Families of the victims of the terrorist attack in Paris: Facebook and Google are aiding and abetting terrorist attacks, Facebook-IT information

On June 17, according to foreign reports, Google, Facebook and Twitter are facing prosecution, alleged terrorist attack in Paris in which become accomplices to the terrorists.

A woman was killed in the terrorist attacks in Paris's father recently-just Canizares (Reynaldo Gonzalez) technology company for alleged terrorists provided "significant help".

He claims that they "apologia" for the so-called "Islamic State" organizations--his complaint called in ISIS--hire, raising funds and spreading "extremist".

Several science and technology companies said they already have the policy to combat extremism.

In November last year, when terrorist attacks Paris, batakelan Theatre, bars, hotels and the national football stadium when they ruthlessly shot and killed 130 innocent civilians, including daughter of Canizares.

"Over the years, the ISIS company chooses to condone terrorist organizations use their social networks to spread extremist statements, raising funds and recruiting new members. "According to documents submitted to the California Court on Tuesday.

"These technology companies provide significant help, the rise of ISIS played a vital role, so that the terrorist organization could carry out a number of terrorist attacks, including the terrorist attacks in Paris November 13, 2015. In the terrorist attacks, a total of more than 125 people have been killed, including daughter just Canizares-NSN m Canizares (Nohemi Gonzalez). ”

Canizares said, without access to Twitter, Facebook and Google video website YouTube,ISIS it is impossible to rise rapidly in the past few years, as the world's most feared terrorist organizations. Technology companies provided the terrorist organization with the necessary infrastructure to disseminate its message.

He cited the Brookings Institute report said, organization of the Islamic countries "to use social media (Twitter is the most notorious of them) to spread their message and information around the world, and bewitch people vulnerable to radicalism. ”

In a statement to the associated press, Twitter and Facebook said that there was no point. The three technology companies are referred to their policy to combat extremism.

For example, Twitter says it "around the world has a special team responsible for investigating violations of the user terms of use report, identifying irregularities and in cooperation with law enforcement authorities if necessary. ”

Facebook statement if the company found "may occur when there is evidence of injury or terrorist attacks", then it will contact law enforcement.

Google said it does not comment on pending litigation. However, it noted that it had developed a "clear policy against terrorists on its network on hiring and spreading terrorism speech aimed at inciting violence and quickly removed the videos that violate these policies. ”

Safe Harbor

According to United States law, an Internet company for the content posted by users on its network is usually excused.

1996 United States the Communications Decency Act (Communications Decency Act) Article No. 230 to Twitter and Facebook and other Internet companies to provide a legal "safe harbor." The Bill stated that "interactive computer service providers and users, should not be considered any information provided by another information content provider of Publisher or speaker. ”

However, now it is not clear in the case of technology companies cited defended the adequacy of the provisions of the law.

Ali, one of the lawyers representing just Canizares-Cresci (Ari Kresch) told the associated press said that "this indictment is not accused of ISIS message said something, but blame Google, Twitter and Facebook allow ISIS using their social media networks to recruit and to carry out various activities. ”

This lawsuit also claims that ISIS terrorist organization not only on Google's video site YouTube to upload your own videos and share the video with the video website advertising commissions.

Senior fellow at the Brookings Institute, Benjamin-Steve Berkowitz (Benjamin Wittes) agreed that, in such cases, the law on the "safe harbor" could not cover the social media company.

However, he also pointed out that technology companies were accused of supporting extremist practices and terrorist attacks in Paris between cause and effect is not obvious.

巴黎恐袭案受害者家属：Facebook和谷歌都是帮凶 - 恐怖袭击,Facebook - IT资讯

6月17日消息，据外电报道，谷歌、Facebook和Twitter正面临起诉，被指控在巴黎恐怖袭击案中沦为了恐怖分子的帮凶。

一名在巴黎恐怖袭击活动中遇害的女子的父亲雷纳尔多-刚萨雷斯（Reynaldo Gonzalez）指控上述科技公司给恐怖分子提供了“重大帮助”。

他声称，它们“纵容”所谓的“伊斯兰国”组织——他在起诉状中称之为ISIS——招人、筹集资金以及散布“极端主义言论”。

这几家科技公司均表示，它们已有打击极端主义内容的政策。

在去年11月，当恐怖分子袭击巴黎巴塔克兰剧院、酒吧、酒店和国家足球场的时候，他们冷酷地射杀了130名无辜的平民，其中包括刚萨雷斯的女儿。

“多年来，这些公司故意纵容恐怖组织ISIS利用它们的社交网络来传播极端主义言论、筹集资金以及吸收新的成员。”周二提交给加利福尼亚州法院的文件称。

“这些科技公司提供的重大帮助，对于ISIS的崛起起到了至关重要的作用，使得该恐怖组织得以实施了很多起恐怖袭击活动，其中包括2015年11月13日的巴黎恐怖袭击活动。在这起恐怖袭击案中，总共有超过125人丧生，其中包括刚萨雷斯的女儿诺西米-刚萨雷斯（Nohemi Gonzalez）。”

刚萨雷斯声称，如果没有Twitter、Facebook和谷歌视频网站YouTube，ISIS就不可能在过去几年中迅速崛起，成为全世界最可怕的恐怖组织。这些科技公司为这个恐怖组织提供了传播其讯息的必要的基础设施。

他援引布鲁金斯学会的研究报告称，伊斯兰国组织“利用社交媒体（其中最臭名昭著的是Twitter）向全世界传播他们的宣传口号和信息，并招募易受激进主义蛊惑的人。”

在发给美联社的一份声明中，Twitter和Facebook均表示，此案并没有意义。这三家科技公司均提到了它们打击极端主义内容的政策。

例如，Twitter声称，它“在世界各地都有专门的团队负责调查各种违反用户使用规定的报告、鉴别违规行为以及在必要的时候与执法部门配合。”

Facebook声明，如果该公司发现“有证明表明可能会发生伤害或恐怖袭击”，那么它就会联系执法部门。

谷歌则表示，它不会就悬而未决的诉讼案发表评论。但是，它指出它已制定了“明确的政策，禁止恐怖分子在其网络上招人和散布旨在煽动暴力的恐怖主义言论，并迅速撤下了违反这些政策的视频。”

安全港湾

根据美国法律，互联网公司对于用户在其网络上发布的内容通常可以免责。

1996年美国《通讯正当行为法案》（Communications Decency Act）的第230条为Twitter和Facebook等互联网公司提供了法律上的“安全港湾”。该法案声称，“互动电脑服务的提供商和用户，不应被当做是其他信息内容提供商所提供的任何信息的出版商或发言人。”

但是，现在尚不清楚在此案中这些科技公司援引该法律条文进行辩护是否充分。

刚萨雷斯的代表律师之一阿里-克雷希（Ari Kresch）对美联社称，“这份起诉书不是指责ISIS的宣传信息说了什么，而是指责谷歌、Twitter和Facebook纵容了ISIS使用其社交媒体网络来招人和开展各种活动。”

这起诉讼案还声称，ISIS恐怖组织不仅在谷歌视频网站YouTube上上传了自己的视频，而且还与该视频网站分享着其视频中的广告提成。

布鲁金斯学会的高级研究员本杰明-维茨（Benjamin Wittes）也认为，在这类案件中，法律上的“安全港湾”可能也罩不住这些社交媒体公司。

但是，他也指出，这些科技公司被指控的支持极端主义者的做法与巴黎恐怖袭击之间的因果关系并不明显。