Go homepage(回首页)
Upload pictures (上传图片)
Write articles (发文字帖)

The author:(作者)aaa
published in(发表于) 2017/3/6 20:23:11
China is “third-level“? Media: Korea is a few stream

English

中文

China is "third-level"? Media: Korea is a few stream

Lotte group headquarters in Seoul, the South Korean public and civil society groups held protests against the Lotte group, the South Korean military to provide "Sade" deployment.


Original title: Editorial: China is a "third level", Korea is the flow?


South Korea from China's mainstream media collectively attack was anger China sanctions relief. 3rd of the Chosun Ilbo editorial said: "as China country, country level only three streams. With the neighbouring countries, is South Korea's fate. "On March 6 editorial in the JoongAng daily said:" China has now become the Korean peninsula, in East Asia, and the world's dangerous. ”


China and South Korea, who cooperate with the United States deploying "Sade" and serious conflicts which evolved into economic depression, common in the world. South Korea hopes seriously undermined China's national security cases without reprisal, only courteous counsel from Beijing, the international political logic?


China and some Chinese companies have been "sanctions", which is a couple of times for economic reasons? China's editorial in the Korea times satire "like a spoiled child, in order to get what they want, to do everything", we don't think the newspaper is clearly in Korea's own sketch?


In the Chinese media, is probably the most bitterly criticized South Korea a global times, in an editorial last week, but stressed that sanction South Korea workable, but not humiliate South Korea's national prestige, much less humiliating ordinary South Korean people's personality. China also does not have a media "third grade" or "four streams" to describe the level of South Korea's State, although we believe that the "Sade" it reflected South Korea's strategic vision is lousy.


We would like to ask a question: China is a "c" level country, belonging to several streams in South Korea? First-class or second-class? The Chosun Ilbo editorial office will probably feel more noble than China. South Korea before 1945 was a Japanese colony, and after that is the American colonies, at least there are still tens of thousands of American troops. There was a man named Liu Xiaobo, China, one of his famous opinion, when the colonial States longer, the better, if the Chosun Ilbo also proud? South Korea than China "Western style" coffee was popular in South Korea than in China.


The Central Daily News said China is "dangerous", but China is a trade deficit with South Korea, the sanctions on North Korea, China's strict implementation of Security Council resolutions, "Thad" before the crisis, did not do anything to damage the interests of South Korea, China, we have been "Korean wave" is the most important demand.


Also, China has nearly 30 years on foreign targets guns move guns South Korean maritime police kept Chinese fishing boat with machine-gun fire. Even though the ship is considered out of bounds by ROK fishing, South Korean maritime police in disadvantaged fishermen before imposing look, is very happy South Korean public opinion. Public opinion not only to deter Chinese fishermen, they also wanted to frighten the Chinese in this country.


Around the "Sade" crisis, confrontation national interest of China and South Korea. Seoul's attitude is that its interest was the first, its decision is final. Shun Tak China against "third countries" into evaluation Center in South Korea, the Chosun Ilbo, became the "national level" belongs to a few streams of rating agencies.


We will not be humiliating upset by the mainstream media in South Korea, global times Editorial Board continues to favour the Chinese society to respect the national dignity of Korean, each Korean character. Meanwhile, we continue to support sanctions on Korea, now that China and South Korea each have their own truth, let both sides shaped as a result of the collision, the result will be more objective truth than imagine both for their own interests, is more reasonable.


Familiar with mainstream media in South Korea today for the Chinese people's attitude towards China, and it was like watching a dime a little video, laugh it off. We would be willing to make friends with South Korea, but it's certainly not being held to, when it is a knife stab us, we smiled and said, "Oh, how cute". South Korea's willingness to cooperate with China how close or how far away, is that it's free.


Korea's own temerity to jump into China and the United States-Russia strategic game, it should know that it will profoundly influence the future of South Korea in a momentous choice. Even if today's Seoul "Sade" means do not understand anything, then please summarize future Korean history to it.


(Editors: Biao Guo UN832)
2017-03-07 05:40:05
Global times
中国是“三流水平国家”? 媒体:韩国是几流

  在韩国首尔乐天集团总部前,韩国民众和民间团体举行抗议示威活动,反对乐天集团向韩国军方提供“萨德”部署地。


  原标题:社评:中国是“三流水平国家”,韩国是几流?


  韩国主流媒体集体向中国发起攻击,以泄遭到中国制裁之愤。其中《朝鲜日报》3日的一篇社论说:“中国身为大国,国家水平却只有三流。与这样的国家为邻,是韩国的宿命。”《中央日报》3月6日的社论则说:“现在的中国已经成为韩半岛、东亚地区,乃至全世界的危险分子。”


  中国和韩国因后者配合美国部署“萨德”而发生严重冲突,这种冲突演变成经济关系的萧条,在全世界司空见惯。韩国方面希望在严重损害中国国家安全的情况下,不受到报复,来自北京的只有彬彬有礼的相劝,这是国际政治的逻辑吗?


  中国和一些中国企业都受到过“制裁”,它们有几次是出于经济原因?《韩国时报》的社论讽刺中国“像一个被宠坏的孩子,为了获得自己想要的东西,无所不为”,我们怎么觉得那家报纸分明是在给韩国自己画素描?


  在中国媒体中,环球时报大概是批评韩国最激烈的一家了,然而我们在上周的一篇社评中特别强调,制裁韩国可行,但不可以羞辱韩国的国格,更不应羞辱普通韩国人的人格。中国还从没有一家媒体用“三流”或者“四流”来形容韩国的国家水平,尽管我们认为,“萨德”这件事反映出来的韩国战略眼光实在不入流。


  我们想在这里问一句:中国是“三流”水平的国家,那么韩国属于几流呢?一流还是二流?《朝鲜日报》编辑部大概会觉得自己国家比中国更高贵。韩国1945年以前是日本殖民地,在那之后有点像是美国殖民地,至少那里仍有几万美国驻军。中国有个叫刘晓波的人,他的一个著名观点是,当殖民地越久的国家越好,是不是《朝鲜日报》也为此而骄傲?有一点韩国确实比中国“洋气”,喝咖啡在韩国比在中国流行多了。


  《中央日报》说中国是“危险分子”,然而中国是对韩贸易的大逆差国,在制裁朝鲜问题上,中国严格执行了安理会决议,在“萨德”危机之前,中国没做任何损害韩国利益的事情,我们一直是“韩流”的最大热捧者。


  还有,中国已经近三十年没有对外国目标动枪动炮了,韩国海警却不断用机关枪扫射中国渔船。尽管那些船被韩方认为越界捕鱼了,但韩国海警在弱势渔民面前威风凛凛的样子,很是让韩国舆论开心。那些舆论不仅想吓住中国渔民,它们还很想吓住中国这个国家。


  围绕“萨德”危机,中国和韩国的国家利益发生对峙。首尔的态度是,它的利益是第一位的,它的决定是不可更改的。中国顺之则德,逆之则“三流国家”,韩国成了价值评价中心,《朝鲜日报》成了“国家水平”属于几流的评级机构。


  我们不会被韩国主流媒体的侮辱性言论激怒,环球时报编辑部继续主张中国社会要尊重韩国的国格,以及每一位韩国人的人格。与此同时,我们继续支持对韩制裁,既然中国和韩国各有各的道理,那么就让双方的碰撞塑造一个结果吧,那个结果将比双方出于各自利益的想象更加客观真实,也更趋合理。


  中国人需要熟悉一下韩国主流媒体今天的对华态度,然后就像看多如牛毛的小视频一样,一笑置之。我们会愿意同韩国做朋友,但肯定不会对它曲意逢迎,当它背后捅我们一刀时,我们还笑着对它说“你好可爱哦”。韩国愿意与中国走多近或者离多远,是它的自由。


  韩国自己要冒失地跳入中国和美国俄战略大博弈中来,它应当知道它在做一个将深刻影响韩国未来的重大选择。如果今天的首尔连“萨德”意味着什么都看不懂,那就请未来的韩国历史去做总结吧。


(责任编辑:郭彪 UN832)
2017-03-07 05:40:05
环球时报



If you have any requirements, please contact webmaster。(如果有什么要求,请联系站长)





QQ:154298438
QQ:417480759