Mobile phones, laptops, desktops, Donnybrook-Intel,NVIDIA, processor-IT information
The rise of mobile computing, the traditional PC giant, Intel, NVIDIA, AMD are actively embracing mobile Internet, mobile phones, notebooks, desktops, blurring, some cross-platform testing tools come into being, and comparison of performance between multiple platforms will have a reference. Famous PRIMATE LABS recently released new Geekbench 4 testing tool, in addition to continued support for cross-platform comparison, adding more dimensional indicators to assess the effectiveness of the CPU and GPU, such as integers, floating point numbers were adjusted, the respective proportion of memory, while joining the GPU test (Compute), multiplatform compare more balance.
Geekbench 4 is based on the Intel Core i7-6600U performance as a benchmark score of--4000 in nature above 4000 points with better performance and less than 4000 experienced decreases. Geekbench 3 is based on the Intel Core i5-2520M a generation ago as a benchmark score--2500 points. We can see that with the development of processor performance baselines, were also raised.
Based on this test, we brought together a market mainstream mobile phones, laptops, desktops, and comprehensive competition, Geekbench 4 PC version,Android provides CPU single core and multicore performance, GPU general purpose computation performance test project, iOS version is currently only available CPU single core and multicore performance testing project.
CPU single-threaded and multithreaded performance comparison
First is the processor performance comparison, PC (desktop + laptop) selects Core i7-6800K (six-core 12 threads), the Core i7-6700K (BA threads, quad-core), Core i5-6500 (Quad four threads), the Core i3-6100 (dual core four threads) as well as Core i7-6700HQ (BA threads, quad-core), Core i5-6200U (dual core four threads), and Core i7-6700HQ Core I5-6200U for the notebook market.
▲ Top desktop platform Core i7-6800K + GeForce GTX 1080
IOS platform, select the iPad Pro A9X and theiPhone6s A9,iPad Air 2 A8X iPhone6 A8, with iPad Air 2 A8X has three core design, others are dual-core designs.
Android platform, we chose the Samsung Exynos 8890, Exynos 7420, Qualcomm Snapdragon 820, Snapdragon 810, mediatek Helio X25, these are high-end mobile phone chip is now mainstream.
? Single and multi-threaded CPU performance comparison
No doubt PC processor a rolled lead mobile processor and desktop processors is generally higher than notebook processors, but examine the A9X processors such as Apple has completely and low-end mobile processor in a teach it out of strength, both single core or multi-core performance is closer to the Core i5-6200U processor Core i5-6200U processor up to 15W TDP, after all, if energy efficiency ratio, Core I5-6200U processor may fail miserably.
With is phone processor, Apple and Ann Zhuo camp mutual has WINS, but Apple of advantage also is very obviously, especially A9X chip, its single nuclear performance let opponents candle, to know phone end more task needs weak, phone of performance is big of is rely on processor of single nuclear performance, except iOS system of advantage, this is why Apple system of smooth experience has been to is better than Android of reasons.
Then take a look at the Android camp three Musketeers: Samsung, Qualcomm, mediatek, overall mediatek both single core or multi-core performance is slightly better, Gao Tongxiao Dragon and Samsung's Orion comparison between winning or losing, and Samsung Exynos 8890 is undoubtedly the thrones in the Android camp, but Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 is also favourably, followed.
GPU general purpose computation performance comparison
General computing performance, Geekbench 4 main considerations chip GPU Compute performance, mobile phone chip GPU and CPU units are integrated in a Die, and high-end notebooks, desktop platform, often with a video card, which card unbridled power rising power, of course, is unmatched by mobile phone chips.
? General computer performance
Can be seen from the figure, excluding Geekbench 4 iOS system does not provide a general purpose computation test project, General complete rolling mobile chips for PC, even iOS system is hard to fight. General GeForce GTX 1080 most desktops is the most powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon mobile 820 23.91 times times, even almost leading Core i5-6200U the iGPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 8,201 times performance.
In the case of power disparities, mobile phone chip in terms of general-purpose computing performance will be hard to discrete graphics and desktop against, after all, in both technology and architecture simultaneously.
General Android Samsung Orion surprisingly comprehensive defeat Gao Tongxiao camp long and varied, even weaker than the mediatek Helio X25 many. We guess Samsung Orion GM performance disappoints on Geekbench 4 and may be less than on the one hand, is the limit of the processor running the software testing peak performance and peak daily use processor cannot continue, but also to affect the user experience very large temperature cannot be reflected in the running software.
Summary
Cell phone/laptop/desktop performance Grand melee test came to an end, is limited by the time this test only brings together typical products currently available, particularly the mobile phone chip manufacturers cooling different performance itself has some differences, the above test scores as a typical reference only.
Overall, this distribution of processor performance, as well as general performance was to be expected, but mobile processors had made rapid progress in recent years has made PC product no longer lonely and lost, especially the A9X Apple chips, with only a few shake w power consumption in the low-end notebook processor, regardless of performance, energy efficiency will no doubt make PC products to shame.
And in terms of General computing performance, absolute dominance of the PC video card is currently not subject to any invasion, after all, the PC card can almost limitless power consumption and heat dissipation make stack lots of transistors, natural compacted cell phone chip and mobile phone chips limited by battery life and heat dissipation, and competition in the PC video card power are also not available.
手机、笔记本、台式机性能大混战 - Intel,NVIDIA,处理器 - IT资讯
移动计算的风云崛起，传统PC巨头Intel、NVIDIA、AMD都在积极拥抱移动互联网，手机、笔记本、台式机的界限越来越模糊，一些跨平台测试工具遍应运而生，多平台之间的性能体验对比就有了参考。近日国外著名的PRIMATE LABS发布了全新的Geekbench 4测试工具，除了一如既往的支持跨平台对比，加入了更多的量纲指标来评估CPU和GPU的效能，比如调整了整数、浮点数、内存的各自所占比例，同时加入了GPU测试（Compute），多平台对比更加平衡。
Geekbench 4是以Intel Core i7-6600U性能作为基准分数--4000分，自然高于4000分有更好的性能，而低于4000分则体验就逐渐降低。而上一代Geekbench 3则是基于Intel Core i5-2520M作为基准分数--2500分。我们可以看出随着处理器性能的飞速发展，基准线也被拔高。
基于此本次测试我们汇聚了市售主流手机、笔记本、台式机，进行性能全面的比拼，Geekbench 4 PC版、Android提供了CPU单核和多核性能、GPU通用计算性能测试项目，而iOS版本目前仅提供CPU的单核和多核性能测试项目。
CPU单线程和多线程性能对比
首先是处理器性能的对比，PC（桌面+笔记本）选取了Core i7-6800K（六核十二线程）、Core i7-6700K（四核八线程）、Core i5-6500（四核四线程）、Core i3-6100（双核四线程）以及Core i7-6700HQ（四核八线程）、Core i5-6200U（双核四线程），其中Core i7-6700HQ和Core i5-6200U面向笔记本市场。
▲桌面顶级平台Core i7-6800K + GeForce GTX 1080
iOS平台则选取了iPad Pro的A9X、iPhone6s的A9、iPad Air 2的A8X和iPhone6的A8，其中iPad Air 2的A8X采用了三核设计，其余均为双核设计。
Android平台选取了三星Exynos 8890、Exynos 7420，高通Snapdragon 820、Snapdragon 810，联发科helio X25，这些都是目前主流的中高端手机芯片。
▲CPU单线程和多线程性能对比
毫无悬念PC处理器以碾压优势领先手机处理器，而桌面处理器也普遍高于笔记本处理器，但是细看诸如苹果的A9X处理器已经完全具备和中低端移动处理器一教高下的实力，无论是单核性能还是多核性能都比较接近Core i5-6200U处理器，毕竟Core i5-6200U处理器TDP高达15W，如果论能效比，Core i5-6200U处理器可能会输的很惨。
同是手机处理器，苹果和安卓阵营互有输赢，但苹果的优势还是非常明显，特别是A9X芯片，其单核性能让对手望其项背，要知道手机端多任务需求疲软，手机的性能很大的是依赖处理器的单核性能，除了iOS系统的优势，这也是为什么苹果系统的流畅体验一直要优于安卓的原因。
再来看看安卓阵营的三个火枪手：三星、高通、联发科，整体来看联发科无论是单核性能还是多核性能都略逊一筹，而高通骁龙和三星猎户座的对比互有输赢，而三星Exynos 8890无疑是安卓阵营的王座，但高通Snapdragon 820也是不遑多让，紧跟其后。
GPU通用计算性能对比
通用计算性能，Geekbench 4主要考量芯片图形处理单元的Compute计算性能，对于手机芯片而言GPU和CPU单元是整合在一颗Die上，而中高端的笔记本、桌面平台，通常配有独立显卡，而这些显卡肆无忌惮的从电源崛起功耗，自然是手机芯片无法比拟的。
▲通用计算性能对比
从上图可以看出，排除iOS系统因为Geekbench 4不提供通用计算测试项目，PC通用计算完全碾压移动芯片，即便是iOS系统也很难对抗。通用计算桌面端最强的GeForce GTX 1080是手机端最强的高通Snapdragon 820的23.91倍，即使是Core i5-6200U的iGPU也几乎领先高通Snapdragon 820一倍的性能。
在功耗差异悬殊的情况下，手机芯片在通用计算性能方面将很难和桌面独立显卡产生对抗，毕竟两者的工艺和架构都在同步推进。
通用计算，安卓阵营三星猎户座出人意料的全面落败高通骁龙，而且差异悬殊，甚至比联发科Helio X25还要弱上不少。我们猜测三星猎户座的通用计算性能大跌眼镜一方面可能是其对Geekbench 4并不足，另外跑分软件测试的是处理器的极限峰值性能，而日常使用下处理器不可能一直持续峰值，而且对使用体验影响非常大的温度在跑分软件中无法体现出来。
小结
手机/笔记本/台式机性能大混战测试告一段落，受限于时间本次测试仅汇聚了目前市售的典型产品，另外特别是手机芯片各厂商散热不同，性能本身也有一定差异，所以以上测试成绩仅作为典型参考。
总体来看，本次的处理器性能以及通用计算性能的分布基本在意料之中，但是手机处理器近些年的进步神速已经让PC产品不再孤独求败，特别是苹果的A9X芯片，仅仅用几W的功耗撼平中低端笔记本处理器，抛开性能，能效比无疑会让PC产品汗颜。
而在通用计算性能方面，PC显卡目前的绝对霸主地位并没有受到任何侵袭，毕竟PC显卡可以几乎无限制的功耗和散热，让其堆栈大量的晶体管，性能自然碾压手机芯片，而手机芯片受制于续航和散热，也完全不具备和PC显卡竞争的实力。