Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)aaa
published in(发表于) 2013/12/24 8:46:29
Reports show faces no case and a case of administrative reconsideration

Xinhuanet, Beijing, December 23 (reporter Chen Fei)-23rd brought to the administrative reconsideration law of the national people's Congress Standing Committee law enforcement inspection report shows that current Governments above the county level and relevant government departments to have an administrative review terms of reference, 30,450 only local administrative body for reconsideration, administrative reconsideration of scattered resources resource allocation efficiency is low, some units "no case" and "a case" exist side by side.

Report displayed, from masses letter calls and online sought views see, reflect of main also has: administrative reconsideration and petition Zhijian lack effective convergence; some administrative reconsideration organ not fulfil reconsideration duties, has case not by; some administrative organ refused to fulfil entered into force of administrative reconsideration decided, led to applicants repeatedly petitioning; some reconsideration organ more consider was applicants interests, on has obviously errors of administrative acts, contrary to applicants wishes for mediation.

NPC Standing Committee law enforcement inspection found that in terms of review procedures, administrative reconsideration cases with most of the current review authority in writing reviews, communications, layers of approval, complicated procedures and inadequate openness and transparency, and private party's participation is not enough.

"Governments at all levels generally weak administrative reconsideration, not commensurate with the work undertaken by the task, affecting and gone through the reconsideration cases before the administrative body for reconsideration. "Deputy Wang Shengjun, Chairman of the 23rd to the Standing Committee of the national people's Congress Standing Committee law enforcement inspection, said the report.

Examination found that administrative review of capacity-building lag problem is particularly prominent in County Government, many listed within the Office of rule of law institutions of County Government is a government agency, about 38.2% without the establishment of rule of law institutions of County Government or listed without preparation, the average full-time administrative review officers less than 1 person of the County Government, personnel quality, security, Office space, common requirements and cannot meet the needs of administrative reconsideration cases.

15 provinces involved in law enforcement and inspection in 1407 County, in 2011 and 2012, respectively, three counties and 306 counties have no administrative reconsideration cases handled, some counties even since the implementation of the administrative reconsideration law did not apply for administrative reconsideration cases. Three hundred or four hundred less but the number of these letters and calls each year, many thousands of pieces.

According to statistics, the current 90% administrative dispute occurred at the grass-roots level, administrative reconsideration should focus on the grass-roots level, County government administrative reconsideration of the status quo and the central administrative disputes resolved at the grass-roots, resolve the requirements there is a large gap in the primary stage.

Report recommended that the strengthening capacity-building for administrative reconsideration. Appropriate full case number and work pressure of administrative reconsideration of agency personnel, administrative review of County Government functions into full play and efforts contradiction in the first stage, resolving at the grassroots level to defuse the crowd around and avoid conflicts move up, reduce the cost of dispute resolution.

At the same time, summing up the power of relatively concentrated review of pilot experience, rational determination of reconsideration acceptance authority, research consolidating resources, improve the efficiency review of reconsideration and further perfecting the system of administrative reconsideration, try to avoid "no" and "no".

　　新华网北京12月23日电(记者陈菲) 23日提请全国人大常委会审议的行政复议法执法检查报告显示，目前县级以上政府和政府相关部门都具有行政复议职权，仅地方行政复议机关就有30450个，行政复议资源分散，资源配置效率偏低，有的单位“无人办案”和有的单位“无案可办”现象并存。

　　报告显示，从群众来信来电和网上征求意见看，反映的主要问题还有：行政复议与信访之间缺乏有效衔接；有些行政复议机关不履行复议职责，有案不受；有的行政机关拒绝履行生效的行政复议决定，导致申请人反复上访；有的复议机关更多考虑被申请人利益，对有明显错误的行政行为，违背申请人意愿进行调解。

　　全国人大常委会执法检查组检查发现，在复议程序方面，目前多数复议机关办理行政复议案件，以书面审查为主，文来文往，层层审批，程序繁杂且不够公开透明，行政相对人参与不够。

　　“各级政府行政复议能力普遍偏弱，与承担的工作任务不相适应，影响行政复议机关及时受理和依法办理复议案件。”全国人大常委会副委员长王胜俊23日向常委会报告执法检查情况时说。

　　检查发现，行政复议能力建设滞后问题在县级政府尤其突出，不少县级政府法制机构是政府办公室内部挂牌机构，约38.2%的县级政府没有设立法制机构或者只挂牌无编制，平均每个县级政府专职行政复议人员不到1人，人员素质、经费保障、办公场所等普遍不能满足办理行政复议案件的需要。

　　在执法检查涉及的15个省份1407个县中，2011年和2012年，分别有306个县和277个县没有办理行政复议案件，有的县甚至从行政复议法实施以来没有办理一起行政复议案件。但这些县每年信访数量少的三四百件，多的上千件。

　　据统计，目前90%的行政争议发生在基层，行政复议工作的重点应当也在基层，县级政府行政复议工作的现状与中央提出的将行政争议化解在基层、化解在初发阶段的要求还有较大差距。

　　报告建议，切实加强行政复议能力建设。适当充实案件数量多、工作压力大的行政复议机构人员，充分发挥县级政府行政复议职能，努力将矛盾化解在初发阶段，化解在基层，化解在群众身边，避免矛盾上移，降低纠纷解决成本。

　　同时，总结各地相对集中复议权试点经验，合理确定复议受理机关，研究整合复议资源、提高复议效率，进一步完善行政复议体制，尽力避免“有案无人办”和“有人无案办”的现象。

赞