Japan on the Diaoyu Island on CCTV: give yourself courage, foreign _ scare people Japanese | | | Diaoyu textbooks news

These two days, the Diaoyu Islands issue, Japan released two consecutive "ruthless", according to Japanese media, this is the first use of "big"-

　　Article fifth US-Japan Security Treaty applies to the Diaoyu Islands, Abe said in the future no longer recognized

President Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, 12th in the United States said in a joint statement after the meeting, both sides confirmed that the Diaoyu Islands belong to the fifth article of the US-Japan Security Treaty applies. Abe 14th meeting of the House of representatives Budget Committee, writes on the Japan-US Joint Declaration the 5th Japan-us Security Treaty applies to the Diaoyu Islands issue pointed out: "this is the first written, does not need a confirmed time and again in the future. "He put the matter as his visit to the United States.

　　Textbooks in vain the Diaoyu Islands is Japan's "inherent territory"

Then, Japan's Education Ministry announced on 14th "study guide Essentials" amendment, requires for the first time in a Japanese junior high school and elementary school social studies curriculum, clearly the Diaoyu Islands is Japan's "inherent territory", will be Japan's unilateral sovereignty, forcing to primary and secondary school students in Japan. Japan Arts province will be open for comment, is expected to be released in March next guidance points announced in June to explain the fastest book.

> Diaoyu Islands in China (information above)

　　China's Foreign Ministry responded: urged Japan to respect historical facts

In view of these two things, spokesman for China's Foreign Ministry response: China's stance on the Diaoyu Island issue is consistent and clear. Diaoyu Islands are Chinese territory and China's determination to safeguard China's territorial sovereignty and the will is unwavering. No matter what Japan says, what to do, I can't change the fact that Diaoyu Islands belong to China.

We urge the Japanese side to respect historical facts, stop provocations and to a correct view of history and teach the younger generation, take concrete actions to show sincerity in improving relations between China and Japan.

The Diaoyu Islands, Japan series offering a "new trick", really useful?

　　CCTV reviews

Abe then fried "cold" is to "embolden internal and external bluff"

Abe's statement: in recent years is in fact the Japanese Government on the Diaoyu Island issue, "Fox" the continuation of the practice, is a typical strategy of propaganda. In fact, over the past few years of American and Japanese leaders meet, diplomatic and defense leaders meeting, the US side has repeatedly expressed a similar position, Trump's position on the US side of traditional statements and there have been no changes, no "first time," said, the Abe fried "cold" is only to Fox.

More importantly, in this statement, the United States, has set aside enough flexible space for themselves. Beauty party never commitment had to using military power "protection" or "back" fishing island, and just claimed the problem applies Yu beauty day security treaty fifth article, this actually is a text game: on Japan,, can with beauty party of said internal emboldened, and foreign bluff, rendering beauty day League of so-called "substantial sex", misleading China on beauty day League in fishing island problem Shang position of judge; on American,, this a said full has explained space, can according to this a said made completely different of policy action, Neither cost any cost, did not tie its future actions.

> Abe to visit the United States

　　Count the United States said key details: Japan "Tiger" indefensible

We take another look at the United States position on key "details":

First of all, set out in the fifth article of the US-Japan Security Treaty, Japan "fertilizer regime" within the scope of attacks, is considered an attack on both Japan and the United States, according to their respective constitutional and internal procedures of the two countries joint response. According to the United States Constitution, the Army went to war, subject to Congressional approval, and related domestic programs is long or short, but can vary according to the situation and policy variables. Some issues apply to the US-Japan Security Treaty, and does not imply any determined policy action.

Secondly, many people are not aware, according to the guidance document on the US-Japan Alliance military cooperation of the US-Japan defense cooperation guidelines, the United States and Japan both have the clear division of the military: Island when fighting Japanese forces responsible for defense or to retake the Islands, us only in the process of with "support and complement" obligations. "Support" and "complement" the concept is vague, it can be seen as both a combat support, can also be reflected as logistic support, or even only for the provision of certain information. Through this provision, the American on the one hand expressly avoids direct involvement in "keep the island" and "claimed the island" fighting obligations, on the other hand must fulfill an obligation to leave room for interpretation for himself.

　　Flicker-style Alliance stands to save differences cannot be sustained

However, Japan is not known. In Japan, there are many academic circles and think tanks who are on Washington's defense commitment clearly expressed distrust. The Japanese Government has repeatedly tried to make the US position more clear, but the United States has been rejected, this is actually inside the US-Japan Alliance position typical of the difference.

For the United States, Japan is the Asia Pacific's Assistant, but only Assistant. The United States cannot permit Japanese weekend, uses the US-Japan Security Treaty to drag the United States into the US side does not need conflict. This will be the long-term policy of the United States.

In this case, Japan had to nag at him while offering a magic weapon for strategic communications, external repeatedly stressed the United States taking any position on the Diaoyu Islands issue, and wilfully obscure detail, blur real American commitment. But "talk" publicity can't last long, less likely to shake China's strong determination to safeguard its territorial sovereignty.

　　Ignore history and complain than practical handling relations with China

In case of confrontation doesn't work, into the United States, China and unreliable, and took out another trick used in Japan-"the territory's education", an attempt to distort history in textbooks. However, this will cause negative effects should not be underestimated.

> Textbook in Japan (information)

In 2014, the parties in dealing with China and Japan and China and Japan reached consensus on the following four principles, which include "recognized around the Diaoyu Islands in East China Sea tensions there are different opinions in recent years, agree that through dialogue and consultation to prevent the deterioration of the situation, establishing a crisis management mechanism to avoid accidents. "Japan tries to explicitly in textbooks the Diaoyu Islands is Japan's" inherent territory ", manifestly not four-point principled consensus, not only can not change the Diaoyu Island and its adjacent islands have been China's inherent territory, it will cast a shadow on the relationship between China and Japan.

These small moves, also suggests that the Government of Japan is now in a shortsighted against mistakes against China, sticks at present specific topics, despite significant changes in the international landscape is, its demand on the substance of the relationship between China and Japan. Instead of racking and complain, than in Japan down to think about how to deal with relations with China, rather than their end into a dead end.

丨 Japan expert Liu Hua

>: Tang Li Weishan

Article keywords:
Diaoyu Island Japanese textbooks

I want feedback
Save a Web page
CCTV

日本针对钓鱼岛放狠招 央视：自己给自己壮胆，对外吓唬人|钓鱼岛|日本|教科书_新闻资讯

　　这两天，针对钓鱼岛问题，日本连续放出两个“狠招”，据日本媒体称，这都是首次使用的“大招”——

　　美日安保条约第五条适用于钓鱼岛 安倍称今后无需再确认

　　美国总统特朗普与日本首相安倍晋三12日在美国会晤后发表联合声明称，双方确认钓鱼岛属于《美日安保条约》第五条的适用范围。安倍晋三14日出席众院预算委员会会议，就日美联合声明写入《日美安保条约》第5条适用于钓鱼岛一事指出：“这是首次写入，今后就不需要一一再确认了。”他将此事作为自己的访美成绩。

　　修改教科书 妄称钓鱼岛是日本的“固有领土”

　　紧接着，日本文部科学省14日下午公布“学习指导要领”的修正案，首次要求在日本初中和小学的社会科课程中，明确提出钓鱼岛是日本的“固有领土”，将日本单方面的主权观念，强行灌输予日本中小学生。日本文科省将公开征求意见，预计于3月发布下期指导要领，最快在6月公布解说书。

>中国钓鱼岛（资料图）

　　中国外交部回应：敦促日方尊重历史事实

　　针对这两件事，中国外交部新闻发言人回应：中方在钓鱼岛问题上的立场是一贯的，明确的。钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿是中国的固有领土，中方维护领土主权的决心和意志坚定不移。无论日方说什么，做什么，都改变不了钓鱼岛属于中国的事实。

　　我们敦促日方尊重历史事实，停止挑衅，以正确的历史观教育年轻一代，以实际行动体现改善中国和日本关系的诚意。

　　针对钓鱼岛，日本接连祭出“新招”，真的有用吗？

　　央视评论

　　安倍再炒“冷饭” 是想“对内壮胆、对外诈唬”

　　先来看安倍的表态：其实是日本政府近年来在钓鱼岛问题上“狐假虎威”做法的延续，也是一种典型的战略宣传。实际上，在过去几年的美日领导人会面、外交及防务领导人会面中，美方已经多次表达过类似立场，特朗普的立场仅是美方传统表态，并没有任何变化，谈不上“首次”之说，此次安倍再炒“冷饭”，不过是想狐假虎威罢了。

　　更重要的是，美国在这一表态中，已经为自己预留了足够的灵活空间。美方从未承诺过要使用军事力量“保护”或“夺回”钓鱼岛，而只是宣称该问题适用于《美日安保条约》第五条，这实际上是一种文字游戏：对日本而言，可以用美方的表态对内壮胆、对外诈唬，渲染美日同盟的所谓“坚固性”，误导中方对美日同盟在钓鱼岛问题上立场的判断；对美国而言，这一表态充满了解释空间，可以根据这一表态做出完全不同的政策行动，既不耗费丝毫成本，也不束缚自己的未来动作。

>安倍访问美国

　　细数美方表态关键细节：日本“狐假虎威”站不住脚

　　我们再来看一下美方表态的关键“细节”：

　　首先，《美日安保条约》第五条中规定，对于日本“施政权”范围内的攻击，被视为对美日两国的攻击，两国将根据各自宪法及国内程序展开联合应对。根据美国宪法，要将军队投入战争，需经国会批准，而相关国内程序更是可长可短，更可能根据形势变化而产生政策变数。某一议题适用于《美日安保条约》，并不意味着任何确定的政策行动。

　　其次，很多人都未注意到，根据美日同盟军事合作指导文件《美日防卫合作指针》，美日双方有明确的军事分工：在岛屿作战时，日本自卫队负责防御或夺回岛屿，美军在此过程中仅有“支援和补充”的义务。而“支援”与“补充”的概念更是模糊，这既可以体现为战斗支援，也可以体现为后勤支援，甚至仅仅体现为提供若干情报。通过这一规定，美军一方面明确回避了直接参与“守岛”和“夺岛”作战的义务，另一方面为自己必须履行的义务留足了解释空间。

　　日美同盟立场存差异 忽悠式宣传不能长久

　　然而，对此日方并不是不知道。在日本国内，有很多学界及智库人士都对美方的防务承诺明确表达不信任感。日本政府也多次试图让美方的表态更加清晰，但美方一直予以拒绝，这其实是美日同盟内部立场差异的典型体现。

　　对于美国而言，日本是其在亚太地区的助手，但也只是助手。美方不可能允许日方反客为主，利用《美日安保条约》将美国拖入美方并不需要的冲突。这将是美国的长期政策。

　　在此情况下，日方不得不在心虚之余祭出战略宣传的法宝，对外反复强调美国对钓鱼岛问题的表态，并故意模糊其中细节，虚化美国承诺实质。只不过，“忽悠”式的宣传终究不能长久，更不可能动摇中国维护自身领土主权的坚强决心。

　　无视历史搞小动作 不如踏实处理对华关系

　　在对抗中国行不通、投向美国又靠不住的情况下，日本又拿出了惯用另一个伎俩——“领土教育”，试图在教科书中篡改历史。然而，此举将引发的负面效应不可小觑。

>日本教科书（资料图）

　　2014年，中国和日本双方就处理和改善中国和日本关系达成以下四点原则共识，其中就包括“双方认识到围绕钓鱼岛等东海海域近年来出现的紧张局势存在不同主张，同意通过对话磋商防止局势恶化，建立危机管控机制，避免发生不测事态。”日方试图在教科书中明确提出钓鱼岛是日本的“固有领土”，明显有违四点原则共识，不仅不能改变钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿自古以来就是中国固有领土的事实，更会给中国和日本关系蒙上阴影。

　　这些小动作，更说明日本政府如今已经陷入短视的对华对抗误区，执拗于眼前的具体议题，无视国际格局正在出现的重大变化，无视自身对中国和日本关系的实质需求。与其挖空心思搞小动作，日本不如踏踏实实想想该如何处理好对华关系，而不要将自己最终逼向死胡同。

　　文丨日本问题专家 刘华

>责任编辑：李伟山

文章关键词：
钓鱼岛 日本 教科书

我要反馈
保存网页
央视