Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)aaapublished in(发表于) 2014/7/19 8:29:22 Elective liuhanliuwei， appeal adjourned sentencing
Xinhuanet, Hubei, Xianning July 19 (reporters Zou Wei and and Yang Weihan and and Li Pengxiang)-intermediate people's Court of Hubei provincial higher people's Court in Xianning city public hearing highlighted such appeals, public hearing Liu Wei, xianan district, Xianning city people's Court appeal. Highlighted such appeals after 6 days 19th trial adjournments, liouville's appeal after a 4-day trial adjournments on 17th. Elective in accordance with law, the Court ruled.
In appeals such as highlighted during the hearing, court litigation rights and conduct forensic investigations. Judges read out the judgement of first instance found that the main facts, opinion and judgment. Liu Han, the appellant and his counsel, appeals unit hanlong group lawsuit on behalf of people who stated the reasons for the appeal. As found in the judgment of first instance courts focused on the appellant objects to the intentional homicide, intentional injury and investigation of the facts and evidence of the Tribunal. Respectively for the appellant highlighted comments on first instance's findings of fact. Defender, asking questions, the Prosecutor for questioning. In evidence, cross-examination session, Liu Han, Liu Xiaoping, and appeals by the appellant and his defenders on a disputed evidence comments published and presented new evidence, prosecutors released a cross-examination. Inspectors the use of multimedia systems which exhibit the Luo, who the witness testimony and other evidence, highlighted cross-examination views and his defenders. Should appeal people Liu Xiaoping Defender applications, and by court license, witnesses Han Dragon Group executives Liu a on Liu Xiaoping cheat loan appear testified, highlighted, and Liu Xiaoping and defender, and inspectors respectively to witnesses for has questions; should appeal people highlighted and defender, and inspectors of applications, and by court license, witnesses officers that a, and lawyer Chen a on deliberately killed Wang yongcheng, and highlighted whether had prosecutors co-defendants appeal people Sun Huajun, illegal crime, related case facts appear testified, highlighted and defender, and Prosecutors to question the witnesses and cross-examination, respectively; appellant Liu Han, Liu Xiaoping Defender application, and with leave of the Court, witnesses hanlong Group executives what xxx hanlong Group's corporate culture, Liu Xiaoping hanlong group service and changes to testify, Liu Han, Liu Xiaoping and his defenders, prosecutors, respectively to question the witnesses, cross-examination and views expressed. Part of arguments in court, Liu Han did defend himself, defended the opinion from the Defender, court opinion from the prosecutors. Parties to appeal conviction on grounds involving disputed factual evidence, sentencing and debate specific issues such as applicable law.
Liouville's appeal during the hearing, informed the Tribunal that the appellant's lawsuit right after the court investigation. Court heard the appellant's grounds of appeal and summarized the appellant's investigation focuses on the Tribunal. Respectively for the appellant liouville commented on first instance's findings of fact. Defender, asking questions, the Prosecutor for questioning. Adducing cross-examinations links, liouville, the appellant and his counsel on a disputed evidence comments published. Liu Wei and his defenders on the appellant's application, and with leave of the Court, witnesses Tan liouville's Mafia organization, leadership and the casinos to testify and answer questions. Liouville, small open plateau of defenders around the sentencing of facts presented new evidence, prosecutors around people such as Liu Wei organizing, leading and participating in mafia-and facts presented new evidence in sentencing, Liu Wei of the appellant and his defenders, prosecutors, such as cross-examination views respectively. Court sentencing facts also conducted a forensic investigation. Part of arguments in court, appellant liouville, and defended the opinion of the trial the defendant and his defenders. Court opinion from the prosecutors. Subsequently, debated opinion of the appellant, Defender, Inspector to the reply.
Court debates ended, Liu Han, Liu Wei made a final statement. Liu han said the Court gave itself the opportunity to express their views fully, liouville indicated its willingness to accept the Justice of the law. Sentence commuted to the other appellant, wants the Court to give a fair and just verdict.
The entire trial process is a peaceful and rational, according to law in an orderly manner. A Court of law and the protection of the legal rights of the appellant, the appellant and his defenders fully been evidence, cross-examination, made submissions, the appellant conducted a final statement. Two full Court insist public hearing according to law, there have been more than 500 people representative of the masses, some relatives of the appellant, the trial of the accused and journalists attended the trial.
赞