Go homepage(回首页) Upload pictures (上传图片) Write articles (发文字帖)
The author:(作者)aaapublished in(发表于) 2014/8/14 8:19:03 State antitrust experts were dismissed， reportedly employed foreign companies charge a high salary
Review: giving top experts that the State Antimonopoly Committee's title, or covertly, to collect money for the surveyed corporate endorsements. After the dismissal, Dodge said: "just as a foreign Word. "Such an expert no matter how high its academic standards, its bad, its virtue contemptible.
Yesterday, Zhang Xinzhu was dismissing the event broke the anti-monopoly Committee panels for more details, Zhang Xinzhu reportedly employed by Qualcomm and charge high fees. Related departments said, "said Zhang Xinzhu be dismissed not because of who he is. "While there is news that, Zhang Xin Zhu charged the" reward "of up to 6 million. In this regard, denied Zhang Xinzhu, Qualcomm said "no response."
In response to
Dismissing the cause really, "high-throughput"
"Has said Zhang Xinzhu be dismissed not because of who he is, but because he used the Antimonopoly Committee has engaged in as a member of the Advisory Panel and perform duties unrelated to the activities of the Advisory Group of experts, a serious violation of work discipline. "In this regard, Zhang Xinzhu was relieved about the authorities respond to the Beijing Youth daily.
Yesterday morning, CCTV News reported, Zhang Xinzhu was dismissed because the State Antimonopoly Committee as a member of the Advisory Group of experts employed by the Qualcomm is under investigation at the national development and Reform Commission, charging high fees, for which issued the so-called "no monopoly" of economic evidence, in violation of the working discipline. Sources have also exposed, Zhang Xin Zhu charged the "reward" of up to 6 million.
On this, yesterday, related sector related persons responded North Green reported reporter Shi clear, State anti-monopoly Committee expert advisory group work rules third chapter work discipline in the 13th article provides of third items clear pointed out that: maintenance expert advisory group of reputation, shall not engaged in and perform expert advisory group duties interests conflict of activities; without State anti-monopoly Committee agreed, shall not to expert advisory group members identity engaged in and perform expert advisory group duties has nothing to do of activities. "For violations of the code of the expert members of the Advisory Group, clearly will be criticized, cautions and dismissals, and Zhang Xinzhu is known in advance. "These people emphasized.
After visiting the
Zhang Xinzhu deny that Qualcomm does not respond
Media coverage of "6 million" bribe is true and so on, yesterday afternoon, Zhang Xinzhu denies, even said in a SMS reply to the media "crap", and high-throughput (China) company's senior public relations manager in full strength says on this matter does not respond to all of your questions.
Ebony says, Qualcomm also knows nothing about it seeing media reports that day, also received a telephone, but the media and the public a unified response was "no response", and only disclose such.
Analysis
High-throughput investigations or "nets"
People familiar with the youth daily reporters yesterday to North, Zhang Xinzhu was relieved in the news release, as well as Qualcomm's case is coming to an end, is about to close the net.
According to the source, a report titled economic evidence about Qualcomm license pricing--Global Economics Group white paper on the national development and Reform Commission to investigate Qualcomm according to the materials of the case to the relevant report, the second author for the Chinese Academy of social sciences researcher Zhang Xinzhu. NDRC's price supervision and inspection with the antitrust authority confirmed that Qualcomm's second President when communicating to the national development and Reform Commission and antitrust Bureau submitted the report. Qualcomm's day specially reminded the NDRC anti-monopoly Bureau, one of two authors of the report to the State Council Antimonopoly Committee expert advisory group expert Zhang Xinzhu.
December 2013, the NDRC anti-monopoly Bureau confirmed that the Agency has officially started on the Qualcomm's alleged monopoly investigation. Then Qualcomm's head three times to communicate on this matter with the national development and Reform Commission of China. Said people familiar with the matter said, Qualcomm hopes that through this official endorsement on behalf of the members of the expert group's report proved that Chinese investigators contradict each other.
These people said, Zhang Xinzhu as members of the Advisory Group of experts on the Antimonopoly Committee, the national development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Commerce and the Administration for industry and Commerce of the three antitrust enforcement agencies any suggestions, are available through the normal channels, without the need to transmit the adopted targets. Qualcomm itself has a large team of lawyers, which hired Zhang Xinzhu to produce relevant reports, mainly to take advantage of Zhang Xinzhu Antimonopoly Committee as a member of the expert group. Text/reporter Liu Shenliang
Financial perspectives
Must not allow some expert chilipawai
Authorities responded in recent days, Chinese Academy of social sciences researcher Zhang Xinzhu without consent of the Antimonopoly Committee, State Council Antimonopoly Committee as a member of the Advisory Group of experts employed by Qualcomm, charging hefty rewards for their submission of so-called economic evidence, in violation of work discipline, dismissal by Antimonopoly Committee panels, ceases to be a member of the Advisory Group.
Giving top experts that the State Antimonopoly Committee's title, or covertly, to collect money for the surveyed corporate endorsements. After the dismissal, Dodge said: "just as a foreign Word. "Such an expert no matter how high its academic standards, its bad, its virtue contemptible.
Even more alarming is that some multinational companies in order to keep their monopoly profits, in the face of antitrust investigations from regulators, all sorts, resorted to various means: delays hinder law enforcement, money operations as "expert" support, "exclusive" argument for their injustice, and so on. In this context, employed in the Government sector-related "expert" "for the foreign word" disciplinary charge stakeholder rewards, this should be checked out, and the public.
Implementation of the anti-monopoly law in China is not a long time. Specialists with expertise in this area bears to commentate on such duties, some experts with official organizational contexts are important participants in the antitrust investigation. Agencies and departments should strengthen supervision and management experts, some expert must not be allowed to fish in troubled waters, and chilipawai and destroy the law's reputation. Text/Xinhua News Agency
Backgrounder
Qualcomm was 7 billion dollars or a ticket
By the end of 2013, the State development and Reform Commission launched an antitrust probe against Qualcomm, patent licensing fees are too high is one of the focus of the investigation. The case for China's first antitrust case of the communications industry. In early August, the monopoly of the national development and Reform Commission said it had determined the high pass.
In accordance with the provisions of the antitrust laws, Qualcomm's alleged monopoly in the domestic investigation concluded that Qualcomm will face fines of up to more than 7 billion yuan. Markets are waiting for the findings of the national development and Reform Commission last.
It is understood that on WCDMA products, Qualcomm takes 5% of all domestic terminal manufacturers licensing fees, charge 4% on LTE announced licensing rates. Such fees, in the view of many domestic cell phone and chip businesses, very high and very irrational. In February of this year, more than more than 40 domestic Smartphone manufacturers, chip makers and other components of the "mobile phone China Union" was submitted to the national development and Reform Commission high-pass evidence of monopoly.
In fact, foreign companies such as Qualcomm, Samsung, Nokia's standard license fee is much lower than the Chinese mobile phone manufacturer, also constitute discriminatory licensing. For more than 10 years, Qualcomm patent licensing mode and chip sales in Europe and Japan and South Korea and India and other places was questioned, antitrust and intellectual property disputes. Korea Fair Trade Commission in 2009 to draw on Qualcomm about $ 208 million tickets, because high-pass conditions of use discounts, the chip is bundled with the patent, to only buy Qualcomm technology but don't buy high-throughput microarray vendors charging discriminatory licensing fees. Text/reporter Liu Shenliang
03:42 August 14, 2014 The Beijing Youth daily
赞