Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)aaa
published in(发表于) 2013/12/24 8:43:10
Former new broad international Chairman, was sentenced to life, please don’t die in prison

Former new broad international Chairman sentenced to life, please don't die in jail | |, Chairman Wu Rijing | goodbye _ news

Information times dispatch (reporter Wei Hui Hui) former new broad international group Chairman Wu Rijing bribery, misappropriation of public funds, bribery in October 2011 at the Zhongshan intermediate people's Court for trial, Tong Chen Hui yi begged the Court lenient sentence to the Court, "don't let me die in prison". Wu Rijing eventually sentenced some into fans, a few days ago, Wu Rijing families of yuexiu district, Guangzhou City intermediate people's Court entrusted with the seizure of a performance object on housing, so that progress in the case once again a concern. It is reported that Wu Rijing were eventually sentenced to life imprisonment and confiscation of all personal property. Guangzhou City intermediate people's Court earlier this month rejected the implementation of dissent.


  Wu Rijing was sentenced to life imprisonment


Reporter was informed that the former a broad international group Chairman, Wu Rijing bribery, General Manager of 27.9 million dollars, embezzling US $ 144.5 million Yuan and 12 million Yuan and a bribe of 1.08 million dollars, Zhongshan city intermediate people's Court of first instance sentenced to life imprisonment and confiscation of all personal property.


Guangzhou intermediate people's Court to enforce an award to disclose, the court seized Wu Rijing name located in Dongshan district of Guangzhou (yuexiu district) Yongsheng Street housing, followed by Wu Rijing families perform objection to the seizure.


Wu Rijing families said were only to seal up houses for Wu Rijing couples housing if the housing is the forced sale process, will enable their family home, to the detriment of Wu Rijing transformation. It is reported that Wu Rijing after a double by provincial Commission for discipline inspection, in accordance with the requirements of the provincial Commission for discipline inspection, total return property 10.78 million RMB, HK $ 100,000 worth.


Guangzhou intermediate people's Court rejected the objection


Guangzhou City intermediate people's Court believed that person Executive Yuan Wu Rijing in Guangzhou, Zhongshan, has no property, is available for the property in their jurisdiction for the Commission in conformity with the law in the case.


According to the Supreme People's Court on the people's Court of sealing up, distraining and freezing properties in civil enforcement regulations, "to be carried out with others total property, the people's Court may seal up, distrain, freeze, and promptly notify the co-owner. Total agreement dividing community property, and approved by the creditors, the people's Court may be deemed effective. Effectiveness of sealing up, distraining and freezing split the person subjected to execution after the agreement to share in the property; the other co-owners share the sealing up, seizing or freezing of property, the people's Court shall make a decision to disarm. Share or request executor brought Division Division proceedings subrogation, the people's Court shall give its permission. Suspension of execution of the property during the proceedings. ”


Guangzhou City intermediate people's Court believes that, pursuant to the aforementioned provisions, courts Wu Rijing and his wife share property can be seized. Currently involved in housing has not Division, Wu Rijing families may take legal action to address identified all of its parts after application to lift the seizure. In addition, because of seized property control measures in the College, not actually dispose of, does not affect the residency rights of their families and dependants. Accordingly, the Guangzhou City intermediate people's Court ruling dismissed the objection.


  


(Original title: the former new broad international Chairman Wu Rijing is awarded the last goodbye)

(Edit: SN095)
December 24, 2013 Information times
(
原新广国际董事长获判无期 曾求不要死在监狱里|董事长|吴日晶|无期_新闻资讯

  信息时报讯 (记者 魏徽徽) 原新广国际集团董事长吴日晶涉嫌受贿、挪用公款、行贿于2011年10月在中山市中院受审,当庭痛陈悔意求法院轻判“不要让我死在监狱里”。吴日晶最终获刑几许成迷, 日前,吴日晶家属对广州市中院受委托查封的一套越秀区房改房提出执行异议,使该案进展再次受到关注。据悉,吴日晶最终获判无期徒刑,没收个人全部财产。广州市中院于本月初驳回了执行异议。


  吴日晶获判无期徒刑


  记者获悉,原新广国际集团董事长、总经理吴日晶涉嫌受贿2790万元,挪用公款人民币1.445亿元及美元1200万元,以及行贿108万元,中山市中级人民法院一审对其判处无期徒刑,并处没收个人全部财产。


  广州中院相关执行裁决书透露,法院查封了吴日晶名下位于广州市东山区(现越秀区)永胜东街的一套房改房,其后,吴日晶的家属对该查封行为提出了执行异议。


  吴日晶家属称,被查封房屋为吴日晶夫妇的唯一住房,如果该房屋被强制拍卖处理,将使其家庭居无定所,不利于吴日晶的改造。据悉,吴日晶被省纪委双规后,按照省纪委的要求,共退还财产人民币1078万元,港币10万元。


  广州中院驳回异议


  广州市中院认为,中山市中院以被执行人吴日晶在广州没有财产,而在其辖区内有可供执行财产为由,将该案委托执行符合法律规定。


  而根据《最高人民法院关于人民法院民事执行中查封、扣押、冻结财产的规定》,“对被执行人与其他人共有的财产,人民法院可以查封、扣押、冻结,并及时通知共有人。共有人协议分割共有财产,并经债权人认可的,人民法院可以认定有效。查封、扣押、冻结的效力及于协议分割后被执行人享有份额内的财产;对其他共有人享有份额内的财产的查封、扣押、冻结,人民法院应当裁定予以解除。共有人提起析产诉讼或者申请执行人代位提起析产诉讼的,人民法院应当准许。诉讼期间中止对该财产的执行。”


  广州市中院认为,依照上述规定,法院可以对吴日晶与其妻子共有的财产进行查封。因目前涉案房屋尚未析产,吴日晶家属可另循法律途径解决后再对确定属于其所有的部分申请解除查封。另外,因本院的查封措施只是财产的控制措施,并未实际处分,不影响其家属及扶养人的居住权。据此,广州市中院裁定驳回异议。


  


(原标题:原新广国际董事长吴日晶获判无期)


(编辑:SN095)
2013年12月24日07:00
信息时报
)


If you have any requirements, please contact webmaster。(如果有什么要求,请联系站长)





QQ:154298438
QQ:417480759