Beware scam, "Jing dong white" fraud to defraud buyers property-Jingdong white, scams-IT information
Lied about helping buyers use "Jing dong white" real cheat
17 year old man three times in three days the crime was jailed for eight months by Jingdong distribution through
Change QQ to Commission people who cash in the guise of, wanted to use "Jing dong white" cash buyer buying specified in the store, and asked to fill out consignee and address, then brought the goods with a fake ID, said cash was ultimately proved to be a hoax. Dongguan, a 17 year old man using serial Jingdong Mall vulnerability to defraud buyers of property, transportation specialist in the East by Beijing after secretly. On May 5, the third Court of Dongguan city, the man was sentenced to eight months on charges of fraud and sentenced to a fine of 1000 Yuan.
On August 15, 2015, the victim Hwang used in Jingdong Mall Jingdong G7 white bought a Huawei mobile phone (1699). Subsequently accused Li Moucheng risking says Jing dong Xu Zhen Tao Huang Dianen telephone employees, said Huang′s problems with orders, you need to fill in order to refund. Lee mistook the consignee "Xu Zhen Tao" as "town". Huang, according to Li Moucheng instructions to the consignee and address changes as "Xu Zhen, Huangjiang town, Dongguan City Star Starlight road near 56th village".
August 16 at 9 o′clock, Hwang received Jingdong distribution company calls its receipt, then contact Lee city, Huang Jing dong, Li Moucheng said there is no user ID and password cannot be received, Huang told the other side. After Li Moucheng Xu Zhen Tao holding fake identity card to the Jingdong company Huangjiang distribution stations intended to obtain Huawei cell phone, alarm after the distribution point through, the police captured Li Moucheng on the second floor in the vicinity of the factory.
Jingdong company Huangjiang distribution station official said that on that day, he received a distribution station reflect the parcels to the consignee to change delivery address after seeing Li Moucheng Xu Zhentao ID to collect, the receipt of the package to fill out address is Starlight village Starlight road, Huangjiang town near 56th, consigned to Xu Zhen, but man. He felt men′s micro-letter group suspect will stall and upload man on ID cards and small video and colleagues reflect the men after an hour away in their hands before a Apple phone, but using different names , and he identified the man suspected of fraud. Then he called his colleagues back to distribution stations, colleagues arrived the men managed to escape, and the two men chased out after it captured.
Third think people′s Court of Dongguan, Li Moucheng of the accused for the purpose of illegal possession, fraud money, larger amounts, the acts have been committed People′s Republic of China criminal law, constitute a crime of fraud, punishable by law. Li Moucheng modus operandi of the defendant is under 18 years of age, minors, shall be given a lighter punishment according to law. Li Moucheng after the arrest of the accused for the basic facts of the crime, may be given a lighter punishment according to law. Combined with its crimes and repentance, judgment was made.
小心骗局，“京东白条”可作假骗取买家财物 - 京东白条,诈骗 - IT资讯
谎称帮买家利用“京东白条”套现实则骗取财物
17岁男子三天内三次作案被京东配送员识破获刑八个月
更改QQ名打着收取佣金帮人套现的幌子，让想利用“京东白条”套现的买家在京东商城上购买指定物品、并按照要求填写收货人和地址，再用假身份证领走货物，最终说好的套现却变成了一场骗局。东莞一名17岁男子利用京东商城漏洞连续作案，骗取买家财物，后被京东配送员识破。5月5日，该男子被东莞市第三法院以诈骗罪判处有期徒刑八个月，并处罚金人民币1000元。
2015年8月15日，被害人黄某在京东商城上使用京东白条购买了一部华为G7手机（价值1699元）。随后被告人李某城冒称京东员工许镇涛电话联系黄典恩，称黄的订单出现问题，需要重新填写订单方能退回款项。李某城误把收货人“许镇涛”发成“许镇”。黄某根据李某城的指示将收货人及地址更改为“许镇、东莞市黄江镇星光村村委会星光路56号附近”。
8月16日9时许，黄某收到京东配送公司电话让其收货，遂联系李某城，李某城表示没有黄某的京东账号和密码无法收货，黄就告诉了对方。后李某城持假冒的许镇涛身份证前往京东公司黄江配送站意图领取华为手机，被配送站人员识破后报警，民警于现场附近一工厂二楼将李某城抓获。
京东公司黄江配送站负责人表示，当天，他接到配送站反映一包裹收货人更改收货地址，之后看到李某城用许镇涛的身份证前来领取，该包裹填写的收货地址是黄江镇星光村村委会星光路56号附近，收货人为许镇，但男子要求自提。他觉得男子可疑便拖住其并在微信群上上传男子的身份证和小视频，后有同事反映该男子一小时前曾在其手中领走一部苹果手机，而且用的是不同的名字，于是他确定该男子有诈骗嫌疑。随后他把同事叫回配送站，同事赶来后该男子趁机逃跑，二人追出去后将其抓获。
东莞市第三人民法院审理认为，被告人李某城以非法占有为目的，诈骗他人财物，数额较大，其行为已触犯中华人民共和国刑律，构成诈骗罪，依法应予惩处。被告人李某城作案时未满十八周岁，系未成年人，依法应当从轻处罚。被告人李某城归案后如实供述基本犯罪事实，依法可以从轻处罚。结合其犯罪情节和悔罪态度，作出以上判决。