Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)aaa
published in(发表于) 2014/7/27 17:47:27
United States scholars say Japan in violation of the Potsdam Proclamation， Koxinga， the Diaoyu Islands against the law

New York, July 26 (Xinhua Ruan Yulin) today issued the Potsdam Proclamation 69 years ago. New York University political science professor Xiong 玠 26th, said in an interview with news agency reporters in New York, Japan is not in accordance with the provisions of the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation, will give back to China in the Diaoyu Islands, has violated Japan signed the surrender of the commitment.

Said Xiong 玠, the Potsdam Proclamation was during World War II, three allies, the United States and Britain in an agreement announced on July 26, 1945. Its key provisions include: first, Japan must surrender, otherwise Japan will face total destruction and, secondly, after surrendering Japan's four islands in the territory are limited to its own, as well as the three allies may agree to other islands.

"Behind this point is repeated as early as December 1, 1943, the same three allies declared the provisions of the Cairo Declaration, Japan in addition to their original four Islands after the war, all the lands of others by force, island, will all ' surrendered ' (restitution)," said Xiong 玠.

"Japan didn't immediately respond, thinking it was the propaganda war", said Xiong 玠, until August 1945, United States to Japan had voted after two atomic bombs, Japan knew the so-called "total destruction" what does it mean, and on September 13 of that year declared an unconditional surrender.

Said Xiong 玠, even though Japan's unconditional surrender, signed the surrender. Surrender also States that Japan accepted the provisions of the Potsdam Declaration. Japan occupied ever since the Treaty of Shimonoseki Taiwan and the Pescadores in 1945 returned to China, did not return to China also belongs to China's Diaoyu Islands. Instead handed over to the US military accepted.

Said Xiong 玠, Japan today and China's Diaoyu Island dispute also plausibly that the Diaoyu Islands is the 1972 United States together with Okinawa (the former Ryukyu) together with "return" Japan. "How can the Diaoyu Island is never Japan areas and Islands is by no means part of the Ryukyu, how to ' return '?"

The Potsdam Proclamation noted that Japan surrendered, its sovereignty was limited to Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku and Islands designated by the allies. Xiong 玠, said on November 26, 1943, ﹑ ﹑ British beauty in the Cairo Declaration and the agreements signed directly relevant to modern times, asked Japan to abandon its takeover of the Islands and territories. This request on July 26, 1945, the Potsdam Proclamation, signed in 1951 and the Treaty of San Francisco to Japan were repeated. Sulfur ball, and these territories and islands including the Taiwan Penghu ﹑ ﹑ Diaoyu Islands.

Xiong 玠 believes that Japan tried to prove that the Diaoyu Islands are in many ways Japan, but only in accordance with the Potsdam Agreement, Japan in 1945 is not in accordance with the provisions of the Potsdam Proclamation, will give back to China in the Diaoyu Islands, has violated its commitment to signing the surrender.

The famous Professor of international law at New York University said, we need to emphasize that, after the Potsdam Proclamation, three allies do not agree under any other areas such as the Diaoyu Islands to Japan. Therefore, Japan even more lame argument is useless, one in international law, Japan will not pass. (End)

(Original title: aesthetics of said violation of the Potsdam Proclamation, "heresy" Diaoyu Islands against the law)

赞