Ambassador to China, a veto by Britain and the United States besieged the scene furious comeback | end | | the veto of the Permanent Mission of China to the United Nations representative _ news

Reference news, March 2 (eruption-text/Shi Xiao yajun) China used the veto once again!

On the last day of February 2017, on the same day the UN Security Council vote on the draft resolution on Syrian chemical weapons, China and Russia vetoed, the Bill had not been adopted.

Maybe it's because China has not exercised the right of veto for the first time, this article about "China and Russia to veto the sanctions resolution on Syria" the message does not have a big ripple in the domestic public opinion, although there are many users for the China-Zambia, commended the "confidently exercise their rights is a responsible country."

But behind the simple news, reference reference news network-sharp attention to detail, the official website of the United Nations Conference on February 28, video display, Liu JIEYI, Permanent Representative of China for his statement seemed to be a lot longer than usual. In particular, the representative of Uruguay compared to less than 1 minutes to speak before, Liu knot about is "special"-he took a 7.5.

> Knot statement video screenshot. Screenshots from the video on the official website of the United Nations.

And, the Xinhua News Agency in a conference report to the United Nations on an issue in the past, Liu with a statement by the representative of most of the content would be finishing as three hundred or four hundred words, 28th of this content is compressed by Xinhua press release disclosure still have nearly thousands of words of text.

Details shows that day statement by the representative of China, described as a rare "long format".

Then, at a vote in the Council's latest resolution on Syria, exactly what happened, Liu with a statement so long?

　　USA, UK and Japan on behalf of groundless accusations, "China and Russia undermine the Council's credibility"

Reasons to start speaking.

Day of the meeting, before getting all 15 Security Council members a draft resolution aimed at sanctions against Syria on grounds of chemical weapons. This document drafted jointly by France, Britain and the United States.

In China and Russia after the exercise of the right of veto, several Western countries on behalf of "quit"-

"I vetoed the draft resolution expressed shock to Russia, China veto surprised and disappointed," Matthew Rycroft, a British representative, said that "it and they (China and Russia) claim supports the principle of non-proliferation is not the same. "" Reject today's resolution, they damage the credibility of the Council, as well as international treaties. ”

> British representative Rycroft

Then, representatives of the United States, Japan is also verbal echoes.

> Representative of the representative of the United States and Japan

Several representatives also appears "well prepared." I saw their speech, eloquently. Britain faces serious when speaking on behalf of Rycroft, frown and look up from time to time, even ignoring the content of his speech, should also be able to feel him "."

　　The representative of China date back to either intentional or accidental, "some irresponsible"

In several Western countries representatives took turns "challenged", finally, turn to the representative of China for his statement.

> Liu open a representative in the hands. Pictures from the Permanent Mission of China to the United Nations website.

Liu junction in which a response in a way:

"China's position is clear and consistent on the issue of chemical weapons. We firmly oppose any country, any organization, any person in any circumstances use chemical weapons, and strongly advocate the punishment of any act of using chemical weapons. China itself used to be victims of the use of chemical weapons, more than any other country, China has the right to express condemnation of the use of chemical weapons. ”

"We all remember, some countries under the so-called ' weapons of mass destruction ' as a pretext for waging war, caused great disaster to countries in the Middle East, until today the effects of these Middle Eastern countries are still affected by the war aftermath. Lessons of history must be learnt, lest they repeat it. Council to vote on the draft resolution based on the findings of the parties remained divided and forcibly put under the Council members deeply divided over the situation, a move that will not help solve the Syrian chemical weapons, do little to advance the talks in Geneva and the process of a political settlement of the problem in Syria. ”

In addition to "should adhere to the political settlement of the general direction of Syria" this consistent position, Liu knot also noted in his speech that "unjustified distortion, attack other solemn position of practices in Member States, is extremely irresponsible and absurd. This just shows that liquciqiong of the countries concerned, with ulterior motives. ”

-Acute reference reference News Network noted that Liu open a few times in the CNE. There are three statements his paper, first writing there seems to be a temporary tracks. When Liu finished knot had already expressed on the third sheet of paper, after he picked up the first piece of paper, continue to be heard.

> Writes there seems to be a temporary marks on the statement.

In the last more than 10 seconds, Liu with a completely Unscripted: "States should profoundly reflect on, and Syria is to go to the today's situation in the Middle East? What role did it play in different countries? Which is proud of, which is a disgrace? Only ' people ' hanging on the verbal, is extremely hypocritical. ”

In the statement by the representative of the whole of China, the British representative Rycroft often with his Chin on his hand, seems to be thoughtful. Liu knot has finished speaking, his eyes compared with Rycroft (pictured below), there is no feeling to the scene of the "charged"?

After the network-according to the reference acute reference understanding at United Nations Headquarters, Liu open a lot of speeches does not in the original script, but adding words, targeted response to the question. There is a diplomatic circles saying the international situation, changes. This is like a "martial arts Assembly", the opponent moves, of course, to be seen tackling.

　　The hand when shot

China and Russia vetoed in the Security Council draft resolution on Syria, is not the first time. According to Russian media reports, in addition to China and Russia in the day, Bolivia also objected to the draft resolution, Egypt, Kazakhstan, Ethiopia then chose to abstain from voting.

Agence France-Presse, combs wrote 6 years during the Syrian war, Russia with 7 Security Council vote to make its ally Syria to resist Western pressure, China followed, 6 oppose.

In early December, in Aleppo, Syria, a request the parties to immediately cease all attacks of the draft resolution because China and Russia veto was not adopted.

> On January 21, in the city of Aleppo in northern Syria, a man walking among the ruins of buildings. (Xinhua/AFP)

Aleppo key stalls in the war, and the resolution is put to the vote a few hours before distributed to the hands of the members of the Council. Then Russia's Vitaly Churkin (deceased) that this violated the Security Council process, first, second, allows the fighter to have breathing space to consolidate the ceasefire, would only exacerbate the suffering of civilians.

So, in that meeting, and the United States also has a wonderful "acrimonious".

Accusations against China and Russia specifically targeted at the United States representative, Liu with a right of reply. He said Syria, how to develop to the point where today? Problems faced by other countries in the Middle East to develop to the point where today? What is the origin? What role plays the countries concerned? What role to play? History is clear, the members of the Council are also very clear, this is not misrepresented the positions of other countries in the Council could change.

　　Chinese diplomats once embodiment of resourcefulness, tele-response capacity

"Liu open a representative's most recent statement for a long time, similar to the usual statements tend to be more brief. This shows that the problems in the Middle East, Syria on the issue, differences between the countries and many different views. "The United Nations expert on, China Foreign Affairs University Professor Zheng Qirong told reference message-acute reference.

He said British and American representatives "led" to China on behalf of "challenged" is not unusual, "especially in the United Kingdom, represented by European countries, for historical reasons, has long been in the sphere of some European countries in the Middle East. Now with regard to the Middle East peace talks, European countries also tend to be more active. "

Zheng Qirong, said that if the resolution can be adopted by consensus of the General Council, all Member States have reached consensus on some issues, do not need to communicate, we may not necessarily be farewell speeches, debate sessions. Conversely, when differences on certain issues, especially among the major powers among the Member States particularly when forced resolution, tends to be feelings of resentment in some countries, hence the need for further debate, to speak, to communicate. "In the Syrian issue, for example, we have the right, and indeed necessary, an explanatory statement. "Zheng Qirong said.

In his view, although China and Russia joined the sixth veto resolution on Syria in the West, but Chinese representatives questioned the "long" response, that "China has its own clear position, China trailed behind Russia, but has independent views on Syria."

"All along, facing accusations of or don't understand, China represents the concrete analysis of concrete problems, timely, stand the sound. "Zheng Qirong explained. Vocal at a time on the stage at the United Nations, is not only an opportunity to show Chinese diplomat style, as well as diplomats a test of resourcefulness, tele-response capacity.

He said, wrestling with the US and Russia in the Middle East more and more deep, complex, representative of China at the United Nations voice explained China's stance, respond to the controversy the movie likely will increasingly view into the outside world.

Source: reference news network

>: Tang Li Weishan

Article keywords:
Liu knot Chinese Permanent Representative to the United Nations veto

I want feedback
Save a Web page
China News Network

中国大使投否决票遭英美围攻 现场愤怒回击|刘结一|中国常驻联合国代表|否决权_新闻资讯

　　参考消息网3月2日报道 （文/史霄萌 亚君） 中国又一次动用了否决权！

　　在2017年2月的最后一天，联合国安理会当天就有关叙利亚化学武器问题的决议草案举行表决，中国与俄罗斯都行使了否决权，草案未获通过。

　　也许是因为中国已不是第一次行使否决权，这条有关“中国和俄罗斯再否决西方制裁叙利亚决议”的消息并未在国内舆论中产生很大涟漪，尽管也有不少网友为中国点赞，称赞“理直气壮地行使权利才是负责任的大国行为”。

　　不过简单的新闻背后，参考消息网-锐参考则注意到一个细节，联合国官网2月28日的会议视频显示，中国常驻联合国代表刘结一的发言时间似乎比平时长了不少。尤其是，与之前乌拉圭代表不到1分钟的发言相比，刘结一讲的话显得“特别多”——他足足讲了7分半钟。

>刘结一发言视频截图。截图源自联合国视频官网。

　　并且，在新华社以往对联合国围绕某个问题的会议报道中，刘结一代表的发言内容大多会被整理为三四百字，但28日的这段内容被新华社通稿压缩后，披露的文字仍有近千字。

　　诸多细节显示，中国代表的当日发言，算得上是一次罕见的“超长规格”。

　　那么，在安理会最新关于叙利亚决议的表决会上，究竟发生了什么、使刘结一的发言如此之长呢？

　　美英日代表无端指责“中国和俄罗斯损害安理会信誉”

　　原因要从头开始说起。

　　当天的会议上，拿到安理会15个成员面前的决议草案，旨在以化学武器为由对叙利亚进行制裁。这份草案由法国、英国和美国联合起草。

　　在中国与俄罗斯行使否决权之后，几位西方国家代表“不干了”——

　　“我对俄罗斯否决决议草案表示震惊，对中国同样行使否决权表示诧异和失望，”英国代表马修·里克罗夫特发言称，“这与他们（中国和俄罗斯）所宣称的支持不扩散原则并不一致。”“否决今天的决议，他们损害了安理会以及国际条约的信誉。”

>英国代表里克罗夫特

　　随即，美国、日本代表也出言附和。

>美国代表与日本代表

　　几位代表也显得“有备而来”。只见他们对着发言稿，慷慨陈词。英国代表里克罗夫特发言时面部表情严肃，不时皱眉、抬头，即使忽略他的讲话内容，也应该能感觉到他传递的“不满”。

　　中国代表脱稿回怼“某些国家不负责任”

　　在几位西方国家代表轮番“发难”之后，终于，轮到中国代表发言了。

>刘结一代表在举手表决中。图片源自中国常驻联合国代表团官网。

　　刘结一在发言中是这样回应的：

　　“中国在化学武器问题上的立场是明确、一贯的。我们坚决反对任何国家、任何组织、任何人在任何情况下使用化武， 坚决主张惩处任何使用化武的行为。中国本身就曾是别国使用化武的受害者，中国比任何国家都有权表达对使用化武的谴责。”

　　“我们都记得，某些国家曾以所谓‘拥有大规模杀伤性武器’为借口发动战争，给中东国家造成巨大灾难，直到今天这些中东国家仍受战争后遗症影响。历史的经验教训必须汲取，否则难免重蹈覆辙。安理会刚刚表决的决议草案基于各方仍存分歧的调查结论，且在安理会成员严重分歧情况下强行付诸表决，此举无助于解决叙利亚化武问题，无助于推进日内瓦和谈和叙利亚问题的政治解决进程。”

　　除了“要坚持政治解决叙利亚问题的大方向”这样的一贯立场，刘结一还在发言中指出，“无端歪曲、攻击其他成员国庄严立场的做法，是极不负责任和荒谬的。这恰恰表明有关国家理屈词穷、别有用心。”

　　参考消息网-锐参考注意到，刘结一几次在发言中脱稿。他有三张发言纸，第一张上似乎有临时写稿的痕迹。当刘结一已经表达完第三张稿纸上的内容后，只见他又拿起了第一张稿纸，继续陈词。

>发言稿上似乎有临时写稿的痕迹。

　　在最后的十几秒中，刘结一索性完全脱稿：“有关国家应当深刻反思，中东和叙利亚是怎样走到今天的局面的？不同国家又扮演了什么角色？哪些是光彩的、哪些是不光彩的？只把‘人民’挂在口头上，是极其虚伪的。”

　　在中国代表的发言全程中，英国代表里克罗夫特时常用手托着下巴，似乎若有所思。而刘结一发言完毕后，他与里克罗夫特四目相对（如下图），有没有感受到现场的“火药味”？

　　事后，据参考消息网-锐参考在联合国总部了解，刘结一的不少发言内容确实不在原本的讲稿上，而是现场加词，有针对性地回应质疑。有一句外交圈的俗语是，国际形势，风云变幻。这就好比一场“武林大会”，对手出招，当然要见招拆招了。

　　该出手时当出手

　　中国和俄罗斯在安理会否决有关叙利亚问题的决议草案，已经不是第一次了。据俄媒报道，当天除了中国和俄罗斯以外，玻利维亚也对这份决议草案表示反对，埃及、哈萨克斯坦、埃塞俄比亚则在投票表决时选择了弃权。

　　法新社梳理写道，6年叙利亚战争期间，俄罗斯以在安理会7次投反对票来使其盟友叙利亚抵御西方压力，中国则跟随其后，有6次反对。

　　就在去年12月上旬，一份要求各方在叙利亚阿勒颇立即停止所有攻击的决议草案也因为中国和俄罗斯行使否决权而未获通过。

>1月21日，在叙利亚北部城市阿勒颇，一名男子在建筑物废墟间行走。（新华社/法新社）

　　当时阿勒颇战事进行到关键档口，而该决议在付诸表决前几个小时散发至安理会成员手中。时任俄罗斯代表丘尔金（已逝）表示，这首先违反了安理会流程，其次，停火使得作战者有喘息之机巩固力量，只会加剧平民的痛苦。

　　所以，在那一次的会议上，中、美代表也有一番精彩的“唇枪舌剑”。　　

　　针对当时美国代表对中国和俄罗斯的指责，刘结一行使答辩权。他说：叙利亚局势如何发展到今天的地步？中东其他国家面临的问题如何发展到今天的地步？起源是什么？有关国家扮演了什么样的角色？发挥了什么样的作用？历史记录是清楚的，安理会成员也十分清楚，这不是在安理会歪曲其他国家的立场就可以改变的。

　　中国外交官随机应变、临场反应能力的一次体现

　　“刘结一代表的最新发言确实时间比较长，平时类似的发言一般比较简短。这说明了在中东问题、在叙利亚问题上，大国之间的分歧和不同看法比较多。”联合国问题研究专家、外交学院教授郑启荣告诉参考消息网-锐参考。

　　他表示，英美代表“带头”向中国代表“发难”并不罕见，“尤其是以英国为代表的欧洲国家，由于历史原因，中东地区曾长期处于一些欧洲国家的势力范围。现在在与中东问题有关的和谈中，欧洲国家也往往比较活跃”。

　　郑启荣介绍说，一般安理会的决议若能被一致通过，说明所有成员国已经就某问题达成了共识，不需要再沟通了，所以不一定再会进行发言、辩论环节。反之，当成员国之间、尤其是大国之间对某些问题分歧特别大时，强行表决相关决议，往往就会有一些国家产生不满情绪，因此就需要进一步的辩论、发言，进行沟通。“比如在此次叙利亚问题上，我们有权利，同时也确实有必要，进行解释性发言。”郑启荣说。

　　在他看来，虽然是中国和俄罗斯第六次联手否决西方涉叙利亚决议，但中国代表针对质疑的“超长”回应说明，“中国有自己明确的立场，中国不是跟在俄罗斯后面，而是对叙利亚问题有着独立的看法”。

　　“其实一直以来，面对外界的指责或者不解，中国代表都会具体问题具体分析，及时地、有立场的发声。”郑启荣解释道。而在联合国舞台上的每次发声，既是展现中国外交官风采的一次机会，也是对外交官随机应变、临场反应能力的一次考验。

　　他表示，随着美俄在中东问题上的角力愈来愈深刻、复杂，中国代表在联合国发声阐释中国立场、回应争议的场景可能将会越来越多地进入外界视野。

　　来源：参考消息网

>责任编辑：李伟山

文章关键词：
刘结一 中国常驻联合国代表 否决权

我要反馈
保存网页
中国新闻网