉得原因可能是有些问题太尖锐，他们不愿回答。
京华时报：在美国采访的地点、人物等如何选择确定？您觉得调查客观吗？
崔永元：我认为很客观，在采访样本里，支持、认可转基因的科学家、农场主等约有三分之一，为什么是这个比例呢？因为我觉得支持转基因的声音已经很多，这三分之一的人所说的观点和我们在国内听到的几乎一模一样。
我们专程采访了全美搞农业研究最好的加州大学戴维斯分校相关负责人，拍了实验室。除采访不同意见的科学家外，我们还采访了民间协会、普通家庭、医生、患者等，从一个记者角度讲，个体感受不一定有科学价值，但观众更容易接受，可以听到美国普通消费者对转基因的声音。
京华时报：陈一文先生是国内旗帜鲜明的“反转派”代表，聘请他担任您调查的翻译是否会使获取的信息片面化？
崔永元：我问问题的时候，陈先生有时会在旁边告诉我应该怎么问。之后我跟他说，我是一个记者，想问什么是我的自由，我可以给你时间跟他们交流，但不要管我问什么问题。
京华时报：方舟子质疑您拍的转基因纪录片其实是推销有机农业的一个纪录片，您怎么看？
崔永元：这就是他设计的一个圈套，做转基因调查必须说有机农业，他也明白你要做对比，所以就说你是有机农业的代言人，拿了他们的钱，但都是引号加问号，你没法告他。你要说我给哪个有机农业做代言，那把证据拿出来，有证据大家都没话可说。我们没有做这个事儿，倒是做转基因的还真有跟我联系的，愿意出高价让我闭嘴。
京华时报：方便透露是哪家企业吗？
崔永元：不方便。
离开央视
违反规定干脆辞职
京华时报：网上对您离开中央电视台有很多传言，您究竟为什么要离开央视？
崔永元：因为中央电视台有规矩，大家都要签协议，不许发这样的微博，连介绍节目内容的微博都不能发，所以这也是促使我离职的很大一个原因。
我用最快的速度跟台里反复交涉，三年前我就提出要走，但这次交涉最强烈，以前一谈就缩回来，人家那么真诚地挽留你，这次我明显违反了台里的规定，那干脆辞职了。
崔方大战
为了科学愿当炮灰
京华时报：您为什么在微博上和方舟子论战转基因？
崔永元：当时我看到新闻，方舟子说要创造条件让国人都吃转基因，一听这话就反感。后来跟方舟子在微博上斗得越来越不像样，都过了底线。
其实转基因这么重要的事儿，明确地说，一个节目主持人不应该抛头露面，但我们的科学家不太给力，凡是老百姓有质疑就骂他水平低、“文傻”，但转基因知识正是需要潜移默化、一点一点耐心给大家说清楚，研究与科普不矛盾，攻击、谩骂不是一个科学的态度。
京华时报：网上有人说您这么做是为了泄私愤？
崔永元：方舟子在微博上再说难听的话，我也还说难听的话，我晚节不保，不要以前树立的公众形象，那个没有用，对我来说狗屁都不是，我觉得公众的生命安全更重要，在这个时候要舍出脸来。我不能说以前是著名主持人、全国政协委员什么的就端着，我才不端着呢，那不是我，如果你们觉得我以前形象很好，那你们就看错了，崔永元有他土匪的一面。
京华时报：方舟子及方粉认为您不懂科学，您觉得专业知识的欠缺影响判断吗？
崔永元：我肯定专业知识上不行，我用了一种非常专业的方式采访，采访支持者的时候用的全是反对的观点，采访反对者的时候用的全是支持的观点，实际上让两边在碰撞而不是附和，不让对方觉得你预设立场，让他把想讲的话讲出来。
京华时报：您还会在微博上持续与方舟子的争论吗？
崔永元：肯定要接着骂。你不把他摁下去，学术界就永远充满了这种戾气。我愿意当这个炮灰，经过这一战让科学界都安静下来，大家好好在学术范围内探讨，不要人身攻击，不要编织谎言。
我认为科学就是经得起质疑，就是在质疑、讨论、不断实践当中一步一步发展，没有一个科学斩钉截铁地告诉你永远不会有争议，那就不科学了。
个人建议
设立专柜标注分明
京华时报：您一直担心转基因的违法种植、监管不力、损害消费者知情权等问题，您是否在用社会问题去反击科学问题？
崔永元：我从来没反对过转基因技术研究，我说得非常清楚，转基因技术本身是中性的，既可以做好事儿又可以做坏事，我本人坚决支持转基因技术研究，而且还觉得研究速度太慢，现在专利大部分都在美国人手里，最好都能在中国人手里。
但中国推转基因产品的专家有一个莫名其妙的论断就是，如果转基因产品不商业化他们就没有研究的动力，这个很奇怪。我在美国所接触到的在实验室里做基础研究的科学家，跟商业化种植毫无关系，这是两个领域的事，非科学家包办。
京华时报：您现在做的事情可能涉及企业、政府的利益，有没有感到压力，受到威胁？
崔永元：威胁微博上天天都有，让我小心点，无数骂人的话，“崔傻”“崔白痴”这个那个，幸亏我不在乎，不然早服毒自杀了，但我觉得还有大事儿需要我办，所以这些无所谓，伤害不了我。
压力肯定一点都没有，既然敢做这件事儿，就全都想好了，这个岁数的男人还怕这个。
京华时报：您觉得在什么情况下中国才可以推广转基因主粮，让老百姓放心吃？
崔永元：我这个方面没有发言权，非要问我的观点，一定要让老百姓知道它确实没有问题，我们想吃得明白。
转基因技术关系国计民生，国家一定要确定这个东西的安全，新成立的国家安全委员会可以介入进来，其他领域的科学家也要参与进来，转基因问题还关涉环境、动植物生物链等很多事儿。在美国还有人因为宗教原因反对转基因，认为上帝创造的不能乱改，我们不信宗教的人，但从社会学角度不能不考虑。我觉得既然转基因食品安全科学家还有争议，最好先不要给老百姓吃，起码应该给公众一个选择的权利。
我建议中国商场内设转基因食品专柜，保证专柜外的食品不是转基因，这件事情上政府应该负责任。
未来打算
播纪录片暂告段落
京华时报：在这件事上您打算做到什么地步？
崔永元：到这儿就告一段落了，把这个纪录片做出来，给公众看，我的任务就完成了。
这次从美国回来，我们在旧金山机场候机的时候碰到一个华人，以前研究大豆，现在是医生，她简直忧心极了，说真的应该有人站出来说转基因这个事儿。我们的心情都是一样的，现在就是螳臂当车，大势所趋，我们作为公民，该说的话要说，要不然对不起自己的良心，就是这么简单。
08、09版采写京华时报记者商西
实习记者樊瑞
出生于天津。
考入北京广播学院新闻系就读。
进入中央人民广播电台任职记者。
中央人民广播电台《午间半小时》中有了记者崔永元报道的声音。
开始参与中央电视台《东方时空》策划。
主持中央电视台《实话实说》，大受欢迎。
正式调入中央电视台。
主持春晚。
9月8日
与方舟子在微博上拉开“转基因大战”序幕。
9月19日
递交请调报告，给现场观众三鞠躬，去意已决。
2013年9月25日
赴日本调查，发现日本的市场很难买到转基因食品。
2013年10月21日
第一次赴美调查，发现很多美国人连转基因是什么都不清楚。
2013年12月7日
第二次赴美调查，采访50人左右，到美国的商场、农场、转基因实验室等地走访拍摄。
12月17日
在认证微博上确认已正式离开央视，入职中国传媒大学任教。
“做转基因的企业有跟我联系的，愿意出高价让我闭嘴。”
——谈商业竞争
“这次我明显违反了台里的规定，那干脆辞了。”——谈离开央视
“方舟子在微博上再说难听的话，我也还说难听的话，我晚节不保，不要以前树立的公众形象，那个没有用，我觉得公众的生命安全更重要，在这个时候要舍出脸来。”
——谈崔方大战
“转基因知识需要潜移默化、一点一点耐心给大家说清楚，研究与科普不矛盾，攻击、谩骂不是一个科学的态度。”
——谈科学态度
“我不能说以前是著名主持人、全国政协委员什么的就端着，那不是我，如果你们觉得我以前形象很好，那你们就看错了，崔永元有他土匪的一面。”
——谈个人形象
“采访支持者的时候用的全是反对的观点，采访反对者的时候用的全是支持的观点，实际上让两边在碰撞而不是附和，不让对方觉得你预设立场，让他把想讲的话讲出来。”
——谈采访手段
“我认为科学就是经得起质疑，就是在质疑、讨论、不断实践当中一步一步发展，没有一个科学斩钉截铁地告诉你永远不会有争议，那就不科学了。”
“转基因技术本身是中性的，既可以做好事儿又可以做坏事，我本人坚决支持转基因研究，而且还觉得研究速度太慢，现在专利大部分都在美国人手里，最好都能在中国人手里。”
——谈个人看法
“现在就是螳臂当车，大势所趋，我们作为公民，该说的话要说，要不然对不起自己的良心，就是这么简单。”——谈公民作为
“在美国，如果你非常在意这件事儿，可以一辈子不吃转基因，因为有机认证非常明确，条形码可以找到生产者，尽管放心。”
——谈赴美经历
（原标题：经过这一战让科学界安静下来）
赞