Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)aaapublished in(发表于) 2014/7/16 9:12:59 Interpretation of Yunnan two officials of the Central Commission for discipline inspection to the parent demote disposition
Beijing News dispatch (reporter Wang Shu) this morning, the Commission informed the previous ranks of Kunming, Yunnan Provincial Party Committee, former General Secretary Zhao Zhiyong, former Secretary Zhang Tianxin result, both of them are "using his position for personal gain". But unlike since the 18 surveyed 35 provincial and ministerial level officials, only two are demoted, Zhang Tianxin was demoted to Deputy Director of non-leadership positions; Zhao Zhiyong was demoted to clerk.
Informed are not "bribes", and so on
"Using his position for personal gain" is "Lok" senior officials of "typical behaviour". Since the 18 surveyed 35 provincial and ministerial level officials, 18 people have been "double". When informed the Commission that the findings of the 18 people, most of them pointed out that "using his position for personal gain". But why is that 18 people had been "double", Zhang Tianxin, Zhao Zhiyong only be demoted?
Tease 18 provincial and ministerial level officials and Zhang Tianxin, Zhao Zhiyong findings informed, "using his position for personal gain" and "suffix" differ.
18 senior officials "used his position for personal gain", the alleged "to ask for or accept bribes." While Zhang Tianxin, neither Zhao Zhiyong said huge bribes, and so on.
This means that Zhang Tianxin, Zhao Zhiyong was also "used his position for personal gain", but only in the degree of discipline, has not reached the extent of illegal, so for two people is only a disciplinary action within the Party and not referred to judicial authorities.
Handlers and other top officials are slightly different
In fact, compared to 18-18 double since provincial and ministerial level officials, Zhang Tianxin, Zhao Zhiyong handling procedures are also different.
18 senior officials were informed the Commission to initiate an investigation, then the Department announced the removal, ccdi after communicating the results of the investigation, given its "double", and referred to judicial authorities.
But Zhang Tianxin, Zhao Zhiyong is the Commission first informed the "removal from Office" and then informed the Central Commission for discipline inspection to processing the results, expelled, demoted, and so on.
Worth noting is that when the Department informed Zhao Zhiyong was dismissed, still uses the "comrades" call. Inform the Department on June 3, "Comrade Zhao Zhiyong was arrested for violation of discipline, Central have recently removed from the members of the Standing Committee of the CPC Jiangxi Provincial Committee, post". But this morning, when dealing with the results of the Central discipline Inspection Commission informed Zhao Zhiyong, Zhao Zhiyong was expelled from the party, informed the full text does not occur again, "Comrade".
"Tips"
Removal is not a disciplinary action
Informed in many issues in the official result, and we often see "removal from Office" and so forth. In fact, Zhu lijia, a Professor of State administration and other experts interviewed explained in an interview with the Beijing News, under the Statute, disposition of cadres limited to warning, demerit, demerit, demotion, dismissal, expulsion, there is no "dismissal". Therefore, strictly speaking, "dismissal" is the realm of cadre organization measures only, not punishment category.
For example, today informed the Central Commission for discipline inspection Zhang Tianxin, Zhao Zhiyong consequences, expelled, demoted, is the formal disciplinary action after removal from Office is not.
(Original title: fellow using his easy access to the self-serving, why only two officials of Yunnan demoted? )
赞