Lok Office officer life sentence 14 Li Zhujiang, that what really happened | | | Lok officials against corruption _ news
> Data
From a life sentence to 14 years ' imprisonment sentence, Guan Li Zhujiang settled the case the Office of Guangdong.
He served as former Vice Secretary-General of Guangdong provincial people's Congress, the provincial marine and fishery Bureau, former Director of the official bribery amounted to 5.07 million RMB, HK $1.31 million Yuan, $10,000, $217,000 Gold, $328,000 yuan Mercedes car, valued at $23,000 on Longines watches, April 2013 fell.
Noteworthy is that at Lok Ma Chau to the judgment of the second instance, lasted for four years, the last revision. What happened to the one?
On October 21, 2014, Shanwei city intermediate people's Court Li Zhujiang case verdict and sentenced him to life imprisonment on charges of taking bribes, deprived of political rights for life and confiscated all his personal property.
According to Article No. 225 of the code of criminal procedure, revision usually there are two cases, one is the original judgment is unclear or insufficient evidence, the second is for legal errors or improper sentencing.
In fact, Li Zhujiang rot there is so much involved, it's clear, but sentencing standards have changed. Guangdong High Court appeal said the revised Criminal Code and sentencing guidelines for bribery of judicial interpretation to adjust according to the old laws and the principle of lighter punishment commuted.
This standard exactly what change? Chang an Street APP previously served as the introduction:
According to the provisions of the Penal Code: the personal bribes of 5,000 yuan to file; the amount of bribes of more than 100,000 yuan, for more than 10 years ' imprisonment or life imprisonment. Amounts only from the point of view, Pearl Lee was sentenced to life.
2015 to implement amendments to the criminal code, deleting a specific amount given to corruption, bribery, principle provides a large amount of or in serious cases, huge or serious circumstances, the amount involved is especially huge or particularly serious three cases, corresponding provisions of three penalties.
That is, the criteria for sentencing, from the simple amount, and amount and degree of social danger.
Due to the amendments to the Penal Code were implemented in 2015, Li Zhujiang is a trial in 2014, so it can be included in the revision.
Not only the amount, but the amount is too large, and sentencing will not light, from the perspective of the implementation of the amendments to the Penal Code of judicial practice, Bai Enpei, such as Su Rong and Zhu mingguo corruption billions of senior officials, were life or death sentence.
Of course there are relatively few, but heavy sentencing, such as the recent was sentenced ne bis in idem with Li Zhujiang original Li Xinghua, Director of the Office of science and technology of Guangdong Province, reached 30 million the total amount of money involved. After the first instance sentenced, he refuses to accept this, when in the second trial, the Court gave a forceful judgment:
Li Xinghua views of grounds of appeal and counsel of the appellant, was found not guilty, not to accept it. Dismissing the appeal, upheld. This ruling is final determination.
Legal profession generally consider that this difference in sentencing scale, exists in two areas, on the one hand is the degree of bad social impact, such as in connection with more than 20 million of the Guangdong provincial party Committee Organization Department, former Vice Minister Lin Cunde, in terms of cadre appointment wantonly accepted bribes, was bad, he was sentenced to life.
Is the manifestation of those involved on the other hand, we often see such a statement in the decision: after given so to case, active account not available for handling some of the facts of the crime of accepting bribes, confession, repentance, and positive pay back all the illicit money and goods, given according to law.
Former Vice Director of China's national development and Reform Commission of Guangxi Liao Xiaobo trial to life imprisonment, commuted to 15 years of imprisonment in the second instance, and confiscation of property of 7 million Yuan. Although was also experienced during the implementation of amendments to the Penal Code changes, but it does have "repentance".
During the second trial, his original Huang Huakuan, Director of the Office of Prosecutor's immediate superior--the Guangxi traffic bribes, during the first trial, also impeach former Vice Mayor of qinzhou Zhang insists corruption clues, was identified as having major meritorious services.
The revision underlines the spirit of the rule is to protect the defendants ' rights. Law revision, the core is the measure of facts and evidence, sometimes commuted from light, there are also commuted punishment.
Supervision Ministry of environment supervision centers in North China three original director Li Xuezhi was sentenced to 12 years, prosecutors appeal, Court of final appeal judgement, punishment to 14.
In fact, Lee is liable to a punishment of ne bis in idem is not bad luck, but embodies the spirit of the rule of law on the other side. Appealed his conviction of the accused may lodge an appeal, the prosecution will appeal the decision or appeal. Lee at first instance has been identified involving 360,000, was found accepting bribes for 2.29 million in the second instance. In other words, two pending the trial's most guilt, has been identified.
Regardless of the punishment is commuted, is the embodiment of meticulous management in judicial practice. From social impact, said, in the final analysis is to play the good and evil, the role of jizhuoyangqing.
Earlier report: Guangdong provincial people's Congress Deputy Secretary General Li Zhujiang for serious discipline violations are double
According to the official website of the Guangdong Provincial Commission for discipline inspection of CPC news, recently approved by the CPC Guangdong Provincial Committee, Deputy Secretary-General of the Guangdong Provincial Commission for discipline inspection of the provincial people's Congress, the provincial marine and fishery Bureau, former Director General Li Zhujiang serious disciplinary problems file checks.
The investigation, Li Zhujiang in the Provincial Oceanic and Fisheries Bureau during his tenure, taking advantage of his position to facilitate, for the benefit of others, many times taking bribes from others, the amount involved is especially huge.
Li Zhujiang the acts constitute a serious disciplinary offence and are suspected of crimes. Under the disciplinary regulations of the CPC and the people's Republic of China Law on civil servants stipulates that by the Guangdong Provincial Commission for discipline inspection Standing Committee for consideration and approval of the Guangdong provincial party Committee, decided to grant Li Zhujiang expelled from the party, dismissed from disposition; collection of proceeds of its discipline; to be suspected of crime transferred to judicial organs according to law.
Source: Changan Street
>: Tang Wu Yan
Article keywords:Pearl Lee anti-corruption Lok officials
I want feedback
Save a Web page
China search network
落马厅官无期改判14年 这其中到底发生了什么|李珠江|
反腐|落马官员_新闻资讯
>资料图
从无期徒刑到有期徒刑14年的改判，广东厅官李珠江案尘埃落定。
这名曾任广东省人大常委会原副秘书长、省海洋与渔业局原局长的官员受贿共计人民币507万元、港币131万元、美元1万元、价值21.7万的黄金、价值32.8万元奔驰轿车一辆、价值港币2.3万元浪琴手表一块，2013年4月落马。
值得关注的是，从落马到二审判决，持续了整整四年，最后改判。这其中到底发生了什么？
2014年10月21日，汕尾市中级人民法院对李珠江案一审判决，以受贿罪判处其无期徒刑，剥夺政治权利终身，并处没收个人全部财产。
根据刑事诉讼法第二百二十五条，改判通常有两种情形，一是原判决事实不清楚或者证据不足，二是适用法律有错误或量刑不当。
事实上，李珠江涉腐的金额还是那么多，事实很清楚，但是量刑的标准发生了变化。广东高院二审认为：修订后的刑法及司法解释对受贿罪的量刑标准作出调整，根据从旧兼从轻原则改判。
这个标准到底发生了什么变化？长安街知事APP此前曾做过介绍：
根据刑法的规定：个人受贿五千元的就要立案；个人受贿数额在10万元以上的，处10年以上有期徒刑或者无期徒刑。仅从金额上看，李珠江够判无期了。
2015年实施的刑法修正案，删去了对贪污、受贿犯罪规定的具体数额，原则规定数额较大或者情节严重，数额巨大或者情节严重，数额特别巨大或者情节特别严重三种情况，相应的规定了三档刑罚。
也就是说，量刑的标准，从单纯看金额，变成了兼看金额和社会危害程度。
由于刑法修正案是2015年实施的，李珠江是2014年一审宣判的，因此可在改判之列。
虽说不唯金额，但金额过大，量刑定然不会轻，从刑法修正案实施后的司法实践来看，白恩培、苏荣、朱明国等贪腐过亿的高官，均获无期或死缓。
当然也有金额相对少，但量刑重的，比如近期与李珠江同被二审宣判的广东省科技厅原厅长李兴华，涉案总金额达到3000万。一审被判无期后，他不服上述，法院在二审时给出了一个铿锵有力的判决：
上诉人李兴华上诉理由及辩护人提出的意见，经查均不成立，均不予采纳。裁定驳回上诉，维持原判。本裁定为终审裁定。
法律界一般认为这种量刑尺度的差异，存在于两个方面，一方面是社会影响的恶劣程度，比如涉案2000多万的广东省委组织部原副部长林存德，在干部任用方面大肆受贿，影响极坏，他被判无期。
另一方面是涉案人的表现，我们常常能在判决中看到这样的表述：鉴于某某到案后，主动交代办案机关尚未掌握的部分受贿犯罪事实，认罪、悔罪，积极退缴全部赃款赃物，依法从轻。
广西中国国家发展改革委员会原副主任廖小波一审获无期徒刑，二审改判有期徒刑15年，并处没收财产700万元。虽然期间也经历了刑法修正案的实施变化，但其确有“悔罪”表现。
二审期间，他检举了顶头上司——广西交通厅原厅长黄华宽受贿，一审期间，也曾检举钦州市原副市长张鸿受贿线索，被认定有重大立功表现。
改判，彰显的是保护被告人权益的法治精神。依法改判，核心在于对事实和证据的衡量，有时改判从轻，也有也会改判加刑。
环保部华北督查中心督查三处原处长李学智一审被判12年，检方抗诉，最终法院二审判决，对其加刑至14年。
事实上，李二审被判加刑，并非运气不好，而是体现了法治精神的另一面。被告人不服判决可以上诉，公诉方不服判决也可以上诉。李一审被认定涉案金额36万，二审被认定受贿金额229万。也就是说，二审最一审未判决的犯罪事实，进行了重新认定。
不论加刑还是减刑，都是精细化管理在司法实践中的体现。而从社会影响上说，归根到底是要起到惩恶扬善、激浊扬清的作用。
早前报道：广东省人大副秘书长李珠江因严重违纪被双开
据中共广东省纪委官方网站消息，日前，经中共广东省委批准，广东省纪委对省人大常委会副秘书长、省海洋与渔业局原局长李珠江严重违纪问题立案检查。
经查，李珠江在省海洋与渔业局任职期间，利用职务上的便利，为他人谋取利益，先后多次收受他人贿赂，数额特别巨大。
李珠江的上述行为已构成严重违纪并涉嫌犯罪。根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》和《中华人民共和国公务员法》等规定，经广东省纪委常委会议审议并报广东省委批准，决定给予李珠江开除党籍、开除公职处分；收缴其违纪所得；将其涉嫌犯罪问题移送司法机关依法处理。
来源：长安街知事
>责任编辑：吴颜
文章关键词： 李珠江
反腐 落马官员
我要反馈
保存网页
中国搜索网