Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)aaapublished in(发表于) 2013/12/24 8:41:11 Administrative procedure law change raises concerns
Xinhuanet, Beijing, December 23 (reporters Zhou Liquan and and Zhang Zhilong and and Cheng Shihua)-news from the authorities, 12 session of the national people's Congress, to be held December 23 the sixth meeting, will consider the draft amendments to the administrative procedure law.
This is a support "mingaoguan" of the law, to promote the rule of law is of great significance. Since inception in 1990, the implementation of the law? Xinhua News Agency reporter conducted a survey for this purpose.
Daughters sue the Government, father away from the post
Taihu County, Anhui Province urban management Bureau, former Deputy Director Chen had recently been transferred to the county headquarters demolition group, he believes this is because my daughter sued the County Government imposed by the illegal housing, he retaliates against the Government.
Chen had said that he had worked in Taihu County Public Security Bureau and Public Security Bureau family home to an apartment. In 2010, his daughter Chen Zilin area of 150 square meters of housing ownership, housing certificate of land and House property certificate.
October 2012, Taihu County Government has decided to levy a County Public Security Bureau in the compound of 60 homes. 4 be dissatisfied with the housing, including Chen Zilin imposed by the decision, called the decision was arrested for an offence, and Anqing City Government in December of that year to apply for administrative reconsideration. In March 2013, Anqing City Government has ordered administrative reconsideration decision, upheld the decision in Taihu County Government.
Chen Zilin and other 4 administrative reconsideration decision of Anqing city, dissatisfied with the Government, to the Anqing city intermediate people's Court of the institution of administrative proceedings. In November, city intermediate people's Court decision, dismissed Chen Zilin and other 4 's claims.
Chen Zilin 4 persons appealed against the verdict, on December 10 to the Anhui provincial higher people's Court within the legal time limit of appeal.
Chen long said local authorities on two occasions, "interviewing" him, asks him to do her daughter "withdrawing", or organizational measures will be taken.
On December 2, Chen had received transfer notices, at present, half moon, but was somewhat disappointed not to report to the new position.
Taihu County Government officials in response to a reporter, said in an interview, transferred a local cadre training and exercise of measures and does not relate to Chen long.
"Chen had suffered, in a sense, a reflection of the ' mingaoguan ' of difficulty. "Beijing lawyer Lang Keyu said.
The people won, enforcement difficulties
"' Mingaoguan ' is difficult, even if the parties stand out, claiming rights to the courts, will meet some difficulties. "For many years agent" mingaoguan "Samantabhadra law firm in Beijing Han Yicun said of the case.
First is the case difficult. Hotel workers is reflected in jiaozuo city, Henan province, the false information provided by the Bureau of industry and commerce only personal, belonging to the Trade Union Hotel transfer to others. Trade union activist, Shanyang District of jiaozuo city people's Court for the institution of administrative proceedings, the result is no filing of the Court.
"Office-going to lead the Government into trouble, who was willing to take this hot potato? "A grass-roots court system staff members said.
Followed by winning difficult. Ancient village of wangjiang County, Anhui Province, West Tower Group of villager Song Xinyuan told reporters that Shu mei Te chemical fibre company limited is in the province of local government introduced a business and put into production in January 2008 by the provincial environmental protection department approval allows the company, instead, the company's emissions are bad, have serious impact on the local environment and people's lives.
To this end, the Song Xinyuan environment protection Bureau in Anhui Province sued the Court, pointed out that approval of the local environmental protection departments programs illegal, legal error, and should be removed; also pointed out that during the process of environmental assessment hearings, participation in the hearing villagers are village officials, ordinary farmers did not know, and hearing attendance books part of the signature shows signs of obvious forgery.
The Shushan's Court of first instance hearing the case considers that, carried out after the local environmental protection departments in processing enterprises to apply for approval before public announcements, "EIA letter" the facts are clear, legitimate procedures, and dismissed the Song Xinyuan requests for administrative litigation.
Recently, the Shenzhen intermediate people's Court of Guangdong Province announced 2012 Shenzhen intermediate people's Court has accepted "mingaoguan" administrative cases 2,531, losing only 6 per cent of the executive authorities. 8%, which means "mingaoguan" won the proportion is relatively low.
Once again was difficult to enforce. In Longnan, Gansu province said Wang Siping hydropower development project manager, years ago he invested in tanchang County, development of water resources, the local development and Reform Commission, the same project was awarded to another firm, for which he will be the local development and Reform Commission to court. 4 years after the win, but enforcement is difficult. "For so many years, tossing it out of me. "Wang Siping said helplessly.
Huang Wenyi, Deputy Director of Jilin provincial Academy of social sciences said that the administrative proceedings, unlike civil litigation, or money available for the implementation of the subject matter, require co-ordination between government departments in the implementation of administrative litigation cases, if relevant departments refused to cooperate with, in addition to superior departments to supervise, and there is no better way.
Speed up judicial reforms, safeguarding citizens ' rights and interests
Law School of China University of politics and law professor said Liu Shen, administrative procedure law defined "mingaoguan" rights such as detentions, fines, administrative penalties such as revoking licenses, they may appeal to administrative litigation in the courts. But it also provides some administrative action cannot be prosecuted, such as administrative regulations, rules or administrative bodies with a general binding force formulated and announced decisions, orders, and so on.
Liu Shen pointed out that some local governments have introduced a variety of decisions, regulatory documents such as meeting minutes, to avoid Government departments as defendants.
In March this year, Shandong pilot "mingaoguan" offsite trial caused concern. Shandong provincial higher people's Court said the present administrative trial, it is generally by the local jurisdiction of the Court of first instance, are often local interference, influence the course of Justice, the inadequate protection of the rights of the parties.
According to reports, the Supreme People's Court in order to resolve "mingaoguan" problem to provide grass-roots Court inadmissible could appeal to a higher court, superior court order, subordinate courts, but the actual results are unsatisfactory.
China politics and Law University professors Ma Huaide and other proposals should be accepted and will not be accepted by the Court, the plaintiff, procuratorial organs, procuratorial organs accessible through the functions of legal supervision of procuratorial recommendations made by requiring courts to accept cases.
"In addition to further regulate by law, how to troubleshoot administrative interference and to safeguard the independence of the judiciary and trial, should be a matter of high priority. "The Jilin provincial Academy of Social Sciences Law Institute at Hiu Kwong said.
"Against executive interference issues such as justice, 18, has made it clear that the third plenary session of the party, under provincial district court property management should be promoted to ensure an independent and impartial judicial power should be exercised according to law. With the advancing judicial reform, will be solved step by step ' mingaoguan ' difficult problems. "Huang Wenyi said.
新华网北京12月23日电（记者周立权、张志龙、程士华）来自权威部门的消息说，12月23日至28日召开的十二届全国人大常委会第六次会议，将审议行政诉讼法修正案草案。
这是一部支持“民告官”的法律，对于推进依法治国具有重要意义。自从1990年实施以来，这部法律的实施情况如何？新华社记者为此进行了调查。
女儿起诉政府，父亲调离岗位
安徽省太湖县城管局原副局长陈龙近日被调到县城建设指挥部征地拆迁组工作，他认为这是因为女儿起诉县政府违法征收房屋，政府对他的打击报复。
陈龙说，他曾在太湖县公安局工作并在公安局家属院分到一套住房。2010年，他把面积150平方米的房屋过户给女儿陈子琳，房屋土地证和房产证齐全。
2012年10月，太湖县政府决定征收县公安局大院内60户房屋。包括陈子琳在内的4人不服房屋征收决定，认为该决定涉嫌违法，并于当年12月向安庆市政府申请行政复议。2013年3月，安庆市政府下达行政复议决定，维持太湖县政府征收决定。
陈子琳等4人不服安庆市政府行政复议决定，向安庆市中级人民法院提起行政诉讼。今年11月，市中院作出判决，驳回了陈子琳等4人的诉讼请求。
陈子琳等4人不服判决结果，于12月10日在法定期限内向安徽省高级人民法院提起上诉。
陈龙透露，当地组织部门曾两次“约谈”他，要求他做女儿工作“撤诉”，否则将采取组织措施。
12月2日，陈龙接到工作调动通知，目前，半月有余，但陈龙一直未到新岗位报到。
太湖县政府有关负责人在回应记者采访时表示，调动工作是当地培养和锻炼干部的措施，并非针对陈龙个人。
“陈龙的遭遇，在一定意义上反映了‘民告官’的难度。”北京律师郎克宇说。
百姓赢了官司，执行起来困难
“‘民告官’难度大，即使有当事人勇敢站出来，向法院主张权利，也会遇到一些困难。”多年代理“民告官”案件的北京市普贤律师事务所律师韩一村说。
首先是立案难。河南省焦作市一家酒店职工反映，该市工商局仅凭个人提供的虚假材料，就将属于职工的酒店过户给他人。职工为了维权，向焦作市山阳区人民法院提起行政诉讼，结果是法院不予立案。
“立案会给政府惹来麻烦，谁愿意接这烫手山芋？”一位基层法院系统工作人员表示。
其次是胜诉难。安徽省望江县古港村西塔组村民宋新元告诉记者，这个省的舒美特化纤股份有限公司是当地政府引进的一家企业，2008年1月经省环保厅批复允许该公司投产，然而该公司排放的废气十分难闻，给当地环境和百姓生活带来了严重影响。
为此，宋新元将安徽省环保厅告上法院，指出当地环保部门的审批行为程序违法、运用法律错误，应予撤销；同时指出，在环评听证过程中，参与听证会村民均为村干部，普通农民并不知情，且听证会签到簿部分签名有明显伪造痕迹。
该案一审合肥市蜀山区人民法院审理认为，当地环保部门在受理企业申请后进行了审批前公示，“环评函”行为事实清楚，程序合法，于是驳回了宋新元行政诉讼的请求。
广东省深圳市中级人民法院近日公布，2012年深圳市中院共受理“民告官”行政案件2531宗，行政机关败诉只占6．8％，这也说明“民告官”获得胜诉的比例比较低。
再次是执行难。甘肃省陇南一水电开发项目经理王四平对记者说，多年前他在宕昌县投资开发水利资源，当地发改委将同一项目又批给了另一家企业，为此他将当地发改委告上了法庭。4年后虽然胜诉，但是执行起来很困难。“这么多年，折腾得我筋疲力尽。”王四平无奈地表示。
吉林省社会科学院副院长黄文艺说，行政诉讼不像民事诉讼，有钱财或标的物可供执行，行政诉讼案件的执行需要政府部门配合，如果相关部门拒不配合，除了上级部门进行督促外，没有更好的办法。
加快司法改革，维护公民权益
中国政法大学法学院教授刘莘对记者说，行政诉讼法确定了“民告官”的权利，诸如对拘留、罚款、吊销许可证等行政处罚不服的，可向法院提起行政诉讼。但同时也规定，有些行政行为不能被起诉，诸如行政法规、规章或者行政机关制定、发布的具有普遍约束力的决定、命令等。
刘莘指出，一些地方政府出台五花八门的决定、会议纪要等规范性文件，以避免政府部门成为被告。
今年3月，山东试点“民告官”异地审理引发关注。山东省高级人民法院表示，目前行政案件审判，一审一般都是由本地法院管辖，往往出现地方干扰，影响司法公正，对当事人权利保障不足。
据介绍，最高人民法院为了解决“民告官”难题，规定基层法院不受理可向上一级法院提出申诉，让上级法院指令下级法院受理，但实际效果并不理想。
中国政法大学教授马怀德等建议，应该受理而法院不受理，原告可找检察机关，检察机关可通过法律监督的职能提出检察建议，要求法院受理案件。
“除了法律上进一步规范外，如何排除行政干预，以及保障司法机关独立审判等，应该引起高度重视。”吉林省社科院法学所所长于晓光说。
“针对行政干预司法等问题，党的十八届三中全会已明确指出，要推动省以下地方法院人财物统一管理，确保依法独立公正行使审判权。随着司法改革的推进，将会逐步解决‘民告官’难度大问题。”黄文艺说。
赞