Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)aaa
published in(发表于) 2014/7/27 17:53:27
“Broadband Bill“ shareholders lost $ 190，000 and charged against

"Broadband Bill" shareholders lost $ 190,000 prosecute two trials are losing-broadband, owe-IT news "Broadband Bill" investor loss of 190,000, charged the losing

Make money, home is always disconnected from the network. Complaint response was "Broadband Bill." In desperation, the citizens of Haikou city, Hainan Province, helong to Internet access to trade stocks for the phone companies to court, but after two trials were lost.

In November 2011, he long and address company broadband packages have signed a one-year contract. According to the contract States that "set modification, rescission shall be in business next month after the entry into force, set before the entry into force, member users according to their own choice of tariff implementation." Because there are only ten days into next month, he long been paid 18 dollars net, for this piece of wire.

On November 30, 2011, he long prepared Internet stocks, only to find no Internet access. Call the customer service, the other side says is overdue. After being explained, they will be dealt with as soon as possible, but not until December 3 are connected to the Internet. According to he long to assess, by cutting off their individual holdings of stock market losses that day was more than 190,000 yuan. To this end, he sued the phone company to court, asking for loss of market value.
Hainan Haikou city xiuying district people's Court of first instance concluded that he long made communication company wrongdoing, shall be liable for breach of contract claims that the evidence is insufficient, the Court does not support. He refuses to accept, filed an appeal. Recently, the Haikou intermediate people's Court of second instance upheld.

Contractors said after the judge in the case, Ho failed to connect home broadband network, customer service personnel due to debt the company interrupted the network services, to this communications company has its faults. But in this case, he long advocated is no Internet access in the day led to its equity losses of 190699.68 should be paid for by the communications company. Communications company providing network services are only marketers, network broadband outages occurred even if the user still can trade stocks in other ways, so he long advocated the day's stock losses and network outage does not exist this causal relationship.

赞