Leping, Jiangxi province, "5·24" homicide: 5 men to murder accused | yamcha | when investigators accuse | men _ news
The morning of January 16, leping, Jiangxi "5·24" killing 5 men who came to Jiangxi province Prosecutor's Office accompanied by the lawyer, to "manslaughter" charges against justice investigators that year, and "crime" charges against the trial judgment included 4 people, including a suspended death sentence in Jiangxi province High Court judges, Jiangxi province, asked Justice overall withdrawal.
Journalists from the "5·24" murder suspect "murderer" Lin Zai was informed by one of the victim's lawyer, Fang Lin Zai case Chief Judge Shen Xiaojie was included the 5 men who were involved in 5·24 murder, the second judge of the first instance, Fang Lin Cubs are caught in the first 4 days of interrogation of suspected missing, requiring Shen Xiaojie to avoid baby Fang Lin.
With "intentional homicide" against investigators
The indictments the morning of January 16, Jiangxi province, has just been submitted to the public prosecutor's Office.
5 name men who to Jiangxi province attorney proposed charged, requirements law on leping Public Security Bureau "5·24" case and the "9·9" case of investigation case personnel Shao Jie, and Chen Zhijun, and Wang Yonggang, and Huang Dongsheng, and Fu g-w,,, Jingdezhen city attorney case investigation stage ahead of intervention, and review arrest, and review prosecution of prosecutorial personnel Zhao Yunxiang, and Zhang Tao, and Xu Wenjun,,, Jingdezhen city in the hospital case a trial and the review of trial personnel Liu Zhefu, and Cheng Jiankai, and Geng Liping, and Yang Wu, and Shen Xiaojie, and Zhang Yunxia, suspected deliberately killing crime filed investigation.
Yamcha "5·24" case lawyers pointed out that these officers pursued criminal justice deprived innocent 5 charged with death of results, have contravened the provisions of China's criminal law article No. 232, "criminal facts are clear, the evidence fully, should murder be investigated for criminal responsibility according to law."
> Yamcha men to "manslaughter" charges against investigators
In addition, 5 men were also requested in Jiangxi province High Court according to law "5·24" reviewed the second instance cases prosecutors and judicial personnel suspected of crime investigation.
Lack of serious evidence of guilt is still perverted
Lawyer mission pointed out that, "5·24" case incident Hou half around, investigation organ in has has key evidence IC card (victims Hao Qiang all) points to "really fierce" party forest cub of situation Xia, is deliberately gave up the major detection clues, will Fang Lin cub when of talk record deliberately hidden, instead in incident two years yihou catch has and this case no relationship of included, and Fang Chunping, and Cheng Fagen, and Cheng Li and 4 people, led to party forest cub thereafter and crazy modus operandi near 20 up, suspected killed 3 article lives. Investigators did not have any connection to an accused person in the case of crime clues, evidence of the case, which caught the innocent, by torture, supplemented by molting, confession by inducement to obtain confessions of guilt, then quickly "detection" service rewarded.
Lawyer mission said,, Jingdezhen city attorney in objective evidence serious insufficient, knows guilty for said may Department torture confessions and to, put on evidence insufficient to proved charged people guilty of situation Xia, still insists on for trial, and review two times prosecution;, Jingdezhen City Intermediate Court, and Jiangxi province senior Court knows guilty evidence serious insufficient, and not excluded torture confessions of case, and defence counsel Caine said charged people innocence and times strongly requirements on site evidence for DNA identification of situation Xia, still illegal not started identification program, Deliberately contrary to the judgments of fact and law, twice sentenced 4 accusers included, and Fang Chunping, Cheng Fagen, and Cheng Lihe the death penalty, a suspended death sentence. In the complaint review procedure in the case, High Court, procuratorate, in Jingdezhen city, Jiangxi province, Jingdezhen city, Jiangxi province Prosecutor's Office-related complaints review officer and other staff members seriously irresponsible, incorrect to perform legal duties, the trial supervision procedure a mere formality, even unreasonable obstruction lawyers, resulting in the case has been delayed for many years before being vindicated.
Jiangxi province, asked public security as a whole to avoid
5 the complainant expressed a willingness to cooperate with the relevant departments of investigation of criminal suspects, and evidence submitted. Indictments pointed out that because of the large case involving judicial personnel, Jiangxi province, Jiangxi province, including the High Court, prosecutors and other staff, in order to ensure the justice and avoiding intervention in human factors, Jiangxi province, the Procuratorate, systems should be avoided as a whole. Jiangxi province Prosecutor's Office after they were given the case request, will report cases of China's Supreme People's Procuratorate in accordance with law, by China's Supreme People's Procuratorate for handling or specified outside of the provincial jurisdiction of the procuratorial organs in Jiangxi province.
January 16, at 11 o'clock in the morning, 5 men, accompanied by lawyers from the Jiangxi provincial procuratorate, 3 reception they prosecutors asked the client to be torture, said it will report this matter to the leadership, please rest assured that the parties and lawyers, "the leaders attach great importance to."
Fang Lin Zai case the presiding judge was the "5·24" case judge
This reporter learned the morning of January 16, Fang Lin Xue Rongmin cub one of the victim's lawyer arrived at the higher Institute of Jiangxi province, asked the Institute urged in Jingdezhen Institute recovery proceedings Fang Lin Zai, and asked the hospital to its application Shen Xiaojie to respond to the disqualification of a judge.
Delivery info, on December 30, 2016, in Jingdezhen city, Zou Zhonghua has signed for Dean asked Shen Xiaojie Xue Rongmin lawyer mailing avoid applications. But as of now, Xue Rongmin has not yet received a formal reply in Jingdezhen.
> Delivery Info
Xue Rongmin, said Shen Xiaojie's name appeared in "5·24" murder, the second on the first instance judgement, is the trial judge, the trial had sentenced to death included 4 people. However, Shen Xiaojie is also "5·24" murder suspect "murderer" cub Lin presiding judge in the case. Fang Lin when the Cubs on October 30, 2013 trial, Fang Lin Zai insisted that "Emerald supermarket" ("5·24"), what they do, Shen Xiaojie said in a stop process "we went over, not what you do."
> Judgement
Xue Rongmin believes that Shen Xiaojie trial began that is directly in the concluding language denying the admission of Fang Lin Zai, will most likely lead the defendants Fang Lin Zai spill Sin affect the fair trial.
Fang Lin 4 days before the Cubs after being caught taking suspect missing
In addition, Xue Rongmin copied from the Jingdezhen city, Jiangxi province, Fang Lin her case file showed that Fang Lin Zai crime was arrested again in December 2011 4, on December 5 of that year for allegedly committing rape, kidnapping be detained. Xue Rongmin found that volume appeared in Fang Lin Zai of the interrogation of the first time was December 8, 2011 10:00-11:41, but not on December 4 of that year to 7th cub of the interrogation of other forest, "as Fang Lin Zai presiding judge in the case, Shen Xiaojie full attention should be paid to Fang Lin Zai missing issues of the interrogation".
Combined was local hidden 3 years of China Ministry of public security property card mirror word (2013) 1467th, evidence test report (displayed from incident site extraction of 3 Gold cigarette butts Shang of DNA from Yu Fang Lin cub of possibilities is greater than 99.999999%), Xue Rongmin reasonable suspected Shen Xiaojie previously known noted many "green treasure supermarket case" Department Fang Lin cub by for of evidence, trial beginning that to conclusion sex of language directly denied Fang Lin cub of admission is to cover its participation of "5·24" case second times first instance judgment, Its behavior is suspected of a crime. Charges against Xue a lawyer would, in due course, asked Shen Xiaojie of criminal accountability.
Lawyers require the presiding judge Fang Lin baby to withdraw
Based on the above, combined with China's law on the provisions, Shen Xiaojie Xue Rongmin requirements to avoid baby Fang Lin, "must be avoided, there is no room to negotiate. ”
Fang Lin babies after the first court hearing on October 30, 2013, has yet to restore hearing. Xue Rongmin has frequently contacted Shen Xiaojie and other members of the collegial panel, were told the case at trial. Xue Rongmin said extended trial caused by the victim's family in the case extremely unstable, "asked that the Court in Jingdezhen restored hearing, Fang Lin cub bear legal responsibilities. ”
> Petition form
The morning of January 16, Xue Rongmin to petition the High Court appeal in Jiangxi province, Jingdezhen, which ordered forest baby as soon as possible in case, request for applications made in Jingdezhen homes forest baby case Chief Judge Shen Xiaojie avoided making a decision. Jiangxi province High Court judges said they will contact as soon as possible in Jingdezhen Institute will be informed with a response.
Source: Beijing times
> Editor: Zhang di
Article keywords:Yamcha accused men
I want feedback
Save a Web page
The future network
江西省乐平市“5·24”杀人案：5名蒙冤者以故意杀人罪控告当年办案人员|乐平|控告|蒙冤_新闻资讯
1月16日上午，江西乐平“5·24”杀人案5名蒙冤者在律师陪同下来到江西省检察院，以“故意杀人罪”控告公检法当年办案人员，并以“徇私枉法罪”控告原审改判黄志强等4人死缓的江西省高院法官，要求江西省公检法整体回避。
记者还从“5·24”杀人案疑似“真凶”方林崽案其中一名被害人的代理律师处获悉，方林崽案的审判长沈晓洁曾任黄志强等5名蒙冤者所涉5·24杀人案第二次一审的审判员，方林崽被抓后前4天的询问笔录疑缺失，其要求沈晓洁回避方林崽案。
以“故意杀人罪”控告办案人
该控告书于1月16日上午刚刚被提交到江西省检察院。
5名蒙冤者向江西省检察院提出控告，要求依法对乐平市公安局“5·24”案及“9·9”案的侦查办案人员邵杰、陈志军、王永钢、黄冬生、付国伟等，景德镇市检察院此案侦查阶段提前介入、审查批捕、审查起诉的检察人员赵云翔、张涛、许文军等，景德镇市中院此案一审及重审的审判人员刘哲甫、程建凯、耿丽萍、杨武、沈晓洁、张云霞等涉嫌故意杀人罪立案侦查。
乐平“5·24”案律师团指出，上述人员利用刑事司法手段追求剥夺无罪的5名控告人死刑的结果，已触犯中国刑法第232条规定，“犯罪事实清楚，证据确实充分，应当依法以故意杀人罪追究其刑事责任”。
>乐平案蒙冤者以“故意杀人罪”控告办案人
此外，5名蒙冤者还要求依法对江西省高院“5·24”案重审二审的办案检察人员及审判人员涉嫌徇私枉法罪立案侦查。
有罪证据严重不足仍枉法裁判
律师团指出，“5·24”案案发后半年左右，侦查机关在已有关键物证IC卡（被害人郝强所有）指向“真凶”方林崽的情况下，却故意放弃该重大破案线索，将方林崽当年的谈话笔录刻意隐藏，反而在案发两年以后抓捕了与本案毫无关系的黄志强、方春平、程发根、程立和4人，导致方林崽此后又疯狂作案近20起，涉嫌杀害3条人命。办案人员在未掌握控告人任何涉嫌本案的犯罪线索、证据的情况下，滥抓无辜，通过刑讯逼供，并辅以指供、诱供方式获得有罪供述，进而迅速“破案”，立功受奖。
律师团称，景德镇市检察院在客观证据严重不足，明知有罪供述可能系刑讯逼供而来，在案证据不足以证明控告人有罪的情况下，仍一意孤行进行原审、重审两次追诉；景德镇市中级法院、江西省高级法院明知有罪证据严重不足、不排除刑讯逼供的情形、辩护律师坚称控告人无罪并多次强烈要求对现场物证进行DNA鉴定的情况下，仍违法不启动鉴定程序，故意违背事实和法律作枉法裁判，两次判处4名控告人黄志强、方春平、程发根、程立和死刑，一次死缓。在此案申诉审查程序中，景德镇市中院、景德镇市检察院、江西省高院、江西省检察院相关申诉审查人员及其他工作人员，严重不负责任，不正确履行法定职责，使审判监督程序流于形式，甚至无理阻挠律师阅卷，导致本案拖延多年才被平反。
要求江西省公检法整体回避
5名控告人表示愿意积极配合有关部门查处犯罪嫌疑人，并配合提交证据。控告书指出，由于此案涉及司法人员众多，涉及包括江西省高级法院、江西省检察院等多名工作人员，为了保证处理结果的公正，避免人为因素的干预，江西省公、检、法系统应当整体回避。请求江西省检察院在接受案件后，依法将案件汇报中国最高人民检察院，由中国最高人民检察院处理或指定江西省外的省级检察机关管辖。
1月16日上午11点多，5名蒙冤者在律师的陪同下离开江西省检察院，3名接待他们的检察官询问了当事人被刑讯逼供的事情，表示将向领导汇报此事，请当事人和律师放心，“领导非常重视”。
方林崽案审判长曾任“5·24”案审判员
记者了解到，1月16日上午，方林崽案其中一名受害人的代理律师薛荣民也赶到江西省高院，要求该院督促景德镇中院恢复审理方林崽案，并要求该院对其申请沈晓洁法官回避的问题予以答复。
快递信息显示，2016年12月30日，景德镇市中院院长邹中华已签收薛荣民律师邮寄的要求沈晓洁回避的申请书。但截至目前，薛荣民仍未收到景德镇中院的正式回复。
>快递信息
薛荣民表示，沈晓洁的名字曾出现在“5·24”杀人案第二次一审判决书上，是此次庭审的审判员，此次审判曾判处黄志强等4人死刑。然而，沈晓洁同时又是“5·24”杀人案疑似“真凶”方林崽案的审判长。方林崽案于2013年10月30日庭审时，方林崽坚称“绿宝超市案”（“5·24”案）系其所为，沈晓洁在制止过程中称“我们查过了，不是你做的”。
>判决书
薛荣民认为，沈晓洁在庭审开始即以结论性的语言直接否定方林崽的自认，很有可能会导致被告人方林崽的漏罪，影响案件公正审理。
方林崽被抓后前4天笔录疑缺失
此外，薛荣民从江西省景德镇市中院复制到的方林崽案的卷宗显示，方林崽于2011年12月4再次作案后被警方抓获，同年12月5日因涉嫌犯强奸罪、绑架罪被刑事拘留。薛荣民发现，卷中出现的方林崽的《讯问笔录》最早时间是2011年12月8日10：00-11：41，却没有当年12月4日至7日对方林崽的《讯问笔录》，“作为方林崽案的审判长，沈晓洁应充分注意到方林崽《讯问笔录》的缺失问题”。
结合被当地隐匿3年的中国公安部公物证鉴字（2013）1467号《物证检验报告》（显示从案发现场提取的3枚烟蒂上的DNA来自于方林崽的可能性大于99.999999%），薛荣民合理怀疑沈晓洁此前已知悉诸多“绿宝超市案”系方林崽所为的证据，庭审伊始即以结论性的语言直接否定方林崽的自认是要掩盖其参与的“5·24”案第二次一审判决，其行为已涉嫌犯罪。薛律师将适时提出控告，要求追究沈晓洁的刑事责任。
律师要求方林崽案审判长回避
根据上述内容，结合中国法律关于回避的规定，薛荣民要求沈晓洁回避方林崽案，“必须回避，没有商量的余地。”
方林崽案在2013年10月30日第一次开庭庭审后，至今未恢复庭审。薛荣民曾多次联系过沈晓洁及合议庭其他法官，均被告知案件在审理中。薛荣民表示，此案超期审理造成被害人家属情绪极度不稳定，“要求景德镇法院尽快恢复审理，让方林崽承担法律责任。”
>信访登记表
1月16日上午，薛荣民向江西高院信访申诉，要求后者责令景德镇中院尽快恢复方林崽案审理、要求景德镇中院对其提出的申请方林崽案审判长沈晓洁回避作出决定。江西省高院法官表示，他们会尽快联系景德镇中院，将在了解情况后予以答复。
来源：京华时报
>责任编辑：张迪
文章关键词： 乐平 控告 蒙冤
我要反馈
保存网页
未来网